Comparison of WEB and Interactive Voice Response (IVR) Methods for Delivering Brief Alcohol Interventions to Hazardous-Drinking University Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial

European Addiction Research

Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 240-252

  Andersson, Claes ^a  

^a MALMÖ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Automated techniques; Binge drinking; Brief intervention; Interactive voice response; Internet; University students

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOL;

ALCOHOL BLOOD LEVEL; ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION; ALCOHOL USE DISORDER; ALCOHOLISM; ARTICLE; BINGE DRINKING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRINKING; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERACTIVE VOICE RESPONSE SYSTEM; INTERNET; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; UNIVERSITY STUDENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED THERAPY; COUNSELING; DRINKING BEHAVIOR; FEMALE; MALE; MOBILE PHONE; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; PSYCHOTHERAPY; SAMPLE SIZE; STUDENT; UNIVERSITY; YOUNG ADULT;

ALCOHOL DRINKING; CELL PHONES; COUNSELING; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; MALE; PATIENT COMPLIANCE; PSYCHOTHERAPY, BRIEF; SAMPLE SIZE; STUDENTS; THERAPY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; UNIVERSITIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84929674338     PISSN: 10226877     EISSN: 14219891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000381017     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Plant MA, Plant ML, Miller P, Gmel G, Kuntsche S: The social consequences of binge drinking: a comparison of young adults in six European countries. J Addict Dis 2009; 28: 294-308.
2. Johnston LD, O'Malley PM, Bachman JG, Schulenberg JE: Monitoring the Future: National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975-2012. Volume 2: College Students and Adults Ages 19-50. Ann Arbor, Institute of Social Research, University of Michigan, 2013.
3. Fillmore MT, Jude R: Defining 'binge' drinking as five drinks per occasion or drinking to a 0.08% BAC: which is more sensitive to risk? Am J Addict 2011; 20: 468-475.
4. Mallett KA, Varvil-Weld L, Borsari B, Read JP, Neighbors C, White HR: An update of research examining college student alcohol-related consequences: new perspectives and implications for interventions. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2013; 37: 709-716.
5. Jennison KM: The short-term effects and unintended long-term consequences of binge drinking in college: a 10-year follow-up study. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse 2004; 30: 659-684.
6. OECD: Education at a Glance 2013: OECD Indicators, OECD Publishing, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/eag-2013-en.
7. Fromme K, Marlatt GA, Baer JS, Kivlahan DR: The alcohol skills training program: a group intervention for young adult drinkers. J Subst Abuse Treat 1994; 11: 143-154.
8. Dimeff LA, Baer JS, Kivlahan DR, Marlatt GA: Brief Alcohol Screening and Intervention for College Students (BASICS): A Harm Reduction Approach. New York, Guilford Press, 1999.
9. Larimer ME, Cronce JM: Identification, prevention and treatment: a review of individualfocused strategies to reduce problematic alcohol consumption by college students. J Stud Alcohol Suppl 2002; 14: 148-163.
10. Larimer ME, Cronce JM: Identification, prevention, and treatment revisited: individualfocused college drinking prevention strategies 1999-2006. Addict Behav 2007; 32: 2439-2468.
11. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA): Brief Interventions: Alcohol Alert No. 66, 2005, pp 1-8.
12. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA): Brief Intervention: College Drinking -Changing the Culture. NIAAA College Materials, 2005. http://www.collegedrinkingprevention.gov/niaaacollegematerials/trainingmanual/module-3.aspx.
13. Perkins HW, Berkowitz AD: Perceiving the community norms of alcohol use among students: some research implications for campus alcohol education programming. Int J Addict 1986; 21: 961-976.
14. Perkins HW: Social norms and the prevention of alcohol misuse in collegiate contexts. J Stud Alcohol Suppl 2002; 14: 167-172.
