Sex and the state: Abortion, divorce, and the family under latin American dictatorships and democracies

Sex and the State: Abortion, Divorce, and the Family Under Latin American Dictatorships and Democracies

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 1-219

  Htun, Mala ^a  

^a NEW SCHOOL FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84929911568     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511615627     Document Type: Book

References (478)

1. Alan Guttmacher Institute. 1994. Aborto clandestino: Uma realidade latinoamericana. New York: Alan Guttmacher Institute.
2. Alan Guttmacher Institute. 1999. Sharing Responsibility: Women, Society and Abortion Worldwide. New York: Alan Guttmacher Institute.
3. Alatorre, Anna-Lizbeth. 1999. “Parties, Gender, and Democratization: The Causes and Consequences of Women’s Participation in the Mexican Congress.” B.A. Thesis, Harvard University.
4. Aldana Santin, Myriam. 2000. “Vozes da Igreja Católica na Câmara Federal.” Journal da RedeSaúde, no. 21 (September).
5. Alessandri Rodríguez, Arturo. 1932. “Comentario a Sabioncello con Hausmann.” Revista de derecho y jurisprudencia 29: 351-4.
6. Almond, Gabriel, and Sidney Verba. 1963. The Civic Culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
7. Alvarez, Sonia. E. 1990. Engendering Democracy in Brazil: Women’s Movements in Transition Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
8. Alvarez, Sonia A. 1998a. “…And Even Fidel Can’t Change That!: Trans/national Feminist Advocacy Strategies and Cultural Politics in Latin America.” Unpublished paper.
9. Alvarez, Sonia E. 1998b. “Latin American Feminisms ‘Go Global’: Trends of the 1990s and Challenges for the New Millenium.” In Sonia E. Alvarez, Evelina Dagnino, and Arturo Escobar, eds., Cultures of Politics: Politics of Cultures. Boulder: Westview. Pp. 293-324.
10. Alvear, Soledad. 1991. “Regimen patrimonial del matrimonio.” El Mercurio. September 8, 1991.
11. Alvear, Soledad. 1994. Una mirada integral. Santiago: Editorial Atena.
12. Alywin, Mariana. 1995. “Para su reflexión.” Ercilla, no. 2981 (January 27): 23.
13. Alywin, Mariana, and Ignacio Walker. 1996. Familia y divorcio: Razones de una posición. Santiago: Editorial Los Andes.
14. Alywin, Patricio. 1991. “Modifica el código civil en materia de regimen patrimonial del matrimonio y otros cuerpos legales que indica. Mensaje de S.E. el presidente de la republica.” Cámara de Diputados. Session 26, August 6.
15. Ames, Barry. 1995a. “Electoral Rules, Constituency Pressures, and Pork Barrel: Bases of Voting in the Brazilian Congress.” Journal of Politics 57, no. 2 (May): 324-43.
16. Ames, Barry. 1995b. “Electoral Strategy Under Open-List Proportional Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 39, no. 2 (May): 406-33.
17. Ames, Barry. 2001. The Deadlock of Democracy in Brazil. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
18. Ames, Barry. 2002. “Party Discipline in the Chamber of Deputies.” In Scott Morgenstern and Benito Nacif, eds., Legislative Politics in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 185-221.
19. Amorim Neto, Octavio. 2001. “The Puzzle of Party Discipline in Brazil.” Latin American Politics and Society 44, no. 1: 127-44.
20. Antecedentes Parlamentarios. 1998. Ley 23.515. “Matrimonio civil-divorcio vincu- lar.” Antecedentes Parlamentarios 5, no. 7 (July). Buenos Aires: La Ley.
21. Aquinas, Saint Thomas. 1988. The Summa of Theology. In St. Thomas Aquinas on Politics and Ethics, trans. and ed. Paul Sigmund. New York: W. W. Norton. Pp. 30-83.
22. Araújo, Maria José de Oliveira. 1993. “Aborto legal no hospital do Jabaquara.” Estudos Feministas I, no. 2: 424-8.
23. Archibald, Katherine. 1988. “The Concept of Social Hierarchy in the Writings of St. Thomas Aquinas.” In Paul Sigmund, ed., St. Thomas Aquinas on Politics and Ethics. New York: W. W. Norton. Pp. 136-42.
24. Ardaillon, Danielle. 1997. “Cidadania de corpo inteiro. Discursos sobre o aborto em número e gênero.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of São Paulo.
25. Baer, Judith. 1999. Our Lives Before the Law: Constructing a Feminist Jurisprudence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
26. Baldez, Lisa. 1998. “Democratic Institutions and Feminist Outcomes: Chilean Policy Toward Women in the 1990s.” Working Paper no. 340, Department of Political Science, Washington University.
27. Baldez, Lisa. 2001. “Coalition Politics and the Limits of State Feminism in Chile.” Women and Politics 22, no. 4: 1-36.
28. Baldez, Lisa. 2002. Why Women Protest: Women’s Movements in Chile. New York: Cambridge University Press.
29. Baldez, Lisa, and John Carey. 2001. “Budget Procedure and Fiscal Restraint in Posttransition Chile.” In Stephan Haggard and Mathew D. McCubbins, eds., Presidents, Parliaments, and Policy. New York: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 105-48.
30. Baltar da Rocha, Maria Isabel. 1993. “Política demográfica e parlamento: Debates de decisões sobre o controle da natalidade.” Textos NEPO 25. Campinas: UNICAMP.
31. Baltar da, Rocha, Maria Isabel. 1996. “O congresso nacional e a questão do aborto.” Unpublished manuscript.
32. Barra, Roberto. 1997. Los derechos delpor nacer en el ordenamiento jurídico argentino. Buenos Aires: Editorial Ábaco de Rodolfo Depalma.
33. Barrig, Maruja. 1997. “De cal y de arena. ONGs y movimiento de mujeres en Chile.” Unpublished paper.
34. Barros, Enrique. 1991. “Por un nuevo regimen de bienes del matrimonio.” Estudios Públicos, no. 43 (Winter): 139-66.
35. Barros, Enrique. 2002. “La ley civil ante las rupturas matrimoniales.” Estudios Públicos 85 (Summer): 5-15.
36. Barros, Robert J. 1997. “By Reason and Force: Military Constitutionalism in Chile, 1973-1989.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago.
37. Baumgartner, Frank R., and Bryan D. Jones. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38. Benhabib, Seyla. 1992. Situating the Self: Gender, Community, and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics. New York: Routledge.
39. Benhabib, Seyla. 1996. “Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy.” In Seyla Benhabib, ed., Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Pp. 67-94.
40. Berlin, Isaiah. 1969. Four Essays on Liberty. London: Oxford University Press.
41. Berry, Jeffrey M. 1989. “Subgovernments, Issues Networks, and Political Conflict.” In Richard Harris and Sidney Milkis, eds., Remaking American Politics. Boulder: Westview Press. Pp. 239-60.
42. Betto, Frei. 1992. “A questão do aborto por uma legislação em defesa da vida.” In Thais Corral, ed., Interrupção de gravidez. Rio de Janeiro: REDEH. Pp. 11-18.
43. Bidart Campos, German. 1987. “La Corte suprema y el divorcio vincular.” ElDerecho 121 (1987): 522-34.
44. Bidau, Joée F., Abel M. Fleitas, and Roberto Martinez Ruiz. 1968. “Nota de la Comisión Redactora al Secretario de Estado de Justicia.” Anales de la legislación argentina. Tomo 28-B. Buenos Aires: La Ley. Pp. 1811-12.
45. Binstock, Hannah. 1997. “Hacia la igualdad de la mujer: Avances legales desde la aprobacion de la convención sobre la eliminación de todas las formas de discrimi- nacion contra la mujer.” Paper prepared for CEPAL, Seventh Regional Conference on Women’s Integration into Economic and Social Development in Latin America and the Caribbean, Santiago, November 19 to 21.
46. Blofeld, Merike. 1998. “The Politics of Abortion in Chile and Argentina: Public Opinion, Social Actors and Discourse, and Political Agendas.” Paper prepared for the 1998 meeting of the Latin American Studies Association, Chicago, September 24-26.
47. Blofeld, Merike. 2001. “The Politics of ‘Moral Sin’: A Study of Abortion and Divorce in Catholic Chile Since 1990.” Nueva Serie FLACSO. Santiago: FLACSO.
48. Borda, Guillermo, and Conrado Etchebarne. 1968. “Nota al poder ejecutivo acompañado el proyecto de ley 17.711.” Anales de la legislacion argentina. Tomo 28-B. Buenos Aires: La Ley. Pp. 1810-11.
49. Boutros-Ghali, Boutros. 1996. “Introduction.” In The United Nations and the Advancement of Women. New York: United Nations. Pp. 3-74.
50. Brito, Eugenia. 1997. Roles sexuales: Diversas escenas. In Olga Grau, Riet Diesling, Eugenia Brito, and Alejandra Farías. Discurso, género y poder. Discursos públicos: Chile 1978-1993. Santiago: LOM Ediciones. Pp. 65-91.
51. Brown, Wendy. 1995. States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
52. Burdick, Michael A. 1995. For God and the Fatherland: Religion and Politics in Argentina. Albany: SUNY Press.
53. Butler Flora, Cornelia. 1984. “Socialist Feminism in Latin America.” Women and Politics 4, no. 1 (Spring): 69-93.
54. Candioti, Enrique. 2000. “Igualdad entre los géneros, desarollo y paz para el siglo XXI: Beijing +5.” Intervención del Jefe de la Delegación Argentina, Embajador Enrique Candioti, Secretario de Estado de Relaciones Exteriores. 23a sesión especial de la asamblea general de las Naciones Unidas, June 8, 2000.
55. Cardoso, Fernando Henrique. 1979. “On the Characterization of Authoritarian Regimes in Latin America.” In David Collier, ed., The New Authoritarianism in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Pp. 33-57.
56. Carey, John. 1997. “Institutional Design and Party Systems.” In Larry Diamond et al., eds., Consolidating the Third World Democracies. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Pp. 67-92.
