Transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialisation with mucopexy versus stapler haemorrhoidopexy: A randomised trial with long-term follow-up

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England

Volumn 95, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 246-251

  Lucarelli, P ^a   Picchio, M ^b   Caporossi, M ^c   De Angelis, F ^d   Di Filippo, A ^d   Stipa, F ^e   Spaziani, E ^d  

^a Hospital 'Madonna delle Grazie'   (Italy)

^b Hospital 'Paolo Colombo'   (Italy)

^c Hospital 'San Sebastiano'   (Italy)

^d SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

^e Hospital San Giovanni Addolorata   (Italy)

Author keywords

Haemorrhoids; Randomised controlled trial; Surgery

Indexed keywords

AGED; ANAL CANAL; ARTERY; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOPPLER FLOWMETRY; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEMORRHOID; HEMORRHOIDECTOMY; HUMAN; INTESTINE MUCOSA; LIGATION; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATION DURATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RECURRENT DISEASE; SURGICAL STAPLING; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VASCULARIZATION;

AGED; ANAL CANAL; ARTERIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEMORRHOIDECTOMY; HEMORRHOIDS; HUMANS; INTESTINAL MUCOSA; LIGATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATIVE TIME; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; RECURRENCE; SURGICAL STAPLING; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL;

