Guidance for the prognostic risk assessment of nanomaterials in aquatic ecosystems

Science of the Total Environment

Volumn 535, Issue , 2015, Pages 141-149

  Koelmans, A A ^a   Diepens, N J ^a   Velzeboer, I ^a   Besseling, E ^a   Quik, J T K ^a,b   van de Meent, D ^b,c  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT   (Netherlands)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Effect assessment; Exposure assessment; Multimedia models; Nanomaterials; Risk assessment; Water quality models

Indexed keywords

AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS; COST EFFECTIVENESS; ECOLOGY; ECOSYSTEMS; NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; WATER QUALITY;

ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT; EFFECT ASSESSMENTS; ENGINEERED NANOMATERIALS; EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT; MULTIMEDIA MODELS; PROBABILISTIC APPROACHES; SPECIES SENSITIVITY DISTRIBUTIONS; WATER QUALITY MODELS;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

ENGINEERED NANOMATERIAL; NANOMATERIAL; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; WATER POLLUTANT;

AQUATIC ECOSYSTEM; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ENVIRONMENTAL FATE; ENVIRONMENTAL RISK; NANOTECHNOLOGY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT; AQUATIC SPECIES; ARTICLE; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FIELD EXPERIMENT; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCREENING; SEMI FIELD EXPERIMENT; SPECIES DISTRIBUTION; SPECIES SENSITIVITY DISTRIBUTION; ANALYSIS; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; PROCEDURES; THEORETICAL MODEL; WATER POLLUTANT;

ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NANOSTRUCTURES; RISK ASSESSMENT; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL;