57. Carey, John. 2002. “Parties, Coalitions, and the Chilean Congress in the 1990s.” In Scott Morgenstern and Benito Nacif, eds., Legislative Politics in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 222-53.
58. Carmines, Edward G., and James A. Stimson. 1980. “The Two Faces of Issue Voting.” American Political Science Review 74, no. 1 (March): 78-91.
59. Carneiro, Nelson. 1973. “E a luta continua….” In A Luta pelo divorcio. Rio de Janeiro. Pp. 13-21.
60. Carneiro, Nelson. 1976. “Proposta de emenda à constituição no. 4, de 1975.” In Palavras. Leva-as ao vento V. Brasília: Senado Federal. Pp. 153-61.
61. Carneiro, Nelson. 1985a. “Direitos civis da mulher casada.” In Palavras: Leva-as ao vento, vol. 10. Brasília: Senado Federal. Pp. 43-54.
62. Carneiro, Nelson. 1985b. “… E a gota d’àigua venceu!” In Palavras: Leva-as ao vento, vol. 10. Brasília: Senado Federal. Pp. 123-33.
63. Carneiro, Nelson. 1991. “Ainda o ciodigo civil.” In Palavras: Leva-as ao vento, vol. 12. Brasília: Senado Federal. Pp. 115-26.
64. Casanova, José. 1994. Public Religions in the Modern World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
65. Casas, Lidia. 1993. “La Despenalización del aborto.” Revista de la Academia de Derecho 2 (October): 35-62.
66. Casas, Lidia. 1996. Mujeres procesadas por aborto. Santiago: Foro Abierto de Salud y Derechos Reproductivos.
67. Cascudo Rodrigues, João Batista. 1962. A mulher brasileira: Direitos politicos e civis. Rio de Janeiro: Renes.
68. Centro da Mulher Brasileira. 1975. “Texto do centro da mulher brasileira fazendo considerações sobre a situação da mulher e a constitucionalidade do novo Código Civil brasileiro.” Rio de Janeiro, September 8.
69. Centro de Estudios Públicos (CEP). 1987. Estudio social y de opinión pública en la población de Santiago. Documento de Trabajo no. 83 (May).
70. Centro de Estudios Públicos (CEP). 1991a. Estudio sobre opinión pública. Documento de Trabajo no. 170 (December).
71. Centro de Estudios Públicos (CEP). 1991b. Estudio social y de opinión pública, diciembre de 1990. Documento de Trabajo no. 151 (February).
72. Centro de Estudios Públicos (CEP). 1991c. Estudio social y de opinión pública, septiembre a octubre de 1991. Documento de Trabajo no. 170 (December).
73. Centro de Estudios Públicos (CEP). 1995. Tema especial. LaMujer chilena hoy: Trabajo, familia, yvalores. Documento de Trabajo no. 237 (August).
74. Centro Legal para Derechos Reproductivos y Políticas Públicas y Grupo de Información en Reproducción Elegida (CRLP/GIRE). 1997. Derechos reproductivos de la mujer en México: Un reporte sombra.
75. Cerda Varas, Fernando. 1943. “Regimen de participación en los gananciales establecido como regimen matrimonial ordinario o sin pacto expreso.” In Federação Interamericana de Advogados, Anais da Segunda Conferência, vol. 5. Rio de Janeiro, August 7-12. Pp. 31-49.
76. CFEMEA. 1997. Dossiê. Aborto Legal.
77. Charlton, Sue Ellen M., Jana Everett, and Kathleen Staudt, eds. 1989. Women, the State, and Development. Albany: SUNY Press.
78. Charrad, Mounira. 2001. States and Women’s Rights: The Making of Postcolonial Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco. Berkeley: University of California Press.
79. Chuchryk, Patricia. 1989. “Subversive Mothers: The Women’s Opposition to the Military Regime in Chile.” In Sue Ellen Charlton, Jana Everett, and Kathleen Staudt, eds., Women, the State, and Development. Albany: SUNY Press. Pp. 130-51.
80. Chuchryk, Patricia. 1994. “From Dictatorship to Democracy: The Women’s Movement in Chile.” In Jane Jaquette, ed., The Women’s Movement in Latin America. Boulder: Westview. Pp. 65-107.
81. Claro, Gloria. 1997. “La Mujer: Igualdad ante la legislación en el plano patrimonial.” Unpublished manuscript.
82. CNBB. 1997. “Declaração da CNBB em favor da vida e contra o aborto.”
83. CNDM. 1986. “Campanha ‘Mulher e Constituente.’ Programa Geral de Campanha Aprovado pelo CNDM em 1985.” Archive of Comba Marques Porto, National Archives, Rio de Janeiro.
84. Código Criminal do Imperio do Brasil. 1861. Ed. Carlos Antonio Cordeiro. Rio de Janeiro: Quirino e Irmão.
85. Código Penal de la República Argentina. 1887. Ed. Julian L. Aguirre. Buenos Aires: Félix LaJouane.
86. Código Penal de la República de Chile. 1889. Edición Oficial. Santiago: Imprenta Nacional.
87. Código Penal de la República Oriental de Uruguay. 1933. 2nd ed., Montevideo: Fundación de Cultura Universitaria, 1986.
88. Código Penal do Brazil [sic]. 1913. Ed. Antonio Bento de Faria. Rio de Janeiro: J. Ribeiro dos Santos.
89. Código Penal. 37th ed. São Paulo: Saraiva.
90. Cohen, Jean. 2002. Regulating Intimacy: A New Legal Paradigm. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
91. Cohen, Jean, and Andrew Arato. 1992. Civil Society and Political Theory. Cambridge: MIT Press.
92. Comisión Intersectorial para la Prevención de Embarazo Adolescente. n.d. “Jornadas comunitarias de conversacion sobre afectividad y sexualidad. Guia de trabajo.”
93. Comisión Nacional de la Familia. 1993. Informe. Santiago: SERNAM.
94. Conferencia Episcopal Argentina. 1984a. “Construyamos juntos la nacion.” Criterio, no. 1935 (November 22): 667-70.
95. Conferencia Episcopal Argentina. 1984b. “Democracia, responsabilidad y esperanza.” Criterio, no. 1921 (April 26): 162-5.
96. Conferencia Episcopal Argentina. 1984c. “Mensaje de los obispos argentinos sobre el matrimonio indisoluble.” Criterio, no. 1921 (April 26): 166-8.
97. Constitución Política de la República de Chile. 1980. 5th ed., Santiago: Editorial Jurídica de Chile, 1996.
98. Constituicao da Republica Federativa do Brasil. 1996.13 th ed. Ed. Juarez de Oliveira. Sao Paulo: Editora Saraiva.
99. Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW). 1979. Text in The United Nations and the Advancement of Women. New York: United Nations. Pp. 244-50.
100. Corral, Hernan. 1994. “Mujer y igualdad juridica: El Derecho a los mismos derechos?” Temas de Derecho 9, no. 2 (July-December): 77-88.
101. Corral, Hernan. 1997. “Iniciativas legales sobre familia y divorcio: La perspectiva del derecho civil.” In Controversia sobre familia y divorcio. Santiago: Ediciones Universidad Católica de Chile. Pp. 130-205.
102. Corrêa, Sonia. 1994. Population and Reproductive Rights: Feminist Perspectives from the South. London: Zed Books.
103. Corrêa, Sonia. 2000. “Pequim +5 e a discriminalização do aborto na América Latina.” Journal da RedeSaúde, no. 21 (September).
104. Cousiño Valdés, Carlos. 1997. “Divorcio y opinión pública.” In Controversia sobre familia y divorcio. Santiago: Ediciones Universidad Católica de Chile. Pp. 67-92.
105. Craske, Nikki. 1999. Women and Politics in Latin America. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
106. Creus, Carlos. 1995. Derecho penal. Parte especial. Tomo i. Buenos Aires: Astrea.
107. Criterio. 1985. “Cuestiones de familia” (Editorial). Criterio 58, no. 1941 (April 11): 113-14.
108. CRLP. 1999. Reproductive Freedom News.
109. Crossette, Barbara. 1998. “A Global Divide on Abortion Splits Poor from Rich.” New York Times, June 7, 1998, sec. 4, p. 16.
110. Crummett, María de los Angeles. 1977. “El Poder Feminino: The Mobilization of Women against Socialism in Chile.” Latin American Perspectives 4, no. 4 (Fall): 103-13.
111. Cury Urzua, Enrique. 1992. Derecho penal. Parte general, tomo I. 2nd ed. Santiago: Editorial Jurídica de Chile.
112. Dacah, Solange. 1993. “As tentativas de legislar a interrupção de gravidez.” In Thais Corral, ed., Interrupção de Gravidez. Rio de Janeiro: REDEH. Pp. 23-5.
113. Deus Simões, Solange. 1985. Deus, patria e família: As mulheres no golpe de 1964. Petrópolis: Vozes.
114. Deutsch, Karl. 1971. “Social Mobilization and Political Development.” In Jason Finkle and Richard Gable, eds., Political Development and Social Change, 2nd. ed. New York: Wiley. Pp. 384-405.
115. Díaz Vergara, Carlos. 1997. “Consecuencias económicas y sociales de la aceptación de una ley de divorcio vincular.” In Controversia sobre familia y divorcio. Santiago: Ediciones Universidad Católica de Chile. Pp. 33-65.
116. Diamond, Larry. 1999. Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
117. Dinardi, Graciela, Monica Gogna, and Silvina Ramos. N.d. “The Politics of Abortion in Argentina: Reflections on the National Constitution Reform.” Unpublished paper.
118. Dirección Nacional de la Mujer. 1984. “Taller I: La Discriminación de la mujer en el derecho de la familia. Propuestas y recomendaciones ante la ratificación de la N.U. para la Eliminación de Todas las Formas de Discriminación contra la Mujer.” Buenos Aires: Secretaría de Desarollo Humano y Familia.
