Comparison of Mini-Incision Total Hip Arthroplasty Through an Anterior Approach and a Posterior Approach Using Navigation

Orthopedic Clinics of North America

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 365-370

  Sugano, Nobuhiko ^a   Takao, Masaki ^a   Sakai, Takashi ^a   Nishii, Takashi ^a   Miki, Hidenobu ^b   Nakamura, Nobuo ^c  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b OSAKA NATIONAL HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^c Kyowakai Hospital   (Japan)

Author keywords

Computer aided surgery; Minimally invasive surgery; Navigation; Range of motion; Total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JOINT STABILITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; OXFORD HIP SCORE; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANGE OF MOTION; REVIEW; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 67649415127     PISSN: 00305898     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2009.04.003     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Berger R.A. Total hip arthroplasty using the minimally invasive two-incision approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 417 (2003) 232-241
2. Matta J.M., Shahrdar C., and Ferguson T. Single-incision anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty on an orthopaedic table. Clin Orthop Relat Res 441 (2005) 115-124
3. Wright J.M., Crockett H.C., Delgado S., et al. Mini-incision for total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, controlled investigation with 5-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 19 5 (2004) 538-545
4. Woolson S.T., Mow C.S., Syquia J.F., et al. Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a standard incision or a mini-incision. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86 7 (2004) 1353-1358
5. DiGioia A.M., Plakseychuk A.Y., Levison T.J., et al. Mini-incision technique for total hip arthroplasty with navigation. J Arthroplasty 18 2 (2003) 123-128
6. Inaba Y., Dorr L.D., Wan Z., et al. Operative and patient care techniques for posterior mini-incision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 441 (2005) 104-114
7. Nogler M., Mayr E., Krismer M., et al. Reduced variability in cup positioning: the direct anterior surgical approach using navigation. Acta Orthop 79 6 (2008) 789-793
8. Hananouchi T., Takao M., Nishii T., et al. Comparison of navigation accuracy in THA between the mini-anterior and -posterior approaches. Int J Med Robot 5 1 (2009) 20-25
9. Light T.R., and Keggi K.J. Anterior approach to hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 152 (1980) 255-260
10. Murray D.W. The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 75 2 (1993) 228-232
11. Widmer K.H., and Zurfluh B. Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion. J Orthop Res 22 (2004) 815-821
12. Sugano N., Nishii T., Miki H., et al. Mid-term results of cementless total hip replacement using a ceramic-on-ceramic bearing with and without computer navigation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89 4 (2007) 455-460
13. Engh C.A., Glassman A.H., and Suthers K.E. The case for porous-coated hip implants: the femoral side. Clin Orthop 261 (1990) 63-81
14. Callaghan J.J., Dysart S.H., and Savory C.G. The uncemented porous-coated anatomic total hip prosthesis: two-year results of a prospective consecutive series. J Bone Joint Surg Am 70 (1988) 337-346
15. Uesugi Y., Makimoto K., Fujita K., et al. Validity and responsiveness of the Oxford hip score in a prospective study with Japanese total hip arthroplasty patients. J Orthop Sci 14 1 (2009) 35-39
16. Lewinnek G.E., Lewis J.L., Tarr R., et al. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60 (1978) 217-220
17. DiGioia A.M., Jaramaz B., Blackwell M., et al. The Otto Aufranc Award. Image guided navigation system to measure intraoperatively acetabular implant alignment. Clin Orthop Relat Res 355 (1998) 8-22