Renal function is the same 6 months after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy regardless of clamp technique: Analysis of outcomes for off-clamp, selective arterial clamp and main artery clamp techniques, with a minimum follow-up of 1 year

BJU International

Volumn 115, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 921-928

  Komninos, Christos ^a,c   Shin, Tae Young ^b   Tuliao, Patrick ^a   Han, Woong Kyu ^a   Chung, Byung Ha ^a   Choi, Young Deuk ^a   Rha, Koon Ho ^a  

^a Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b Chuncheon Sacred Hospital Hallym Medical College   (South Korea)

^c GENERAL HOSPITAL OF NIKEA   (Greece)

Author keywords

partial nephrectomy; selective clamping; warm ischemia time; zero ischemia

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; CREATININE; INDIGO CYANINE GREEN DYE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTERY CLAMP; ARTICLE; CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CREATININE BLOOD LEVEL; DOPPLER ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GLOMERULUS FILTRATION RATE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; ISCHEMIA; KIDNEY FUNCTION; KIDNEY TUMOR; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; NEPHRECTOMY; OPERATION DURATION; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROBOT ASSISTED SURGERY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TUMOR VOLUME; ADVERSE EFFECTS; HEMOSTASIS; KIDNEY; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURE; SURGERY; VASCULARIZATION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE; HEMOSTASIS, SURGICAL; HUMANS; KIDNEY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHRECTOMY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84930040318     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bju.12975     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Thompson RH, Lane BR, Lohse CM, et al. Every minute counts when the renal hilum is clamped during partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 2010; 58: 340-5
2. Liu W, Li Y, Chen M, et al. Off-clamp versus hilar control partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endourol 2014; 28: 597-76
3. 99mTc-mercaptoacetyltriglycine scintigraphy parameter. Urology 2012; 79: 160-4
4. Kaczmarek BF, Tanagho YS, Hillyer SP, et al. Off-clamp robot assisted partial nephrectomy preserves renal function: a multi-institutional propensity score analysis. Eur Urol 2013; 64: 988-93
5. Desai MM, Castro Abreu AL, Leslie S, et al. Robotic partial nephrectomy with superselective versus main artery clamping: a retrospective comparison. Eur Urol 2014; 66: 713-9
6. Ficarra V, Novara G, Secco S, et al. Perioperativeaspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) classification of renal tumours in patientswho are candidates for nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol 2009; 56: 786-93
7. Kutikov A, Uzzo RG,. The RENAL nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol 2009; 182: 844-53
8. Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, et al. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med 1999; 130: 461-70
9. Levey AS, Coresh J, Balk E, et al. National kidney function practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification and stratification. Ann Intern Med 2003; 139: 137-47
10. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA,. Classification of surgical complications: a newproposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 205-13
11. Shin TY, Choi KH, Lim SK, et al. Simplified zero ischemia in robot assisted partial nephrectomy: initial Yonsei experience. Korean J Urol 2013; 54: 78-84
12. Simmons MN, Hillyer SP, Lee BH, et al. Functional recovery after partial nephrectomy: effects of volume loss and ischemic injury. J Urol 2012; 187: 1667-73
13. Fergany AF, Saad IR, Woo L, et al. Open partial nephrectomy for tumor in a solitary kidney: experience with 400 cases. J Urol 2006; 175: 1630-3
14. Becker F, Van Poppel H, Hakenberg OW, et al. Assessing the impact of ischemia time during partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 2009; 56: 625-634
15. Lane BR, Novick AC, Babineau D, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy for tumor in a solitary kidney. J Urol 2008; 179: 847-52
16. Thompson RH, Frank I, Lohse CM, et al. The impact of ischemia time during open nephron sparing surgery on solitary kidneys: a multi-institutional study. J Urol 2007; 177: 471-6
17. Funahashi Y, Hattori R, Yamamoto T, et al. Ischemic renal damage after nephron-sparing surgery in patients with normal contralateral kidney. Eur Urol 2009; 55: 209-16
18. Desai MM, Gill IS, Ramani AP, et al. The impact of warm ischemia on renal function after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. BJU Int 2005; 95: 377-83
19. Bhayani SB, Rha KH, Pinto PA, et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: effect of warm ischemia on serum creatinine. J Urol 2004; 172: 1264-6
20. Krane LS, Mufarrij PW, Manny TB, et al. Comparison of clamping technique in robotic partial nephrectomy: does unclamped partial nephrectomy improve perioperative outcomes and renal function? Can J Urol 2013; 20: 6662-6667
21. Lee JW, Kim H, Choo M, et al. Different methods of hilar clamping during partial nephrectomy: impact on renal function. Int J Urol 2014; 21: 232-6
22. Parekh DJ, Weinberg JM, Ercole B, et al. Tolerance of the human kidney to isolated controlled ischemia. J Am Soc Nephrol 2013; 24: 506-17
23. Rogers CG, Ghani KR, Kumar RK, et al. Robotic partial nephrectomy with cold ischemia and on-clamp tumor extraction: recapitulating the open approach. Eur Urol 2013; 63: 573-8