Are nanosized or dissolved metals more toxic in the environment? A meta-analysis

Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry

Volumn 33, Issue 12, 2014, Pages 2733-2739

  Notter, Dominic A ^a   Mitrano, Denise M ^a   Nowack, Bernd ^a  

^a SWISS FEDERAL LABORATORIES FOR MATERIALS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Ecotoxicity; Meta analysis; Metal nanomaterial; Metal oxide nanomaterial; Regulation

Indexed keywords

COPPER OXIDES; DISSOLUTION; II-VI SEMICONDUCTORS; LAWS AND LEGISLATION; METAL IONS; METALS; NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS; OXIDE MINERALS; ZINC OXIDE;

ECOTOXICITY; EFFECTIVE CONCENTRATION; ENGINEERED NANOMATERIALS; INDUSTRY REPRESENTATIVES; META ANALYSIS; METAL CONCENTRATIONS; METAL-OXIDE NANOMATERIAL; REGULATION;

METAL ANALYSIS;

CARBONIC ACID; COPPER OXIDE; FRESH WATER; METAL ION; NATURAL ORGANIC MATTER; PHOSPHATE; SEA WATER; SILVER; ZINC OXIDE; COPPER; CUPRIC OXIDE; METAL; METAL NANOPARTICLE; POLLUTANT; SOIL POLLUTANT;

BIOENGINEERING; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); DATA SET; DISSOLVED MATTER; ECOTOXICOLOGY; ERROR ANALYSIS; FRESHWATER ENVIRONMENT; META-ANALYSIS; METAL; OXIDE; POLLUTION EFFECT;

ARTICLE; COMPLEX FORMATION; DISSOLUTION; EC50; ECOTOXICITY; MARINE SPECIES; NONHUMAN; PARTICLE SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REDUCTION; SEDIMENTATION; SURFACE AREA; TROPHIC LEVEL; ANIMAL; BACTERIUM; CHEMISTRY; CRUSTACEA; DRUG EFFECTS; FACTUAL DATABASE; META ANALYSIS; POLLUTANT; SOIL POLLUTANT; THEORETICAL MODEL; TOXICITY;

ANIMALS; BACTERIA; COPPER; CRUSTACEA; DATABASES, FACTUAL; ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANTS; FRESH WATER; METAL NANOPARTICLES; METALS; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PARTICLE SIZE; SILVER; SOIL POLLUTANTS; ZINC OXIDE;

EID: 84922991087     PISSN: 07307268     EISSN: 15528618     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/etc.2732     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Kahru A, Ivask A. 2013. Mapping the dawn of nanoecotoxicological research. Acc Chem Res 46:823-833.
2. Krug HF, Wick P. 2011. Nanotoxicology: An interdisciplinary challenge. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 50:1260-1278.
3. Nel A, Xia T, Meng H, Wang X, Lin S, Ji Z, Zhang H. 2013. Nanomaterial toxicity testing in the 21st century: Use of a predictive toxicological approach and high-throughput screening. Acc Chem Res 46:607-621.
4. Aschberger K, Micheletti C, Sokull-Kluttgen B, Christensen FM. 2011. Analysis of currently available data for characterising the risk of engineered nanomaterials to the environment and human health-Lessons learned from four case studies. Environ Int 37:1143-1156.
5. Batley GE, Kirby JK, McLaughlin MJ. 2013. Fate and risks of nanomaterials in aquatic and terrestrial environments. Acc Chem Res 46:854-862.
6. Gottschalk F, Kost E, Nowack B. 2013. Engineered nanomaterials in water and soils: A risk quantification based on probabilistic exposure and effect modeling. Environ Toxicol Chem 32:1278-1287.
7. Handy RD, Cornelis G, Fernandes T, Tsyusko O, Decho A, Sabo-Attwood T, Metcalfe C, Steevens JA, Klaine SJ, Koelmans AA, Horne N. 2012. Ecotoxicity test methods for engineered nanomaterials: Practical experiences and recommendations from the bench. Environ Toxicol Chem 31:15-31.
8. Zhu M, Nie G, Meng H, Xia T, Nel A, Zhao Y. 2013. Physicochemical properties determine nanomaterial cellular uptake, transport, and fate. Acc Chem Res 46:622-631.
9. Bondarenko O, Juganson K, Ivask A, Kasemets K, Mortimer M, Kahru A. 2013. Toxicity of Ag, CuO and ZnO nanoparticles to selected environmentally relevant test organisms and mammalian cells in vitro: A critical review. Arch Toxicol 87:1181-1200.
10. Nowack B, Mueller NC, Krug HF, Wick P. 2014. How to consider engineered nanomaterials in major accident regulations? Environ Sci Eur 26:2.
11. Hansen SF, Baun A. 2012. When enough is enough. Nat Nanotechnol 7:409-411.
12. Malloy TF. 2011. Nanotechnology regulation: A study in claims making. ACS Nano 5:5-12.
13. Beaudrie CEH, Kandlikar M, Satterfield T. 2013. From cradle-to-grave at the nanoscale: Gaps in U.S. regulatory oversight along the nanomaterial life cycle. Environ Sci Technol 47:5524-5534.
14. United Nations. 2013. Globally Harmonized Systems of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS), 5th ed. Geneva, Switzerland.
15. European Commission. 2008. Regulation (EC) no 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the council of 16 December 2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures. Official J Eur Union L353:1-1355.
16. Misra SK, Dybowska A, Berhanu D, Luoma SN, Valsami-Jones E. 2012. The complexity of nanoparticle dissolution and its importance in nanotoxicological studies. Sci Total Environ 438:225-232.
17. Ma HB, Williams PL, Diamond SA. 2013. Ecotoxicity of manufactured ZnO nanoparticles-A review. Environ Pollut 172:76-85.
18. Shaw BJ, Handy RD. 2011. Physiological effects of nanoparticles on fish: A comparison of nanometals versus metal ions. Environ Int 37:1083-1097.
19. Ferguson EA, Hogstrand C. 1998. Acute silver toxicity to seawater-acclimated rainbow trout: Influence of salinity on toxicity and silver speciation. Environ Toxicol Chem 17:589-593.
20. Ratte HT. 1999. Bioaccumulation and toxicity of silver compounds: A review. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:89-108.
21. Macken A, Byrne HJ, Thomas KV. 2012. Effects of salinity on the toxicity of ionic silver and Ag-PVP nanoparticles to Tisbe battagliai and Ceramium tenuicorne. Ecotox Environ Safe 86:101-110.
22. Auffan M, Rose J, Bottero J-Y, Lowry GV, Jolivet J-P, Wiesner MR. 2009. Towards a definition of inorganic nanoparticles from an environmental, health and safety perspective. Nat Nano 4:634-641.
23. Lowry GV, Gregory KB, Apte SC, Lead JR. 2012. Transformations of nanomaterials in the environment. Environ Sci Technol 46:6893-6899.