EID: 84929651131     PISSN: 00489697     EISSN: 18791026     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.02.032     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Arvidsson R., Molander S., Sanden B.A., Hasselhöv M. Challenges in exposure modeling of nanoparticles in aquatic environments. Hum. Ecol. Risk. Assess. 2011, 17:245-262.
2. Barton L.E., Therezien M., Auffan M., Bottero J.Y., Wiesner M.R. Theory and methodology for determining nanoparticle affinity for heteroaggregation in environmental matrices using batch measurements. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2014, 31:421-427.
3. Besseling E., Wang B., Lurling M., Koelmans A.A. Nanoplastic affects growth of S. obliquus and reproduction of D. magna. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48:12336-12343.
4. Brock T.C. Priorities to improve the ecological risk assessment and management for pesticides in surface water. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. 2013, 9:64-74.
5. Buffet P.-E., Richard M., Caupos F., Vergnoux A., Perrein-Ettajani H., Luna-Acosta A., Akcha F., Amiard J.-C., Amiard-Triquet C., Guibbolini M., Risso-De Faverney C., Thomas-Guyon H., Reip P., Dybowska A., Berhanu D., Valsami-Jones E., Mouneyrac C. A mesocosm study of fate and effects of CuO nanoparticles on endobenthic species (Scrobicularia plana, Hediste diversicolor). Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47:1620-1628.
6. Buffet P.-E., Zalouk-Vergnoux A., Châtel A., Berthet B., Métais I., Perrein-Ettajani H., Poirier L., Luna-Acosta A., Thomas-Guyon H., Risso-de Faverney C., Guibbolini M., Gilliland D., Valsami-Jones E., Mouneyrac C. A marine mesocosm study on the environmental fate of silver nanoparticles and toxicity effects on two endobenthic species: the ragworm Hediste diversicolor and the bivalve mollusc Scrobicularia plana. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 470-471:1151-1159.
7. Covich A.P., Austen M.C., Bärlocher F., Chauvet E., Cardinale B.J., Biles C.L., Inchausti P., Dangles O., Solan M., Gessner M.O., Statzner B., Moss B. The role of biodiversity in the functioning of freshwater and marine benthic ecosystems. Bioscience 2004, 54:767-775.
8. Dale A.L., Lowry G.V., Casman E.A. Modeling nanosilver transformations in freshwater sediments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47:12920-12928.
9. Dale A.L., Lowry G.V., Casman E. Much ado about α: reframing the debate over appropriate fate descriptors in nanoparticle environmental risk modeling. Environ. Sci.: Nano 2015, 2:27-32.
10. Di Toro D., Zarba C., Hansen D., Berry W., Swartz R., Cowan C., Pavlou S., Allen H., Thomas N., Paquin P. Technical basis for the equilibrium partitioning method for establishing sediment quality criteria. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1991, 11:1541-1583.
11. Diepens N.J., Arts G.H.P., Brock T.C.M., Smidt H., Van den Brink P.J., van den Heuvel-Greve M.J., Koelmans A.A. Sediment toxicity testing of organic chemicals in the context of prospective risk assessment. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 44:255-302.
12. ECHA, 2014. In: Tarazona, Jose V., B. V., Janssen, Colin, De Laender, Frederik, Vangheluwe, Marnix, Knight, Derek (Eds.), Principles for Environmental Risk Assessment of the Sediment Compartment: Proceedings of the Topical Scientific Workshop, 7-8 May 2013, Helsinki, Finland, 7-8 May 2013, 2014. European Chemicals Agency, Helsinki, Finland.
13. EFSA Guidance on tiered risk assessment for plant protection products for aquatic organisms in edge of field surface waters. EFSA J. 2013, 11(7):186.
14. European Commission Common Implementation Strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC) Guidance Document No 27 Technical Guidance Document for Deriving Environmental Quality Standards. Technical Report- 2011-055 2011.
15. Forbes V.E., Calow P. Use of the ecosystem services concept in ecological risk assessment of chemicals. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. 2013, 9:269-275.
16. Garner K.L., Keller A.A. Emerging patterns for engineered nanomaterials in the environment: a review of fate and toxicity studies. J. Nanopart. Res. 2014, 16:2503.
17. 2 nanoparticles from sunscreens into surface waters: a one-year survey at the old Danube recreational lake. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48:5415-5422.
18. 2, ZnO, Ag, CNT, fullerenes) for different regions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43:9216-9222.
19. Gottschalk F., Sun T., Nowack B. Environmental concentrations of engineered nanomaterials: review of modeling and analytical studies. Environ. Pollut. 2013, 181:287-300.
20. Gottschalk F., Kost E., Nowack B. Engineered nanomaterials in water and soils: a risk quantification based on probabilistic exposure and effect modeling. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2013, 32:1278-1287.
