COMPRES: A prospective postmarketing evaluation of the compression anastomosis ring CAR 27™/ColonRing™

Colorectal Disease

Volumn 17, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 522-529

  D'Hoore, A ^a   Albert, M R ^b   Cohen, S M ^c   Herbst, F ^d   Matter, I ^e   Van Der Speeten, K ^f   Dominguez, J ^g   Rutten, H ^h   Muldoon, J P ⁱ   Bardakcioglu, O ^j   Senagore, A J ^k   Ruppert, R ^l   Mills, S ^m   Stamos, M J ⁿ   Pahlman L ^o   Choman, E ^p   Wexner, S D ^q   On behalf of the COMPRES collaborative study group, ^r  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b FLORIDA HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d GENERAL HOSPITAL KLAGENFURT   (Austria)

^e BNAI ZION MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^f DEPARTMENT OF CARDIOLOGY   (Belgium)

^g Ferrell Duncan Clinic   (United States)

^h CATHARINA HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^j UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^k Children's Hospital of Michigan   (United States)

^l Klinikum Neuperlach   (Germany)

^m UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

ⁿ UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^o UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^p novoGI Ltd   (Israel)

^q DEPARTMENT OF COLORECTAL SURGERY   (United States)

^r NONE

more..

Author keywords

Anastomotic leakage; Compression anastomosis; Low anterior resection

Indexed keywords

NITINOL; ALLOY;

ABSCESS; ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ANASTOMOSIS RING; ARTICLE; COLORECTAL ANASTOMOSIS; COLORECTAL CANCER; COMPRESSION ANASTOMOSIS RING; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; CONVERSION TO OPEN SURGERY; DIVERTICULITIS; FEMALE; FISTULA; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; OPEN STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTMARKETING SURVEILLANCE; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECTUM ANTERIOR RESECTION; REOPERATION; STOMA; ADVERSE EFFECTS; ANASTOMOSIS; ANASTOMOTIC LEAK; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLON; COLON RESECTION; DEVICES; EUROPE; ISRAEL; MIDDLE AGED; PHASE 4 CLINICAL TRIAL; PROCEDURES; RECTUM; SEPSIS; SURGERY; UNITED STATES; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALLOYS; ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; ANASTOMOTIC LEAK; COLECTOMY; COLON; EUROPE; FEMALE; HUMANS; ISRAEL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRODUCT SURVEILLANCE, POSTMARKETING; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RECTUM; SEPSIS; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84929670656     PISSN: 14628910     EISSN: 14631318     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/codi.12884     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Senagore AJ, Delaney CP. A critical analysis of laparoscopic colectomy at a single institution: lessons learned after 1000 cases. Am J Surg 2006; 191: 377-80.
2. Rahbari NN, Weitz J, Hohenberger W et al. Definition and grading of anastomotic leakage following anterior resection of the rectum: a proposal by the International Study Group of Rectal Cancer. Surgery 2010; 147: 339-51.
3. Paun BC, Cassie S, MacLean AR, Dixon E, Buie WD. Postoperative complications following surgery for rectal cancer. Ann Surg 2010; 251: 807-18.
4. Lustosa SA, Matos D, Atallah AN, Castro AA. Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Sao Paulo Med J 2002; 120: 132-6.
5. MacRae HM, McLeod RS. Handsewn vs. stapled anastomoses in colon and rectal surgery: a meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 1998; 41: 180-9.
6. Neutzling CB, Lustosa SA, Proenca IM, da Silva EM, Matos D. Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery. Cochrane Database Sys Rev 2012; 2: CD003144.
7. Senagore A1, Lane FR, Lee E et al.; Bioabsorbable Staple Line Reinforcement Study Group. Bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement in restorative proctectomy and anterior resection: a randomized study. Dis Colon Rectum 2014; 57: 324-30.
8. Baek SJ, Kim SH, Cho JS, Shin JW, Kim J. Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a cost analysis from a single institute in Korea. World J Surg 2012; 36: 2722-9.
9. Wullstein C, Gross E. Compression anastomosis (AKA-2) in colorectal surgery: results in 442 consecutive patients. Br J Surg 2000; 87: 1071-5.
10. Gullichsen R, Havia T, Ovaska J, Rantala A. Colonic anastomosis using the biofragmentable anastomotic ring and manual suture: a prospective, randomized study. Br J Surg 1992; 79: 578-80.
11. Zbar AP, Nir Y, Weizman A, Rabau M, Senagore A. Compression anastomosis in colorectal surgery: a review. Tech Coloproctol 2012; 16: 187-99.
12. Masoomi H, Mills S, Carmichael JC, Senagore AJ, Stamos MJ. Compression anastomosis ring device in colorectal anastomosis: a review of 1, 180 patients. Am J Surg 2013; 79: 1058-63.
13. Pata G, D'Hoore A, Fieuws S, Penninckx F. Mortality risk analysis following routine versus selective defunctioning stoma formation after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis 2009; 11: 797-805.
14. Mathiessen P, Hallböök O, Rutegărd J, Simert G, Sjödahl R. Defunctioning stoma reduces symptomatic anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection of the rectum for cancer: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 2007; 246: 207-14.
15. Chun J, Lee D, Stewart D, Talcott M, Fleshman J. Comparison of the compression anastomosis ring (EndoCAR) with a circular stapled anastomosis in a porcine model. Surg Innov 2011; 18: 235-40.
16. Chun J, Parikh P, Lee D, Fleshman J. Safety of the NiTi EndoCAR following chemoradiation in a porcine model. Surg Innov 2011; 18: 394-9.
17. Berho M, Fleshman JW, Wexner SD, Anug AM, Pelled D. Histopathological advantages of compression ring anastomosis healing as compared to stapled anastomosis in a porcine model: a blinded comparative study. Dis Colon Rectum 2014; 57: 506-13.
18. D'Hoore A, Hompes D, Folkesson J, Penninckx F, Păhlman L. Circular 'superelastic' compression anastomosis: from the animal lab to clinical practice. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 2008; 17: 172-5.