From information to property and back again

Information and Communications Technology Law

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 299-312

  Keyder, Virginia Brown ^a,b  

^a BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b SABANCI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84929857925     PISSN: 13600834     EISSN: 14698404     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13600830500377061     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Boyle, J., 2003. The opposite of property. Law and Contemporary Problems, 66 (1 – 2)
2. Basu, S., 2003. Doha declaration nearly decided—the fate of medicine access in poor countries. Bulatlat, August 31 – September 6 reprinted from Znet/Global Economy
3. Boldrin, M, and Levine, D. K., 2002. The case against intellectual property, University of Minnesota and UCLA.
4. Blum, V., 2004. The strange GOP-Hollywood alliance: justice department prepares to join fight against digital pirates. Legal Times, 19 July
5. Boyle, J., 2004. A manifesto on WIPO and the future of intellectual property. Duke L. & Tech. Rev.,: 0009
6. Clement, M., 2004. Rice imperialism: the agribusiness threat to Third World rice production. Bulatlat, 8 – 14 February
7. Cullet, P., 2004. “ Human rights and intellectual property, Working Paper 4 ”. Geneva: International Environmental Law Research Center.
8. Cullet, P., 2001. Patents bill, trips and right to health. Economic and Political Weekly, 27 October
9. Dutfield, G., and Suthersanen, U., 2004. “ Harmonization or differentiation in intellectual property protection ”. Quaker United Nations Office, Occasional Paper No. 15, August
10. Espada, D., 2002. Plant variety protection act: farm law to safeguard TNCs—but not planters. Bulatlat, 15 – 21 December
11. Finger, J. M., and Schuler, P., eds. 2004. Poor People's Knowledge—Promoting Intellectual Property in Developing Countries, World Bank and OUP.
12. Fink, C., and Maskus, K. E., 2005. Intellectual Property and Development—Lessons from Recent Economic Research, World Bank.
13. Forston, D., 2004. The big squeeze: more companies are making a business solely out of patent licensing. Is this the start of an IP Armageddon. IP Law and Business, 29 November
14. Ghosh. 2004. “ The opportunities of free/libre/open source software for developing Countries ”. Unpublished paper presented at UNCTAD-ICTSD Dialogue on Moving the Pro-development IP Agenda Forward: Preserving Public Goods in Health, Education and Learning, Bellagio, 29 November – 3 December 2004
15. Goel, R., 2005. India: data exclusivity—its interpretation and India. Mondaq, 7 January
16. Heller, M., and Eisenberg, R., 1998. Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research. Science, 280 (5364): 698–701.
17. Hoffman, B. T., 2004. An art lawyer's musings on the intellectual property debate in the digital age: defining the delicate balance. NYSBA Bright Ideas, Fall
18. Kaplan, W., and Laing, R., 2004. Priority Medicines for Europe and the World, World Health Organization.
19. Kumar, N., 2003. Intellectual property rights, technology and economic development: experiences of Asian countries. Economic and Political Weekly, 18 January
20. Lesser, W., 2001. The Effects of TRIPs-Mandated Intellectual Property Rights on Economic Activities in Developing Countries, WIPO.
21. Lohr, S., 2004. Knowing their politics by their software. New York Times, 5 July
22. Maskus, K. E., 2005. “ The role of intellectual property rights in encouraging foreign direct investment and technology transfer ”. In Intellectual Property and Development–Lessons in Recent Economic Research, World Bank.
23. Monbiot, G., 2002. Patent nonsense—companies now demanding intellectual property rights were built up without them. The Guardian, 12 March
24. Okediji, R., 2004. “ Development in the information age issues in the regulation of intellectual property rights, computer software and electronic commerce ”. Issue Paper No. 9 UNCTAD
25. Ott, R., 2004. Protection of plant varieties and the farmers rights act. OKLA Journal of Law and Technology, 14
26. Palast, G., 2004. Big business the key to US strategy people's press printing society Ltd. Morning Star, 9 November
27. Perelman, M., 2002. Steal this Idea, Palgrave.
28. Rai, A., and Eisenberg, R., 2000. Bayh-dole reform and the progress of biomedicine. Law and Contemporary Problems, 289
29. Raj, R. D., 2000. Biopiracy-friendly laws worry neem battle winner. Asia Times, 27 May
30. Rajkumar, R., 2005. The central American Free Trade Agreement: an end run around the DOHA declaration on TRIPS and public health. 15 Alb. L.J. Sci. & Tech., 433
31. Reisinger, S., 2004. Giant slayer. Corporate Counsel, 30 December
32. Rost, P., 2004. Big pharma's dirty little secret. Los Angeles Times, 26 December
33. Sandburg, B., 2005. India inked. The Recorder, 18 January
34. Slind-Flor, V., 2004. Can these mice be saved?: Fenwick lawyers say that DuPont's licensing terms are preventing researchers from using the Harvard Mouse. IP Law and Business, 30 September
35. Story, A., 2004. “ Intellectual property and computer software—a battle of competing use and access visions for countries of the South ”. In UNCTAD, Intellectual Property Rights and Sustainable Development Issue Paper 10, May 2004
36. Tait, N., 2004. A patently valid decision. Financial Times, 8 November
37. Tessensohn, J. A., 2004. Publicity rights for horses reined in by supreme court of Japan. NYSBA Bright Ideas, Fall
38. Tuosto, C. 2004. The TRIPS council decision of August 30, 2003 on the import of pharmaceuticals under compulsory license. EIPR, December
39. Zagaris, B., 2004. U.S. starts anti-counterfeiting initiative. International Enforcement Law Reporter, December