A comparative review of North American tundra delineations

ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 324-348

  Silver, Kirk C ^a   Carroll, Mark ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND   (United States)

^b NASA GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Classification systems; Ecoregion; GIS; North America; Review; Tundra

Indexed keywords

EID: 84929914909     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22209964     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/ijgi2020324     Document Type: Review

References (98)

1. Markham, C.R. On the origin and migrations of the greenland esquimaux. J. Roy Geogr. Soc. London 1865, 35, 87-99.
2. National Snow & Ice Data Center (NSIDC). Arctic Sea Ice Extent Settles at Record Seasonal Minimum. Available online: http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/2012/09/arctic-sea-ice-extent-settles-at-record-seasonal-minimum/(accessed on 30 September 2012).
3. White, D.; Hinzman, L.; Alessa, L.; Cassano, J.; Chambers, M.; Falkner, K.; Francis, J.; Gutowski, W.J.; Holland, M.; Holmes, R.M.; et al. The arctic freshwater system: Changes and impacts. J. Geophys. Res. 2007, doi: 10.1029/2006JG000353.
4. Arft, A.M.; Walker, M.D.; Gurevitch, J.; Alatalo, J.M.; Bret-Harte, M.S.; Dale, M.; Diemer, M.; Gugerli, F.; Henry, G.H.R.; Jones, M.H.; et al. Responses of tundra plants to experimental warming: Meta-analysis of the international tundra experiment. Ecol. Monogr. 1999, 69, 491-511.
5. Foley, J.A. Tipping points in the tundra. Science 2005, 310, 627-628.
6. Henry, G.H.; Molau, U. Tundra plants and climate change: The international tundra experiment (itex). Glob. Change Biol. 1997, 3, 1-9.
7. Liston, G.E.; Mcfadden, J.P.; Sturm, M.; Pielke, R.A. Modelled changes in arctic tundra snow, energy and moisture fluxes due to increased shrubs. Glob. Change Biol. 2002, 8, 17-32.
8. Walker, M.D.; Wahren, C.H.; Hollister, R.D.; Henry, G.H.; Ahlquist, L.E.; Alatalo, J.M.; Bret-Harte, M.S.; Calef, M.P.; Callaghan, T.V.; Carroll, A.B.; et al. Plant community responses to experimental warming across the tundra biome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 1342-1346.
9. Jeong, J.H.; Kug, J.S.; Kim, B.M.; Min, S.K.; Linderholm, H.W.; Ho, C.H.; Rayner, D.; Chen, D.; Jun, S.Y. Greening in the circumpolar high-latitude may amplify warming in the growing season. Clim. Dynam. 2012, 38, 1421-1431.
10. Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP). Geographical Coverage. Available online: http://www.amap.no (accessed on 28 March 2013).
11. Loveland, T.R.; Merchant, J.M. Ecoregions and ecoregionalization: Geographical and ecological perspectives. Environ. Manage. 2004, 34, S1-S13.
12. Thornthwaite, C.W. The climates of north america: According to a new classification. Geogr. Rev. 1931, 21, 633-655.
13. Merriam, C.H. Life Zones and Crop Zones of the United States; US Department of Agriculture, Division of Biological Survey: Washington, DC, USA, 1898.
14. Clements, F.E.; Shelford, V.E. Bioecology; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1939; p. 425.
15. Maini, J.S. Phytoecological study of sylvotundra at small tree lake, NWT. Arctic 1966, 19, 220-243.
16. Tikhomirov, B.A. Plantgeographical investigations of the tundra vegetation in the soviet union. Can. J. Bot. 1960, 38, 815-832.
17. Thompson, R.S.; Shafer, S.L.; Anderson, K.H.; Strickland, L.E.; Pelltier, R.T.; Bartlein, P.J.; Kerwin, M.W. Topographic, bioclimatic, and vegetation characteristics of three ecoregion classification systems in north america: Comparisons along continent-wide transects. Environ. Manage. 2004, 34, S125-S148.