15. Neighbors C, Walters ST, Lee CM, Vader AM, Vehige T, Szigethy T, DeJong W: Event-specific prevention: addressing college student drinking during known windows of risk. Addict Behav 2007; 32: 2667-2680.
16. Walters ST, Neighbors C: Feedback interventions for college alcohol misuse: what, why and for whom? Addict Behav 2005; 30: 1168-1182.
17. Borsari B, Carey KB: Effects of a brief motivational intervention with college student drinkers. J Consult Clin Psychol 2000; 68: 728-733.
18. Neighbors C, Larimer ME, Lewis MA: Targeting misperceptions of descriptive drinking norms: efficacy of a computer-delivered personalized normative feedback intervention. J Consult Clin Psychol 2004; 72: 434-447.
19. Neighbors C, Dillard AJ, Lewis MA, Bergstrom RL, Neil TA: Normative misperceptions and temporal precedence of perceived norms and drinking. J Stud Alcohol 2006; 67: 290-299.
20. Walters ST, Vader AM, Harris TR, Field CA, Jouriles EN: Dismantling motivational interviewing and feedback for college drinkers: a randomized clinical trial. J Consult Clin Psychol 2009; 77: 64-73.
21. Ajzen I: The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 1991; 50: 179-211.
22. Conner M, Warren R, Close S, Sparks P: Alcohol consumption and the theory of planned behavior: an examination of the cognitive mediation of past behavior. J Appl Soc Psychol 1999; 29: 1676-1704.
23. Armitage CJ, Norman P, Conner M: Can the theory of planned behaviour mediate the effects of age, gender and multidimensional health locus of control? Br J Health Psychol 2002; 7: 299-316.
24. Collins SE, Carey KB: The theory of planned behavior as a model of heavy episodic drinking among college students. Psychol Addict Behav 2007; 21: 498-507.
25. Collins SE, Logan DE, Neighbors C: Which came first: the readiness or the change? Longitudinal relationships between readiness to change and drinking among college drinkers. Addiction 2010; 105: 1899-1909.
26. Glassman TJ, Dodd VJ, Sheu JJ, Rienzo BA, Wagenaar AC: Extreme ritualistic alcohol consumption among college students on game day. J Am Coll Health 2010; 58: 413-423.
27. Martens MP, Ferrier AG, Cimini MD: Do protective behavioral strategies mediate the relationship between drinking motives and alcohol use in college students? J Stud Alcohol Drugs 2007; 68: 106-114.
28. Blume AW, Marlatt AG: Motivational enhancement as a brief intervention for college student drinkers; in Miles W, Klinger E (eds): Handbook of Motivational Counseling: Goal- Based Approaches to Assessment and Intervention with Addiction and Other Problems, ed 2. Chichester, John Wiley & Sons, 2011, pp 531-547.
29. Benton SL, Schmidt JL, Newton FB, Shin K, Benton SA, Newton DW: College student protective strategies and drinking consequences. J Stud Alcohol 2004; 65: 115-121.
30. Delva J, Smith MP, Howell RL, Harrison DF, Wilke D, Jackson DL: A study of the relationship between protective behaviors and drinking consequences among undergraduate college students. J Am Coll Health 2004; 53: 19-26.
31. Martens MP, Pederson ER, LaBrie JW, Ferrier AG, Cimini MD: Measuring alcohol-related protective behavioral strategies among college students: further examination of the protective behavioral strategies scale. Psychol Addict Behav 2007; 21: 307-315.
32. Araas TE, Adams TB: Protective behavioral strategies and negative alcohol-related consequences in college students. J Drug Educ 2008; 38: 211-224.
33. Ray AE, Turrisi R, Abar B, Peters KE: Socialcognitive correlates of protective drinking behaviors and alcohol-related consequences in college students. Addict Behav 2009; 34: 911-917.
34. Martens MP, Martin JL, Littlefield AK, Murphy JG, Cimini MD: Changes in protective behavioral strategies and alcohol use among college students. Drug Alcohol Depend 2011; 118: 504-507.
35. Walters ST, Baer JS: Talking with College Students about Alcohol: Motivational Strategies for Reducing Abuse. New York, NY, Guilford Press, 2006.
36. Andersson C, Johnsson KO, Berglund M, Ojehagen A: Intervention for hazardous alcohol use and high level of stress in university freshmen: a comparison between an intervention and a control university. Brain Res 2009; 1305:S61-S71.
37. Barnett NP, Murphy JG, Colby SM, Monti PM: Efficacy of counselor vs. computer-delivered intervention with mandated college students. Addict Behav 2007; 32: 2529-2548.
38. Carey KB, Scott-Sheldon LA, Carey MP, DeMartini KS: Individual-level interventions to reduce college student drinking: a metaanalytic review. Addict Behav 2007; 32: 2469-2494.
