Visibility of children behind 2010-2013 model year passenger vehicles using glances, mirrors, and backup cameras and parking sensors

Accident Analysis and Prevention

Volumn 66, Issue , 2014, Pages 158-167

  Kidd, David G ^a   Brethwaite, Andrew ^a  

^a Insurance Institute for Highway Safety ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Backup camera; Blind zone; Rear parking sensor; Rear visibility

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BACKUP CAMERA; BLIND ZONE; CAR; CHILD; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMAN; INFANT; MOTOR VEHICLE; PRESCHOOL CHILD; REAR PARKING SENSOR; REAR VISIBILITY; SAFETY; STANDARD; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT;

BACKUP CAMERA; BLIND ZONE; REAR PARKING SENSOR; REAR VISIBILITY;

ACCIDENTS, TRAFFIC; AUTOMOBILES; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; INFANT; MOTOR VEHICLES; SAFETY;

EID: 84894472582     PISSN: 00014575     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.01.006     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. R. Austin Fatalities and Injuries in Motor Vehicle Backing Crashes Report to Congress (DOT HS 811 144) 2008 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Washington, DC
2. J.A. Cohen A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales Educ. Psychol. Meas. 20 1960 37 46
3. Consumer Reports Best and worst rear blind zones Retrieved from the Consumer Reports 2012 website: http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/cars/car- safety/car-safety-reviews/mind-that-blind-spot/best-and-worst/index.htm
4. W.R. Garrott, and E.N. Mazzae The ability of rear-mounted convex mirrors to improve rear visibility The 21st International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (Paper No. 09-0558), National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Washington, DC 2009
5. Gordon, C.C., Bradtmiller, B., Churchill, T., Clauser, C.E., McConville, J.T., Tebbetts, I., & Walker, R.A. 1989. 1988 Anthropometric survey of U.S. Army personnel: Methods and summary statistics (Technical Report NATICK/TR-89/044). Natick Massachusetts: U.S. Army Natick RD&E Center.
6. W. Hadley ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis 2009 Springer New York New York, NY Accessed at http://had.co.nz.ggplot2/book, ISBN 978-0-387-98140-6
7. Highway Loss Data Institute Buick collision avoidance features: initial results Loss Bulletin, Arlington, VA 28 2011 Highway Loss Data Institute 22
8. Highway Loss Data Institute Mazda collision avoidance features: initial results Loss Bulletin, Arlington, VA 28 2011 Highway Loss Data Institute 13
9. Highway Loss Data Institute Mercedes-Benz collision avoidance features: initial results Loss Bulletin, Arlington, VA 29 2012 Highway Loss Data Institute 7
10. Insurance Australia Group Reversing Visibility 2013 Insurance Australia Group Retrieved from the Insurance Australia Group website: http://iagresearch. com.au/index.php?option=com-content&task=view&id=279&Itemid=263
11. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety Guidelines for Using the UMTRI ATD Positioning Procedure for ATD and Seat Positioning (Version V) Arlington, VA 2004 Insurance Institute for Highway Safety Accessed at http://www.iihs.org/ ratings/protocols/pdf/ATD-positioning-procedure.pdf
12. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety Bumper mismatch is still a problem Status Report 45 2010 1 7 12
13. Insurance Institute for Highway Safety They're working: insurance claims data show which new technologies are preventing crashes Status Report 47 2012 1 3 5
14. R. Kim, R. Rauschenberger, G. Heckman, D. Young, and R. Lange Efficacy and usage patterns for three types of rearview camera displays during backing up SAE 2012 World Congress & Exhibition (Paper no. 2012-01-0287), Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA 2012
15. R.E. Llaneras, C.A. Green, R.J. Kiefer, W.J. Chundrlik Jr., O.D. Altan, and J.P. Singer Design and evaluation of a prototype rear obstacle detection and driver warning system Hum. Factors 47 1 2005 199 215 (Pubitemid 40598099)
16. R. Llaneras, M. Neurauter, and C. Green Factors moderating the effectiveness of rear vision systems: what performance-shaping factors contribute to drivers' detection and response to unexpected in-path obstacles when backing? SAE 2011 World Congress & Exhibition (Paper No. 2011-01-0549), Society of Automotive Engineers Warrendale, PA 2011
17. Marathon Marathon Premium Unleaded Gasoline Material Safety Data Sheet, Findlay, OH 2010 Marathon Petroleum Company LP Accessed at http://www. marathonpetroleum.com/brand/content/documents/mpc/msds/0126MAR019.pdf
18. E.N. Mazzae Drivers' Use of Rearview Video and Sensor-based Backing Aid Systems in a Non-Laboratory Setting 2010 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Washington, DC
19. E.N. Mazzae Direct Rear Visibility Measurement Data: 2010-11 Passenger Cars and 2008-10 Low-Speed Vehicles 2013 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Washington, DC
20. E.N. Mazzae, and F. Barickman On-Road Study of Drivers' Use of Rearview Video Systems (ORSDURVS) (DOT HS 811 024) 2008 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Washington, DC
21. E.N. Mazzae, and F. Barickman Direct Rear Visibility of Passenger Cars: Laser-Based Measurement Development and Findings for Late Model Vehicles (DOT HS 811 174) 2009 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Washington, DC
22. E.N. Mazzae, and W.R. Garrott Experimental Evaluation of the Performance of Available Backover Prevention Technologies (DOT HS 810 634) 2006 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Washington, DC
23. E.N. Mazzae, and W.R. Garrott Light Vehicle Rear Visibility Assessment (DOT HS 810 909) 2008 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Washington, DC
24. E.N. Mazzae, and W.R. Garrott Vehicle Rearview Image Field of View and Quality Measurement (DOT HS 811 512) 2011 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Washington, DC
25. C. Nhan, L. Rothman, M. Slater, and A. Howard Back-over collisions in child pedestrians from the Canadian Hospitals Injury Reporting and Prevention Program Traffic Inj. Prev. 10 2009 350 353
26. Office of the Federal Register Federal Register National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Docket No. NHTSA-2010-0162, 49 CFR Parts 571 and 585: Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard, Rearview Mirrors; Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard, Low-Speed Vehicles Phase-in Reporting Requirements 75 2010 National Archives and Records Administration Washington, DC 76186 76250 234
27. M. Paine, A. Macbeth, and M. Henderson The danger to young pedestrians from reversing motor vehicles Proceedings of the 18th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (Paper no. 466), National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Washington, DC 2003
28. K.A. Pinkney, A. Smith, C. Mann, G.D. Mower, D. Davis, and J.M. Dean Risk of pediatric back-over injuries in residential driveways by vehicle type Pediatr. Emergency Care 22 6 2006 402 406
29. R Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria 2012 R Foundation for Statistical Computing Accessed at http://www.R-project.org, ISBN 3-900051-07-0
30. M.P. Reed, M.M. Lehto, and M.J. Flannagan Field of View in Passenger Car Mirrors (UMTRI-2000-23) 2000 University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute Ann Arbor, MI
31. M.P. Reed, S.M. Ebert, and M.J. Flannagan Mirror Field of View in Light Trucks, Minivans, and Sport Utility Vehicles (UMTRI-2001-1) 2001 University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute Ann Arbor, MI
32. H. Satoh, A. Yamanaka, T. Kondoh, M. Yamashita, M. Matsuzaki, and K. Akizuki Development of periscope mirror system JSAE Rev. 12 1983 66 72
33. A.R. Tilley The Measure of Man and Woman: Human Factors in Design 2002 John Wiley & Sons New York, NY