Evaluating online information regarding the direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 803-807

  Mohan, Rohith ^a,b   Yi, Paul H ^b   Hansen, Erik N ^b  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Direct anterior approach; Hip replacement; Online information; Patient education; Total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DIRECT ANTERIOR APPROACH; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; INFORMATION; INTERNET; PHYSICIAN; RISK; SEARCH ENGINE; SURGICAL APPROACH; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; ACCESS TO INFORMATION; HIP REPLACEMENT; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PATIENT EDUCATION; PROCEDURES;

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; HUMANS; INTERNET; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; SEARCH ENGINE;

EID: 84929997152     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.12.022     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Ethgen O., Bruyère O., Richy F., et al. Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86-A:963.
2. Unger A.S., Stronach B.M., Bergin P.F., et al. Direct anterior total hip arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 2014, 63:227.
3. Lovell T.P. Single-incision direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty using a standard operating table. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23:64. 10.1016/j.arth.2008.06.027.
4. Bremer A.K., Kalberer F., Pfirrmann C.W.A., et al. Soft-tissue changes in hip abductor muscles and tendons after total hip replacement: comparison between the direct anterior and the transgluteal approaches. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2011, 93:886. 10.1302/0301-620X.93B7.25058.
5. Bergin P.F., Doppelt J.D., Kephart C.J., et al. Comparison of minimally invasive direct anterior versus posterior total hip arthroplasty based on inflammation and muscle damage markers. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2011, 93:1392. 10.2106/JBJS.J.00557.
6. Nakata K., Nishikawa M., Yamamoto K., et al. A clinical comparative study of the direct anterior with mini-posterior approach: two consecutive series. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24:698. 10.1016/j.arth.2008.04.012.
7. Sugano N., Takao M., Sakai T., et al. Comparison of mini-incision total hip arthroplasty through an anterior approach and a posterior approach using navigation. Orthop Clin North Am 2009, 40:365. 10.1016/j.ocl.2009.04.003.
8. Lamontagne M., Varin D., Beaulé P.E. Does the anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty better restore stair climbing gait mechanics?. J Orthop Res 2011, 29:1412. 10.1002/jor.21392.
9. Maffiuletti N.A., Impellizzeri F.M., Widler K., et al. Spatiotemporal parameters of gait after total hip replacement: anterior versus posterior approach. Orthop Clin North Am 2009, 40:407. 10.1016/j.ocl.2009.02.004.
10. Sariali E., Leonard P., Mamoudy P. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty using Hueter anterior approach. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23:266. 10.1016/j.arth.2007.04.003.
11. Siguier T., Siguier M., Brumpt B. Mini-incision anterior approach does not increase dislocation rate: a study of 1037 total hip replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 164.
12. Jewett B.A., Collis D.K. High complication rate with anterior total hip arthroplasties on a fracture table. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011, 469:503. 10.1007/s11999-010-1568-1.
13. Archibeck M.J., White R.E. Learning curve for the two-incision total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 232.
14. Goulding K., Beaulé P.E., Kim P.R., et al. Incidence of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve neuropraxia after anterior approach hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010, 468:2397. 10.1007/s11999-010-1406-5.
15. Yi C., Agudelo J.F., Dayton M.R., et al. Early complications of anterior supine intermuscular total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2013, 36:e276. 10.3928/01477447-20130222-14.
16. Christensen C.P., Karthikeyan T., Jacobs C.A. Greater Prevalence of Wound Complications Requiring Reoperation With Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2014, 10.1016/j.arth.2014.04.036.
17. Powell J., Inglis N., Ronnie J., et al. The characteristics and motivations of online health information seekers: cross-sectional survey and qualitative interview study. J Med Internet Res 2011, 13:e20. 10.2196/jmir.1600.
18. Lee S., Shin J.J., Haro M.S., et al. Evaluating the quality of Internet information for femoroacetabular impingement. Arthroscopy 2014, 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.04.102.
