Individual differences in the calibration of trust in automation

Human Factors

Volumn 57, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 545-556

  Pop, Vlad L ^a   Shrewsbury, Alex ^a   Durso, Francis T ^a  

^a GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

attribution; errors; expectancy; propensity to trust; reliability

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; ERRORS; RELIABILITY;

ATTRIBUTION; AUTOMATED DECISION AID; AUTOMATION RELIABILITIES; BAGGAGE SCREENING; CAUSAL ATTRIBUTIONS; EXPECTANCY; INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES; PROPENSITY TO TRUST;

AUTOMATION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUTOMATION; AVIATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INDIVIDUALITY; MALE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PSYCHOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARDS; TRUST; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AIR TRAVEL; AUTOMATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INDIVIDUALITY; MALE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SECURITY MEASURES; TRUST; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84930442341     PISSN: 00187208     EISSN: 15478181     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0018720814564422     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavior sciences. 1988 ). Statistical power analysis for the behavior sciences (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum ; 1988
2. Cohen M., Parasuraman R., Freeman J. T.. Trust in decision aids: A model and its training implications. Proceedings of the Command and Control Research and Technology Symposium ; 1998 ; 1998. 255.
3. Dzindolet M. T., Peterson S. A., Pomranky R. A., Pierce L. G., Beck H. P.. The role of trust in automation reliance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 2003 ; 58: 697-718
4. Dzindolet M. T., Pierce L. G., Beck H. P., Dawe L. A., Anderson B. W.. Predicting misuse and disuse of combat identification systems. Military Psychology. 2001 ; 13: 147-164
5. Jian J. Y., Bisantz A. M., Drury C. G.. Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems. International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics. 2000 ; 4: 53-71
6. Kassin S. M.. Consensus information, prediction, and causal attribution: A review of the literature and issues. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1979 ; 37: 1966-1981
7. Keller M. D., Rice S.. System-wide versus component-specific trust using multiple aids. Journal of General Psychology. 2010 ; 137: 114-128
8. Kelley H. H. Nebraska symposium on motivation. Levine D., ed. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press ; 1967: 192-238.
9. Lee J. D., Moray N.. Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine systems. Ergonomics. 1992 ; 35: 1243-1270
10. Lee J. D., Moray N.. Trust, self-confidence, and operators' adaptation to automation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies. 1994 ; 40: 153-184
11. Lee J. D., See J.. Trust in automation and technology: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors. 2004 ; 46: 50-80
12. Madhavan P., Wiegmann D. A., Lacson F. C.. Automation failures on tasks easily performed by operators undermine trust in automated aids. Human Factors. 2006 ; 48: 241-256
13. Mayer R. C., Davis J. H., Schoorman F. D.. An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review. 1995 ; 20: 709-734
14. Merritt S. M., Ilgen D. R.. Not all trust is created equal: Dispositional and history-based trust in human-automation interactions. Human Factors. 2008 ; 50: 194-210
15. Parasuraman R., Riley V.. Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors. 1997 ; 39: 230-253
16. Prinzel L. J., Freeman F. G., Prinzel H. D.. Individual differences in complacency and monitoring for automation failures. Individual Differences Research. 1995 ; 3: 27-49
17. Rotter J. B.. A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. Journal of Personality. 1967 ; 35: 651-665
18. Russell D.. The causal dimension scale: A measure of how individuals perceive causes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1982 ; 42: 1137-1145
19. Singh I. L., Molloy R., Parasuraman R.. Automation-induced "complacency": Development of a complacency-potential scale. International Journal of Aviation Psychology. 1993a ; 3: 111-122
20. Singh I. L., Molloy R., Parasuraman R.. Individual differences in monitoring failures of automation. Journal of General Psychology. 1993b ; 120: 357-373
21. Teas R. K., McElroy J. C.. Causal attributions and expectancy estimates: A framework for understanding the dynamics of salesforce motivation. Journal of Marketing. 1986 ; 50: 75-86
22. Tomlinson E., Mayer R.. The role of causal attribution dimensions in trust repair. Academy of Management Review. 2009 ; 34: 85-104
23. Weiner B.. A theory of motivation for some classroom experiences. Journal of Educational Psychology. 1979 ; 71: 3-25
24. Weiner B. An attributional model of motivation and emotion. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag ; 1986
25. Wiegmann D. A., Rich A., Zhang H.. Automated diagnostic aids: The effects of aid reliability on users' trust and reliance. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science. 2001 ; 2: 352-367