Long-term patency of endoscopically harvested radial arteries

Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 77-84

  Burns, Daniel J P ^a   Swinamer, Stuart A ^a   Fox, Stephanie A ^a   Romsa, Jonathan ^a   Vezina, William ^a   Akincioglu, Cigdem ^a   Warrington, James ^a   Guo, Lin Rui ^a   Chu, Michael W A ^a   Quantz, Mackenzie A ^a   Novick, Richard J ^a   Kiaii, Bob ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Coronary artery bypass grafting; Endoscopic harvest; Minimally invasive; Radial artery

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKING AGENT;

ADULT; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE ASSESSMENT; CAUSE OF DEATH; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONVENTIONAL ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; ENDOSCOPIC RADIAL ARTERY HARVEST; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; ENDOSCOPIC VESSEL HARVESTING SYSTEM; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GRAFT OCCLUSION; GRAFT PATENCY; HEART MUSCLE PERFUSION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE ASSESSMENT; RADIAL ARTERY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SEATTLE ANGINA QUESTIONNAIRE; SHORT FORM 36; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOSCOPY; PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SAPHENOUS VEIN; TRANSPLANTATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULAR PATENCY;

CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; ENDOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; RADIAL ARTERY; SAPHENOUS VEIN; TISSUE AND ORGAN HARVESTING; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULAR PATENCY;

EID: 84930366207     PISSN: 15569845     EISSN: 15590879     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000133     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Desai ND, Cohen EA, Naylor CD, Naylor CD, Fremes SE; Radial Artery Patency Study Investigators. A randomized comparison of radial-artery and saphenous-vein coronary bypass grafts. N Engl J Med. 2004;351: 2302Y2309.
2. Desai ND, Naylor CD, Kiss A, et al.; Radial Artery Patency Study Investigators. Impact of patient and target-vessel characteristics on arterial and venous bypass graft patency: insight from a randomized trial. Circulation. 2007;115:684Y691.
3. Rehman SM, Yi G, Taggart DP. The radial artery: current concepts on its use in coronary artery revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;96: 1900Y1909.
4. Deb S, Cohen EA, Singh SK, Une D, Laupacis A, Fremes SE; RAPS Investigators. Radial artery and saphenous vein patency more than 5 years after coronary artery bypass surgery: results from RAPS (Radial Artery Patency Study). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60:28Y35.
5. Kempfert J, Rastan A, Leontyev S, et al. Current perspectives in endoscopic vessel harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2011;9:1481Y1488.
6. Hussaini BE, Lu XG,Wolfe JA, Thatte HS. Evaluation of endoscopic vein extraction on structural and functional viability of saphenous vein endothelium. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011;6:82.
7. Bleiziffer S, Hettich I, Eisenhauer B, et al. Neurologic sequelae of the donor arm after endoscopic versus conventional radial artery harvesting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;136:681Y687.
8. Bisleri G, Moggi A, Muneretto C. Endoscopic vessel harvesting: good or bad? Curr Opin Cardiol. 2013;28:666Y670.
9. Abstracts of the 2013 International Society for Minimally Invasive Cardiothoracic Surgery (ISMICS) Annual Scientific Meeting, June 12Y15, 2013, Prague, Czech Republic. Innovations. 2013;8:81Y174.
10. Reyes AT, Frame R, Brodman RF. Technique for harvesting the radial artery as a coronary artery bypass graft. Ann Thorac Surg. 1995;59: 118Y126.
11. Connolly MW, Torrillo LD, Stauder MJ, et al. Endoscopic radial artery harvesting: results of first 300 patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2002;74: 502Y505.
12. Chavanon O, Tremblay I, Delay D, et al. Carbon dioxide embolism during endoscopic saphenectomy for coronary artery bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;118:557Y558.
13. Brown EN, Kon ZN, Tran R, et al. Strategies to reduce intraluminal clot formation in endoscopically harvested saphenous veins. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;134:1259Y1265.
14. Currie ME, Romsa J, Fox SA, et al. Long-term angiographic follow-up of robotic-assisted coronary artery revascularization. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012; 93:1426Y1431.
15. Spertus JA,Winder JA, Dewhurst TA, et al. Development and evaluation of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire: A new functional status measure for coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:333Y341.
16. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992; 30:473Y483.
17. Spertus JA,Winder JA, Dewhurst TA, Deyo RA, Fihn SD. Monitoring the quality of life in patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1994;74:1240Y1244.
18. Hayward PA, Gordon IR, Hare DL, et al. Comparable patencies of the radial artery and right internal thoracic artery or saphenous vein beyond 5 years: results from the Radial Artery Patency and Clinical Outcomes trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139:60Y65.
19. Hayward PA, Buxton BF. The Radial Artery Patency and Clinical Outcomes trial: design, intermediate term results and future direction. Heart Lung Circ. 2011;20:187Y192.
20. Collins P, Webb CM, Chong CF, Moat NE; Radial Artery Versus Saphenous Vein Patency (RSVP) Trial Investigators. Radial artery versus saphenous vein patency randomized trial: five-year angiographic follow-up. Circulation. 2008;117:2859Y2864.
21. Goldman S, Sethi GK, HolmanW, et al. Radial artery grafts vs saphenous vein grafts in coronary artery bypass surgery: A randomized trial. JAMA. 2011;305:167Y174.
22. Burris NS, Brown EN, Grant M, et al. Optical coherence tomography imaging as a quality assurance tool for evaluating endoscopic harvest of the radial artery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85:1271Y1277.
23. Bleiziffer S, Hettich I, Eisenhauer B, et al. Patency rates of endoscopically harvested radial arteries one year after coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;134:649Y656.
24. Dimitrova KR, Hoffman DM, Geller CM, DeCastro H, Dienstag B, Tranbaugh RF. Endoscopic radial artery harvest produces equivalent and excellent midterm patency compared with open harvest. Innovations. 2010;5:265Y269.
25. Kim G, Jeong Y, Cho Y, Lee J, Cho J. Endoscopic radial artery harvesting may be the procedure of choice for coronary artery bypass grafting. Circ J. 2007;71:1511Y1515.
26. McCarus SD. Physiologic mechanism of the ultrasonically activated scalpel. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1996;3:601Y608.
27. Shapira OM, Eskenazi BR, Anter E, et al. Endoscopic versus conventional radial artery harvest for coronary artery bypass grafting: functional and histologic assessment of the conduit. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006; 131:388Y394.
28. Medalion B, Tobar A, Yosibash Z, et al. Vasoreactivity and histology of the radial artery: comparison of open versus endoscopic approaches. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008;34:845Y849.
29. Sun Z, Lin C, Davidson R, Dong C, Liao Y. Diagnostic value of 64-slice CTangiography in coronary artery disease: A systematic review. Eur J Radiol. 2008;67:78Y84.
30. Budoff MJ, Dowe D, Jollis JG, et al. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:1724Y1732.