An economic evaluation of colorectal cancer screening in primary care practice

American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Volumn 48, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 714-721

  Meenan, Richard T ^a   Anderson, Melissa L ^b   Chubak, Jessica ^b   Vernon, Sally W ^d   Fuller, Sharon ^b   Wang, Ching Yun ^c   Green, Beverly B ^b  

^a CENTER FOR HEALTH RESEARCH   (United States)

^b GROUP HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c USA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; CANCER SCREENING; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DEMOGRAPHY; ECONOMIC EVALUATION; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE PRACTICE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NURSE; OCCULT BLOOD; PARALLEL DESIGN; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; REFUSAL TO PARTICIPATE; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; TELEPHONE; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EARLY CANCER DIAGNOSIS; ECONOMICS; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; FEMALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REMINDER SYSTEM;

AGED; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; OCCULT BLOOD; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; REMINDER SYSTEMS;

EID: 84929643056     PISSN: 07493797     EISSN: 18732607     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2014.12.016     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement Ann Intern Med 149 9 2008 627 637 10.7326/0003-4819-149-9-200811040-00243
2. Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, et al, eds. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2011. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute. www.seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975-2011/.
3. E.P. Whitlock, J.S. Lin, E. Liles, T.L. Beil, and R. Fu Screening for colorectal cancer: a targeted, updated systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Ann Intern Med 149 9 2008 638 658 10.7326/0003-4819-149-9-200811040-00245
4. A.G. Zauber, I. Lansdorp-Vogelaar, A.B. Knudsen, J. Wilschut, M. van Ballegooijen, and K.M. Kuntz Evaluating test strategies for colorectal cancer screening: a decision analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Ann Intern Med 149 9 2008 659 669 10.7326/0003-4819-149-9-200811040-00244
5. CDC Vital signs: colorectal cancer screening test use - United States, 2012 Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 62 44 2013 881 888
6. J.A. Shapiro, C.N. Klabunde, T.D. Thompson, M.R. Nadel, L.C. Seeff, and A. White Patterns of colorectal cancer test use, including CT colonography, in the 2010 National Health Interview Survey Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 21 6 2012 895 904 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-0192
7. V. Shankaran, T.H. Luu, and N. Nonzee Costs and cost effectiveness of a health care provider-directed intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening J Clin Oncol 27 32 2009 5370 5375 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.6458
8. T.D. Sequist, C. Franz, and J.Z. Ayanian Cost-effectiveness of patient mailings to promote colorectal cancer screening Med Care 48 6 2010 553 557 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3181dbd8eb
9. CDC. 2014. Guide to Community Preventive Services. www.thecommunityguide.org/index.html.
10. B.B. Green, C.Y. Wang, and K. Horner Systems of support to increase colorectal cancer screening and follow-up rates (SOS): design, challenges, and baseline characteristics of trial participants Contemp Clin Trials 31 6 2010 589 603 10.1016/j.cct.2010.07.012
11. B.B. Green, C.Y. Wang, and M.L. Anderson An automated intervention with stepped increases in support to increase uptake of colorectal cancer screening: a randomized trial Ann Intern Med 158 5, pt 1 2013 301 311 10.7326/0003-4819-158-5-201303050-00002
12. B.B. Green, A. Bogart, and J. Chubak Nonparticipation in a population-based trial to increase colorectal cancer screening Am J Prev Med 42 4 2012 390 397 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.11.014
13. J.S. Hoch, A.H. Briggs, and A.R. Willan Something old, something new, something borrowed, something blue: a framework for the marriage of health econometrics and cost-effectiveness analysis Health Econ 11 5 2002 415 430 10.1002/hec.678
14. E. Fenwick, and S. Byford A guide to cost-effectiveness acceptability curves Br J Psychiatry 187 2005 106 108 10.1192/bjp.187.2.106
15. J.S. Hoch, M.A. Rockx, and A.D. Krahn Using the net benefit framework to construct cost-effectiveness acceptability curves: an example using data from a trial of external loop recorders versus Holter monitoring for ambulatory monitoring of "community acquired" syncope BMC Health Serv Res 6 2006 68 10.1186/1472-6963-6-68
16. Centre for Health Economics Regression Methods for Health Economic Evaluation Workshop Session Guide 2010 University of York York, UK
17. K.D. Frick Micro-costing quantity data collection methods Med Care 47 suppl 1 2009 S76 S81 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31819bc064 (7)
18. I. Lansdorp-Vogelaar, A.B. Knudsen, and H. Brenner Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening Epidemiol Rev 33 1 2011 88 100 10.1093/epirev/mxr004
19. D.H. Smith, A.C. Feldstein, and N. Perrin Automated telephone calls to enhance colorectal cancer screening: economic analysis Am J Manag Care 18 11 2012 691 699
20. D.R. Lairson, M. Dicarlo, and A.A. Deshmuk Cost-effectiveness of a standard intervention versus a navigated intervention on colorectal cancer screening use in primary care Cancer 120 7 2014 1042 1049 10.1002/cncr.28535
21. D.R. Lairson, M. DiCarlo, and R.E. Myers Cost-effectiveness of targeted and tailored interventions on colorectal cancer screening use Cancer 112 4 2008 779 788 10.1002/cncr.23232
22. S. Misra, D.R. Lairson, and W. Chan Cost effectiveness of interventions to promote screening for colorectal cancer: a randomized trial J Prev Med Public Health 44 3 2011 101 110 10.3961/jpmph.2011.44.3.101
23. M.S. Wolf, K.A. Fitzner, and E.F. Powell Costs and cost effectiveness of a health care provider-directed intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening among Veterans J Clin Oncol 23 34 2005 8877 8883 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.6278
24. T.C. Davis, C.L. Arnold, and C.L. Bennett Strategies to improve repeat fecal occult blood testing cancer screening Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 23 1 2014 134 143 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-0795
25. I. Lansdorp-Vogelaar, K.M. Kuntz, A.B. Knudsen, M. van Ballegooijen, A.G. Zauber, and A. Jemal Contribution of screening and survival differences to racial disparities in colorectal cancer rates Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 21 5 2012 728 736 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-0023
26. S.L. Goede, A.H. van Roon, and J.C. Reijerink Cost-effectiveness of one versus two sample faecal immunochemical testing for colorectal cancer screening Gut 62 5 2013 727 734 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301917
27. J.A. Wilschut, L. Hol, and E. Dekker Cost-effectiveness analysis of a quantitative immunochemical test for colorectal cancer screening Gastroenterology 141 5 2011 1648 1655 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.07.020