19. Schweppe M.L., Seyler T.M., Plate J.F., et al. Does surgical approach in total hip arthroplasty affect rehabilitation, discharge disposition, and readmission rate?. Surg Technol Int 2013, 23:219.
20. Beredjiklian P.K., Bozentka D.J., Steinberg D.R., et al. Evaluating the source and content of orthopaedic information on the Internet. The case of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000, 82-A:1540.
21. Butler L., Foster N.E. Back pain online: a cross-sectional survey of the quality of web-based information on low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003, 28:395. 10.1097/01.BRS.0000048497.38319.D3.
22. Fabricant P.D., Dy C.J., Patel R.M., et al. Internet search term affects the quality and accuracy of online information about developmental hip dysplasia. J Pediatr Orthop 2013, 33:361. 10.1097/BPO.0b013e31827d0dd2.
23. Rose S., Bruce J., Maffulli N. Accessing the Internet for patient information about orthopedics. JAMA 1998, 280:1309.
24. Labovitch R.S., Bozic K.J., Hansen E. An evaluation of information available on the internet regarding minimally invasive hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2006, 21:1. 10.1016/j.arth.2005.04.019.
25. Meena S., Palaniswamy A., Chowdhury B. Web-based information on minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 2013, 21:305.
26. Search engines-top 10 search engine lists [accessed August 19, 2014]. http://www.listofsearchengines.org/.
27. How Google instant's autocomplete suggestions work [accessed July 13, 2014]. http://searchengineland.com/how-google-instant-autocomplete-suggestions-work-62592.
28. Zawadsky M.W., Paulus M.C., Murray P.J., et al. Early outcome comparison between the direct anterior approach and the mini-incision posterior approach for primary total hip arthroplasty: 150 consecutive cases. J Arthroplasty 2014, 29:1256. 10.1016/j.arth.2013.11.013.
29. Manrique J., Chen A.F., Heller S., et al. Direct anterior approach for revision total hip arthroplasty. Ann Transl Med 2014, 2:100. 10.3978/j.issn. 2305-5839.2014.09.11.
30. Freeman G.H., Halton J.H. Note on an exact treatment of contingency, goodness of fit and other problems of significance. Biometrika 1951, 38:141.
31. Post Z.D., Orozco F., Diaz-Ledezma C., et al. Direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty: indications, technique, and results. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2014, 22:595. 10.5435/JAAOS-22-09-595.
32. Poehling-Monaghan K.L., Kamath A.F., Taunton M.J., et al. Direct anterior versus miniposterior THA with the same advanced perioperative protocols: surprising early clinical results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014, 10.1007/s11999-014-3827-z.
33. Rodriguez J.A., Deshmukh A.J., Rathod P.A., et al. Does the direct anterior approach in THA offer faster rehabilitation and comparable safety to the posterior approach?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014, 472:455. 10.1007/s11999-013-3231-0.
34. Zuckerman J.D., Koli E.N., Inneh I., et al. Can a hip and knee adult reconstruction orthopaedic surgeon sustain a practice comprised entirely of medicare patients?. J Arthroplasty 2014, 10.1016/j.arth.2014.02.041.
35. Rana A.J., Iorio R., Healy W.L. Hospital economics of primary THA decreasing reimbursement and increasing cost, 1990 to 2008. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011, 469:355. 10.1007/s11999-010-1526-y.
36. Yahoo! Search Powered by Bing. . . But Not Identical 2012.
37. Ghobrial G.M., Mehdi A., Maltenfort M., et al. Variability of patient spine education by Internet search engine. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2014, 118:59. 10.1016/j.clineuro.2013.12.013.
38. Ganta A., Yi P.H., Hussein K., et al. Readability of sports medicine-related patient education materials from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ) 2014, 43:E65.
39. Yi P.H., Ganta A., Hussein K.I., et al. Readability of arthroscopy-related patient education materials from the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons and Arthroscopy Association of North America Web sites. Arthroscopy 2013, 29:1108. 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.03.003.
40. Hansberry D.R., Agarwal N., Shah R., et al. Analysis of the readability of patient education materials from surgical subspecialties. Laryngoscope 2014, 124:405. 10.1002/lary.24261.
41. Dy C.J., Taylor S.A., Patel R.M., et al. Does the quality, accuracy, and readability of information about lateral epicondylitis on the internet vary with the search term used?. Hand (N Y) 2012, 7:420. 10.1007/s11552-012-9443-z.