The effectiveness of a rearview camera and parking sensor system alone and combined for preventing a collision with an unexpected stationary or moving object

Human Factors

Volumn 57, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 689-700

  Kidd, David G ^a   Hagoski, Bradly K ^b   Tucker, Tia G ^b   Chiang, Dean P ^b  

^a Insurance Institute for Highway Safety   (United States)

^b Dynamic Research Inc ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

backover crashes; backover prevention; backup cameras; parking sensors; rearview cameras

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENTS;

BACKOVER CRASHES; BACKOVER PREVENTION; LIGHT VEHICLES; MOVING OBJECTS; SENSOR SYSTEMS; STATIONARY OBJECTS; TECHNOLOGY CONDITION;

CAMERAS;

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CAR DRIVING; DEVICES; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TASK PERFORMANCE; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT; VIDEORECORDING; YOUNG ADULT;

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; ACCIDENTS, TRAFFIC; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; VIDEO RECORDING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84930445931     PISSN: 00187208     EISSN: 15478181     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0018720814553028     Document Type: Review

References (24)

1. Bliss J. P., Gilson R., Deaton J.. Human probability matching behavior in response to alarms of varying reliability. Ergonomics. 1995 ; 38: 2300-2313
2. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 1988 ). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum ; 1988
3. Cumming G.. The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological Science. 2014 ; 25: 7-29
4. Edworthy J., Loxley S., Dennis I.. Improving auditory warning design: Relationship between warning sound parameters and perceived urgency. Human Factors. 1991 ; 33: 205-231
5. Goh J., Wiegmann D. A., Madhavan P. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 49th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society ; 2005: 492-496.
6. Heckman G. M., Kim R. S., Lin S., Rauschenberger R., Young D. E., Lange R. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 56th Annual Meeting. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society ; 2012: 2236-2240.
7. Hurwitz D. S., Pradhan A., Fisher D. L., Knodler M. A., Muttart J. W., Menon R., Meissner U.. Backing collisions: A study of drivers' eye and backing behavior using combined rear-view camera and sensor systems. Injury Prevention. 2010 ; 16: 79-84
8. Road vehicles: Ergonomic aspects of transport information and control systems. Occlusion method to assess visual demand due to the use of in-vehicle systems. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO Copyright Office ; 2007
9. Kidd D. G., Brethwaite A.. Visibility of children behind 2010-2013 model year passenger vehicles using glances, mirrors, and backup cameras and parking sensors. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 2014 ; 66: 158-167
10. Kim R., Rauschenberger R., Heckman G., Young D., Lange R. SAE 2012 World Congress & Exhibition. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers ; 2012
11. Llaneras R. E., Green C. A., Kiefer R. J., Chundrlik W. J., Altan O. D., Singer J. P.. Design and evaluation of a prototype rear obstacle detection and driver warning system. Human Factors. 2005 ; 47: 199-215
12. Llaneras R. E., Neurauter M. L., Green C. A. SAE 2011 World Congress & Exhibition. Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers ; 2011
13. Marshall D. C., Lee J. D., Austria P. A.. Alerts for in-vehicle information systems: Annoyance, urgency, and appropriateness. Human Factors. 2007 ; 49: 145-157
14. Mazzae E. N. Drivers' use of rearview video and sensor-based backing aid systems in a non-laboratory setting. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ; 2010
15. Mazzae E. N. Rearview video system use by drivers of a sedan in an unexpected obstacle event. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ; 2013
16. Mazzae E. N., Barickman F., Baldwin G. H. S., Ranney T. On-road study of drivers' use of rearview video systems (ORSDURVS). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ; 2008
17. Mazzae E. N., Garrott W. R. Experimental evaluation of the performance of available backover prevention technologies. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ; 2006
18. McLaughlin S. B., Hankey J. M., Green C. A., Kiefer R. J.. Driver performance evaluation of two rear parking aids. Proceedings of the 18th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles ; 2003 Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ; 2003..
19. Final regulatory impact analysis: Backover crash avoidance technologies FMVSS No. 111. Washington, DC: Author ; 2014
20. Newcombe R. G.. Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: Comparison of eleven methods. Statistics in Medicine. 1998 ; 17: 873-890
21. Perez M., Angell L. S., Hankey J., Deering R. K., Llaneras R. E., Green C. A., Neurauter M. L., Antin J. F. Advanced Crash Avoidance Technologies (ACAT) Program: Final report of the GM-VTTI backing crash countermeasures project. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration ; 2011
22. Rudin-Brown C. M., Burns P., Hagen L., Roberts S., Scipione A. Advances in traffic psychology. Sullman M. Dorn L., ed. Burlington, VT: Ashgate ; 2012: 285-294.
23. Tabachnick B. G., Fidell L. S. Using multivariate statistics. 2007 ). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). New York, NY: Pearson Education. New York, NY: Pearson Education ; 2007
24. Tilley A. R. The measure of man and woman: Human factors in design. New York, NY: Wiley ; 2002