메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 9781489980410, Issue , 2014, Pages 29-43

Identifying objectives and alternative actions to frame a decision problem

Author keywords

Decision analysis; Decision threshold; Ecological threshold; Means objectives; Utility threshold

Indexed keywords


EID: 84929930792     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-8041-0_3     Document Type: Chapter
Times cited : (12)

References (16)
  • 1
    • 0003802606 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Probabilistic risk analysis
    • Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    • Bedford, T., and R. Cooke. 2001. Probabilistic risk analysis. Foundations and methods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • (2001) Foundations and Methods
    • Bedford, T.1    Cooke, R.2
  • 2
    • 38849171140 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Generating objectives: Can decision makers articulate what they want?
    • Bond, S. D., K. A. Carlson, and R. L. Keeney. 2008. Generating objectives: Can decision makers articulate what they want? Management Science 54:56-70.
    • (2008) Management Science , vol.54 , pp. 56-70
    • Bond, S.D.1    Carlson, K.A.2    Keeney, R.L.3
  • 3
    • 34548749772 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Integrating science and local knowledge in environmental risk management: A decision-focused approach
    • Failing, L., R. Gregory, and M. Harstone. 2007. Integrating science and local knowledge in environmental risk management: A decision-focused approach. Ecological Economics 64:47-60.
    • (2007) Ecological Economics , vol.64 , pp. 47-60
    • Failing, L.1    Gregory, R.2    Harstone, M.3
  • 4
    • 0033876321 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • An evaluation of multiple objective decision support weighting techniques in natural resource management
    • Hajkowicz, S. A., G. T. McDonald, and P. N. Smith. 2000. An evaluation of multiple objective decision support weighting techniques in natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 43:505-518.
    • (2000) Journal of Environmental Planning and Management , vol.43 , pp. 505-518
    • Hajkowicz, S.A.1    McDonald, G.T.2    Smith, P.N.3
  • 6
    • 0030576487 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Value-focused thinking: Identifying decision opportunities and creating alternatives
    • Keeney, R. L. 1996. Value-focused thinking: Identifying decision opportunities and creating alternatives. European Journal of Operational Research 92:537-549.
    • (1996) European Journal of Operational Research , vol.92 , pp. 537-549
    • Keeney, R.L.1
  • 7
    • 0036877242 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Common mistakes in making value trade-offs
    • Keeney, R. L. 2002. Common mistakes in making value trade-offs. Operations Research 50: 935-945.
    • (2002) Operations Research , vol.50 , pp. 935-945
    • Keeney, R.L.1
  • 8
    • 77957117318 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Developing objectives and attributes
    • ed. W. Edwards, R. F. Miles Jr., and D. von Winterdfeldt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    • Keeney, R. L. 2007. Developing objectives and attributes. In Advances in decision analysis. From foundations to applications, ed. W. Edwards, R. F. Miles Jr., and D. von Winterdfeldt. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    • (2007) Advances in Decision Analysis. from Foundations to Applications
    • Keeney, R.L.1
  • 9
    • 14644422604 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Selecting attributes to measure achievement of objectives
    • Keeney, R. L., and R. S. Gregory. 2005. Selecting attributes to measure achievement of objectives. Operations Research 53:1-11.
    • (2005) Operations Research , vol.53 , pp. 1-11
    • Keeney, R.L.1    Gregory, R.S.2
  • 10
    • 42649092559 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Reasoning maps for decision aid: An integrated approach for problem-structuring and multi-criteria evaluation
    • Montibeller, G., V. Belton, F. Ackermann, and L. Ensslin. 2008. Reasoning maps for decision aid: An integrated approach for problem-structuring and multi-criteria evaluation. Journal of the Operational Research Society 59:575-589.
    • (2008) Journal of the Operational Research Society , vol.59 , pp. 575-589
    • Montibeller, G.1    Belton, V.2    Ackermann, F.3    Ensslin, L.4
  • 12
    • 58149179018 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Uses and misuses of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) in environmental decision-making
    • Steele, K., Y. Carmel, J. Cross, and C. Wilcox. 2009. Uses and misuses of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) in environmental decision-making. Risk Analysis 29:26-33.
    • (2009) Risk Analysis , vol.29 , pp. 26-33
    • Steele, K.1    Carmel, Y.2    Cross, J.3    Wilcox, C.4
  • 13
    • 0037448809 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Towards reconciling outranking and value measurement practice
    • Stewart, T.J., and F.B. Losa. 2003. Towards reconciling outranking and value measurement practice. European Journal of Operational Research 145:645-659.
    • (2003) European Journal of Operational Research , vol.145 , pp. 645-659
    • Stewart, T.J.1    Losa, F.B.2
  • 14
    • 80052603694 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Interior
    • United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2010. Adaptive harvest management: 2010 hunting season. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Interior.
    • (2010) Adaptive Harvest Management: 2010 Hunting Season


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.