Potential and challenges of patient-generated health data for high-quality cancer care

Journal of Oncology Practice

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 195-197

  Chung, Arlene E ^a   Basch, Ethan M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER PATIENT; CONFERENCE PAPER; CURRENT PROCEDURAL TERMINOLOGY; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HOLISTIC CARE; HOSPITAL FINANCE; HUMAN; MEDICAID; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICARE; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PATIENT GENERATED HEALTH DATA; PATIENT INFORMATION; PATIENT MONITORING; REIMBURSEMENT; REMOTE SENSING; SELF MONITORING; STANDARDIZATION; WORKFLOW; WORKLOAD; DEVICES; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; NEOPLASMS; ONCOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; REGISTER; STANDARDS; TELEMETRY; TIME FACTOR; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; TRANSDUCER; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

DATA COLLECTION; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HUMANS; MEDICAL ONCOLOGY; NEOPLASMS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; QUALITY INDICATORS, HEALTH CARE; REGISTRIES; TELEMETRY; TIME FACTORS; TRANSDUCERS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84929662775     PISSN: 15547477     EISSN: 1935469X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2015.003715     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Feeley TW, Lake F: Improving the quality of cancer care in America. Future Oncology 10:1133-1136, 2014
2. Forte GJ, Hanley A, Hagerty K, et al: American Society of Clinical Oncology national census of oncology practices: Preliminary report. J Oncol Pract 9:9-19, 2013
3. Shapiro M, Johnston D, Wald J, et al: Patient-generated health data: White Paper prepared for the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology 2012. http://www.rti.org/pubs/patientgeneratedhealthdata.pdf
4. Institute of Medicine: Delivering High-Quality Cancer Care: Charting a New Course for a System in Crisis. Washington, DC, National Academies Press, 2013
5. Sledge GW Jr, Miller RS, Hauser R: CancerLinQ and the future of cancer care. Am Soc Clin Oncol Ed Book 430-434, 2013
6. Fox S, Duggan M: Tracking for health 2013. http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/Tracking-for-Health.aspx
7. Consumer Electronics Association White Paper: Connected Health and Wellness Market. Baltimore, MD, Consumer Electronics Association, 2014
8. Health Information Technology Policy Committee meaningful use stage 3 final recommendations 2014. http://www.healthit.gov/sites/faca/files/HITPC-MUWG-Stage3-Recs-2014-04-01.pdf
9. Chung AE, Basch EM: Incorporating the patient's voice into electronic health records through patient-reported outcomes asthe "review of systems." J Am Med Inform Assoc doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocu007 [epub online ahead of print on January 21, 2015]
10. Petersen MA, Larsen H, Pedersen L, et al: Assessing health-related quality of life in palliative care: Comparing patient and physician assessments. Eur J cancer 42:1159-1166, 2006
11. Fromme EK, Eilers KM, Mori M, et al: How accurate is clinician reporting of chemotherapy adverse effects? A comparison with patient-reported symptoms from the Quality-of-Life Questionnaire C30. J Clin Oncol 22:3485-3490, 2004
12. Basch E, Iasonos A, McDonough T, et al: Patient versus clinician symptom reporting using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events: Results of a questionnaire-based study. Lancet Oncol 7:903-909, 2006
13. Basch E, Artz D, Dulko D, et al: Patient online self-reporting of toxicity symptoms during chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 23:3552-3561, 2005
14. Kotronoulas G, Kearney N, Maguire R, et al: What is the value of the routine use of patient-reported outcome measures toward improvement of patient outcomes, processes of care, and health service outcomes in cancer care? A systematic review of controlled trials. J Clin Oncol 32:1480-1501, 2014
15. Donnell J: Case Study: An HIE-populated personal health record for cardiac revascularization patients 2014. https://www.nomoreclipboard.com/providers/info/casestudy-an-hie-populated-personal-health-record-for-cardiac-revascularization-patients
16. Watson AJ, Kvedar JC, Rahman B, et al: Diabetes connected health: A pilot study of a patient- and provider-shared glucose monitoring web application J Diabetes Sci Technol 3:345-352, 2009
17. Seto E, Leonard KJ, Cafazzo JA, et al: Perceptions and experiences of heart failure patients and clinicians on the use of mobile phone-based telemonitoring. J Med Internet Res 14:e25, 2012
18. Darkins A, Ryan P, Kobb R, et al: Care coordination/home telehealth: The systematic implementation of health informatics, home telehealth, and disease management to support the care of veteran patients with chronic conditions. Telemed JEHealth 14:1118-1126, 2008
19. Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society: National eHealth Collaborative Patient-Generated Health Data Technical Expert Panel Final Report. December 2013. http://www.himss.org/ResourceLibrary/genResourceDetailPDF.aspx?ItemNumber=28740
20. [No authors listed]: Medicare program: Revisions to payment policies under the physician fee schedule, clinical laboratory fee schedule, access to identifiable data for the Center for Medicare and Medicaid innovation models and other revisions to part B for CY 2015. Federal Register, November 13, 2014. https://federalregister.gov/a/2014-26183
21. Reeve BB, Mitchell SA, Dueck AC, et al: Recommended patient-reported core set of symptoms to measure in adult cancer treatment trials. J Natl Cancer Inst 106, 2014
22. Cleeland CS, Zhao F, Chang VT, et al: The symptom burden of cancer: Evidence for a core set of cancer-related and treatment-related symptoms from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Symptom Outcomes and Practice Patterns study. Cancer 119:4333-4340, 2013
23. National eHealth Collaborative: Patient-generated health data technical expert panel: Final report December 2013. http://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/pghi-tep-finalreport121713.pdf