Applying the behaviour change technique (BCT) taxonomy v1: a study of coder training

Translational Behavioral Medicine

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 134-148

  Wood, Caroline E ^a   Richardson, Michelle ^b   Johnston, Marie ^a,c   Abraham, Charles ^d   Francis, Jill ^e   Hardeman, Wendy ^f   Michie, Susan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF EXETER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United Kingdom)

^e CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Behaviour change techniques; Taxonomy; Training methods

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR CHANGE; BEHAVIOUR CHANGE TECHNIQUE TAXONOMY V1; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CODING; COMPETENCE; CONSENSUS; COURSE EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STUDENT; TAXONOMY; TRAINING; WORKSHOP;

EID: 84930198406     PISSN: 18696716     EISSN: 16139860     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13142-014-0290-z     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Murray CJL, Richards MA, Newton JN, et al. UK health performance: findings of the global burden of disease study. Lancet. 2010;2013:997-1020.
2. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Health systems and health-related behavior change: a review of primary and secondary evidence. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2007.
3. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new medical research council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:a1655.
4. Moher DG, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. BMC. 2001;1:2.
5. Moher DG, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Clin Oral Investig. 2003;7:2-7.
6. Des Jarlais DC, Lyles C, Crepaz N, et al. Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: the trend statement. AJPH. 2004;94:3.
7. Medical Research Council. A framework for development and evaluation of RCTs for complex interventions to improve health. London: Medical Research Council; 2000.
8. Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, et al. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ. 2000;321:694-696.
9. McCleary N, Duncan EM, Stewart F, et al. Active ingredients are reported more often for pharmacologic interventions than non-pharmacologic interventions: an illustrative review of reporting practices in titles and abstracts. Trials. 2013;14:146.
10. Michie S, Abraham C, Eccles MP, et al. Strengthening evaluation and implementation by specifying components of behavior change interventions: a study protocol. Impair Sci. 2011;6:10.
11. Michie S, Johnston M. Theories and techniques of behavior change: developing a cumulative science of behavior change. Health Psychol Rev. 2012;6(1):1-6.
12. Michie S, Richardson M, Abraham C, et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Beh Med. 2013.
13. Abraham C, Michie S. A taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in interventions. Health Psychol. 2008;27:3. 379–387.
14. Michie S, Hyder N, Walia A, et al. Development of a taxonomy of behavior change techniques used in individual behavioral support for smoking cessation. Addict Behav. 2011;36:315-319.
15. Michie S, Ashford A, Sniehotta FF, et al. A refined taxonomy of behavior change techniques to help people change their physical activity and healthy eating behaviors: the calore taxonomy. Psychol Health. 2011;26:1479-1498.
16. Michie S, Whittington C, Hamoudi Z, et al. Identification of behavior change techniques to reduce excessive alcohol consumption. Addiction. 2012;107:1431-1440.
17. Dixon D, Johnston M. Health behavior change competency framework: competences to deliver interventions to change lifestyle behaviors that affect health. National Health Service Scotland, 2010.
18. Abraham C, Good A, Huedo-Medina TB, et al. Reliability and utility of the sharp taxonomy of behavior change techniques. Psychol Health, 2012; sup1: 1–357.
19. Hak T, Bernts T. Coder training: explicit instruction and implicit socialization? In: Krippendorff K, Bock A, eds. The content analysis reader. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2009:220-233.
20. Bernard RM, Abrami PC, Lou Y, et al. How does distance education compare with classroom instruction? A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Rev Educ Res. 2004;74:379-439.
21. Potter WJ, Levine-Donnerstein D. Rethinking validity and reliability in content analysis. J App Commun Res, 1999: 258–284.
22. Michie S, Abraham C, Whittington C, et al. Effective techniques in healthy eating and physical activity interventions: a meta-regression. Health Psychol. 2009;28(6):690-701.
23. Dombrowski SU, Sniehotta FF, Johnston M, et al. Optimizing acceptability and feasibility of an evidence-based behavioral intervention for obese adults with obesity-related co-morbidities or additional risk factors for co-morbidities: an open-pilot intervention study in secondary care. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;87(1):108-119.
24. Murphy C, Ciszewska-Carr J. Sources of difference in reliability: identifying sources of difference in reliability in content analysis of online asynchronous discussions. Int Rev Res in Online Dist Learn, 2005.
25. Pollock PH, Hamann K, Wilson BM. Learning through discussions: comparing the benefits of small-group and large-class settings. J Polit Sci Educ. 2011;7:48-64.
26. Salas E, Cannon-Bowers JA. The science of training: a decade of progress. Ann Rev Psychol. 2001;52:471-499.
27. Salas E, Kosarzycski MP, Burke S, et al. Emergent themes in distance learning research: some food for thought. Int J Manag Rev. 2002;4:135-153.
28. Bandura A. Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1977.
29. Lorencatto F, West R, Seymour N, et al. Developing a method for specifying the components of behavior change interventions in practice: the example of smoking cessation. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2013;81:528-544.
30. Byrt T, Bishop J, Carlin JB. Bias, prevalence and kappa. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46:423-429.
31. Michie S, Wood CE, Johnston M, Abraham C, Francis J, et al. Behaviour change techniques: the development and evaluation of a taxonomic method for reporting and describing behaviour change interventions. Manuscript under review.
32. Cohen J. Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull. 1968;70:213-220.
33. Fisher RA. Statistical methods for research workers, Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.
34. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159-174.
35. Glasziou PP, Chalmers I, Altman DG, et al. Taking healthcare interventions from trial to practice. BMJ. 2010;341:c3852.
36. Hoffman TC, Erueti C, Glasziou PP. Poor description of non-pharmacological interventions: analysis of consecutive sample of randomised trials. BMJ. 2013;347:f3755.
37. Aguinis H, Kraiger K. Benefits of training and development for individuals and teams, organisations and society. Annu Rev Psychol. 2009;60:451-474.
38. Abraham C, Johnston M, Michie S. et al. Are behavior change interventions replicable? Identifying reliable and valid behavior change techniques using BCT taxonomy v1 (BCTTv1), In prep 2013.