Needed: Critical foxes

Vital Directions for Mathematics Education Research

Volumn 9781461469773, Issue , 2013, Pages 173-187

  Kilpatrick, Jeremy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84930456908     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-6977-3_8     Document Type: Chapter

References (11)

1. Begle, E. G. (1969). The role of research in the improvement of mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 2, 232-244.
2. Begle, E. G. (1979). Critical variables in mathematics education: Findings from a survey of the empirical literature. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America and National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
3. Berlin, I. (1953). The hedgehog and the fox: An essay on Tolstoy's view of history. New York, NY: Simon & Schuster.
4. Kaminski, J. A., and Sloutsky., V. M., & Heckler, A. F. (2008). The advantage of abstract examples in learning math. Science, 320, 454-455.
5. Kilpatrick, J. (1987). Editorial. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 18, 330.
6. Kilpatrick, J. (1988). Editorial. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 19, 370.
7. Kilpatrick, J. (2007). A commentary on research commentaries. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 38, 106-107.
8. National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
9. Pólya, G. (1981). Mathematical discovery: On understanding, learning, and teaching problem solving (Combined ed.th ed.). New York, NY: Wiley. Original work published 1962, 1965.
10. Pólya, G., & Kilpatrick, J. (2009). The Stanford mathematics problem book: With hints and solutions. New York, NY: Dover. Original work published 1974.
11. Tetlock, P. E. (2005). Expert political judgment: How good is it? How can we know? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.