21. Handy R.D., Cornelis G., Fernandes T., Tsyusko O., Decho A., Sabo-Attwood T., Metcalfe C., Steevens J.A., Klaine S.J., Koelmans A.A., Horne N. Ecotoxicity test methods for engineered nanomaterials: practical experiences and recommendations from the bench. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2012, 31:15-31.
22. Hassellöv M., Readman J.W., Ranville J.F., Tiede K. Nanoparticle analysis and characterization methodologies in environmental risk assessment of engineered nanoparticles. Ecotoxicology 2008, 17:344-361.
23. Hendren C.O., Lowry M., Grieger K.D., Money E.S., Johnston J.M., Wiesner M.R., Beaulieu S.M. Modeling approaches for characterizing and evaluating environmental exposure to engineered nanomaterials in support of risk-based decision making. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47:1190-1205.
24. Hendren C.O., Badireddy A.R., Casman E., Wiesner M.R. Modeling nanomaterial fate in wastewater treatment: Monte Carlo simulation of silver nanoparticles (nano-Ag). Sci. Total Environ. 2013, 449:418-425.
25. Holden P.A., Klaessig F., Turco R.F., Priester J.H., Rico C.M., Avila-Arias H., Mortimer M., Pacpaco K., Gardea-Torresdey J.L. Evaluation of exposure concentrations used in assessing manufactured nanomaterial environmental hazards: are they relevant?. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48:10541-10551.
26. Ivask A., Juganson K., Bondarenko O., Mortimer M., Aruoja V., Kasemets K., Blinova I., Heinlaan M., Slaveykova V., Kahru A. Mechanisms of toxic action of Ag, ZnO and CuO nanoparticles to selected ecotoxicological test organisms and mammalian cells in vitro: a comparative review. Nanotoxicology 2014, 8:57-71.
27. Kennedy A.J., Gunter J.C., Chappell M.A., Goss J.D., Hull M.S., Kirgan R.A., Steevens J.A. Influence of nanotube preparation in aquatic bioassays. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2009, 28:1930-1938.
28. Klaine S.J., Koelmans A.A., Horne N., Handy R.D., Kapustka L., Nowack B., von der Kammer F. Paradigms to assess the environmental impact of manufactured nanomaterials. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2012, 31:3-14.
29. Koelmans A.A., Van der Heijde A., Knijff L., Aalderink R.H. Modelling feedbacks between eutrophication and organic contaminant fate & effects in aquatic ecosystems. A review. Water Res. 2001, 35:3517-3536.
30. Koelmans A.A., Nowack B., Wiesner M. Comparison of manufactured and black carbon nanoparticle concentrations in aquatic sediments. Environ. Pollut. 2009, 157:1110-1116.
31. Koelmans A.A., Quik J.T.K., Velzeboer I. Lake retention of manufactured nanoparticles. Environ. Pollut. 2015, 196:171-175.
32. Kühnel D., Nickel C. The OECD expert meeting on ecotoxicology and environmental fate-towards the development of improved OECD guidelines for the testing of nanomaterials. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 472:347-353.
33. Levin L.A., Boesch D.F., Covich A., Dahm C., Erséus C., Ewel K.C., Kneib R.T., Moldenke A., Palmer M.A., Snelgrove P., Strayer D., Weslawski J.M. The function of marine critical transition zones and the importance of sediment biodiversity 2001, 4:430-451.
34. 2 nanoparticles to benthic organisms. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2014, 33:1563-1569.
35. Liu H.H., Cohen Y. Multimedia environmental distribution of engineered nanomaterials. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48:3281-3292.
36. Lowry G.V., Gregory K.B., Apte S.C., Lead J.R. Transformations of nanomaterials in the environment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46:6893-6899.
37. Meesters J., Koelmans A.A., Quik J.T.K., Hendriks A.J., Van de Meent D. Multimedia modeling of engineered nanoparticles with SimpleBox 4 nano: model definition and evaluation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48:5726-5736.
38. Mueller N.C., Nowack B. Exposure modeling of engineered nanoparticles in the environment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42:4447-4453.
39. Nienstedt K.M., Brock T.C.M., van Wensem J., Montforts M., Hart A., Aagaard A., Alix A., Boesten J., Bopp S.K., Brown C., Capri E., Forbes V., Köpp H., Liess M., Luttik R., Maltby L., Sousa J.P., Streissl F., Hardy A.R. Development of a framework based on an ecosystem services approach for deriving specific protection goals for environmental risk assessment of pesticides. Sci. Total Environ. 2012, 415:31-38.
40. Notter D.A., Mitrano D.M., Nowack B. Are nanosized or dissolved metals more toxic in the environment? A meta-analysis. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2014, 33:2733-2739.
41. Nowack B., Ranville J., Diamond S., Gallego-Urrea J., Metcalfe C., Rose J., Horne N., Koelmans A.A., Klaine S.J. Potential scenarios for nanomaterial release and subsequent alteration in the environment. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2012, 31:50-59.
42. Peijnenburg W.J.G.M., Baalousha M., Chen J., Chaudry Q., Von der Kammer F., Kuhlbusch T.A.J., Lead J., Nickel C., Quik J.T.K., Renkerg M., Wang Z., Koelmans A.A. Properties en processes determining the fate of engineered nanomaterials in the aquatic environment. A review. Critical Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, (in press).