18. Bliss, L.C. Arctic Tundra and Polar Desert Biome. In North American Terrestrial Vegetation, 2nd ed.; Barbour, M.G., Billings, W.D., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2000; pp. 1-40.
19. Commission for Environmental Cooperation. Ecological Regions of North America: Toward a Common Perspective; Commission for Environmental Cooperation: Montréal, QC, Canada, 1997.
20. Post, W.M.; Emanuel, W.R.; Zinke, P.J.; Stangenberger, A.G. Soil carbon pools and world life zones. Nature 1982, 298, 156-159.
21. Christensen, T.R. Methane emission from arctic tundra. Biogeochemistry 1993, 21, 117-139.
22. Scholze, M.; Knorr, W.; Arnell, N.W.; Prentice, I.C. A climate-change risk analysis for world ecosystems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 13116-13120.
23. Brandt, J.P. The extent of the north american boreal zone. Environ. Rev. 2009, 17, 101-161.
24. British Columbia Ministry of Forests and Range (BCMFR). Biogeoclimatic Maps. Available online: http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hre/becweb/resources/maps/GISdataDownload.html (accessed on 23 January 2013).
25. Saucier, J.P.; Robitaille, A.; Grondin, P.; Bergeron, J.F.; Gosselin, J. Les Régions Écologiques du Québec Méridional (Version 4). Scale: 1:1,250,000. Available online: http://www.mrnf.gouv.qc.ca/publications/forets/connaissances/carte-regions-ecologiques.pdf (accessed on 23 January 2013).
26. Canadian Forest Service. North American Boreal Zone Map Shapefiles. Available online: http://cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/pages/357 (accessed on 23 January 2013).
27. Kottek, M.; Grieser, J.; Beck, C.; Rudolf, B.; Rubel, F. World map of the koppen-geiger climate classification updated. Meteorol. Z. 2006, 15, 259-263.
28. Kottek, M.; Grieser, J.; Beck, C.; Rudolf, B.; Rubel, F. World Map of the Köppen-Geiger Climate Classification Updated. Available online: http://koeppen-geiger.vu-wien.ac.at/present.htm (accessed on 23 January 2013).
29. Alberta Tourism, Parks, and Recreation. 2005 Natural Regions and Subregions of Alberta. Available online: http://tpr.alberta.ca/parks/heritageinfocentre/naturalregions/default.aspx (accessed on 23 January 2013).
30. Natural Regions Committee. Natural Regions and Subregions of Alberta. Available online: http://www.tpr.alberta.ca/parks/heritageinfocentre/docs/NRSRcomplete%20May-06.pdf (accessed on 23 January 2013).
31. US Environmental Protection Agency. Ecoregions of North America. Scale: Various Scales. Available online: http://www.epa.gov/wed/pages/ecoregions/na-eco.htm (accessed on 23 January 2013).
32. Walker, D.A.; Raynolds, M.K.; Daniëls, F.J.A.; Einarsson, E.; Elvebakk, A.; Gould, W.A.; Katenin, A.E.; Kholod, S.S.; Markon, C.J.; Melnikov, E.S.; et al. The circumpolar arctic vegetation map. J. Veg. Sci. 2005, 16, 267-282.
33. University of Alaska Fairbanks. Map Catalog. Available online: http://www.arcticatlas.org/maps/catalog/index (accessed on 23 January 2013).
34. Latifovic, R.; Zhu, Z.L.; Cihlar, J.; Giri, C.; Olthof, I. Land cover mapping of north and central america-Global land cover 2000. Remote. Sens. Environ. 2004, 89, 116-127.
35. Joint Research Centre, Land Resource Management Unit, European Comission. Global Land Cover-2000 Products. 2003. Available online: http://bioval.jrc.ec.europa.eu/products/glc2000/products.php (accessed on 28 January 2013).
36. World Wildlife Federation. Terrestrial Ecoregions of the World. Available online: http://worldwildlife.org/publications/terrestrial-ecoregions-of-the-world (accessed on 23 January 2013).
