A comparative and prospective study between stapled hemorrhoidopexy and hemorrhoid artery ligation with mucopexy;Étude prospective et comparative du traitement de la maladie hémorroïdaire par anopexie (Longo) ou par ligatures des artères hémorroïdaires sous écho-doppler avec mucopexie (THDm)

Journal de Chirurgie Viscerale

Volumn 151, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 261-267

  Beliard A ^b   Labbe F ^a   De Faucal, D ^b   Fabreguette, J M ^b   Pouderoux, P ^b   Borie, F ^b  

^a CHG de Carcassonne   (France)

^b DEPARTMENT OF NEUROLOGY   (France)

Author keywords

Artery ligation; Hemorrhoid; Mucopexy; Stapled hemorrhoidopexy

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTERY; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVICES; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEMORRHOIDECTOMY; HEMORRHOIDS; HUMAN; INTESTINE MUCOSA; LENGTH OF STAY; LIGATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECTUM; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SURGICAL STAPLING; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULARIZATION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTERIES; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEMORRHOIDECTOMY; HEMORRHOIDS; HUMANS; INTESTINAL MUCOSA; LENGTH OF STAY; LIGATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RECTUM; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SURGICAL STAPLING; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84929940302     PISSN: 1878786X     EISSN: 18787878     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2014.03.009     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Haas PA, Haas GP, Schmaltz S, et al. The prevalence of hemor-rhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 1983;26:435-9.
2. Johanson JF, Sonnenberg A. Temporal changes in the occur-rence of hemorrhoids in the United States and England. DisColon Rectum 1991;34:585-91 [discussion 91-3
3. Goligher J. Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon. 5th ed.London: Baillière Tindall; 1984.
4. Shanmugam V, Thaha MA, Rabindranath KS, et al. Systematicreview of randomized trials comparing rubber band ligationwith excisional haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2005;92:1481-7.
5. Altomare DF, Roveran A, Pecorella G, et al. The treatmentof hemorrhoids: guidelines of the Italian Society of ColorectalSurgery. Tech Coloproctol 2006;10:181-6.
6. Cataldo P, Ellis CN, Gregorcyk S, et al. Practice parameters forthe management of hemorrhoids (revised). Dis Colon Rectum. 2005;48:189-94.
7. Madoff RD, Fleshman JW. American Gastroenterological Asso-ciation technical review on the diagnosis and treatment ofhemorrhoids. Gastroenterology 2004;126:1463-73.
8. Maw A, Eu KW, Seow-Choen F. Retroperitoneal sepsis compli-cating stapled hemorrhoidectomy: report of a case and reviewof the literature. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:826-8.
9. Molloy RG, Kingsmore D. Life threatening pelvic sepsis afterstapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 2000;355:810.
10. Person B, Wexner SD. Novel technology and innovations incolorectal surgery: the circular stapler for treatment of hemor-rhoids and fibrin glue for treatment of perianal fistulae. SurgInnov 2004;11:241-52.
11. Pescatori M. PPH stapled hemorrhoidectomy - A cautionarynote. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46:131.
12. Shao WJ, Li GC, Zhang ZH, et al. Systematic review and meta-Analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing stapledhaemorrhoidopexy with conventional haemorrhoidectomy. BrJ Surg 2008;95:147-60.
13. Wong LY, Jiang JK, Chang SC, et al. Rectal perforation: a life-Threatening complication of stapled hemorrhoidectomy: reportof a case. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46:116-7.
14. Morinaga K, Hasuda K, Ikeda T. A novel therapy for internalhemorrhoids: ligation of the hemorrhoidal artery with a newlydevised instrument (Moricorn) in conjunction with a Dopplerflowmeter. Am J Gastroenterol 1995;90:610-3.
15. Scheyer M, Antonietti E, Rollinger G, et al. Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation. Am J Surg 2006;191:89-93.
16. Wallis de Vries BM, van der Beek ES, de WijkersloothLR, et al. Treatment of grade 2 and 3 hemorrhoids withDoppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation. Dig Surg 2007;24:436-40.
17. Ratto C, Donisi L, Parello A, et al. Evaluation of trans-Anal hemorrhoidal dearterialization as a minimally invasivetherapeutic approach to hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum. 2010;53:803-11.
18. Giordano P, Overton J, Madeddu F, et al. Transanal hemorrhoi-dal dearterialization: a systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009;52:1665-71.
19. Felice G, Privitera A, Ellul E, et al. Doppler-guided hemorrhoi-dal artery ligation: an alternative to hemorrhoidectomy. DisColon Rectum 2005;48:2090-3.
20. Sohn N, Aronoff JS, Cohen FS, et al. Transanal hemorrhoidaldearterialization is an alternative to operative hemorrhoidec-Tomy. Am J Surg 2001;182:515-9.
21. Arnold S, Antonietti E, Rollinger G, et al. Doppler ultrasoundassisted hemorrhoid arteryligation. A new therapy in sympto-matic hemorrhoids. Chirurg 2002;73:269-73.
22. Greenberg R, Karin E, Avital S, et al. First 100 cases withDoppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation. Dis Colon Rectum. 2006;49:485-9.
23. Lienert M, Ulrich B. Doppler-guided ligation of the hemorrhoi-dal arteries. Report of experiences with 248 patients. DtschMed Wochenschr 2004;129:947-50.
24. Infantino A, Altomare DF, Bottini C, et al. Prospective rando-mised multicenter study comparing stapler haemorrhoidopexy(SH) with Doppler guided transanal haemorrhoid dearteria-lization (THD) for III degree haemorrhoids. Colorectal Dis. 2012;14(2):205-11.
25. Tjandra JJ, Chan MK. Systematic review on the procedurefor prolapse and hemorrhoids (stapled hemorrhoidopexy). DisColon Rectum 2007;50:878-92.
26. Nisar PJ, Acheson AG, Neal KR, et al. Stapled hemorrhoidopexycompared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy: systematicreview of randomized, controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum. 2004;47:1837-45.
27. Bursics A, Morvay K, Kupcsulik P, et al. Comparison of early and1-year follow-up results of conventional hemorrhoidectomyand hemorrhoid artery ligation: a randomized study. Int J Colo-rectal Dis 2004;19:176-80.
28. Sajid MS, Parampulli U, Whitehouse P, et al. A systematicreview comparing transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialization to stapled haemorrhoidopexy in the management of haemorrhoi-dal disease. Coloproctology 2012;16:1-8.
29. Lucarelli P, Picchio M, Caporossi M, et al. Transanal hae-morrhoidal dearterialisation with mucopexy versus staplerhaemorrhoidopexy: a randomised trial with long-Term follow-up. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2013;95(4):246-51.
30. Ripetti V, Caricato M, Arullani A. Rectal perforation, retro-pneumoperitoneum, and pneumomediastinum after staplingprocedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids: report of a case andsubsequent considerations. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:268-70.
31. Cipriani S, Pescatori M. Acute rectal obstruction after PPH sta-pled haemorrhoidectomy. Colorectal Dis 2002;4:367-70.
32. Narro JL. Hemorrhoid therapy with Doppler guided hemorrhoi-dal artery ligation via proctoscope KM-25. A new alternativeto hemorrhoidectomy and rubber band ligation?. Zentralbl Chir. 2004;129:208-10.
33. Lopez Ramirez MK, Olivares Becerra JJ, Gonzalez OjedaA. Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal disarterialization. A surgicalalternative in the management of hemorrhoidal disease. RevGastroenterol Mex 2004;69:290-2.