119. Dolinger, Jacob. 1966. A capacidade civil da mulher casada. Rio de Janeiro: Biblos.
120. Domínguez, Jorge I. 1978. Cuba: Order and Revolution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
121. Domínguez, Jorge I. 1998. “Free Politics and Free Markets in Latin America.” Journal of Democracy 9, no. 4 (October): 70-84.
122. Dore, Elizabeth. 2000. “One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: Gender and the State in the Long Nineteenth Century.” In Elizabeth Dore and Maxine Molyneux, eds., Hidden Histories of Gender and the State in Latin America. Durham: Duke University Press. Pp. 3-22.
123. Dore, Elizabeth, and Maxine Molyneux, eds. 2000. Hidden Histories of Gender and the State in Latin America. Durham: Duke University Press.
124. Drogus, Carol Ann. 1997. Women, Religion, and Social Change in Brazil’s Popular Church. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
125. Dryzek, John. 1990. Discursive Democracy: Politics, Policy and Political Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
126. Dubkin, Claudia. 1994. “Aborto.” Para Ti, no. 3760 (August).
127. Durand, Teresa, and Maria Alicia Gutiérrez. 1998. “Cuerpo de mujer: Considera- ciones sobre los derechos sociales, sexuales y reproductivos en la Argentina.” In Mujeres sanas: Ciudadanas libres (o elpoder para decidir). Buenos Aires: Foro por los Derechos Reproductivos/CLADEM/FEIM. Pp. 3-44.
128. Dworkin, Ronald. 1984. “Liberalism.” In Michael Sandel, ed., Liberalism and Its Critics. New York: New York University Press. Pp. 60-79.
129. Eckstein, Susan. 1989. “Power and Popular Protest in Latin America.” In Power and Popular Protest: Latin American Social Movements. Berkeley: University of California Press. Pp. 1-60.
130. Engels, Friedrich. 1884. “The Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State.” In Robert C. Tucker, ed., The Marx-Engels Reader. New York: W. W. Norton, 1978.
131. Ergas, Yasmine. 1982. “1968-1979 - Feminism and the Italian Party System: Women’s Politics in a Decade of Turmoil.” Comparative Politics 14, no. 3 (April): 253-79.
132. Etchebarne, Conrado. 1967. “Disertación del secretario de estado de justicia Dr. Conrado J. Etchebarne: Pronunciada en el colegio de abogados de la ciudad de Buenos Aires, con motivo de la XVI conferencia interamericana de abogados.” Buenos Aires: Secretaría de Estado de Justicia.
133. Familias por la Familia. n.d. “Treinta y tres razones para defender la familia y evitar el divorcio.” Pamphlet.
134. Farrell, Michael J. 1995. “Irish Vote for Divorce Ends Era of Church’s Social Dominance.” National Catholic Reporter (December 8): 19.
135. Feijoó, María del Carmen. 1998. “Democratic Participation and Women in Argentina.” In Jane S. Jaquette and Sharon L. Wolchik, eds., Women and Democracy: Latin America and Central and Eastern Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Pp. 29-46.
136. Feijoó, María del Carmen, and Marcela María Alejandra Nari. 1994. “Women and Democracy in Argentina.” In Jane S. Jaquette, ed., The Women’s Movement in Latin America. Boulder: Westview. Pp. 109-29.
137. Feijoó, María del Carmen, and Marcela M. A. Nari. 1996. “Women in Argentina During the 1960s.” Latin American Perspectives 23, no. 1 (Winter): 7-26.
138. Ferreira Filho, Manoel Gonçalves. 1992. “Fundamental Aspects of the 1988 Constitution.” In Jacob Dolinger and Keith S. Rosenn, eds., A Panorama of Brazilian Law. Miami: North South Center Press. Pp. 11-25.
139. Figueiredo, Argelina, and Fernando Limongi. 1999. Executivo e legislativo na nova ordem constitucional. Rio de Janeiro: Editora FGV.
140. Figueiredo, Argelina, and Fernando Limongi. 2000. “Presidential Power, Legislative Organization, and Party Behavior in Brazil.” Comparative Politics 32, no. 2 (January): 151-70.
141. Filc, Judith. 1997. Entre el parentesco y la polltica: Familia y dictadura, 1976-1983. Buenos Aires: Editorial Biblos.
142. Finnis, John. 1998. Aquinas: Moral, Political, and Legal Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
143. FLACSO. 1992a. Mujeres latinoamericanas en cifras. Brasil. Santiago: FLACSO.
144. FLACSO. 1992b. Mujeres latinoamericanas en cifras. Chile. Santiago: FLACSO.
145. FLACSO. 1993. Mujeres latinoamericanas en cifras. Argentina. Santiago: FLACSO.
146. FLACSO. 1995. Latin American Women. Compared Figures. Santiago: FLACSO.
147. Fleet, Michael, and Brian Smith. 1997. The Catholic Church and Democracy in Chile and Peru. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
148. Fleischer, David. 1995. Las Consecuencias políticas del sistema electoral brasileño: Partidos políticos, poder legislativo y gobernabilidad. San José: IIDH/CAPEL.
149. Fleishman, Rishona. 2000. “The Battle Against Reproductive Rights: The Impact of the Catholic Church on Abortion Law in Both International and Domestic Arenas.” Emory International Law Review 14 (Spring): 277-314.
150. Foley, Nadine. 1977. “Woman in Vatican Documents. i960 to the Present.” In James A. Coriden, ed., Sexism and Church Law: Equal Rights and Affirmative Action. New York: Paulist Press. Pp. 82-108.
151. Fonseca, Gelson. 1958. Divorcio para os nao-catolicos. Rio de Janeiro: Josl Konfino.
152. Fontan Balestra, Carlos. 1983. Tratado de Derecho Penal, tomo 4. Buenos Aires: Abeledo-Perrot.
153. Fontan Balestra, Carlos. 1991. Derecho penal. Parte especial. 13th ed. Buenos Aires: Abeledo-Perrot.
154. Fragoso, Heleno Cláudio. 1987a. Lições de direito penal: A nova parte geral. IIth ed. Rio de Janeiro: Forense.
155. Fragoso, Heleno Cláudio. 1987b. Lições de direito penal: Parte especial, vol. I. 9th ed. Rio de Janeiro: Forense.
156. Franco, Jean. 1998. “Defrocking the Vatican: Feminism’s Secular Project.” In Sonia E. Alvarez, Evelina Dagnino, and Arturo Escobar, eds., Cultures of Politics: Politics of Cultures. Boulder: Westview. Pp. 278-89.
157. Fraser, Nancy. 1997. Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the “Postsocialist” Condition. New York: Routledge.
158. Fraser, Nancy, and Linda Nicholson. 1990. “Social Criticism without Philosophy: An Encounter between Feminism and Postmodernism.” In Linda Nicholson, ed., Feminism/Postmodernism. New York: Routledge. Pp. 19-38.
159. Friedman, Elisabeth. 2000. Unfinished Transitions: Women and the Gendered Development of Democracy in Venezuela, 1936-1996. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
160. Frohmann, Alicia, and Teresa Valdez. 1993. “Democracy in the Country and in the Home: the Women’s Movement in Chile.” FLACSO Series Estudios Sociales no. 55. Santiago: FLACSO.
161. Frug, Mary Joe. 1992. “A Postmodern Feminist Legal Manifesto (An Unfinished Draft).” Harvard Law Review 105, no. 5 (March): 1045-75.
162. Fuente Noriega, Margarita. 1986. La patria potestad compartida en el código civil español. Madrid: Editorial Montecorro.
163. Fukuyama, Francis. 1995. Trust: The Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New York: Free Press.
164. Furtado, Cid. 1975. Parecer No. 43 da Comissão Mista, sobre PECs 4 e 5 de 1975. Brasília: Congresso Nacional.
165. Gacitúa, Andrés. 1991. “Algunos aspectos de la realidad en las estadísticas demográficas y judiciales.” In Nos habíamos amado tanto: Un aporte al debate sobre divorcio en Chile. Santiago: CORSAPS. Pp. 31-9.
166. Garretón, Manuel Antonio. 1995. “Redemocratization in Chile.” Journal of Democracy 6, no. 1 (January): 146-58.
167. Gaudiem etspes. 1965. In The Sixteen Documents of Vatican II, ed. Marianne Lorraine Trouvé. Boston: Pauline Books and Media, 1999. Pp. 615-719.
168. Gauri, Varun. 1998. School Choice in Chile: Two Decades of Educational Reform. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
169. Gayán, Patricio. 1993. “El Aborto terapéutico desde el punto de vista gineco- obstétrico.” In Simposio nacional: Leyes para la salud y vida de las mujeres. Hablemos de aborto terapéutico. Santiago: Foro Abierto de Salud y Derechos Reproductivos.
170. Geddes, Barbara. 1995. “The Politics of Economic Liberalization.” Latin American Research Review 30, no. 2: 195-214.
171. Geertz, Clifford. 1973. “Thick Description: Toward an Interpretive Theory of Culture.” In The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books. Pp. 3-30.
172. Gelb, Joyce. 1989. Feminism and Politics: A Comparative Perspective. Berkeley: University of California Press.
173. Gelb, Joyce. 1996. “Abortion and Reproductive Choice: Policy and Politics in Japan.” In Marianne Githens and Dorothy McBride Stetson, eds., Abortion Politics: Public Policy in Cross-Cultural Perspective. New York: Routledge. Pp. 119-37.
174. Gelb, Joyce, and Marian Lief Palley. 1996. Women and Public Policies. New ed. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
175. Germani, Gino. 1955. Estructura social de la Argentina: Análisis estadístico. Buenos Aires: Editorial Raigal.
176. Ghio, José María. 1991. “The Latin American Church in the Wojtyla’s Era: New Evangelization or ‘Neo-Integralism’?” Working Paper no. 159. University of Torcuato di Tella.
177. Ghio, José María. 1996. “The Catholic Church and Politics in Argentina.” Ph.D. dissertation, Columbia University.
178. Gilfeather, Katherine. 1979. “Women Religious, the Poor, and the Institutional Church in Chile.” Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 21, no. 1 (February): 129-55.
