Syn-Vivo bioerosion of Nautilus by endo- and epilithic foraminiferans (New Caledonia and Vanuatu)

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2015, Pages

  Seuss, Barbara ^a   Wisshak, Max ^b   Mapes, Royal H ^c   Landman, Neil H ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ERLANGEN NUREMBERG   (Germany)

^b SENCKENBERG DEUTSCHES ENTOMOLOGISCHES INSTITUT   (Germany)

^c NORTH CAROLINA MUSEUM OF NATURAL SCIENCES   (United States)

^d DIVISION OF INVERTEBRATE ZOOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EPOXY RESIN;

ARTICLE; BIOEROSION; CHEMOTROPH; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL EROSION; ENZYME SPECIFICITY; FORAMINIFER; MARINE ENVIRONMENT; NAUTILUS; NAUTILUS MACROMPHALUS; NAUTILUS POMPILIUS; NEW CALEDONIA; NONHUMAN; PHOTOTROPHY; PSEUDOPODIUM; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; VANUATU; ANIMAL; ANIMAL SHELL; ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS AND RELATED PHENOMENA; PARASITOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY;

NAUTILIDA; NAUTILUS;

ANIMAL SHELLS; ANIMALS; ECOLOGICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL PHENOMENA; FORAMINIFERA; NAUTILUS; NEW CALEDONIA; VANUATU;

