Relationship between endothelial cell loss and microcoaxial phacoemulsification parameters in noncomplicated cataract surgery

Clinical Ophthalmology

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 503-510

  Soliman Mahdy, Mohamed A E ^a,b   Eid, Mohamed Z ^a   Mohammed, Mahmoud Abdel Badei ^c   Hafez, Amr ^d,e   Bhatia, Jagdish ^b  

^a AL AZHAR UNIVERSITY   (Egypt)

^b Rustaq Hospital   (Oman)

^c RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF OPHTHALMOLOGY   (Egypt)

^d Magrabi Eye and Ear Center   (Oman)

^e Al Azhar University Hospitals   (Egypt)

Author keywords

Cataract surgery; Cumulative dissipated energy; Endothelial cells; Ozil; Phacoemulsification

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CATARACT; CATARACT EXTRACTION; CELL COUNT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEAL ENDOTHELIAL CELL LOSS; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HARDNESS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PHACOEMULSIFICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEX DIFFERENCE; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; VISUAL ACUITY;

EID: 84930476137     PISSN: 11775467     EISSN: 11775483     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S29865     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Kohnen T. Compromised corneal endothelium and cataract: how should we decide? J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(8):1377-1378.
2. Liu Y, Zeng M, Liu X, et al. Torsional mode versus conventional ultrasound mode phacoemulsification: randomized comparative clinical study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33(2):287-292.
3. Zeng M, Liu X, Liu Y, et al. Torsional ultrasound modality for hard nucleus phacoemulsification cataract extraction. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008;92(8):1092-1096.
4. Davison JA. Cumulative tip travel and implied followability of longitudinal and torsional phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(6):986-990.
5. Miyoshi T, Yoshida H. Ultra-high-speed digital video images of vibrations of an ultrasonic tip and phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(6):1024-1028.
6. Wilczynski M, Drobniewski I, Synder A, Omulecki W. Evaluation of early corneal endothelial cell loss in bimanual microincision cataract surgery (MICS) in comparison with standard phacoemulsification. Eur J Ophthalmol. 2006;16(6):798-803.
7. Werblin TP. Long-term endothelial cell loss following phacoemulsification: model for evaluating endothelial damage after intraocular surgery. Refract Corneal Surg. 1993;9(1):29-35.
8. Mencucci R, Ponchietti C, Virgili G, Giansanti F, Menchini U. Corneal endothelial damage after cataract surgery: microincision versus standard technique. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006;32(8):1351-1354.
9. Storr-Paulsen A, Norregaard JC, Farik G, Tarnhoj J. The influence of viscoelastic substances on the corneal endothelial cell population during cataract surgery: a prospective study of cohesive and dispersive viscoelastics. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007;85(2):183-187.
10. Hayashi K, Yoshida M, Manabe S, Hirata A. Cataract surgery in eyes with low corneal endothelial cell density. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37(8):1419-1425.
11. Lucena DR, Ribeiro MS, Messias A, Bicas HE, Scott IU, Jorge R. Comparison of corneal changes after phacoemulsification using BSS Plus versus Lactated Ringer's irrigating solution: a prospective randomised trial. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011;95(4):485-489.
12. Chylack LT Jr, Wolfe JK, Singer DM, et al. The Lens Opacities Classification System III. The Longitudinal Study of Cataract Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111(6):831-836.
13. Prakash P, Kasaby HE, Aggarwal RK, Humfrey S. Microincision bimanual phacoemulsification and Thinoptx implantation through a 1.70 mm incision. Eye (Lond). 2007;21(2):177-182.
14. Tsuneoka H, Shiba T, Takahashi Y. Ultrasonic phacoemulsification using a 1.4 mm incision: clinical results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28(1):81-86.
15. Donnenfeld ED, Olson RJ, Solomon R, et al. Efficacy and woundtemperature gradient of whitestar phacoemulsification through a 1.2 mm incision. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29(6):1097-1100.
16. Alio J, Rodriguez-Prats JL, Galal A, Ramzy M. Outcomes of microincision cataract surgery versus coaxial phacoemulsification. Ophthalmology. 2005;112(11):1997-2003.
17. Reuschel A, Bogatsch H, Barth T, Wiedemann R. Comparison of endothelial changes and power settings between torsional and longitudinal phacoemulsification. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010; 36(11):1855-1861.
18. Storr-Paulsen A, Norregaard JC, Ahmed S, Storr-Paulsen T, Pedersen TH. Endothelial cell damage after cataract surgery: divide-and-conquer versus phaco-chop technique. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(6): 996-1000.
19. Vasavada V, Raj SM, Vasavada AR. Intraoperative performance and postoperative outcomes of microcoaxial phacoemulsification. Observational study. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007;33(6):1019-1024.
20. Lee KM, Kwon HG, Joo CK. Microcoaxial cataract surgery outcomes: comparison of 1.8 mm system and 2.2 mm system. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35(5):874-880.
21. Berdahl JP, Jun B, DeStafeno JJ, Kim T. Comparison of a torsional handpiece through microincision versus standard clear corneal cataract wounds. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34(12):2091-2095.