179. Gilheany, Barry. 1998. “The State and the Discursive Construction of Abortion.” In Vicky Randall and Georgina Waylen, eds., Gender, Politics and the State. London: Routledge. Pp. 58-79.
180. Gill, Anthony. 1998. Rendering unto Caesar: The Catholic Church and the State in Latin America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
181. Gill, Anthony. 1999. “The Struggle to Be a Soul Provider.” In Christian Smith and Joshua Prokopy, eds., Latin American Religion in Motion. New York: Routledge. Pp. 17-42.
182. Githens, Marianne. 1996. “Reproductive Rights and the Struggle with Change in Eastern Europe.” In Marianne Githens and Dorothy McBride Stetson, eds., Abortion Politics: Public Policy in Cross-Cultural Perspective. New York: Routledge. Pp. 54-68.
183. Glendon, Mary Ann. 1987. Abortion and Divorce in Western Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
184. Glendon, Mary Ann. 1989. The Transformation of Family Law: State, Law and the Family in the United States and Western Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
185. Glendon, Mary Ann, Michael Wallace Gordon, and Christopher Osakwe. 1982. Comparative Legal Traditions in a Nutshell. St. Paul: West Publishing.
186. Goldman, Wendy. 1991. “Women, Abortion, and the State, 1917-36.” In Barbara Evans Clements, Barbara Alpern Engel, and Christine D. Worobec, eds., Russia’s Women. Berkeley: University of California Press. Pp. 243-66.
187. Gomes, Orlando. 1984. O novo direito de familia. Porto Alegre: Sergio Antonio Fabris Editor.
188. Gonzales, Encarna Bodelon. 1994. “Spain.” In Bill Rolston and Anna Eggert, eds., Abortion in the New Europe: A Comparative Handbook. Westport: Greenwood Press. Pp. 229-36.
189. Gonzales, Victoria, and Karen Kampwirth, eds. 2001. Radical Women in Latin America: Left and Right. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
190. Gonzales Moya, Carlos A. 1992. Nueva ley de la mujer. Santiago: Editora Jurídica Manuel Montt S.A.
191. Goode, William J. 1993. World Changes in Divorce Patterns. New Haven: Yale University Press.
192. Gordon, Linda. 1976. Woman’s Body, Woman’s Right: A Social History of Birth Control in America. New York: Grossman.
193. Gourevitch, Peter. 1978. “The Second Image Reversed: The International Sources of Domestic Politics.” International Organization 32, no. 4 (Autumn): 881-912.
194. Grau, Olga, Raquel Olea, and Francisa Pérez. 1998. “El Género en apuros.” Draft. Santiago: Corporación de Desarollo de la Mujer La Morada, Grupo Iniciativa Chile.
195. Grondona, Mariano. 1999. Las Condiciones culturales del desarollo económico. Buenos Aires: Ariel-Planeta.
196. Grosman, Cecilia. 1976. “Situación de la mujer en la familia argentina.” Universitas, no. 51 (December): 319-41.
197. Grosman, Cecilia P. 1998. “El Derecho de familia en la Argentina en los umbrales del siglo XXI.” Unpublished manuscript.
198. Grupo Iniciativa. 1999. “Encuesta nacional: Opinión y actitudes de las mujeres chilenas sobre la condición de género.”
199. Gutiérrez, María Alicia. 1998. “‘Parirás con Dolor’: Aborto, derechos sexuales y reproductivos en la cosmovisión eclesiástica.” In Nuestros cuerpos, nuestras vidas: Propuestas para la promoción de los derechos sexuales y reproductivos. Buenos Aires: Foro por los Derechos Reproductivos. Pp. 75-93.
200. Gutmann, Amy, and Dennis Thompson. 1996. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
201. Guy, Donna. 2000. “Parents Before the Tribunals: The Legal Construction of Patriarchy in Argentina.” In Elizabeth Dore and Maxine Molyneux, eds., Hidden Histories of Gender and the State in Latin America. Durham: Duke University Press. Pp. 172-93.
202. Guzmán, Jaime. 1997. “Reflexiones acerca del divorcio.” Fundación Jaime Guzmán E. (September).
203. Haas, Liesl. 2000. “Legislating Equality: Institutional Politics and the Expansion of Women’s Rights in Chile.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
204. Haas, Liesl. 2001. “Changing the System from Within? Feminist Participation in the Brazilian Workers’ Party.” In Victoria Gonzáles and Karen Kampwirth, eds., Radical Women in Latin America: Left and Right. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press. Pp. 249-71.
205. Habermas, Jürgen. 1990. “Discourse Ethics: Notes on a Program of Philosophical Justification.” In Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. Cambridge: MIT Press.
206. Habermas, Jürgen. 1996a. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press.
207. Habermas, Jürgen. 1996b. “Three Normative Models of Democracy.” In Seyla Benhabib, ed., Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Pp. 21-30.
208. Hagopian, Frances. 1990. “‘Democracy by Undemocratic Means?’ Elites, Political Pacts, and Regime Transition in Brazil.” Comparative Political Studies 23, no. 2 (July): 147-66.
209. Hall, Peter. 1992. “The Movement from Keynesianism to Monetarism: Institutional Analysis and British Economic Policy in the 1970s.” In Sven Steinmo, Kathleen Thelen, and Frank Longstreth, eds., Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 90-113.
210. Hall, Peter. 1993. “Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State: The Case of Economic Policymaking in Britain.” Comparative Politics 25, no. 3 (April): 275-96.
211. Hall, Peter, and Rosemary Taylor. 1996. “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms.” Political Studies 44: 936-57.
212. Harrison, Lawrence, and Samuel P. Huntington, eds. 2000. Culture Matters: Values and Human Progress. New York: Basic Books.
213. Hart, H. L. A. 1994. The Concept of Law. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
214. Hebblethwaite, Peter. 1990. “The Vatican’s Latin America Policy.” In Dermot Keogh, ed., Church and Politics in Latin America. New York: St. Martin’s Press. Pp. 49-64.
215. Heclo, Hugh. 1978. “Issue Networks and the Executive Establishment.” In Anthony King, ed., The New American Political System. Washington: American Enterprise Institute. Pp. 87-124.
216. Hegel, G. W. F. 1991. Elements of the Philosophy of Right. Ed. Allen W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
217. Hortal, Jesus. 1991. O que deus uniu: Lições de direito matrimonial canônico. São Paulo: Edições Loyola.
218. Htun, Mala N. 1998. “Women’s Political Participation, Representation, and Leadership in Latin America.” Women’s Leadership Conference of the Americas Issue Brief. Washington, D.C.: Inter-American Dialogue/International Center for Research on Women.
219. Htun, Mala. 2001a. “Advancing Women’s Rights in the Americas: Achievements and Challenges.” Working Paper. Leadership Council for Inter-American Summitry, North-South Center, University of Miami.
220. Htun, Mala. 2001b. “Women’s Leadership in Latin America: Trends and Challenges.” In Politics Matters: A Dialogue of Women Political Leaders. Washington, D.C.: Inter-American Dialogue. Pp. 13-26.
221. Htun, Mala. 2002. “Mujeres y poder político en Latinoamérica.” In Mujeres en el Parlamento. Más allá de los números. Stockholm: International IDEA.
222. Htun, Mala N., and Mark P. Jones. 2002. “Engendering the Right to Participate in Decisionmaking: Electoral Quotas and Women’s Leadership in Latin America.” In Nikki Craske and Maxine Molyneux, eds., Gender and the Politics of Rights and Democracy in Latin America. London: Palgrave. Pp. 32-56.
223. Hungria, Nelson. 1942. Comentários ao código penal, vol. 5. Rio de Janeiro: Forense.
224. Hunter, Wendy. 1995. “Politicians against Soldiers: Contesting the Military in Postauthoritarian Brazil.” Comparative Politics 27 (July): 425-43.
225. Huntington, Samuel P. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
226. Inglehart, Ronald. 1997. Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
227. Instituto de Docencia y Investigación Jurídica. 1973. Informe sobre futura ley de divorcio vincular. Valparaíso: Edeval.
228. Instituto Interamericano de, Derechos Humanos (IIDH). 1997. Protección internacional de los derechos humanos de las mujeres. San José: IIDH/CLADEM.
229. Inter-American Bar Association (IABA). 1943. Anais da segunda conferencia, vol. 5. Rio de Janeiro, August 7-12.
230. Inter-American Bar Association (IABA). 1945. Themes and Resolutions of the Fourth Conference of the Inter-American Bar Association.
231. Inter-American Bar Association (IABA). 1969. Resolutions, Recommendations, and Declarations approved by XVI Conference. Caracas, Venezuela, November 1-8.
232. Inter-American Development Bank. 2000. Development Beyond Economics. Economic and Social Progress in Latin America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
233. Inter-American Dialogue. 2001. Women and Power in the Americas. A Report Card. Washington, D.C.: Inter-American Dialogue.
234. Jackman, Robert W., and Ross A. Miller. 1996. “A Renaissance of Political Culture?” American Journal of Political Science 40, no. 3 (August): 632-59.
235. Jacob, Herbert. 1988. Silent Revolution: The Transformation of Divorce Law in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
236. Jaquette, Jane S. 1994. “Introduction: From Transition to Participation - Women’s Movements and Democratic Politics.” In Jane S. Jaquette, ed., The Women’s Movement in Latin America. Boulder: Westview. Pp. 1-11.
237. Jaquette, Jane S., and Sharon L. Wolchik. 1998. “Women and Democratization in Latin America and Central and Eastern Europe: A Comparative Introduction.” In Jaquette and Wolchik, eds., Women and Democracy: Latin America and Central and Eastern Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Pp. 1-28.
238. Jiménez de Asúa, Luis. 1942. Libertad de amar y derecho a morir: Ensayos de un crimi- nalista sobre eugenesia y euthanasia. Rev. ed. Buenos Aires: Losada.
239. Jiménez de Asúa, Luis. 1943. Cuestiones penales de eugenesia, filosofia y poli'tica. Sucre: Facultad de Derecho, Ciencias Políticas y Sociales.
