Classification of effective operators for interactions between the Standard Model and dark matter

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2015, Issue 5, 2015, Pages

  Duch, M ^a   Grzadkowski, B ^a   Wudka, J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW   (Poland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Beyond Standard Model; Cosmology of Theories beyond the SM; Effective field theories

Indexed keywords

EID: 84930211488     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP05(2015)116     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. S. Bhattacharya, A. Drozd, B. Grzadkowski and J. Wudka, Two-component dark matter, JHEP10 (2013) 158 [arXiv:1309.2986] [INSPIRE].
2. S. Bhattacharya, A. Drozd, B. Grzadkowski and J. Wudka, Constraints on two-component dark matter, Acta Phys. Polon.B 44 (2013) 2373 [arXiv:1310.7901] [INSPIRE].
3. H.D. Politzer, Power corrections at short distances, Nucl. Phys.B 172 (1980) 349 [INSPIRE].
4. H. Kluberg-Stern and J.B. Zuber, Renormalization of non-Abelian gauge theories in a background-field gauge. II. Gauge-invariant operators, Phys. Rev.D 12 (1975) 3159 [INSPIRE].
5. C. Grosse-Knetter, Effective Lagrangians with higher derivatives and equations of motion, Phys. Rev.D 49 (1994) 6709 [hep-ph/9306321] [INSPIRE].
6. C. Arzt, Reduced effective Lagrangians, Phys. Lett.B 342 (1995) 189 [hep-ph/9304230] [INSPIRE].
7. H. Simma, Equations of motion for effective Lagrangians and Penguins in rare B decays, Z. Phys.C 61 (1994) 67 [hep-ph/9307274] [INSPIRE].
8. J. Wudka, Electroweak effective Lagrangians, Int. J. Mod. Phys.A 9 (1994) 2301 [hep-ph/9406205] [INSPIRE].
9. J. Hisano, D. Kobayashi, N. Mori and E. Senaha, Effective interaction of electroweak-interacting dark matter with Higgs boson and its phenomenology, Phys. Lett.B 742 (2015) 80 [arXiv:1410.3569] [INSPIRE].
10. R.J. Hill and M.P. Solon, Standard model anatomy of WIMP dark matter direct detection. II. QCD analysis and hadronic matrix elements, Phys. Rev.D 91 (2015) 043505 [arXiv:1409.8290] [INSPIRE].
11. S. Matsumoto, S. Mukhopadhyay and Y.-L.S. Tsai, Singlet Majorana fermion dark matter: a comprehensive analysis in effective field theory, JHEP10 (2014) 155 [arXiv:1407.1859] [INSPIRE].
12. M.B. Krauss, S. Morisi, W. Porod and W. Winter, Higher dimensional effective operators for direct dark matter detection, JHEP02 (2014) 056 [arXiv:1312.0009] [INSPIRE].
13. N.F. Bell, Y. Cai and A.D. Medina, Co-annihilating dark matter: effective operator analysis and collider phenomenology, Phys. Rev.D 89 (2014) 115001 [arXiv:1311.6169] [INSPIRE].
14. E. Dudas, L. Heurtier, Y. Mambrini and B. Zaldivar, Extra U(1), effective operators, anomalies and dark matter, JHEP11 (2013) 083 [arXiv:1307.0005] [INSPIRE].
15. M.R. Buckley, Using effective operators to understand CoGeNT and CDMS-Si signals, Phys. Rev.D 88 (2013) 055028 [arXiv:1308.4146] [INSPIRE].
16. A. De Simone, A. Monin, A. Thamm and A. Urbano, On the effective operators for dark matter annihilations, JCAP02 (2013) 039 [arXiv:1301.1486] [INSPIRE].
17. J.-Y. Chen, E.W. Kolb and L.-T. Wang, Dark matter coupling to electroweak gauge and Higgs bosons: an effective field theory approach, Phys. Dark Univ.2 (2013) 200 [arXiv:1305.0021] [INSPIRE].
18. R. Ding, Y. Liao, J.-Y. Liu and K. Wang, Comprehensive constraints on a spin-3/2 singlet particle as a dark matter candidate, JCAP05 (2013) 028 [arXiv:1302.4034] [INSPIRE].