EID: 84929994920     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125558     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Maeda H, Mapes RH, Mapes G. Taphonomic features of a lower Permian beached cephalopod assemblage from central Texas. Palaios. 2003; 18: 421-434.
2. Mapes RH, Chaffin DT. Predation on cephalopods: A general overview with a case study from the Upper Carboniferous of Texas. In: Kelley PH, Kowalewski M, Hansen TA, editors. Predator-Prey Interactions in the Fossil Record. New York: Kluwer/Plenum Publishers; 2003. pp. 77-213.
3. Wani R. Experimental fragmentation patterns of modern Nautilus shells and the implications for fossil cephalopod taphonomy. Lethaia. 2004; 37: 113-123.
4. Wani R. Differential preservation of the Upper Cretaceous ammonoid Anagaudryceras with corrugated shell in central Hokkaido, Japan. Acta Palaeontol Pol. 2007; 52: 77-84.
5. Saunders WB, Landman NH. Nautilus: The Biology and Paleobiology of a Living Fossil. 2nd ed. New York: Springer Press; 2009.
6. Mapes RH, Hembree DI, Rasor BA, Stigall A, Goiran C, Richer de Forges B. Modern Nautilus (Cephalopoda) taphonomy in a subtidal to backshore environment, Lifou (Loyalty Islands). Palaios. 2010; 25: 656-670.
7. Mapes RH, Landman NH, Cochran K, Goiran C, Richer de Forges B, Renfro A. Early taphonomy and significance of naturally submerged Nautilus shells from the New Caledonia region. Palaios. 2010; 25: 597-610.
8. Ritterbush KA, Hoffmann R, Lukeneder A, DeBaets K. Pelagic palaeoecology: The importance of recent constraints on ammonoid palaeobiology and life history. J Zool. 2014; 292: 229-241.
9. Bonacum J, Landman NH, Mapes RH, White MM, White A-J, Irlam J. Evolutionary radiation of present-day Nautilus and Allonautilus. Am Malacol Bull. 2011; 29: 77-93.
10. Landman NH, Saunders BW, Winston JE, Harries PJ. Incidence and kinds of epizoans on the shells of live Nautilus. Top Geobiol. 2010; 6: 163-177.
11. Neumann AC. Observations on coastal erosion in Bermuda and measurements of the boring rate of the sponge Cliona lampa. Limnol Oceanogr. 1966; 11: 92-108.
12. Bromley RG. The palaeoecology of bioerosion. In: Donovan SK, editor. The Palaeobiology of Trace Fossils. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 1994. pp. 134-154.
13. Golubic S, Perkins RD, Lucas KJ. Boring microorganisms and microborings in carbonate substrates. In: Frey RM, editor. The Study of Trace Fossils. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 1975. pp. 229-259.
14. Warme JE. Borings as trace fossils and the processes of marine bioerosion. In: Frey RM, editor. The Study of Trace Fossils. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 1975. pp. 181-227.
15. Bromley RG. A stratigraphy of marine bioerosion. In: McIllroy D, editor. The application of ichnology to paleoenvironmental and stratigraphic analysis. London: Geol Soc London Spec Publ. 2004;228: 455-481.
16. Wilson MA. Macroborings and the evolution of marine bioerosion. In: Miller W, editor. Trace fossils: Concepts, Problems, Prospects. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2007. pp. 356-367.
17. Wisshak M, Tribollet A, Golubic S, Jakobsen J, Freiwald A. Temperate bioerosion: Ichnodiversity and biodiversity from intertidal to bathyal depths (Azores). Geobiology. 2011; 9: 492-520. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-4669.2011.00299.x PMID: 21992504
18. Wisshak M. Microbioerosion. In: Knaust D, Bromley RG, editors. Trace fossils as indicators of sedimentary environments. Developments in Sedimentology. 2012;64: 213-243.
19. Glaub I, Golubic S, Gektidis M, Radtke G, Vogel K. Microborings and microbial endoliths: geological implications. In: Miller W, editor. Trace fossils: Concepts, Problems, Prospects. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2007. pp. 368-381.
20. Golubic S, Brent G, LeCampion T. Scanning electron microscopy of endolithic algae and fungi using a multipurpose casting-embedding technique. Lethaia. 1970; 3: 203-209.
21. Golubic S, Campbell S, Spaeth C. Kunstharzausgüsse fossiler Mikroben-Bohrgänge. Präparator. 1983; 29: 197-200.
22. Debenay J-P. A Guide to 1,000 Foraminiferas from Southwestern Pacific: New Caledonia. 1st ed. Paris: Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle; 2012.
23. Vénec-Pyré M-T. Boring foraminifera in French Polynesian coral reefs. Coral Reefs. 1987; 5: 205-212.
24. Vénec-Peyré M-T. Bioeroding foraminifera: a review. Mar Micropaleontol. 1996; 28: 19-30. PMID: 8698042
25. Beuck L, López-Correa M, Freiwald A. Biogeographical distribution of Hyrrokkin (Rosalinidae, Foraminifera) and its host-specific morphological and textural trace variability. In: Wisshak M, Tapanila L, editors. Current Developments in Bioerosion. Berlin: Springer; 2008. pp. 329-360.
26. Wisshak M, Rüggeberg A. Colonisation and bioerosion of experimental substrates by benthic foraminiferans from euphotic to aphotic depths (Kosterfjord, SWSweden). Facies. 2006; 52: 1-17.
27. Todd R. A new Rosalina (Foraminifera) parasitic on a bivalve. Deep-Sea Res. 1965; 12: 831-837.
28. Bromley RG, Wisshak M, Glaub I, Botquelen A. Ichnotaxonomic review of dendriniform borings attributed to foraminiferans: Semidendrina igen. nov. In: Miller W, editor. Trace fossils: Concepts, Problems, Prospects. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2007. pp. 518-530.
29. Wisshak M, Seuss B, Nützel A. Evolutionary implications of an exceptionally preserved Carboniferous microboring assemblage in the Buckhorn Asphalt Lagerstätte (Oklahoma, USA). In: Wisshak M, Tapanila L, editors. Current Developments in Bioerosion. Berlin: Springer Press; 2008. pp. 21-54.
30. Plewes CR, Palmer TJ, Haynes JR. A boring foraminiferan from the Upper Jurassic of England and Northern France. J Micropaleontol. 1993; 12: 83-89.
31. Neumann C, Wisshak M. A Foraminiferal Parasite on the Sea Urchin Echinocorys: Ichnological Evidence from the Late Cretaceous (Lower Maastrichtian, Northern Germany). Ichnos. 2006; 13: 185-190.
32. Golubic S, Radtke G, Le Campion-Alsumard T. Endolithic fungi in marine ecosystems. Trends in Microbiol. 2005; 13: 229-235. PMID: 15866040
33. Waite JH. Quinine-tanned scleroproteins. In: Wilbur KM, editor. The Mollusca, Vol. I. Hochachka PW, editor. Metabolic Biochemistry and Molecular Biomechanics. New York: Academic Press; 1983. pp. 467-504.
34. Hook JE, Golubic S. Mussel periostracum from deep-sea redox communities as a microbial habitat: the scalloping periostracum borer. Mar Ecol. 1988; 9: 347-364.
35. Hook JE, Golubic S. Mussel periostracum from deep-sea redox communities as a microbial habitat: 2. The pit borers. Mar Ecol. 1990; 11: 239-254.
36. Kaehler S. Incidence and distribution of phototrophic shell-degrading endoliths of the brown mussel Perna perna. Mar Biol. 1999; 135: 505-514.
37. Kaehler S, McQuaid CD. Lethal and sub-lethal effects of phototrophic endoliths attacking the shell of the intertidal mussel Perna perna. Mar Biol. 1999; 135: 497-503.
38. Mao Che L, Le Campion-Alsumard T, Boury-Esnault N, Payri C, Golubic S, Bézac C. Biodegradation of shells of the black pearl oyster, Pinctada margaritifera var. cumingii, by microborers and sponges of French Polynesia. Mar Biol. 1996; 126: 509-519.
39. Seuss B, Hembree DI, Wisshak M, Mapes RH, Landman NH. in press Taphonomy of backshore versus deep-marine collected Nautilus macromphalus conchs (New Caledonia). Palaios: in press.
40. Seuss B, Wisshak M, Mapes RH, Hembree DI, Landman NH, Lignier V. Microbial bioerosion of erratic sub-fossil Nautilus shells in a karstic cenote (Lifou, Loyalty Islands, New Caledonia). Ichnos: doi: 10.1080/10420940.2015.1030074
41. Cedhagen T. Taxonomy and biology of Hyrrokkin sarcophaga gen. et sp. n., a parasitic foraminiferan (Rosalinidae). Sarsia. 1994; 79: 65-82.
42. Freiwald A, Schönberg J. Substrate pitting and boring pattern of Hyrrokkin sarcophaga Cedhagen, 1994 (Foraminifera) in a modern deep-water coral reef mound. Mar Micropaleontol. 1996; 28: 199-207.
43. Mapes RH, Davis RA. Chapter 5 Color patterns in Ammonoids. In: Landman N, Tanabe K, Davis RA, editors. Ammonoid Paleobiology. New York: Springer Press; 1996. pp. 104-127.
44. Klug C, Montenari M, Schulz H, Ulrichs M. Chapter 10 Soft-tissue attachment of middle Triassic Ceratidida from Germany. In: Landman NH, Davis RA, Mapes RH, editors. Cephalopods Present and Past - New Insights and Fresh Perspectives. New York: Springer Press; 2007. pp. 205-22 doi: 10.1016/j.ejop.2012.11.005 PMID: 25774650
45. Zapalski MK. Parasitism versus commensalism: the case of tabulate endobionts. Palaeontology. 2007; 50: 1375-1380.