Concentrating genomic length DNA in a microfabricated array

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 114, Issue 19, 2015, Pages

  Chen, Yu ^a   Abrams, Ezra S ^c   Boles, T Christian ^c   Pedersen, Jonas N ^d   Flyvbjerg, Henrik ^d   Austin, Robert H ^a,b   Sturm, James C ^a  

^a Princeton University   (United States)

^b PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Sage Science   (United States)

^d TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA; DNA SEQUENCES; ELASTIC MODULI; GENES; MICROFABRICATION; MOLECULES; SHEAR FLOW; SHEAR STRAIN;

DEPLETION FORCE; ENZYMATIC REACTION; HIGH FLOW VELOCITY; MICROFABRICATED; MICROFABRICATED ARRAYS; NEXT-GENERATION DNA SEQUENCING; PEG CONCENTRATION; SINGLE MOLECULE;

GENE ENCODING;

DNA; MACROGOL DERIVATIVE;

CHEMISTRY; CONFORMATION; DEVICES; DNA MICROARRAY; GENETICS; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; MICROTECHNOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SHEAR STRENGTH;

DNA; MICROTECHNOLOGY; NUCLEIC ACID CONFORMATION; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; SHEAR STRENGTH;

EID: 84930226812     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.198303     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. T.A.J. Duke, J. Chem. Phys. 93, 9049 (1990). JCPSA6 0021-9606 10.1063/1.459195
2. O. Bakajin, T.A.J. Duke, J. Tegenfeldt, C.-F. Chou, S.S. Chan, R.H. Austin, and E.C. Cox, Anal. Chem. 73, 6053 (2001). ANCHAM 0003-2700 10.1021/ac015527o
3. L.R. Huang, J.O. Tegenfeldt, J.J. Kraeft, J.C. Sturm, R.H. Austin, and E.C. Cox, Nat. Biotechnol. 20, 1048 (2002). NABIF9 1087-0156 10.1038/nbt733
4. J.O. Tegenfeldt, C. Prinz, H. Cao, S. Chou, W.W. Reisner, R. Riehn, Y.M. Wang, E.C. Cox, J.C. Sturm, P. Silberzan, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 10979 (2004). PNASA6 0027-8424 10.1073/pnas.0403849101
5. E.T. Lam, A. Hastie, C. Lin, D. Ehrlich, S.K. Das, M.D. Austin, P. Deshpande, H. Cao, N. Nagarajan, M. Xiao, Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 771 (2012). NABIF9 1087-0156 10.1038/nbt.2303
6. E. Borgström, S. Lundin, and J. Lundeberg, PLoS One 6, e19119 (2011). POLNCL 1932-6203 10.1371/journal.pone.0019119
7. W.D. Volkmuth and R.H. Austin, Nature (London) 358, 600 (1992). NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/358600a0
8. J.A. Davis, D.W. Inglis, K.J. Morton, D.A. Lawrence, L.R. Huang, S.Y. Chou, J.C. Sturm, and R.H. Austin, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 14779 (2006). PNASA6 0027-8424 10.1073/pnas.0605967103
9. D.W. Inglis, J.A. Davis, R.H. Austin, and J.C. Sturm, Lab Chip 6, 655 (2006). LCAHAM 1473-0197 10.1039/b515371a
10. D.W. Inglis, J.A. Davis, T.J. Zieziulewicz, D.A. Lawrence, R.H. Austin, and J.C. Sturm, J. Immunol. Methods 329, 151 (2008). JIMMBG 0022-1759 10.1016/j.jim.2007.10.004
11. K. Loutherback, J. Puchalla, R.H. Austin, and J.C. Sturm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 045301 (2009). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.045301
12. K. Loutherback, K.S. Chou, J. Newman, J. Puchalla, R.H. Austin, and J.C. Sturm, Microfluid. Nanofluid. 9, 1143 (2010). 1613-4982 10.1007/s10404-010-0635-y
13. K. Loutherback, J. D'Silva, L. Liu, A. Wu, R.H. Austin, and J.C. Sturm, AIP Adv. 2, 042107 (2012). AAIDBI 2158-3226 10.1063/1.4758131
14. L.R. Huang, E.C. Cox, R.H. Austin, and J.C. Sturm, Science 304, 987 (2004). SCIEAS 0036-8075 10.1126/science.1094567
15. N.M. Karabacak, Nat. Protoc. 9, 694 (2014). 1754-2189 10.1038/nprot.2014.044
16. T. Biben, P. Bladon, and D. Frenkel, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 8, 10799 (1996). JCOMEL 0953-8984 10.1088/0953-8984/8/50/008