37. Olson, D.M.; Dinerstein, E.; Wikramanayake, E.D.; Burgess, N.D.; Powell, G.V.N.; Underwood, E.C.; D'amico, J.A.; Itoua, I.; Strand, H.E.; Morrison, J.C.; et al. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: A new map of life on earth. BioScience 2001, 51, 933-938.
38. Nowacki, G.; Spencer, P.; Fleming, M.; Brock, T.; Jorgenson, T. Unified Ecoregions of Alaska: 2001. Usgs Open File Report 02-297. Available online: http://agdcftp1.wr.usgs.gov/pub/projects/fhm/akecoregions.htm (accessed on 23 January 2013).
39. Elliott-Fisk, D.L. The Taiga and Boreal Forest. In North American Terrestrial Vegetation, 2nd ed.; Barbour, M.G., Billings, W.D., Eds.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2000; pp. 41-74.
40. Marshall, I.B.; Shut, P.H.; Ballard, M. National Ecological Framework for Canada. Available online: http://sis.agr.gc.ca/cansis/nsdb/ecostrat/index.html (accessed on 23 January 2013).
41. Ecological Stratification Working Group (ESWG). A National Ecological Framework for Canada; Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Research Branch, Centre for Land and Biological Resources Research and Environment Canada, State of the Environment Directorate, Ecozone Analysis Branch: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 1999.
42. Bailey, R.G. Ecoregions of North America. Scale: 1:15,000,000; USDA Forest Service: Washington, DC, USA, 1997.
43. Bailey, R.G.; US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. Ecoregions of North America. Available online: http://www.fs.fed.us/rm/ecoregions/products/map-ecoregions-north-america/(accessed on 28 January 2013).
44. Bailey, R.G. Description of the Ecoregions of the United States, 2nd ed.; US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: Washington, DC, USA, 1995.
45. Nowacki, G.T.; Brock, T. Ecoregions and Subregions of Alaska, Ecomap Version 2.0. Scale: 1:5,000,000. Available online: http://agdc.usgs.gov/data/usgs/erosafo/ecoreg (accessed on 23 January 2013).
46. Schultz, J. The Ecozones of the World: The Ecological Divisions of the Geosphere; Springer-Verlag: Stuttgart, Germany, 1995.
47. Timoney, K.P. A Geobotanical Investigation of the Subarctic Forest-Tundra of the Northwest Territories. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 1988.
48. Tuhkanen, S. A circumpolar system and indices in plant geography. Acta. Bot. Fenn. 1984, 127, 1-50.
49. Payette, S. The forest tundra and present tree-lines of the northern québec-labrador peninsula. Nordicana 1983, 47, 3-23.
50. Atkinson, K. Vegetation zonation in the canadian subarctic. Area 1981, 13, 13-17.
51. Brown, D.E.; Lowe, C.H.; Pase, C.P. A digitized classification system for the biotic communities of North America, with community (series) and association samples from the southwest. J. Ariz-Nev. Acad. Sci. 1979, 14, 1-16.
52. The Nature Conservancy. Biotic Communities of the Southwest GIS Layer. Available online: http://azconservation.org/downloads/biotic-communities-of-the-southwest-gis-data (accessed on 23 January 2013).
53. Franklin, J.F. The biosphere reserve program in the united states. Science 1977, 195, 262-267.
54. Oswald, E.T.; Senyk, J. Ecoregions of Yukon Territory; Canadian Forestry Service: Victoria, BC, USA, 1977.
55. Walter, H.; Box, E. Global classification of natural terrestrial ecosystems. Plant Ecol. 1976, 32, 75-81.
56. Udvardy, M.D.F. A Classification of the Biogeographical Provinces of the World; International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources: Morges, Switzerland, 1975; p. 48.
57. FAO GeoNetwork. Udvardy's Ecoregions. Available online: http://www.fao.org/geonetwork/srv/en/metadata.show?id=1008 (accessed on 23 January 2013).
58. International Union of Conservation of Nature. UNEP-WCMC Metadata-Udvardy's Biogeographical Provinces. Available online: http://www.unep-wcmc.org/medialibrary/2011/10/03/7d9d7a51/Udvardy-metadata.pdf (accessed on 23 January 2013).
