GlideScope video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in the emergency department: A propensity score-matched analysis

BMJ Open

Volumn 5, Issue 5, 2015, Pages

  Choi, Hyuk Joong ^a   Kim, Young Min ^b   Oh, Young Min ^b   Kang, Hyung Goo ^a   Yim, Hyun Woo ^b,c   Jeong, Seung Hee ^c  

^a Hanyang University   (South Korea)

^b The Catholic University of Korea   (South Korea)

^c The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMERGENCY WARD; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE STYLET; FEMALE; HUMAN; LARYNGOSCOPY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PROPENSITY SCORE; RIGID LARYNGOSCOPE; TREATMENT FAILURE; VIDEOLARYNGOSCOPE; ADOLESCENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVICES; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; EVALUATION STUDY; HOSPITAL EMERGENCY SERVICE; LARYNGOSCOPE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHYSICIAN; PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RESPIRATION CONTROL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK; SOUTH KOREA; STANDARDS; VERY ELDERLY; VIDEORECORDING; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AIRWAY MANAGEMENT; EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES; EMERGENCY SERVICE, HOSPITAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; LARYNGOSCOPES; LARYNGOSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PHYSICIANS; PROPENSITY SCORE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPUBLIC OF KOREA; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK; TREATMENT FAILURE; VIDEO RECORDING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84930226501     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20446055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007884     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Sun DA, Warriner CB, Parsons DG, et al. The GlideScope video laryngoscope: randomized clinical trial in 200 patients. Br J Anaesth 2005;94:381-4.
2. Nouruzi-Sedeh P, Schumann M, Groeben H. Laryngoscopy via Macintosh blade versus GlideScope: success rate and time for tracheal intubation in untrained medical personnel. Anesthesiology 2009;110:32-7.
3. Griesdale DE, Liu D, McKinney J, et al. Glidescope®video-laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anesth 2012;59:41-52.
4. Griesdale DE, Chau A, Isac G, et al. Video-laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in critically ill patients: a pilot randomized trial. Can J Anesth 2012;59:1032-9.
5. Lee YK, Chen CC, Wang TL, et al. Comparison of video and direct laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in emergency settings: a meta-analysis. J Acute Med 2012;2:43-9.
6. Lim HC, Goh SH. Utilization of a Glidescope videolaryngoscope for orotracheal intubations in different emergency airway management settings. Eur J Emerg Med 2009;16:68-73.
7. Choi HJ, Kang HG, Lim TH, et al. Tracheal intubation using a GlideScope video laryngoscope by emergency physicians: a multicentre analysis of 345 attempts in adult patients. Emerg Med J 2010;27:380-2.
8. Platts-Mills TF, Campagne D, Chinnock B, et al. A comparison of GlideScope video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy intubation in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2009;16:866-71.
9. Yeatts DJ, Dutton RP, Hu PF, et al. Effect of video laryngoscopy on trauma patient survival: a randomized controlled trial. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2013;75:212-19.
10. Sakles JC, Mosier JM, Chiu S, et al. Tracheal intubation in the emergency department: a comparison of GlideScope(R) video laryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy in 822 intubations. J Emerg Med 2012;42:400-5.
11. Mosier JM, Stolz U, Chiu S, et al. Difficult airway management in the emergency department: GlideScope videolaryngoscopy compared with direct laryngoscopy. J Emerg Med 2012;42:629-34.
12. Adnet F, Borron SW, Racine SX, et al. The Intubation Difficulty Scale (IDS): proposal and evaluation of a new score characterizing the complexity of tracheal intubation. Anesthesiology 1997;87:1290-7.
13. Aziz MF, Healy D, Kheterpal S, et al. Routine clinical practice effectiveness of the Glidescope in difficult airway management: an analysis of 2,004 Glidescope intubations, complications, and failures from two institutions. Anesthesiology 2011;114:34-41.
14. Reed AP. The unanticipated difficult intubation with adequate mask ventilation. Mount Sinai J Med 1995;62:27-30.
15. Tarasi PG, Mangione MP, Wang HE. Endotracheal intubation skill acquisition by medical students. Med Educ Online 2011;16:7309.
16. Savoldelli GL, Schiffer E, Abegg C, et al. Learning curves of the Glidescope, the McGrath and the Airtraq laryngoscopes: a manikin study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2009;26:554-8.
17. Dupanovic M, Diachun CA, Isaacson SA, et al. Intubation with the GlideScope videolaryngoscope using the "gear stick technique". Can J Anesth 2006;53:213-14.
18. Jones PM, Turkstra TP, Armstrong KP, et al. Effect of stylet angulation and tracheal tube camber on time to intubation with the GlideScope. Can J Anesth 2007;54:21-7.
19. Wilcox SR, Brown DF, Elmer J. Video laryngoscopy is a valuable adjunct in emergency airway management but is not sufficient as an exclusive method of training residents. Ann Emerg Med 2013;61:252-3.
20. Rothfield KP, Russo SG. Videolaryngoscopy: should it replace direct laryngoscopy? A pro-con debate. J Clin Anesth 2012;24:593-7.
21. Sakles JC, Mosier J, Chiu S, et al. A comparison of the C-MAC video laryngoscope to the Macintosh direct laryngoscope for intubation in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 2012;60:739-48.
22. Sakles JC, Patanwala AE, Mosier JM, et al. Comparison of video laryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy for intubation of patients with difficult airway characteristics in the emergency department. Intern Emerg Med 2014;9:93-8.
23. Greenland KB, Brown AF. Evolving role of video laryngoscopy for airway management in the emergency department. Emerg Med Australas 2011;23:521-4.
24. McElwain J, Simpkin A, Newell J, et al. Determination of the utility of the Intubation Difficulty Scale for use with indirect laryngoscopes. Anaesthesia 2011;66:1127-33.