Histopathologic advantages of compression ring anastomosis healing as compared with stapled anastomosis in a porcine model: A blinded comparative study

Diseases of the Colon and Rectum

Volumn 57, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 506-513

  Berho, Mariana ^a   Wexner, Steven D ^a   Botero Anug, Ana Maria ^b   Pelled, Dori ^c   Fleshman, James W ^d  

^a DEPARTMENT OF COLORECTAL SURGERY   (United States)

^b PathoVet   (Israel)

^c novoGI Ltd   (Israel)

^d BAYLOR UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Blinded comparative study; Colorectal anastomosis; Compression ring anastomosis; Healing; Histopathology; Long term effect; Porcine model; Stapled anastomosis

Indexed keywords

ANASTOMOSIS RING; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; COLORECTAL ANASTOMOSIS; COMPRESSION ANASTOMOSIS RING; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; END TO END ANASTOMOSIS; FEMALE; FOREIGN BODY; FOREIGN BODY REACTION; HISTOPATHOLOGY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INFLAMMATORY CELL; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROTOMY; LYMPHOCYTE; MONONUCLEAR CELL; MORPHOMETRICS; NONHUMAN; POLYMORPHONUCLEAR CELL; PORCINE MODEL; RECTUM BIOPSY; STAPLER; SURGICAL STAPLING; TISSUE REPAIR; WOUND HEALING;

ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; ANIMALS; CICATRIX; COLON; FEMALE; FOREIGN-BODY REACTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PRESSURE; RANDOM ALLOCATION; RECTUM; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; SURGICAL STAPLING; SWINE; WOUND CLOSURE TECHNIQUES; WOUND HEALING;

