Comparison of the clinical effectiveness between the streamlined liner of pharyngeal airway (SLIPA) and the laryngeal mask airway by novice personnel

Korean Journal of Anesthesiology

Volumn 63, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 136-141

  Oh, Seok Kyeong ^a   Lim, Byung Gun ^a   Kim, Heezoo ^a   Lim, Sang Ho ^a  

^a Korea University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Airway; Laryngeal mask; SLIPA; Supraglottic

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AIRWAY; ANESTHETIC EQUIPMENT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYSPHAGIA; DYSPHONIA; FEMALE; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LARYNGEAL MASK; LUNG HEMODYNAMICS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL PERSONNEL; MORBIDITY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; SORE THROAT; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STREAMLINED LINER OF PHARYNGEAL AIRWAY;

EID: 84930477627     PISSN: 20056419     EISSN: 20057563     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4097/kjae.2012.63.2.136     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Brain AI. The laryngeal mask-a new concept in airway management. Br J Anaesth 1983; 55: 801-5.
2. Miller DM, Camporota L. Advantages of ProSeal and SLIPA airways over tracheal tubes for gynecological laparoscopies. Can J Anaesth 2006; 53: 188-93.
3. Woo YC, Cha SM, Kang H, Baek CW, Jung YH, Kim JY, et al. Less perilaryngeal gas leakage with SLIPA than with LMA- ProSeal in paralyzed patients. Can J Anaesth 2011; 58: 48-54.
4. Miller DM, Light D. Laboratory and clinical comparisons of the streamlined liner of the pharynx airway (SLIPA) with the laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia 2003; 58: 136-42.
5. Hein C, Owen H, Plummer J. Randomized comparison of the SLIPA (Streamlined Liner of the Pharynx Airway) and the SS-LM (Soft Seal Laryngeal Mask) by medical students. Emerg Med Australas 2006; 18: 478-83.
6. Schulz KF, Grimes DA. Generation of allocation sequences in randomized trials: chance, not choice. Lancet 2002; 359: 515-9.
7. Lachin JM. Statistical properties of randomization in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1988; 9: 289-311.
8. Wilkins CJ, Cramp PG, Staples J, Stevens WC. Comparison of the anesthetic requirement for tolerance of laryngeal mask airway and endotracheal tube. Anesth Analg 1992; 75: 794-7.
9. McCrirrick A, Ramage DT, Pracilio JA, Hickman JA. Experience with the laryngeal mask airway in two hundred patients. Anaesth Intensive Care 1991; 19: 256-60.
10. Puri GD, Hegde HV, Jayant A, Bhukal I. Haemodynamic and Bispectral index response to insertion of the Streamlined Liner of the Pharynx Airway (SLIPA): comparison with the laryngeal mask airway. Anaesth Intensive Care 2008; 36: 404-10.
11. Choi YM, Cha SM, Kang H, Baek CW, Jung YH, Woo YC, et al. The clinical effectiveness of the streamlined liner of pharyngeal airway (SLIPATM) compared with the laryngeal mask airway ProSealTM during general anesthesia. Korean J Anesthesiol 2010; 58: 450-7.
12. Tan MG, Chin ER, Kong CS, Chan YH, Ip-Yam PC. Comparison of the re-usable LMA Classic and two single-use laryngeal masks (LMA Unique and SoftSeal) in airway management by novice personnel. Anaesth Intensive Care 2005; 33: 739-43.
13. Kim HS, Nam HW, Kim YH. The maximal changes of signs to laryngeal mask airway prosealTM Insertion or tracheal intubation after anesthetic induction in hypertensive patients. Korean J Anesthesiol 2002; 43: 145-9.
14. Brimacombe J, Holyoake L, Keller C, Barry J, Mecklem D, Blinco A, et al. Emergence characteristics and postoperative laryngopharyngeal morbidity with the laryngeal mask airway: a comparison of high versus low initial cuff volume. Anaesthesia 2000; 55: 338-43.
15. Reinhart DJ, Simmons G. Comparison of placement of the laryngeal mask airway with endotracheal tube by paramedics and respiratory therapists. Ann Emerg Med 1994; 24: 260-3.