240. Jones, Mark P. 1997a. “Evaluating Argentina’s Presidential Democracy: 1983- 1995.” In Scott Mainwaring and Matthew Soberg Shugart, eds., Presidential- ism and Democracy in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 259-99.
241. Jones, Mark P. 1997b. “Gender and Legislator Policy Priorities in the Argentine Chamber of Deputies and the United States House of Representatives,” Policy Studies Journal 25, no. 4 (Winter): 613-29.
242. Jones, Mark P., Sebastian Saiegh, Pablo T. Spiller, and Mariano Tommasi. 2002. “Amateur Legislators - Professional Politicians: The Consequences of Party- Centered Electoral Rules in a Federal System.” American Journal of Political Science 46, no. 3 (July): 656-69.
243. Jones, Mark P. 2002. “Explaining the High Level of Party Discipline in the Argentine Congress.” In Scott Morgenstern and Benito Nacif, eds., Legislative Politics in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 147-84.
244. Katzenstein, Mary. 1987. “Comparing the Feminist Movements of the United States and Western Europe: An Overview.” In Mary Katzenstein and Carol Mueller, eds., The Women’s Movements of the United States and Western Europe. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. Pp. 3-20.
245. Katznelson, Ira. 1997. “Structure and Configuration in Comparative Politics.” In Mark Irving Lichbach and Alan S. Zuckerman, eds., Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, Structure. New York: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 81-112.
246. Kaufman, Robert, and Barbara Stallings. 1989. “Debt and Democracy in the 1980s: The Latin American Experience.” In Barbara Stallings and Robert Kaufman, eds., Debt and Democracy in Latin America. Boulder: Westview Press. Pp. 201-23.
247. Keck, Margaret, and Kathryn Sikkink. 1998. Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in Transnational Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
248. Kerber, Linda K. 1998. No Constitutional Right to Be Ladies: Women and the Obligations of Citizenship. New York: Hill and Wang.
249. Ketting, Evert, and Philip van Praag. 1986. “The Marginal Relevance of Legislation Relating to Induced Abortion.” In Joni Lovenduski and Joyce Outshoorn, eds., The New Politics of Abortion. London: Sage Publications. Pp. 154-69.
250. King, Gary, Robert O. Keohane, and Sidney Verba. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
251. Kirchheimer, Otto. 1990. “The Catch-All Party.” In Peter Mair, ed., The West European Party System. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 50-60.
252. Kirkwood, Julieta. 1990. Ser política en Chile: Los Nudos de la sabiduria feminista. Santiago: Editorial Cuarto Propio.
253. Kissling, Frances. 1989. “Epilogo.” In Ana Maria Portugal, ed., Mujeres e iglesia: Sexualidad e aborto en America Latina. Mexico: Distribuciones Fontamara. Pp. 113-18.
254. Klaiber, Jeffrey, S. J. 1998. The Church, Dictatorships, and Democracy in Latin America. Maryknoll: Orbis Books.
255. Klimpel, Felícitas. 1962. La Mujer chilena (El Aporte femenino al progreso de Chile) 1910-1960. Santiago: Editorial Andres Bello.
256. Kogut, Edy Luiz. 1976. Analise economica do fenômeno demográfico no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: Fundação Getulio Vargas.
257. Kohli, Atul, et al. 1995. “The Role of Theory in Comparative Politics: A Symposium.” World Politics 48, no. 1 (October): 1-49.
258. Krotsch, Carlos Pedro. 1988. “Iglesia, educacion y Congreso Pedagógico Nacional.” In Ana María Ezcurra, ed., Iglesia y transición democrática. Buenos Aires: Pantosur. Pp. 205-50.
259. Lagomarsino, Carlos, and Jorge Uriarte. 1991. Separación personal y divorcio. Buenos Aires: Editorial Universidad.
260. Lamounier, Bolívar. 1999. “Brazil: Inequality against Democracy.” In Larry Diamond, Jonathan Hartlyn, and Juan J. Linz, eds., Democracy in Developing Countries: Latin America, 2nd ed. Boulder: Lynne Rienner. Pp. 131-89.
261. Larraín, Hernan. 1994. “Moción: Aumenta penalización del aborto.” República de Chile, Senado. Boletín 1302-07.
262. Lavrín, Asunción. 1995. Women, Feminism, and Social Change in Argentina, Chile, and Uruguay, 1890-1940. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
263. Leonard, Virginia. 1989. Politicians, Pupils, and Priests: Argentine Education since 1943. New York: Peter Lang.
264. Levine, Daniel. 1973. Conflict and Political Change in Venezuela. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
265. Levine, Daniel H. 1990. “The Catholic Church and Politics in Latin America: Basic Trends and Likely Futures.” In Dermot Keogh, ed., Church and Politics in Latin America. New York: St. Martin’s Press. Pp. 25-48.
266. Levine, Daniel, and Scott Mainwaring. 1989. “Religion and Popular Protest in Latin America: Contrasting Experiences.” In Susan Eckstein, ed., Power and Popular Protest: Latin American Social Movements. Berkeley: University of California Press. Pp. 203-40.
267. Lewis, Jane. 1992. “Gender and the Development of Welfare Regimes.” Journal of European Social Policy 2, no. 3: 159-73.
268. Libertad y Desarollo. 1991. “Comentários al proyecto que legaliza el aborto ter- apeútico.” Serie Opinión. S11 (November).
269. Libertad y Desarollo. 1997a. “Agenda de libertades culturales: Una evaluación política.” Temas Públicos, no. 333 (April 25): 1-6.
270. Libertad y Desarollo. 1997b. Boletin 1090-07. Resefia Legislativa 326 (March 15-28).
271. Libertad y Desarollo. 1997c. “El Gobierno, la moral y la libertad de expresion.” Temas Publicos, no. 332 (April 17): 1-3.
272. Linhares Barsted, Leila. 1993. “Ten Years of Struggle to Legalize Abortion in Brazil.” In Women: Watched and Punished. Lima: CLADEM. Pp. 223-47.
273. Linhares Barsted, Leila. 1994. “Em busca do tempo perdido: Mulher e políticas públicas no Brasil: 1983-1993.” Estudos Feministas 2, special issue (October): 38-54.
274. Linz, Juan J. 1973. “The Future of an Authoritarian Situation or the Institutionalization of an Authoritarian Regime: The Case of Brazil.” In Alfred Stepan, ed., Authoritarian Brazil. New Haven: Yale University Press. Pp. 232-54.
275. Linz, Juan J., and Alfred Stepan. 1996. Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
276. Lipset, Seymour Martin, and Stein Rokkan. 1967. “Cleavage Structures, Party Systems, and Voter Alignments: An Introduction.” In Seymour Martin Lipset and Stein Rokkan, eds., Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-National Perspectives. New York: Free Press. Pp. 1-64.
277. Locke, John. 1689. A Letter Concerning Toleration, ed. James H. Tully. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1983.
278. Londregan, John. 2000. Legislative Institutions and Ideology in Chile. New York: Cambridge University Press.
279. Lowi, Theodore J. 1964. “American Business, Public Policy, Case-Studies, and Political Theory.” World Politics 16, no. 4 (July): 677-715.
280. Luciak, Ilja. 2002. After the Revolution: Gender and Democracy in El Salvador, Nicaragua, and Guatemala. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
281. Luker, Kristin. 1984. Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood. Berkeley: University of California Press.
282. Lynch, Edward A. 1993. Latin America’s Christian Democratic Parties: A Political Economy. Westport: Praeger.
283. MacKinnon, Catharine. 1989. Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
284. Mahon, Evelyn. 1987. “Women’s Rights and Catholicism in Ireland.” New Left Review 166 (November-December): 53-77.
285. Mainwaring, Scott. 1986. The Catholic Church and Politics in Brazil, 1916-1985. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
286. Mainwaring, Scott. 1997. “Multipartism, Robust Federalism, and Presidentialism in Brazil.” In Scott Mainwaring and Matthew Soberg Shugart, eds., Presiden- tialism and Democracy in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 55-I09.
287. Mainwaring, Scott. 1999. Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
288. Mainwaring, Scott, and Timothy Scully. 1995. “Introduction: Party Systems in Latin America.” In Mainwaring and Scully, eds., Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Pp. 1-34.
289. Mainwaring, Scott, and Matthew Soberg Shugart. 1997. “Conclusion: Presidential- ism and the Party System.” In Scott Mainwaring and Matthew Soberg Shugart, eds., Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 394-439.
290. Mainwaring, Scott, and Alexander Wilde. 1989. “The Progressive Church in Latin America: An Interpretation.” In Mainwaring and Wilde, eds., The Progressive Church in Latin America. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. Pp. 1-37.
291. Mansbridge, Jane J. 1986. Why We Lost the ERA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
292. Matear, Ann. 1996. “Desde la Protesta a la Propuesta: Gender Politics in Transition in Chile.” Democratization 3, no. 3 (Autumn 1996): 246-63.
293. McBride Stetson, Dorothy, and Amy G. Mazur. 1995. Comparative State Feminism. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
294. McGee Deutsch, Sandra. 1991. “Gender and Sociopolitical Change in Twentieth- Century Latin America.” Hispanic American Historical Review 71, no. 2 (May): 259-306.
295. McKenna, Megan. 1997. “Women’s Rights and Divorce in Ireland.” http://www.columbia.edu/cu/sipa/PUBS/SLANT/SPRING97/mckenna.html.
296. Meacham, Carl E. 1994. “The Role of the Chilean Catholic Church in the New Chilean Democracy.” Journal of Church and State 36, no. 2 (Spring): 277-99.
297. Mecham, J. Lloyd. 1966. Church and State in Latin America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
298. Merryman, John Henry. 1985. The Civil Law Tradition. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
299. Mignone, Emilio. 1988. Witness to the Truth: The Complicity of Church and Dictatorship in Argentina. Maryknoll: Orbis Books.
300. Miller, Francesca. 1991. Latin American Women and the Search for Social Justice. Hanover: University Press of New England.