17. J. Pelletier, K. Halvorsen, B.-Y. Ha, R. Paparcone, S.J. Sandler, C.L. Woldringh, W.P. Wong, and S. Jun, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, E2649 (2012). PNASA6 0027-8424 10.1073/pnas.1208689109
18. S. Cunha, C.L. Woldringh, and T. Odijk, J. Struct. Biol. 136, 53 (2001). JSBIEM 1047-8477 10.1006/jsbi.2001.4420
19. L.S. Lerman, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 68, 1886 (1971). PNASA6 0027-8424 10.1073/pnas.68.8.1886
20. S.B. Zimmerman and A.P. Minton, Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 22, 27 (1993). ABBSE4 1056-8700 10.1146/annurev.bb.22.060193.000331
21. S. Asakura and F. Oosawa, J. Polym. Sci. 33, 183 (1958). JPSCAU 0022-3832 10.1002/pol.1958.1203312618
22. P.-G. de Gennes, Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, 1979).
23. N. Pamme, Lab Chip 7, 1644 (2007). LCAHAM 1473-0197 10.1039/b712784g
24. M.D. Tarn, M.J. Lopez-Martinez, and N. Pamme, Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 406, 139 (2014). ABCNBP 1618-2642 10.1007/s00216-013-7363-6
25. See Supplemental Material at http://link.aps.org/supplemental/10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.198303 for details on the sample preparation, the parameters of the device, the statistics of bumping, and a description of the movies recorded.
26. D.E. Smith, H.P. Babcock, and S. Chu, Science 283, 1724 (1999). SCIEAS 0036-8075 10.1126/science.283.5408.1724
27. H. Yamakawa, Modern Theory of Polymer Solutions, Harper's Chemistry Series (Harper and Row, New York, 1971).
28. Staining with one YOYO-1 molecule per 10 base pairs gives a 12% extension of the contour length [29].
29. K. Günther, M. Mertig, and R. Seidel, Nucleic Acids Res. 38, 6526 (2010). NARHAD 0305-1048 10.1093/nar/gkq434
30. The thermal blob size of DNA, within which self-avoidance is not felt, is [31] (Equation presented), where (Equation presented) is the excluded volume of a Kuhn segment [see below Eq. (3)]. As (Equation presented) is comparable to the radius of gyration (Equation presented), the freely jointed chain model gives a reasonable approximation for the size of the molecule.
31. M. Rubinstein and R.H. Colby, Polymer Physics (Oxford University Press, New York, 2003).
32. P.G. de Gennes, J. Chem. Phys. 60, 5030 (1974). JCPSA6 0021-9606 10.1063/1.1681018
33. H. Kang, P.A. Pincus, C. Hyeon, and D. Thirumalai, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 068303 (2015). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.068303
34. In Ref. [17] they use PEG-20000, not PEG-8000 as in the present study.
35. K. Yoshikawa, Y. Yoshikawa, Y. Koyama, and T. Kanbe, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 6473 (1997). JACSAT 0002-7863 10.1021/ja970445w
36. N.H. Olson, M. Gingery, F.A. Eiserling, and T.S. Baker, Virology 279, 385 (2001). EMVRAE 0042-6822 10.1006/viro.2000.0735
37. In bulk the dominant state of DNA in the presence of condensing agents is rodlike or globular, but it can enter a toroidal state if the addition of condensing agents is carefully tuned. The toroidal state is also observed in single-molecule experiments with optical tweezers. For details, see Ref. [38] and references therein. A recent study with optical tweezers shows that PEG might also induce a toroidal state [39].
38. B. van den Broek, M.C. Noom, J. van Mameren, C. Battle, F.C. MacKintosh, and G.J.L. Wuite, Biophys. J. 98, 1902 (2010). BIOJAU 0006-3495 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.12.4334
39. H. Ojala, G. Ziedaite, A.E. Wallin, D.H. Bamford, and E. Hæggström, Eur. Biophys. J. 43, 71 (2014). EBJOE8 0175-7571 10.1007/s00249-013-0941-x
40. K.J. Morton, K. Loutherback, D.W. Inglis, O.K. Tsui, J.C. Sturm, S.Y. Chou, and R.H. Austin, Lab Chip 8, 1448 (2008). LCAHAM 1473-0197 10.1039/b805614e