Haemodynamic and bispectral index response to insertion of the streamlined liner of the pharynx airway (SLIPA™): Comparison with the laryngeal mask airway

Anaesthesia and Intensive Care

Volumn 36, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 404-410

  Puri, G D ^a   Hegde, H V ^a   Jayant, A ^a   Bhukal, I ^a  

^a POSTGRADUATE INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FENTANYL; PROPOFOL; OXYGEN;

ADULT; AIRWAY; ANESTHESIA LEVEL; ARTICLE; BISPECTRAL INDEX; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE ANATOMY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; LARYNGEAL MASK; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEAN ARTERIAL PRESSURE; PHARYNX; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; AGED; ANESTHESIA; BLOOD; BLOOD PRESSURE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DRUG EFFECT; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; INSTRUMENTATION; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT MONITORING; PHARYNGITIS; PHYSIOLOGY; TREATMENT FAILURE;

ADULT; AGED; ANESTHESIA; BLOOD PRESSURE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMANS; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; LARYNGEAL MASKS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; OXYGEN; PHARYNGITIS; PHARYNX; TREATMENT FAILURE;

EID: 44449085320     PISSN: 0310057X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0310057x0803600312     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Miller DM, Youkhana I, Karunaratne WU, Pearce A. Presence of protein deposits on 'cleaned' reusable anaesthetic equipment. Anaesthesia 2001; 56:1069-1072
2. Clery G, Brimacombe J, Stone T, Keller C, Curtis S. Routine cleaning and autoclaving does not remove protein deposits from reusable laryngeal mask devices. Anesth Analg 2003; 97:1189-1191
3. Miller DM, Light D. Laboratory and clinical comparisons of the Streamlined Liner of the Pharynx Airway (SLIPA) with the laryngeal mask airway. Anaesthesia 2003; 58:136-142
4. Scanlon P, Carey M, Power M, Kirby F. Patient response to laryngeal mask insertion after induction of anaesthesia with propofol or thiopentone. Can J Anaesth 1993; 40:816-818
5. McKeating K, Bali IM, Dundee W. The effects of thiopentone and propofol on upper airway integrity. Anaesthesia 1988; 43:638-640
6. Brown GW, Patel N, Ellis FR. Comparison of propofol and thiopentone for laryngeal mask insertion. Anaesthesia 1991; 46:771-772
7. Nakazawa K, Hikawa Y, Maeda M. Laryngeal mask airway insertion using propofol without muscle relaxants; a comparative study of pretreatment with midazolam or fentanyl. Eur J Anaesthesiol 1999; 16:550-555
8. Drage MP, Nunez J, Vaughan RS, Asai T. Jaw thrusting as a clinical test to assess the adequate depth of anaesthesia for insertion of the laryngeal mask. Anaesthesia 1996; 51:1167-1170
9. Struys M, Versichelen L, Byttebier G, Mortier E, Moerman A, Rolly G. Clinical usefulness of the bispectral index for titrating propofol target effect-site concentration. Anaesthesia 1998; 53:4-12
10. Versichelen L, Struys M, Krombez E, Fonck K, Mortier E, Rolly G. Haemodynamic and electroencephalographic response to insertion of a cuffed oropharyngeal airway: comparison with the laryngeal mask airway. Br J Anaesth 1998; 81:393-397
11. Brain AIJ. The Intavent Laryngeal Mask. Instruction Manual, 2nd ed. 1993
12. Miller DM, Camporota L. Advantages of ProSeal and SLIPA airways over tracheal tubes for gynecological laparoscopies. Can J Anaesth 2006; 53:188-193
13. Hein C, Plummer J, Owen H. Evaluation of the SLIPA™ (Streamlined Liner of the Pharynx Airway), a single use supraglottic airway device, in 60 anaesthetized patients undergoing minor surgical procedures. Anaesth Intensive Care 2005; 33:756-761
14. Lamb K, James MFM, Janicki PK. The laryngeal mask airway for intraocular surgery: effects on intraocular pressure and stress response. Br J Anaesth 1992; 69:143-147
15. Wood MLB, Forrest ETS. The haemodynamic response to the insertion of the laryngeal mask airway: a comparison with laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1994; 38:510-513
16. Harding CJ, McVey FK. Interview method affects incidence of postoperative sore throat. Anaesthesia 1987; 42:1104-1107