301. Ministerio da Justica. 2002. Programa Nacional de Direitos Humanos. PNDH II. Brasilia: Secretaria de Estado dos Direitos Humanos, Ministerio da Justica.
302. Ministerio de Justicia. 1929. Proyecto de Código Penal. Santiago: Imprenta Nacional.
303. Ministerio de Salud. 1993. Normas de Paternidad Responsable. Santiago: Programa de Salud Materna y Perinatal, Ministerio de Salud.
304. Mink, Gwendolyn. 1998. Welfare’s End. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
305. Molyneux, Maxine. 1985. “Family Reform in Socialist States: The Hidden Agenda.” Feminist Review 21 (Winter 1985): 47-62.
306. Molyneux, Maxine. 1988. “The Politics of Abortion in Nicaragua: Revolutionary Pragmatism or Feminism in the Realm of Necessity?” Feminist Review no. 29 (Spring 1988): 114-32.
307. Molyneux, Maxine. 2000. “Twentieth-Century State Formations in Latin America.” In Elizabeth Dore and Maxine Molyneux, eds., Hidden Histories of Gender and the State in Latin America. Durham: Duke University Press. Pp. 33-81.
308. Montes de Oca, Zita. 1997. “Las Mujeres y el estado, el estado para las mujeres.” In Marcela Rodriguez, Diana L. Staubli, and Patricia Laura Gomez, eds., Mujeres en los’90: Legislación y políticas públicas. Vicente Lopez, Argentina: Centro Municipal de la Mujer de Vicente Lopez. Pp. 25-46.
309. Moreira Alves, José Carlos. 1992. “A Panorama of Brazilian Civil Law from Its Origins to the Present.” In Jacob Dolinger and Keith S. Rosenn, eds., A Panorama of Brazilian Law. Miami: North-South Center. Pp. 87-111.
310. Moreira Alves, Marcio. 1979. A igreja e a polttica no Brasil. São Paulo: Editora Brasilense.
311. Moreira Alves, Maria Helena. 1984. “Grassroots Organizations, Trade Unions, and the Church: A Challenge to the Controlled Abertura in Brazil.” Latin American Perspectives 11, no. 1 (Winter): 73-102.
312. Morgenstern, Scott and Benito Nacif, eds. 2002. Legislative Politics in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.
313. Morgenstern, Scott. 2002. “Explaining Legislative Politics in Latin America.” In Scott Morgenstern and Benito Nacif, eds., Legislative Politics in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 413-45.
314. Morrisey, Francis. 1977. “The Juridical Status of Women in Contemporary Ecclesiastical Law.” In James A. Coriden, ed., Sexismand Church Law: Equal Rights and Affirmative Action. New York: Paulist Press. Pp. 1-20.
315. Mouffe, Chantal. 1992. “Feminism, Citizenship, and Radical Democratic Politics.” In Judith Butler and Joan W. Scott, eds., Feminists Theorize the Political. New York: Routledge. Pp. 367-84.
316. Munizaga, Giselle, and Lilian Letelier. 1988. “La Mujer y la acción hegemonizadora del regimen militar.” In Mundo de mujer: Continuidad y cambio. Santiago: Centro de Estudios de la Mujer. Pp. 525-62.
317. Muraro, Rose Marie. 1989. “El Aborto y la fé religiosa en América Latina.” In Ana María Portugal, ed., Mujeres e iglesia: Sexualidadeaborto en America Latina. Mexico: Distribuciones Fontamara. Pp. 81-94.
318. Navarro, Marysa. 1989. “The Personal Is Political: Las Madres de la Plaza de Mayo.”In Susan Eckstein, ed., Power and Popular Protest. Berkeley: University of California Press. Pp. 241-58.
319. Navarro, Marysa, and Susan C. Bourque. 1998. “Fault Lines of Democratic Governance: A Gender Perspective.” In Felipe Agüero and Jeffrey Stark, eds., Fault Lines of Democracy in Post-Transition Latin America. Miami: North-South Center Press. Pp. 175-202.
320. Nazzari, Muriel. 1995. “Widows as Obstacles to Business: British Objections to Brazilian Marriage and Inheritance Laws.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 37, no. 4 (October): 781-802.
321. Neto, Jorge Andalaft. 1999. “Dez anos de serviços de aborto legal.” Journal da RedeSaúde, no. 18 (September 1999).
322. Noonan, John T. 1970. “An Almost Absolute Value in History.” In Noonan, ed., The Morality of Abortion: Legal and Historical Perspectives. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Pp. 1-59.
323. O’Connor, Julia, Ann Shola Orloff, and Sheila Shaver. 1999. States, Markets, Families: Gender, Liberalism, and Social Policy in Australia, Canada, Great Britain and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
324. O’Donnell, Guillermo. 1979. Modernization and Bureaucratic Authoritarianism: Studies in South American Politics. Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, University of California.
325. O’Donnell, Guillermo. 1994. “Delegative Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 5 (January): 55-69.
326. O’Donnell, Guillermo. 1999a. “On the State, Democratization, and Some Conceptual Problems: A Latin American View with Glances at Some Postcommunist Countries.” In Counterpoints: Selected Essays on Authoritarianism and Democratization. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. Pp. 133-57.
327. O’Donnell, Guillermo. 1999b. “Polyarchies and the (Un)Rule of Law in Latin America: A Partial Conclusion.” In Juan E. Méndez, Guillermo O’Donnell, and Paulo Sergio Pinheiro, eds., The (Un)Rule of Law and the Underprivileged in Latin America. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. Pp. 303-37.
328. Okin, Susan Moller. 1979. Women in Western Political Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
329. Okin, Susan Moller. 1989. Justice, Gender, and the Family. New York: Basic Books.
330. Okin, Susan Moller. 1991. “Gender, the Public and the Private.” In David Held, ed., Political Theory Today. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Pp. 67-90.
331. Okin, Susan Moller. 1999. “Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women?” In Joshua Cohen, Matthew Howard, and Martha Nussbaum, eds., Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women? Princeton: Princeton University Press. Pp. 7-24.
332. Olsen, Frances. 1993. “The Myth of State Intervention in the Family.” In Martha Minow, ed., Family Matters: Readings on Family Lives and the Law. New York: New Press. Pp. 277-82.
333. Organization of American States/Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (OAS/CIDH). 1998. “Informe de la comisión interamericana de derechos humanos sobre la condición de la mujer en las américas.” Washington, D.C.: Organization of American States.
334. Orloff, Ann Shola. 1993. “Gender and the Social Rights of Citizenship: The Comparative Analysis of Gender Relations and Welfare States.” American Sociological Review 58, no. 3 (June 1993): 303-328.
335. Osnajanski, Norma, and Adriana Llano. 1985. “Informe especial: Divorcio.” Vivir, no. 106 (March 1985). Pp. 19-27.
336. Outshoorn, Joyce. 1996. “The Stability of Compromise: Abortion Politics in Western Europe.” In Marianne Githens and Dorothy McBride Stetson, eds., Abortion Politics: Public Policy in Cross-Cultural Perspective. New York: Routledge. Pp. 145-64.
337. Parekh, Bhikhu. 1999. “A Varied Moral World.” In Joshua Cohen, Matthew Howard, and Martha Nussbaum, eds., Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women? Princeton: Princeton University Press. Pp. 69-75.
338. Pateman, Carole. 1989. The Disorder of Women: Democracy, Feminism, and Political Theory. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
339. PDC. 1994. “Democracia Cristiana, familia y rupturas matrimoniales. Once tesis de consenso.” Santiago, July 14, 1994.
340. Peco, José. 1942. “Proyecto de Código Penal. Exposición de motivos presentado a la Camara de Diputados de la Nación Argentina.” La Plata: Instituto de Criminologia.
341. Pedersen, Susan. 1993. Family, Dependence, and the Origins of the Welfare State: Britian and France, 1914-1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
342. Petchesky, Rosalind Pollack. 1990. Abortion and Woman’s Choice: The State, Sexuality, and Reproductive Freedom. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
343. Petrocelli, José Luis. 1994. “Nupcialidade.” In Sílvio ManougKaloustian, ed., Família brasileira: A base de tudo. São Paulo: Cortez.
344. Philippi, Julio. 1979. “Breve explicación de las principales modificaciones que con- tiene el proyecto sobre capacidad de la mujer casada, sobre sociedad conyugal y otras materias del derecho de familia.” In Leslie Tomasello Hart and Alvaro Quintanilla Pérez, Reformas al regimen matrimonial y de filiación. Valparaíso: Edeval, 1981.
345. Phillips, Anne. 1991. Engendering Democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
346. Phillips, Anne. 1995. The Politics of Presence. New York: Oxford University Press.
347. Phillips, Roderick. 1988. Putting Asunder: A History of Divorce in Western Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
348. Pierson, Paul. 1994. Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
349. Pierson, Paul. 2000. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review 94, no. 2 (June): 251-67.
350. Pimentel, Silvia. 1987. A Mulher e a Constituinte: Uma contribuição ao debate. São Paulo: Cortez Editora.
351. Pimentel, Silvia, and Florisa Verucci. 1981. “Esboço de um Novo Estatuto Civil da Mulher.” Photocopy.
352. Pimentel, Silvia, and Florisa Verucci. 1983a. Letter to Brazilian women’s movements, dated March 8.
353. Pimentel, Silvia, and Florisa Verucci. 1983 b. Letter to Brazilian women’s movements, dated November 3.
354. Pimentel, Silvia, Beatriz di Giorgi, and Flávia Piovesan. 1993. A Figura/Personagem mulher em processos de família. Porto Alegre: Sergio Antonio Fabris Editor.
355. Pinheiro, Paulo Sergio. 1999. “The Rule of Law and the Underprivileged in Latin America: Introduction.” In Juan E. Méndez, Guillermo O’Donnell, and Paulo Sérgio Pinheiro, eds., The (Un)Rule of Law and the Underprivileged in Latin America. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. Pp. 1-15.