EID: 84898760662     PISSN: 00123706     EISSN: 15300358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000009     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. McKinley AJ, Krukowski ZH. Intestinal anastomoses. Surgery. 2006;24:224-228.
2. Nandakumar G, Stein SL, Michelassi F. Anastomoses of the lower gastrointestinal tract. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;6:709-716.
3. Mortensen NJ, Ashraf S. Intestinal anastomosis. In: Ashley SW, ed. ACS Surgery: Principles and Practice. Vol 5. Philadelphia, PA: BC Decker Inc.; 2008.
4. Enoch S, Leaper DJ. Basic science of wound healing. Surgery. 2005;23:37-42.
5. Patel KA, Thomas WEG. Sutures, ligatures and staples. Surgery. 2008;26:48-53.
6. Thompson SK, Chang EY, Jobe BA. Clinical review: healing in gastrointestinal anastomoses, part I. Microsurgery. 2006;26:131-136.
7. Koruda MJ, Rolandelli RH. Experimental studies on the healing of colonic anastomoses. J Surg Res. 1990;48:504-515.
8. Senagore A, Milsom JW, Walshaw RK, Dunston R, Chaudry IH. Direct comparison between Czerny-Lembert and circular-stapled anastomotic techniques in colorectal anastomosis: a similar pattern of healing for both. Dis Colon Rectum. 1992;35:862-869.
9. Kaidar-Person O, Rosenthal RJ, Wexner SD, Szomstein S, Person B. Compression anastomosis: history and clinical considerations. Am J Surg. 2008;195:818-826.
10. Zbar AP, Nir Y, Weizman A, Rabau M, Senagore A. Compression anastomoses in colorectal surgery: a review. Tech Coloproctol. 2012;16:187-199.
11. Aggarwal R, Darzi A. Compression anastomoses revisited. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;201:965-971.
12. Kopelman D, Hatoum OA, Kimmel B, et al. Compression gastrointestinal anastomosis. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2007;4:821-828.
13. Ho YH, Ashour MA. Techniques for colorectal anastomosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16:1610-1621.
14. Stewart D, Hunt S, Pierce R, et al. Validation of the NITI Endoluminal Compression Anastomosis Ring (EndoCAR) device and comparison to the traditional circular stapled colorectal anastomosis in a porcine model. Surg Innov. 2007;14:252-260.
15. Chun J, Parikh P, Lee D, Fleshman J. Safety of the NiTi Endo-CAR following chemoradiation in a porcine model. Surg Innov. 2011;18:394-399.
16. Chun J, Lee D, Stewart D, Talcott M, Fleshman J. Comparison of the compression anastomosis ring (EndoCAR) with a circular stapled anastomosis in a porcine model. Surg Innov. 2011;18:235-240.
17. Koo EJ, Choi HJ, Woo JH, et al. Anastomosis by use of compression anastomosis ring (CAR 27) in laparoscopic surgery for left-sided colonic tumor. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012;27: 391-396.
18. Avgoustou C, Penlidis P, Tsakpini A, Sioros C, Giannousis D. Compression anastomoses in colon and rectal surgery with the NiTi ColonRing. Tech Coloproctol. 2012;16:29-35.
19. Lee JY, Woo JH, Choi HJ, et al. Early experience of the compression anastomosis ring (CAR 27) in left-sided colon resection. World J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:4787-4792.
20. Dauser B, Winkler T, Loncsar G, Herbst F. Compression anastomosis revisited: prospective audit of short- and medium-term outcomes in 62 rectal anastomoses. World J Surg. 2011;35:1925-1932.
21. Buchberg BS, Masoomi H, Bergman H, Mills SD, Stamos MJ. The use of a compression device as an alternative to hand-sewn and stapled colorectal anastomoses: is three a crowd? J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15:304-310.
22. Kopelman Y, Siersema PD, Nir Y, et al. Endoluminal compression clip: full-thickness resection of the mesenteric bowel wall in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:1146-1157.
23. Elliot SJ, Karl M, Berho M, et al. Smoking induces glomerulosclerosis in aging estrogen-deficient mice through cross-talk between TGF-beta1 and IGF-I signaling pathways. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17:3315-3324.
24. Kuzu MA, Kuzu I, Koksoy C, et al. Histological evaluation of colonic anastomotic healing in the rat following preoperative 5-fluorouracil, fractionated irradiation, and combined treatment. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1998;13:235-240.
25. Shaper KR, Savage FJ, Hembry RM, Boulos PB. Regulation of matrix metalloproteinases in a model of colonic wound healing in a rabbit. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:1857-1866.
26. Thornton FJ, Barbul A. Healing in the gastrointestinal tract. Surg Clin North Am. 1997;77:549-573.
27. Schlegel RD, Dehni N, Parc R, Caplin S, Tiret E. Results of reoperations in colorectal anastomotic strictures. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001;44:1464-1468.
28. Ambrosetti P, Francis K, De Peyer R, Frossard JL. Colorectal anastomotic stenosis after elective laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease: a prospective evaluation of 68 patients. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51:1345-1349.
29. Lustosa SA, Matos D, Atallah AN, Castro AA. Stapled versus handsewn methods for colorectal anastomosis surgery: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Sao Paulo Med J. 2002;120:132-136.
30. Sadahiro S, Kameya T, Iwase H, et al. Which technique, circular stapled anastomosis or double stapling anastomosis, provides the optimal size and shape of rectal anastomotic opening? J Surg Res. 1999;86:162-166.
31. MacRae HM, McLeod RS. Handsewn vs. stapled anastomoses in colon and rectal surgery: a meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998;41:180-189.
32. Grassi N, Cipolla C, Bottino A, et al. Validity of shape memory NiTi colon ring BioDynamix ColonRing (or NiTi CAR 27) to prevent anastomotic colorectal strictures: preliminary results. G Chir. 2012;33:194-198.
33. D'Hoore A, Hompes D, Folkesson J, Penninckx F, Pahlman L. Circular 'superelastic' compression anastomosis: from the animal lab to clinical practice. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2008;17:172-175.