39. Cellucci T, Krogh J, Vik P: Help seeking for alcohol problems in a college population. J Gen Psychol 2006; 133: 421-433.
40. Buscemi J, Murphy JG, Martens MP: Helpseeking for alcohol-related problems in college students: correlates and preferred resources. Psychol Addict Behav 2010; 24: 571-580.
41. Elliott JC, Carey KB, Bolles JR: Computerbased interventions for college drinking: a qualitative review. Addict Behav 2008; 33: 994-1005.
42. Bewick BM, Trusler K, Barkham M, Hill AJ, Cahill J, Mulhern B: The effectiveness of webbased interventions designed to decrease alcohol consumption -a systematic review. Prev Med 2008; 47: 17-26.
43. Carey KB, Scott-Sheldon LA, Elliott JC, Bolles JR, Carey MP: Computer-delivered interventions to reduce college student drinking: a meta-analysis. Addiction 2009; 104: 1807-1819.
44. White A, Kavanagh D, Stallman H, Klein B, Kay-Lambkin F, Proudfoot J, Drennan J, Connor J, Baker A, Hines E, Young R: Online alcohol interventions: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2010; 12:e62.
45. Riper H, Spek V, Boon B, Conijn B, Kramer J, Martin-Abello K, Smit F: Effectiveness of E-self-help interventions for curbing adult problem drinking: a meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res 2011; 13:e42.
46. Carey KB, Scott-Sheldon LA, Elliott JC, Garey L, Carey MP: Face-to-face versus computerdelivered alcohol interventions for college drinkers: a meta-analytic review, 1998 to 2010. Clin Psychol Rev 2012; 32: 690-703.
47. Moreira MT, Smith LA, Foxcroft D: Social norms interventions to reduce alcohol misuse in university or college students. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; 3:CD006748.
48. Khadjesari Z, Murray E, Hewitt C, Hartley S, Godfrey C: Can stand-alone computer-based interventions reduce alcohol consumption? A systematic review. Addiction 2011; 106: 267-282.
49. Saitz R, Palfai TP, Cheng DM, Horton NJ, Freedner N, Dukes K, Kraemer KL, Roberts MS, Guerriero RT, Samet JH: Brief intervention for medical inpatients with unhealthy alcohol use: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 2007; 146: 167-176.
50. Kypri K, Langley JD, Saunders JB, Cashell-Smith ML, Herbison P: Randomized controlled trial of web-based alcohol screening and brief intervention in primary care. Arch Intern Med 2008; 168: 530-536.
51. Hustad JT, Barnett NP, Borsari B, Jackson KM: Web-based alcohol prevention for incoming college students: a randomized controlled trial. Addict Behav 2010; 35: 183-189.
52. Helzer JE, Rose GL, Badger GJ, Searles JS, Thomas CS, Lindberg SA, Guth S: Using interactive voice response to enhance brief alcohol intervention in primary care settings. J Stud Alcohol Drugs 2008; 69: 251-258.
53. James W, Gardner D: Learning styles: implications for distance learning. New Dir Adult Cont Educ 1995; 67: 19-32.
54. Reinert DF, Allen JP: The alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT): a review of recent research. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2002; 26: 272-279.
55. Bergman H, Källmén H: Alcohol use among Swedes and a psychometric evaluation of the alcohol use disorders identification test. Alcohol Alcohol 2002; 37: 245-251.
56. Collins RL, Parks GA, Marlatt GA: Social determinants of alcohol consumption: the effects of social interaction and model status on the self-administration of alcohol. J Consult Clin Psychol 1985; 53: 189-200.
57. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA): Computing a BAC Estimate. Washington, DC, US Department of Transportation, 1994. https://www.craftbeer.com/attachments/0000/1170/Computing-a-BAC-Estimate.pdf.
58. Vickers AJ, Altman DG: Statistics notes: analysing controlled trials with baseline and follow up measurements. BMJ 2001; 323: 1123-1124.
59. Heather N: The efficacy-effectiveness distinction in trials of alcohol brief intervention. Addict Sci Clin Pract 2014; 9: 13.
60. Sinadinovic K, Wennberg P, Johansson M, Berman AH: Targeting individuals with problematic alcohol use via web-based cognitive- behavioral self-help modules, personalized screening feedback or assessment only: a randomized controlled trial. Eur Addict Res 2014; 20: 305-318.
61. Schulz KF, Grimes DA: Multiplicity in randomised trials I: endpoints and treatments. Lancet 2005; 365: 1591-1595.