19. A. Greljo, J. Julio, J.F. Kamenik, C. Smith and J. Zupan, Constraining Higgs mediated dark matter interactions, JHEP11 (2013) 190 [arXiv:1309.3561] [INSPIRE].
20. Y.J. Chae and M. Perelstein, Dark matter search at a linear collider: effective operator approach, JHEP05 (2013) 138 [arXiv:1211.4008] [INSPIRE].
21. J.-M. Zheng et al., Constraining the interaction strength between dark matter and visible matter: I. Fermionic dark matter, Nucl. Phys.B 854 (2012) 350 [arXiv:1012.2022] [INSPIRE].
22. Z.-H. Yu et al., Constraining the interaction strength between dark matter and visible matter: II. Scalar, vector and spin-3/2 dark matter, Nucl. Phys.B 860 (2012) 115 [arXiv:1112.6052] [INSPIRE].
23. R. Ding and Y. Liao, Spin 3/2 particle as a dark matter candidate: an effective field theory approach, JHEP04 (2012) 054 [arXiv:1201.0506] [INSPIRE].
24. K. Cheung, P.-Y. Tseng, Y.-L.S. Tsai and T.-C. Yuan, Global constraints on effective dark matter interactions: relic density, direct detection, indirect detection and collider, JCAP05 (2012) 001 [arXiv:1201.3402] [INSPIRE].
25. Q.-H. Cao, C.-R. Chen, C.S. Li and H. Zhang, Effective dark matter model: relic density, CDMS II, Fermi LAT and LHC, JHEP08 (2011) 018 [arXiv:0912.4511] [INSPIRE].
26. J. Goodman et al., Constraints on light Majorana dark matter from colliders, Phys. Lett.B 695 (2011) 185 [arXiv:1005.1286] [INSPIRE].
27. M. Beltrán, D. Hooper, E.W. Kolb, Z.A.C. Krusberg and T.M.P. Tait, Maverick dark matter at colliders, JHEP09 (2010) 037 [arXiv:1002.4137] [INSPIRE].
28. J. Goodman et al., Constraints on dark matter from colliders, Phys. Rev.D 82 (2010) 116010 [arXiv:1008.1783] [INSPIRE].
29. M. Duch, Effective operators for dark matter interactions, MSc Thesis, University of Warsaw, Warsaw Poland (2014) [arXiv:1410.4427] [INSPIRE].
30. W. Buchmüller and D. Wyler, Effective Lagrangian analysis of new interactions and flavor conservation, Nucl. Phys.B 268 (1986) 621 [INSPIRE].
31. B. Grzadkowski, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak and J. Rosiek, Dimension-six terms in the standard model Lagrangian, JHEP10 (2010) 085 [arXiv:1008.4884] [INSPIRE].
32. M.B. Einhorn and J. Wudka, The bases of effective field theories, Nucl. Phys.B 876 (2013) 556 [arXiv:1307.0478] [INSPIRE].
33. B. Grzadkowski and J. Wudka, Pragmatic approach to the little hierarchy problem: the case for dark matter and neutrino physics, Phys. Rev. Lett.103 (2009) 091802 [arXiv:0902.0628] [INSPIRE].
34. B. Grzadkowski and J. Wudka, Naive solution of the little hierarchy problem and its physical consequences, Acta Phys. Polon.B 40 (2009) 3007 [arXiv:0910.4829] [INSPIRE].
35. O. Lebedev, H.M. Lee and Y. Mambrini, Vector Higgs-portal dark matter and the invisible Higgs, Phys. Lett.B 707 (2012) 570 [arXiv:1111.4482] [INSPIRE].
36. S. Kanemura, S. Matsumoto, T. Nabeshima and N. Okada, Can WIMP dark matter overcome the nightmare scenario?, Phys. Rev.D 82 (2010) 055026 [arXiv:1005.5651] [INSPIRE].
37. H. Ruegg and M. Ruiz-Altaba, The Stueckelberg field, Int. J. Mod. Phys.A 19 (2004) 3265 [hep-th/0304245] [INSPIRE].
38. H. van Hees, The renormalizability for massive Abelian gauge field theories revisited, hep-th/0305076 [INSPIRE].
39. J.F. Kamenik and C. Smith, FCNC portals to the dark sector, JHEP03 (2012) 090 [arXiv:1111.6402] [INSPIRE].
40. J.F. Kamenik and C. Smith, Could a light Higgs boson illuminate the dark sector?, Phys. Rev.D 85 (2012) 093017 [arXiv:1201.4814] [INSPIRE].
41. C. Arzt, M.B. Einhorn and J. Wudka, Patterns of deviation from the standard model, Nucl. Phys.B 433 (1995) 41 [hep-ph/9405214] [INSPIRE].