356. Piovesan, Flávia. 1992. “Constituição e transformação social: A eficácia das normas constitucionais programáticas e a concretização dos direitos e garantias fundamen- tais.” Revista PGE/SP, no. 37 (June): 65-74.
357. Pitanguy, Jacqueline. 1996. “Movimento de mujeres y políticas públicas en Brasil” In Geertje Lycklama, Virginia Vargas, and Saskia Wieringa, eds., Triángulo de Poder. Bogotá: Tercer Mundo Editores. Pp. 55-80.
358. Pollard, Miranda. 1998. Reign of Virtue: Mobilizing Gender in Vichy France. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
359. Pope John XXIII. 1963. Pacem in terris. In Claudia Carlen Ihm, ed., The Papal Encyclicals, vol. 5. Wilmington, N.C.: McGrath, 1981. Pp. 107-29.
360. Pope John Paul II. 1988. The Dignity of Women. Apostolic Letter Mulieris Dignitatem. Dublin: Veritas Publications.
361. Pope Leo XIII. 1891. Rerum novarum. In Claudia Carlen Ihm, ed., The Papal Encyclicals, vol. 2. Wilmington, N.C.: McGrath, 1981. Pp. 241-61.
362. Pope Paul VI. 1968. Humane vitae. In Claudia Carlen Ihm, ed., The Papal Encyclicals, vol. 5. Wilmington, N.C.: McGrath, 1981. Pp. 223-36.
363. Portugal, Ana María. 1989. “Introducción.” In Portugal, ed., Mujeres e iglesia: Sexu- alidad e aborto en America Latina. Mexico: Distribuciones Fontamara. Pp. 1-8.
364. Posner, Richard. 1992. Sex and Reason. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
365. Potash, Robert A. 1996. The Army and Politics in Argentina, 1962-1973. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
366. Primero Concilio Plenario Chileno. 1946. In urbe s. iacobi en Chile anno domini M.CM.XL VI celebratum Iosepho Maria S.R.E. Card. Caro Rodriguez S. iacobi en Chile Archiepiscopo Summi Pontificis PII PP. XII legato a latere praeside. Chile, 1955.
367. Programa de Asesoria Legislativa (PAL). 1991. Regimen patrimonial del matrimonio: Proyecto que modifica el código civil y otros cuerpos legales. Analisis Legislativo 15, Año 1.
368. Programa de Asesoria Legislativa (PAL). 1994. Proyecto de ley que modifica el Código Civil y otros cuerpos legales en materia de filiación. Analisis Legislativo 45, Año III.
369. Przeworski, Adam. 1991. Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
370. Przeworski, Adam, and Fernando Limongi. 1997. “Modernization: Theories and Facts.” World Politics 49, no. 2: 155-183.
371. Rabkin, Rhoda. 1996. “Redemocratization, Electoral Engineering, and Party Strategies in Chile, 1989-1995.” Comparative Political Studies 29, no. 3 (June 1996): 335-56.
372. Ramos, Silvina. 2001. “Mujeres, un paso adelante.” Clarín, April 30, 2001.
373. Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
374. Rawls, John. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
375. Remmer, Karen. 1990. “Democracy and Economic Crisis: The Latin American Experience.” World Politics 42, no. 3 (April): 315-35.
376. República Argentina. 1986. Fallos de la Corte Suprema de la Nación. Sept.-Dec. Tomo 308, vol. 2. Buenos Aires.
377. República de Chile. 1976. Actas Oficiales de la Comisión Constituyente. Sesión 191, celebrada en jueves 18 de marzo de 1976.
378. Reyes, Carmen. 1992. “La Familia chilena hoy: Fundamentos para políticas públicas orientadas al grupo familiar.” In La Familia en Chile. Santiago: Centro de Estudios de la Realidad Contemporanea/Instituto Chileno de Estudios Humanisticos. Pp. 43-77.
379. Rheinstein, Max. 1972. Marriage Stability, Divorce, and the Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
380. Rhode, Deborah. 1989. Justice and Gender. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
381. Ribeiro, Leonídio. 1942. O novo código penal e a medicina legal. Rio de Janeiro: Jacinto.
382. Ribeiro, Leonídio. 1973. Reforma do código penal. Rio de Janeiro: São José.
383. Risse, Thomas, and Kathryn Sikkink. 1999. “The Socialization of International Human Rights Norms into Domestic Practices: An Introduction.” In Thomas Risse, Stephen C. Ropp, and Kathryn Sikkink, eds., The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 1-38.
384. Rodrigues, Almira. 2000. “Legislativo federal e os direitos das mulheres: Não falta sensibilidade e sim vontade politíca.” Journal da RedeSaúde, no. 21 (September).
385. Rodriguez, Marcela V. 1997. “La situación legal de los derechos reproductivos y sexuales en Argentina.” In Nuestros cuerpos, nuestras vidas: Propuestas para la pro- mocion de los derechos sexuales y reproductivos. Buenos Aires: Foro por los Derechos Reproductivos. Pp. 29-42.
386. Rodríguez, Victoria. 1998. “The Emerging Role of Women in Mexican Political Life.” In Victoria Rodríguez, ed., Women’s Participation in Mexican Political Life. Boulder: Westview. Pp. 1-20.
387. Rodríguez, Victoria, ed. 1998. Women’s Participation in Mexican Political Life. Boulder: Westview.
388. Rosenn, Keith S. 1990. “Brazil’s New Constitution: An Exercise in Transient Constitutionalism for a Transitional Society.” American Journal of Comparative Law 38: 773-802.
389. Rouquié, Alain. 1984. Poder militar e sociedad política en la Argentina. Buenos Aires: Emece.
390. Sales Brasil, Francisco. 1953. As Fontes do divórcio: Com um estudo completivo sobre o Projeto Nelson Carneiro. Salvador: Editora Era Nova.
391. Samuels, David. 2003. Ambition, Federalism, and Legislative Politics in Brazil. New York: Cambridge University Press.
392. Santa Cruz, Lucía. 1996. “Sexo y Estado.” Libertad y Desarollo, no. 58 (October): 18-21.
393. Schlueter, Vanessa. 2000. “The Politics of Sex: Democracy and Feminist Policy Change in Argentina.” B.A. thesis, Department of Government, Harvard University.
394. Schmitter, Phillipe. 1979. “Still a Century of Corporatism?” In Phillipe Schmitter and Gerhard Lehmbruch, eds., Trends toward Corporatist Intermediation. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications. Pp. 7-52.
395. Schumaher, Maria Aparecida, and Elisabeth Vargas. 1993. Lugar no Governo: Álibi ou conquista? Estudos Feministas I, no. 2. Pp. 348-65.
396. Scott, Joan Wallach. 1988. “Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis.” In Gender and the Politics of History. New York: Columbia University Press. Pp. 28-50.
397. Scott, Rosemary. 1949. “Capacity of Married Women to Contract.” In Inter- American Bar Association, Proceedings of the Sixth Conference held at Detroit, Michigan, May 22-June 1, 1949. Washington, D.C. Pp. 194-5.
398. Scott, Samuel Parsons, ed. 1931. Las Siete partidas. Chicago: Commerce Clearing House.
399. Scully, Timothy R. 1992. Rethinking the Center: Party Politics in Nineteenth- and Twentieth-Century Chile. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
400. Scully, Timothy R. 1995. “Reconstituting Party Politics in Chile.” In Scott Mainwaring and Timothy R. Scully, eds., Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Pp. 100-37.
401. Senado de la Nación. 1919. La Reforma penal en el Senado. Informe y despacho de la Comisión de Códigos de la Camara de Senadores de la Nación Argentina sobre el proyecto de Código Penal. Buenos Aires.
402. Serbin, Kenneth. 1996. “Church-State Reciprocity in Contemporary Brazil: The Convening of the International Eucharistic Congress of 1955 in Rio de Janeiro.” Hispanic American Historical Review 76, no. 4 (1996): 721-51.
403. SERNAM. 1996. Memoria: 1994-1996. Santiago: SERNAM.
404. Shepard, Bonnie. 2000. “The ‘Double Discourse’ on Sexual and Reproductive Rights in Latin America: The Chasm between Public Policy and Private Action.” Health and Human Rights 4, no. 2: 121-43.
405. Shepsle, Kenneth, and Barry Weingast, eds. 1995. Positive Theories of Congressional Institutions. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
406. Siavelis, Peter. 1997. “Executive-Legislative Relations in Post-Pinochet Chile: A Preliminary Assessment.” In Scott Mainwaring and Matthew Soberg Shugart, eds., Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 321-62.
407. Siavelis, Peter. 2002. “Exaggerated Presidentialism and Moderate Presidents: Executive-Legislative Relations in Chile.” In Scott Morgenstern and Benito Nacif, eds., Legislative Politics in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 79-113.
408. Siavelis, Peter, and Arturo Valenzuela. 1996. “Electoral Engineering and Democratic Stability: The Legacy of Authoritarian Rule in Chile.” In Arend Lijphart and Carlos Waisman, eds., Institutional Design in New Democracies: Eastern Europe and Latin America. Boulder: Westview. Pp. 77-99.
409. Siero, Isabel. 1949. “Contractual Capacity of Married Women.” In Inter-American Bar Association, Proceedings of the Sixth Conference held at Detroit, Michigan, May 22-June 1, 1949. Washington, D.C. P. 196.
410. Sigmund, Paul. 1988. “Thomistic Natural Law and Social Theory.” In Paul Sigmund, ed., St. Thomas Aquinas on Politics and Ethics. New York: W. W. Norton. Pp. 180-8.
411. Sikkink, Kathryn. 1991. Ideas and Institutions: Developmentalism in Brazil and Argentina. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
412. Simões, Solange de Deus. 1985. Deus, patria e familia: As mulheres no golpe de 1964. Petropolis: Vozes.
413. Skidmore, Thomas E. 1988. The Politics of Military Rule in Brazil, 1964-1985. New York: Oxford University Press.
414. Skinner, Quentin. 1986. “The Paradoxes of Political Liberty.” The Tanner Lectures on Human Values. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.
