Secondary triage in prehospital emergency ambulance services: A systematic review

Emergency Medicine Journal

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 486-492

  Eastwood, Kathryn ^a,b   Morgans, Amee ^a   Smith, Karen ^a,b   Stoelwinder, Johannes ^a,b  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b Ambulance Victoria   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; AMBULANCE TRANSPORTATION; EMERGENCY CARE; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HOME CARE; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT SAFETY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TELECONSULTATION; AMBULANCE DIVERSION;

AMBULANCE DIVERSION; HUMANS; TRIAGE;

EID: 84930378742     PISSN: 14720205     EISSN: 14720213     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2013-203120     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Lowthian JA, Jolley DJ, Curtis AJ, et al. The challenges of population ageing: accelerating demand for emergency ambulance services by older patients, 1995-2015. MJA 2011;194:574-8.
2. Wrigley H, George S, Smith H, et al. Trends in demand for emergency ambulance services in Wiltshire over nine years: observational study. BMJ 2002;324:646-7.
3. Weaver MD, Moore CG, Patterson PD, et al. Medical necessity in emergency medical services transports. AJMQ 2012;27:250-5.
4. Snooks H, Williams S, Crouch R, et al. NHS emergency response to 999 calls: alternatives for cases that are neither life threatening nor serious. [Review] [29 refs]. BMJ 7359;325:330-3.
5. Ambulance Service of New South Wales. Demand for our services. Sydney: NSW Government, 2011.
6. Tanaka A, Takano T, Nakamura K. Inappropriate use of emergency ambulance services and the implications for primary health care in Japan. Health Promot Int 1994;9:259-68.
7. Wellington Free Ambulance. Busy times for Wellington free ambulance. New Zealand: Wellington Free Ambulance, 2012.
8. Marks PJ, Daniel TD, Afolabi O, et al. Emergency (999) calls to the ambulance service that do not result in the patient being transported to hospital: an epidemiological study. EMJ 2002;19:449-52.
9. Brown E, Sindelar J. The emergent problem of ambulance misuse. Ann Emerg Med 1993;22:646-50.
10. Chen JC, Bullard MJ, Liaw SJ. Ambulance use, misuse, and unmet needs in a developing emergency medical services system. Eur J Emerg Med 1996;3:73-8.
11. Ohshige K. Reduction in ambulance transports during a public awareness campaign for appropriate ambulance use. Acad Emerg Med 2008;15:289-93.
12. Fox C, Rodriguez C, McSwain NE. EMT telephone triage. EMT J 1981;5:410-15.
13. Audit Commission for Local Authorities the National Health Service. A Life in the Fast Lane: Value for Money in Emergency Ambulance Services: Audit Commission for Local Authorities and the National Health Service in England and Wales, 1998.
14. Turner J, Snooks H, Youren A, et al. The costs and benefits of managing some low priority 999 ambulance calls by NHS Direct nurse advisers. Final report for the National Coordinating Centre for NHS SDO R&D. The University of Sheffield, 2006.
15. Dale J, Higgins J, Williams S, et al. Computer assisted assessment and advice for "non-serious" 999 ambulance service callers: The potential impact on ambulance despatch. EMJ 2003;20:178-83.
16. Nicholl J, Coleman P, Parry G, et al. Emergency priority dispatch systems-a new era in the provision of ambulance services in the UK. Pre-hosp Immediate Care 1999;3:71-5.
17. Pandey A, Khandekar R. Evaluating the effectiveness of telephone triage for priority emergency ambulance dispatch. J Clin Diagn Res 2009;3:1726-30.
18. Farand L, Leprohon J, Kalina M, et al. The role of protocols and professional judgement in emergency medical dispatching. Eur J Emerg Med 1995;2:136-48.
19. Studnek J, Thestrup L, Blackwell T, et al. Utilization of prehospital dispatch protocols to identify low-acuity patients. Prehosp Emerg Care 2012;16:204-9.
20. Smith WR, Culley L, Plorde M, et al. Emergency medical services telephone referral program: an alternative approach to nonurgent 911 calls. Prehosp Emerg Care 2001;5:174-80.
21. Morimura N, Aruga T, Sakamoto T, et al. The impact of an emergency telephone consultation service on the use of ambulances in Tokyo. EMJ 2011;28:64-70.
22. Dale J, Williams S, Foster T, et al. Safety of telephone consultation for "non-serious" emergency ambulance service patients. BMJ Qual Saf 2004;13:363-73.
23. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 2009;339:b2535.
24. Burgess S, Smith E, Piper S, et al. The development of an updated prehospital search filter for the Cochrane Library: Prehospital Search Filter Version 2.0. JEPHC 2010;8:1-4.
25. Hoot NR, Aronsky D. Systematic review of emergency department crowding: causes, effects, and solutions. [Review] [115 refs]. Ann Emerg Med 2008;52:126-36.
26. Crowther L, Williams R. Nurse interventions in ambulance command-and-control centres. Emerg Nurse 2009;17:22-5.
27. Lattimer V, George S, Thompson F, et al. Safety and effectiveness of nurse telephone consultation in out of hours primary care: randomised controlled trial. The South Wiltshire Out of Hours Project (SWOOP) Group. BMJ 1998;317:1054-9.
28. Wachter DA, Brillman JC, Lewis J, et al. Pediatric telephone triage protocols: standardized decisionmaking or a false sense of security? Ann Emerg Med 1999;33:388-94.
29. Poole SR. Are you interested in telephone triage research? [6]. Pediatrics 1995;95:802.
30. Marsden J. An evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of telephone triage as a method of patient prioritization in an ophthalmic accident and emergency service. J Adv Nurs 2000;31:401-9.
31. Anonymous. 'Telephone triage' is 'risky business' for nurses. Nurs Law Regan Rep 2006;46:2.
32. Quallich SA. Caller ID: the art of telephone triage. Urol Nurs 2003;23:229-30.
33. Ambulance-Victoria. Annual Report 2011-2012. Doncaster: Ambulance Victoria, 2012.