59. Hare, K.F.; Ritchie, J.C. The boreal bioclimates. Geogr. Rev. 1972, 66, 333-365.
60. Crowley, J.M. Biogeography. Can. Geogr. 1967, 11, 312-326.
61. Lobeck, A.K. Physiographic Provinces of North America (Scale: 1:12,000,000); Hammond: Maplewood, NJ, USA, 1948.
62. Dice, L.R. The Biotic Provinces of North America; University of Michigan Press: Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 1943; p. 78.
63. Hargrove, W.W.; Hoffman, F.M. Using multvariate clustering to characterize ecoregion borders. Comput. Sci. Eng. 1999, 1, 18-25.
64. Zhou, Y.; Narumalani, S.; Waltman, W.J.; Waltman, S.W.; Palecki, M.A. A GIS-based spatial pattern analysis model for eco-region mapping and characterization. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2003, 17, 445-462.
65. Bailey, R.G. Identifying ecoregion boundaries. Environ. Manage. 2004, 34, S14-S26.
66. McMahon, G.; Gregonis, S.M.; Waltman, S.W.; Omernik, J.M.; Thorson, T.D.; Freeouf, J.A.; Rorick, A.H.; Keys, J.E. Developing a spatial framework of common ecological regions for the conterminous united states. Environ. Manage. 2001, 28, 293-316.
67. Omernik, J.M. Perspectives on the nature and definition of ecological regions. Environ. Manage. 2004, 34, S27-S38.
68. McMahon, G.; Wiken, E.B.; Gauthier, D.A. Toward a scientifically rigorous basis for developing mapped ecological regions. Environ. Manage. 2004, 34, S111-S124.
69. Hargrove, W.W.; Hoffman, F.M. Potential of multivariate quantitative methods for delineation and visualization of ecoregions. Environ. Manage. 2004, 34, S39-S60.
70. Gallant, A.L.; Loveland, T.R.; Sohl, T.L.; Napton, D.E. Using an ecoregion framework to analyze land-cover and land-use dynamics. Environ. Manage. 2004, 34, S89-S110.
71. Omernik, J.M. Ecoregions of the conterminous united states. Ann. Assoc. Amer. Geogr. 1987, 77, 118-125.
72. US Environmental Protection Agency. Level IV Ecoregions of the Conterminous United States. Available online: ftp://ftp.epa.gov/wed/ecoregions/us/Eco-Level-IV-US.htm (accessed on 23 January 2013).
73. Wiken, E.B.; Nava, F.J.; Griffith, G.E. North American Terrestrial Ecoregions-Level III. Available online: ftp://ftp.epa.gov/wed/ecoregions/pubs/NA-TerrestrialEcoregionsLevel3-Final-2june11-CEC.pdf (accessed on 23 January 2013).
74. Indiana Biological Survey Aquatic Research Center. Ecoregions. Available online: http://www.indiana.edu/~inbsarc/ecoregions.html (accessed on 23 January 2013).
75. Linam, G.W.; Kleinsasser, L.J.; Mayes, K.B. Regionalization of the Index of Biotic Integrity for Texas Streams. Available online: http://www.tpwd.state.tx.us/publications/pwdpubs/media/pwd-rp-t3200-1086.pdf (accessed on 23 January 2013).
76. Buettner, G.; Hendricks, A.; Boness, K.; Ballard, L.; Bright, K.; Brill, K.; Cassady, S.; Castillo, K.; Dahlberg, H.; Dawe, C. Arizona Forest Resource Strategy. Available online: ftp://ftp.epa.gov/wed/ecoregions/pubs/Arizona-Forest-Resource-Strategy-2010.pdf (accessed on 23 January 2013).
77. Bailey, R.G. Ecoregions Map of North America : Explanatory Note; US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: Washington, DC, USA, 1998.