415. Skocpol, Theda. 1992. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
416. Skocpol, Theda, and Margaret Somers. 1980. “The Uses of Comparative History in Macro-Social Inquiry.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 22 (April): 174-97.
417. Skocpol, Theda, Marshall Ganz, and Ziad Munson. 2000. “A Nation of Organizers: The Institutional Origins of Civic Voluntarism in the United States.” American Political Science Review 94, no. 3 (September): 527-46.
418. Smith, Brian. 1982. The Church and Politics in Chile: Challenges to Modern Catholicism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
419. Soler, Sebastian. 1945. Derecho penal argentino. Buenos Aires: La Ley.
420. Soler, Sebastian, Carlos Fontán Balestra, and Eduardo Aguirre Obarrio. 1967. “Ex- posición de motivos” for Law 17.567. In Anales de la legislación argentina 1967. Tomo 27-C. Buenos Aires: La Ley. Pp. 2873-4.
421. Soto, Moira. 1982. “La Patria potestad debe ser compartida.” Vosotras, año 47, no. 2426 (November 3): 1-2.
422. Staudt, Kathleen. 1997. “Gender Politics in Bureaucracy: Theoretical Issues in Comparative Perspective.” In Women, International Development, and Politics: The Bureaucratic Mire. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
423. Steigenga, Timothy J., and David A. Smilde. 1999. “Wrapped in a Holy Shawl: The Strange Case of Conservative Christians and Gender Equality in Latin America.” In Christian Smith and Joshua Prokopy, eds., Latin American Religion in Motion. New York: Routledge. Pp. 173-86.
424. Stepan, Alfred. 1978. The State and Society: Peru in Comparative Perspective. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
425. Stepan, Alfred. 1988. Rethinking Military Politics: Brazil and the Southern Cone. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
426. Stepan, Nancy. 1991. “The Hour of Eugenics": Race, Gender, and Nation in Latin America. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
427. Sternbach, Nancy Saporta, et al. 1992. “Feminisms in Latin America: From Bogota to San Bernardo.” Signs 27, no. 2 (Winter): 393-434.
428. Stevenson, Linda. 1999. “Gender Politics in the Mexican Democratization Process.” In Jorge Domínguez and Alejandro Poiré, eds., Towards Mexico’s Democratization. New York: Routledge. Pp. 57-87.
429. Swers, Michele L. 2002. The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
430. Tabak, Fanny. 1983. Autoritarianismo e participação política da mulher. Rio de Janeiro: Graal.
431. Tabak, Fanny. 1989. A mulher brasileira no congresso nacional. Brasília: Camara de Deputados.
432. Tarrow, Sidney. 1998. Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
433. Thelen, Kathleen, and Sven Steinmo. 1992. “Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Politics.” In Sven Steinmo, Kathleen Thelen, and Frank Longstreth, eds., Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 1-32.
434. Thomas, Sue. 1994. How Women Legislate. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
435. Thompson, Augusto F. G. 1982. Escorço histórico do direito criminal luso-brasileiro. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Liber Juris Ltda.
436. Threlfall, Monica. 1996. “Feminist Politics and Social Change in Spain.” In Monica Threlfall, ed., Mapping the Women’s Movement. London: Verso. Pp. 115-51.
437. Todaro Williams, Margaret. 1976. “Church and State in Vargas’s Brazil: The Politics of Cooperation.” Journal of Church and State 18, no. 3 (Autumn): 443-62.
438. Tomasello Hart, Leslie. 1989. Situacion juridica de la mujer casada. Valparaíso: Edeval.
439. Tomasello Hart, Leslie, and Alvaro Quintanilla Pérez. Reformas al regimen matrimonial y de filiación. Valparaíso: Edeval, 1981.
440. Tribe, Laurence. 1992. Abortion: The Clash of Absolutes. New York: W. W. Norton.
441. Tribunal Eclesiástico de Santiago. N.d. Instrucciones para las personas que solicitan los servicios del Tribunal Eclesiástico de Santiago en las causas matrimoniales.
442. Unión Cívica Radical. 1983. Plataforma de gobierno. Buenos Aires: El Cid Editor.
443. United Nations. 1996. The United Nations and the Advancement of Women, 1945-1996. New York: United Nations.
444. United Nations Development Program (UNDP). 1998. Human Development Report. New York: United Nations.
445. Valdés, Teresa, and Marisa Weinstein. 1997. “Corriendo y descorriendo tupidos velos.” In Chile 96. Amilisis y Opiniones. Santiago: FLACSO-Chile.
446. Valenzuela, María Elena. 1987. La mujer en el Chile militar. Santiago: CESOC.
447. Valenzuela, María Elena. 1998. “Women and the Democratization Process in Chile.” In Jaquette and Wolchik, eds., Women and Democracy: Latin America and Central and Eastern Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Pp. 47-74.
448. Valenzeula Carrazola, Andrea. N.d. “Algunos antecedentes en torno al estado actual del aborto terapéutico en Chile.” Unpublished paper.
449. Valiente, Celia. 1995. “Family Obligations in Spain.” In Jane Millar and Andrea Warman, eds., Defining Family Obligations in Europe. Bath Social Policy Papers no. 23, University of Bath. Pp. 325-58.
450. Vallier, Ivan. 1970. Catholicism, Social Control, and Modernization in Latin America. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
451. Vasallo, Marta. 1997. “Derechos reproductivos: Un desafio a la dinámica par- tidaria.” In Nuestros cuerpos, nuestras vidas: Propuestas para la promocíon de los dere- chos sexuales y reproductivos. Buenos Aires: Foro por los Derechos Reproductivos. Pp. 67-74.
452. Verucci, Florisa. 1987. A mulher e o direito. São Paulo: Nobel.
453. Verucci, Florisa. 1991. “Women and the New Brazilian Constitution.” Feminist Studies 17, 3 (Fall): 551-68.
454. Vial Correa, Gonzalo. 1996. “Un estado corruptor?” El Mercurio, September 10.
455. Viotti da Costa, Emilia. 1985a. “The Fall of the Monarchy.” In The Brazilian Empire: Myth and Histories. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Pp. 202-33.
456. Viotti da Costa, Emilia. 1985b. “Liberalism: Theory and Pratice.” In The Brazilian Empire: Myth and Histories. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Pp. 53-77.
457. Vogel, Ursula. 1998. “The State and the Making of Gender: Some Historical Legacies.” In Vicky Randall and Georgina Waylen, eds., Gender, Politics and the State. London: Routledge. Pp. 29-44.
458. Wainerman, Catalina H., and Rosa N. Geldstein. 1994. “Vivendo en Familia: Ayer y Hoy.” In Wainerman, ed., Vivir en familia. Buenos Aires: Editorial Losada. Pp. 183-230.
459. Watson, Peggy. 1996. “The Rise of Masculinism in Eastern Europe.” In Monica Threlfall, ed., Mapping the Women’s Movement. London: Verso. Pp. 216-31.
460. Waylen, Georgina. 1994. “Women and Democratization: Conceptualizing Gender Relations in Transition Politics.” World Politics 46, no. 3: 327-54.
461. Waylen, Georgina. 1998. “Gender, Feminism, and the State: An Overview.” In Vicky Randall and Georgina Waylen, eds. Gender, Politics, and the State. New York: Routledge. Pp. 1-17.
462. Weir, Margaret. 1992. “Ideas and the Politics of Bounded Innovation.” In Sven Steinmo, Kathleen Thelen, and Frank Longstreth, eds., Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 188-216.
463. Weir, Margaret, and Theda Skocpol. 1985. “State Structures and the Possibilities for ‘Keynesian’ Reponses to the Great Depression.” In Peter B. Evans, Dietrich Rueschemeyer, and Theda Skocpol, eds., Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 107-63.
464. Weitzman, Lenore J. 1985. The Divorce Revolution: The Unexpected Social and Economic Consequences for Women and Children in America. New York: Free Press.
465. Weyland, Kurt. 1997. “Growth with Equity in Chile’s New Democracy?” Latin American Research Review 32, no. 1: 37-67.
466. Whale, John, et al. 1980. The Man Who Leads the Church: An Assessment of Pope John Paul II. San Francisco: Harper and Row.
467. Wiarda, Howard. 1973. “Toward a Framework for the Study of Political Change in the Iberic-Latin Tradition: The Corporative Model.” World Politics 25 (January): 206-35.
468. Wiecko de Castilho, Ela. 1999. “Uma mulher na comissão revisora: Entrevista com Ela Wiecko de Castilho.” Journal da RedeSaúde, no. 18 (September 1999).
469. Williams, Edward J. 1967. Latin American Christian Democratic Parties. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
470. Williams, Joan. 2000. Unbending Gender: Why Family and Work Conflict and What to Do About It. New York: Oxford University Press.
471. World Bank. 2002. Genderstats. Database of Gender Statistics. http://genderstats.worldbank.org.
472. Yishai, Yael. 1993. “Public Ideas and Public Policy: Abortion Politics in Four Democracies.” Comparative Politics 25, no. 2 (January): 207-28.
473. Young, Iris Marion. 1994. “Gender as Seriality: Thinking About Women as a Social Collective.” Signs 19, no. 3: 713-38.
474. Young, Iris Marion. 1997. Intersecting Voices: Dilemmas of Gender, Political Philosophy, and Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
475. Zakaria, Fareed. 1997. “The Rise of Illiberal Democracy.” Foreign Affairs 76, no. 6 (November/December): 22-43.
476. Zannoni, Eduardo. 1998a. Derecho deFamilia, tomo 1, 3rd ed. Buenos Aires: Astrea.
477. Zannoni, Eduardo. 1998b. Derecho deFamilia, tomo 2. 3rd ed. Buenos Aires: Astrea.
478. Zielinska, Eleonora. 2000. “Between Ideology, Politics, and Common Sense: The Discourse of Reproductive Rights in Poland.” In Susan Gal and Gail Kligman, eds., Reproducing Gender: Politics, Publics, and Everyday Life after Socialism. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Pp. 23-57.