43. Petersen E.J., Henry T.B. Methodological considerations for testing the ecotoxicology of carbon nanotubes and fullerenes: review. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2012, 31:60-72.
44. Petosa A.R., Jaisi D.P., Quevedo I.R., Elimelech M., Tufenkji N. Aggregation and deposition of engineered nanomaterials in aquatic environments: role of physicochemical interactions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44:6532.
45. Posthuma L., Suter G.W., Traas T.P. Species sensitivity distributions in ecotoxicology 2002, Boca Raton, FL, Lewis.
46. Posthuma L., Eijsackers H.J.P., Koelmans A.A., Vijver M.G. Ecological effects of diffuse mixed pollution are site-specific and require higher-tier risk assessment to improve site management decisions: a discussion paper. Sci. Total Environ. 2008, 406:503-517.
47. 2 nanoparticles in the Rhine River. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46:6705-6713.
48. Praetorius A., Labille J., Scheringer M., Thill A., Hungerbühler K., Bottero J.Y. Heteroaggregation of titanium dioxide nanoparticles with model natural colloids under environmentally relevant conditions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48:10690-10698.
49. Quik J.T.K. Fate of Nanoparticles in the Aquatic Environment: Removal of Engineered Nanomaterials From the Water Phase Under Environmental Conditions 2013, (Thesis), Radboud University Nijmegen.
50. Quik J.T.K., Vonk J.A., Hansen S.F., Baun A., Van de Meent D. How to assess exposure of aquatic organisms to manufactured nanoparticles?. Environ. Int. 2011, 37:1068-1077.
51. Quik J.T.K., Velzeboer I., Wouterse M., Koelmans A.A., van de Meent D. Heteroaggregation and sedimentation rates for nanomaterials in natural waters. Water Res. 2014, 47:269-279.
52. Quik J.T.K., van de Meent D., Koelmans A.A. Simplifying modelling of nanoparticle aggregation-sedimentation behaviour in environmental systems: a theoretical analysis. Water Res. 2014, 62:193-201.
53. Quik J.T.K., de Klein J.J.M., Koelmans A.A. Spatially explicit fate modelling of nanomaterials in natural waters. Proceedings SETAC Annual Meeting, Basel, Switzerland 2014.
54. Solomon K.R., Brock T.C.M., De Zwart D., Dyer S.D., Sanderson H., Sibley P.K., Van den Brink P.J. Extrapolation Practice for Ecotoxicological Effect Characterization of Chemicals 2008, SETAC Press & CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA.
55. Som C., Nowack B., Krug H.F., Wick P. Toward the development of decision supporting tools that can be used for safe production and use of nanomaterials. Acc. Chem. Res. 2013, 46:863-872.
56. Tella M., Auffan M., Brousset L., Issartel J., Kieffer I., Pailles C., Morel E., Santaella C., Angeletti B., Artells E., Rose J., Thiéry A., Bottero J.Y. Transfer, transformation, and impacts of ceria nanomaterials in aquatic mesocosms simulating a pond ecosystem. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48:9004-9013.
57. Therezien M., Thill A., Wiesner M.R. Importance of heterogeneous aggregation for NP fate in natural and engineered systems. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 485-486:309-318.
58. Thill A., Moustier S., Aziz J., Wiesner M.R., Bottero J.Y. Flocs restructuring during aggregation: experimental evidence and numerical simulation. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2001, 243:171-182.
59. Van Beelen P., Doelman P. Significance and application of microbial toxicity tests in assessing ecotoxicological risks of contaminants in soil and sediment. Chemosphere 1997, 34:455-499.
60. Van den Brink P.J. Response to recent criticism on aquatic semifield experiments: opportunities for new developments in ecological risk assessment of pesticides. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. 2006, 2:202-203.
61. Velzeboer I., Kupryianchyk D., Peeters E.T.H.M., Koelmans A.A. Community effects of carbon nanotubes in aquatic sediments. Environ. Int. 2011, 37:1126-1130.
62. Velzeboer I., Peeters E.T.H.M., Koelmans A.A. Multiwalled carbon nanotubes at environmentally relevant concentrations affect the composition of benthic communities. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47:7475-7482.
63. Velzeboer I., Quik J.T.K., van de Meent D., Koelmans A.A. Rapid settling of nanomaterials due to heteroaggregation with suspended sediment. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2014, 33:1766-1773.
64. Von der Kammer F., Ferguson P.L., Holden P., Masion A., Roger K., Klaine S.J., Koelmans A.A., Horne N., Unrine J. Analysis of nanomaterials in complex matrices (environment and biota): general considerations and conceptual case studies. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2012, 31:32-49.
65. Wall D.H. Sustaining Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in Soils and Sediments 2004, Island Press, Washington.