78. Hoekstra, J.M.; Molnar, J.L.; Jennings, M.; Revenga, C.; Spalding, M.D.; Boucher, T.M.; Robertson, J.C.; Heibel, T.J.; Ellison, K. The Atlas of Global Conservation: Changes, Challenges and Opportunities to Make a Difference; University of California Press: Berkeley, CA, USA, 2010.
79. Sotomayor, L. Terrestrial and Marine Ecoregions of the United States. Available online: http://gis.tnc.org/data/MapbookWebsite/map-page.php?map-id=103 (accessed on 23 January 2013).
80. National Wildlife Federation. Ecoregions. Available online: http://www.nwf.org/Wildlife/Wildlife-Conservation/Ecoregions.aspx (accessed on 23 January 2013).
81. US Department of Agriculture, Colorado State University. UV-B Monitoring Climatological and Research Network. Available online: http://uvb.nrel.colostate.edu/UVB/uvb-network.jsf (accessed on 23 January 2013).
82. Olson, D.M.; Dinerstein, E. The global 200: A representation approach to conserving the earth's most biologically valuable ecoregions. Conserv. Biol. 1998, 12, 502-515.
83. Omernik, J.M. Ecoregions: A Spatial Framework for Environmental Management. In Biological Asessment and Criteria: Tools for Water Resource Planning and Decision Making; Davis, W., Simon, T., Eds.; Lewis Publishing: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 1995; pp. 49-62.
84. Environmental Systems Resource Institute (ESRI). SDC Feature Database, World Continents; ESRI: Redlands, CA, USA, 2012.
85. US Geological Survey. Alaska Ecoregions Mapping. Available online: http://agdc.usgs.gov/data/usgs/erosafo/ecoreg (accessed on 23 January 2013).
86. US Environmental Protection Agency. Level III Ecoregions of the Continental United States. Available online: http://www.epa.gov/wed/pages/ecoregions/level-iii-iv.htm (accessed on 23 January 2013).
87. Wiken, E.B. Terrestrial Ecozones of Canada; Ecological Land Classification Series; Environment Canada: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 1986.
88. Wiken, E.B.; Gauthier, D.A.; Marshall, I.B.; Lawton, K.; Hirvonen, H. A Perspective on Canada's Ecosystems: An Overview of the Terrestrial and Marine Ecozones; Occasional Paper; Canadian Council on Ecological Areas: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 1996.
89. Bailey, R.G. Ecoregions of the United States (Scale: 1:7,500,000); USDA Forest Service: Ogden, UT, USA, 1976.
90. Köppen, W. Grundriss der Klimakunde; Walter de Gruyter: Berlin, Germany, 1931.
91. Bailey, R.G.; Cushwa, C.T. Ecoregions of North America (Scale: 1:12,000,000); US Fish and Wildlife Service: Washington, DC, USA, 1981.
92. Van Vliet, J.; Bregt, A.K.; Hagen-Zanker, A. Revisiting Kappa to account for change in the accuracy assessment of land-use change models. Ecol. Model. 2011, 222, 1367-1375.
93. Monserud, R.A.; Leemans, R. Comparing global vegetation maps with the Kappa statistic. Ecol. Model. 1992, 62, 275-293.
94. Foody, G.M. Thematic map comparison: Evaluating the statistical significance of differences in classification accuracy. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sensing 2004, 70, 627-633.
95. Visser, H.; de Nijs, T. The map comparison kit. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2006, 21, 346-358.
96. Anderson, M.; Comer, P.; Grossman, D.; Groves, C.; Poiani, K.; Reid, M.; Schneider, R.; Vickery, B.; Weakley, A. Guidelines for Representing Ecological Communities in Ecoregional Conservation Plans; Available online: http://conserveonline.org/workspaces/cbdgateway/era/standards/supportmaterials/std7sm/EcoregionConservation%20PlansGuide.pdf (accessed on 28 March 2013).
97. Rowe, J.S. Forest Regions of Canada; Information Canada: Ottawa, ON, Canada, 1972.
98. Viereck, L.A.; Little, E.L. Alaska Trees and Shrubs; Agriculture Handbook; US Department of Agriculture: Washington, DC, USA, 1972.