EID: 84877799378     PISSN: 00358843     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1308/003588413X13511609958136     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. MacRae HM, MacLeod RG. Comparison of hemorrhoidal treatment modalities. A meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38: 687-694.
2. Longo A. Treatment of haemorrhoids disease by reduction of mucosa and haemorrhoidal prolapse with a circular suturing device: a new procedure. Presented at: 6th World Congress of Endoscopic Surgery; June 1998; Rome.
3. Tjandra JJ, Chan MK. Systematic review on the procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (stapled hemorrhoidopexy). Dis Colon Rectum 2007; 50: 878-892.
4. Giordano P, Gravante G, Sorge R et al. Long-term outcomes of stapled hemorrhoidopexy vs conventional hemorrhoidectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Surg 2009; 144: 266-272.
5. Morinaga K, Hasuda K, Ikeda T. A novel therapy for internal hemorrhoids: ligation of the hemorrhoidal artery with a newly devised instrument (Moricorn) in conjunction with a Doppler flowmeter. Am J Gastroenterol 1995; 90: 610-613.
6. Ratto C, Donisi L, Parello A et al. Evaluation of transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization as a minimally invasive therapeutic approach to hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 2010; 53: 803-811.
7. Festen S, van Hoogstraten MJ, van Geloven AA, Gerhards MF. Treatment of grade III and IV haemorrhoidal disease with PPH or THD. A randomized trial on postoperative complications and short-term results. Int J Colorectal Dis 2009; 24: 1,401-1,405.
8. Avital S, Itah R, Skornick Y, Greenberg R. Outcome of stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation for grade III hemorrhoids. Tech Coloproctol 2011; 15: 267-271.
9. Giordano P, Nastro P, Davies A, Gravante G. Prospective evaluation of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialisation for stage II and III haemorrhoids: three-year outcomes. Tech Coloproctol 2011; 15: 67-73.
10. Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain. Lancet 1974; 2: 1,127-1,131. 11. Ng KH, Ho KS, Ooi BS et al. Experience of 3711 stapled haemorrhoidectomy operations. Br J Surg 2006; 93: 226-230.
11. Ng KH, Ho KS, Ooi BS et al. Experience of 3711 stapled haemorrhoidectomy operations. Br J Surg 2006; 93: 226-230.
12. Nyström PO, Qvist N, Raahave D et al. Randomized clinical trial of symptom control after stapled anopexy or diathermy excision for haemorrhoid prolapse. Br J Surg 2010; 97: 167-176.
13. Ceci F, Picchio M, Palimento D et al. Long-term outcome of stapled hemorrhoidopexy for Grade III and Grade IV haemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 51: 1,107-1,112.
14. Finco C, Sarzo G, Savastano S et al. Stapled haemorrhoidectomy in fourth degree haemorrhoidal prolapse: is it worthwhile. Colorectal Dis 2006; 8: 130-134.
15. Giordano P, Overton J, Madeddu F et al. Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization: a systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum 2009; 52: 1,665- 1,671.
16. Faucheron JL, Gangner Y. Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation for the treatment of symptomatic hemorrhoids: early and three-year follow-up results in 100 consecutive patients. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 51: 945-949.
17. Scheyer M, Antonietti E, Rollinger G et al. Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation. Am J Surg 2006; 191: 89-93.
18. Ratto C, Giordano P, Donisi L et al. Transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD) for selected fourth-degree haemorrhoids. Tech Coloproctol 2011; 15: 191-197.
19. Infantino A, Altomare DF, Bottini C et al. Prospective randomized multicentre study comparing stapler haemorrhoidopexy with Doppler-guided transanal haemorrhoid dearterialization for third-degree haemorrhoids. Colorectal Dis 2012; 14: 205-211.
20. Smyth EF, Baker RP, Wilken BJ et al. Stapled versus excision haemorrhoidectomy: long-term follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2003; 361: 1,437-1,438.
21. Picchio M, Palimento D, Attanasio U, Renda A. Stapled vs open hemorrhoidectomy: long-term outcome of a randomized controlled trial. Int J Colorectal Dis 2006; 21: 668-669.
22. Bursics A, Morvay K, Kupcsulik P, Flautner L. Comparison of early and 1-year follow-up results of conventional hemorrhoidectomy and hemorrhoid artery ligation: a randomized study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2004; 19: 176-180.
23. Stuto A, Favero A, Cerullo G et al. Double stapled haemorrhoidopexy for haemorrhoidal prolapse: indications, feasibility and safety. Colorectal Dis 2012; 14: e386-e389.
24. Naldini G, Martellucci J, Talento P et al. New approach to large haemorrhoidal prolapse: double stapled haemorrhoidopexy. Int J Colorectal Dis 2009; 24: 1,383-1,387.
25. Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Stuto A et al. Stapled transanal rectal resection for outlet obstruction: a prospective, multicenter trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47: 1,285-1,296.
26. Gao XH, Fu CG, Nabieu PF. Residual skin tags following procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids: differentiation from recurrence. World J Surg 2010; 34: 344-352.
27. Lan P, Wu X, Zhou X et al. The safety and efficacy of stapled hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis of ten randomized control trials. Int J Colorectal Dis 2006; 21: 172-178.
28. Kam MH, Ng KH, Lim JF et al. Results of 7302 stapled haemorrhoidectomy operations in a single centre: a seven-year review and follow-up questionnaire survey. ANZ J Surg 2011; 81: 253-256.
29. Arroyo A, Pérez-Vicente F, Miranda E et al. Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing two different circular staplers for mucosectomy in the treatment of hemorrhoids. World J Surg 2006; 30: 1,305-1,310.
30. Molloy RG, Kingsmore D. Life threatening pelvic sepsis after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 2000; 335: 810.
31. Beattie GC, Lam JP, Loudon MA. A prospective evaluation of the introduction of circumferential stapled anoplasty in the management of haemorrhoids and mucosal prolapse. Colorectal Dis 2000; 2: 137-142.
32. Fueglistaler P, Guenin MO, Montali I et al. Long-term results after stapled hemorrhoidopexy: high patient satisfaction despite frequent postoperative symptoms. Dis Colon Rectum 2007; 59: 204-212.
33. Ganio E, Altomare DF, Milito G et al. Long-term outcome of a multicentre randomized clinical trial of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2007; 94: 1,033-1,037.
34. Nisar PJ, Acheson AG, Neal KR, Scholefield JH. Stapled hemorrhoidopexy compared with conventional hemorrhoidectomy: systematic review of randomized, controlled trials. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47: 1,837-1,845.