Technical characteristics can make the difference in a surgical linear stapler. or not?

Journal of Surgical Research

Volumn 197, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 101-106

  Giaccaglia, Valentina ^a   Antonelli, Maria Serena ^a   Addario Chieco, Paola ^a   Cocorullo, Gianfranco ^b   Cavallini, Marco ^a   Gulotta, Gaspare ^b  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PALERMO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Pressure resistance; Surgical linear stapler; Surgical stapler; Tensile strength

Indexed keywords

ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GASTROINTESTINAL STAPLER; NONHUMAN; PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TENSILE STRENGTH; WOUND CLOSURE; ANASTOMOSIS; ANASTOMOTIC LEAK; ANIMAL; BIOMECHANICS; DEVICES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EVALUATION STUDY; INTESTINE; PIG; STAPLER; SURGERY; SURGICAL STAPLING;

ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; ANASTOMOTIC LEAK; ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; INTESTINES; PRESSURE; SURGICAL STAPLERS; SURGICAL STAPLING; SWINE; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 84930183137     PISSN: 00224804     EISSN: 10958673     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2015.03.096     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. J. Pickleman, W. Watson, and J. Cunningham The failed gastrointestinal anastomosis: an inevitable catastrophe? J Am Coll Surg 188 1999 473
2. D.A. Telem, M. Sur, and P. Tabrizian Diagnosis of gastrointestinal anastomotic dehiscence after hospital discharge: impact on patient management and outcome Surgery 147 2010 127
3. C. Platell, N. Barwood, and G. Dorfmann The incidence of anastomotic leaks in patients undergoing colorectal surgery Colorectal Dis 9 2006 71
4. A. Mirnezami, R. Mirnezami, and K. Chandrakumaran Increased local recurrence and reduced survival from colorectal cancer following anastomotic leak: systematic review and meta-analysis Ann Surg 253 2011 890
5. N. Picardi History of mechanical sutures in digestive system surgery Ann Ital Chir 73 2002 1
6. M. Guivarc'h The history of intestinal suturing: it's decisive influence on digestive surgery J Chir (Paris) 141 2004 67
7. D. Korolija The current evidence on stapled versus hand-sewn anastomosis in the digestive tract Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 17 2008 151
8. E. Chekan, and R.L. Whelan Surgical stapling device-tissue interactions: what surgeons need to know to improve patient outcomes Med Devices (Auckl) 7 2014 305
9. F. Daams, M. Luyer, and J.F. Lange Colorectal anastomotic leakage: aspects of prevention, detection and treatment World J Gastroenterol 19 2013 2293
10. M. Ito, M. Sugito, and A. Kobayashi Relationship between multiple numbers of stapler firings during rectal division and anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic rectal resection Int J Colorectal Dis 23 2008 703
11. E. Contini, M.L. Godek, and J.M. Whiffen Ex vivo pneumostasis evaluation of variable-height staple design Innovations (Phila) 8 2013 284
12. S.R. Myers, W.S. Rothermel, and L. Shaffer The effect of tissue compression on circular stapler line failure Surg Endosc 25 2011 3043
13. K. Kawasaki, Y. Fujino, and K. Kanemitsu Experimental evaluation of the mechanical strength of stapling techniques Surg Endosc 21 2007 1796
14. J. Yang, M. Soltz, and H. Russell Surface deformation analysis of end-to-end stapled intestinal anastomosis Surg Innov 19 2012 281
15. J.K. Champion, and M.D. Williams Prospective randomized comparison of linear staplers during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass Obes Surg 13 2003 855
16. A. Sozutec, T. Colak, and A. Dag Comparison of standard 4-row vs 6-row 3-D linear cutter stapler in creation of gastrointestinal system anastomosis: a prospective randomized trial Clinics 67 2012 1035
17. S. Gentilli, L. Portigliotti, and M. Aronici Ultrastructural analysis of different-made staplers' staples Minerva Chir 67 2012 439