Nonparticipation in a population-based trial to increase colorectal cancer screening

American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 390-397

  Green, Beverly B ^a   Bogart, Andy ^a   Chubak, Jessica ^a   Vernon, Sally W ^c   Morales, Leo S ^a   Meenan, Richard T ^d,e   Laing, Sharon S ^a   Fuller, Sharon ^a   Ko, Cynthia ^a   Wang, Ching Yun ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^d CENTER FOR HEALTH RESEARCH   (United States)

^e KAISER PERMANENTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CANCER SCREENING; COLORECTAL CANCER; COST; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH INSURANCE; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW; MINORITY GROUP; RACE DIFFERENCE; REFUSAL TO PARTICIPATE; RISK FACTOR; SOCIAL STATUS; UNITED STATES;

AGED; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; CONTINENTAL POPULATION GROUPS; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE, INTEGRATED; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PATIENT SELECTION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; TREATMENT REFUSAL;

EID: 84863385751     PISSN: 07493797     EISSN: 18732607     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2011.11.014     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. P. Hewitson, P. Glasziou, L. Irwig, B. Towler, E. Watson Screening for colorectal cancer using the faecal occult blood test, Hemoccult Cochrane Database Syst Rev 1 2007 CD001216
2. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Screening for colorectal cancer: an updated systematic review 2008 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Rockville MD
3. CDC Vital signs: breast cancer screening among women aged 50-74 yearsU.S., 2008 MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 59 26 2010 813 816
4. CDC Vital signs: colorectal cancer screening, incidence, and mortalityU.S., 20022010 MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 460 26 2011 884 889
5. D.J. Holden, R. Harris, D.S. Porterfield Enhancing use and quality of colorectal cancer screening 2010 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Rockville MD Report No.: 10-E002
6. D. Wendler, R. Kington, J. Madans Are racial and ethnic minorities less willing to participate in health research? PLoS Med 3 2 2006 e19
7. J.G. Ford, M.W. Howerton, G.Y. Lai Barriers to recruiting underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials: a systematic review Cancer 112 2 2008 228 242
8. B.A. Rabin, R.E. Glasgow, J.F. Kerner, M.P. Klump, R.C. Brownson Dissemination and implementation research on community-based cancer prevention: a systematic review Am J Prev Med 38 4 2010 443 456
9. N.S. Weiss, T.D. Koepsell, B.M. Psaty Generalizability of the results of randomized trials Arch Intern Med 168 2 2008 133 135 (Pubitemid 351185878)
10. B.B. Green, C.Y. Wang, K. Horner Systems of support to increase colorectal cancer screening and follow-up rates (SOS): design, challenges, and baseline characteristics of trial participants Contemp Clin Trials 31 6 2010 589 603
11. J.R. Ridpath, C.J. Wiese, S.M. Greene Looking at research consent forms through a participant-centered lens: the PRISM readability toolkit Am J Health Promot 23 6 2009 371 375
12. B. Starfield, J. Weiner, L. Mumford, D. Steinwachs Ambulatory care groups: a categorization of diagnoses for research and management Health Serv Res 26 1 1991 53 74
13. J.P. Weiner, B.H. Starfield, D.M. Steinwachs, L.M. Mumford Development and application of a population-oriented measure of ambulatory care case-mix Med Care 29 5 1991 452 472
14. N. Breslau, K.G. Reeb Continuity of care in a university-based practice J Med Educ 50 10 1975 965 969
15. M.N. Elliott, A. Fremont, P.A. Morrison, P. Pantoja, N. Lurie A new method for estimating race/ethnicity and associated disparities where administrative records lack self-reported race/ethnicity Health Serv Res 2008 May 12 [Epub ahead of print]
16. C. DiClemente, J. Prochaska Toward a comprehensive, transtheoretical model of change W.R. Miller, N. Heather, Treating addictive behaviors 1998 Springer New York 3 24
17. S.W. Vernon, L.K. Bartholomew, A. McQueen A randomized controlled trial of a tailored interactive computer-delivered intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening: sometimes more is just the same Ann Behav Med 41 3 2011 284 299
18. L.A. McNutt, C. Wu, X. Xue, J.P. Hafner Estimating the relative risk in cohort studies and clinical trials of common outcomes Am J Epidemiol 157 10 2003 940 943 (Pubitemid 36555054)
19. T.J. Beebe, N.J. Talley, M. Camilleri, S.M. Jenkins, K.J. Anderson, G.R. Locke 3rd The HIPAA authorization form and effects on survey response rates, nonresponse bias, and data quality: a randomized community study Med Care 45 10 2007 959 965
20. G.Y. Lai, T.L. Gary, J. Tilburt Effectiveness of strategies to recruit underrepresented populations into cancer clinical trials Clin Trials 3 2 2006 133 141 (Pubitemid 43829213)
21. E. Fan, A. Laupacis, P.J. Pronovost, G.H. Guyatt, D.M. Needham How to use an article about quality improvement JAMA 304 20 2010 2279 2287
22. M.A. Handley, D. Schillinger, S. Shiboski Quasi-experimental designs in practice-based research settings: design and implementation considerations J Am Board Fam Med 24 5 2011 589 596
23. C. Lewis, M. Pignone, L.A. Schild Effectiveness of a patient- and practice-level colorectal cancer screening intervention in health plan members: design and baseline findings of the CHOICE trial Cancer 116 7 2010 1664 1673
24. R. Kunz, G. Vist, A.D. Oxman Randomisation to protect against selection bias in healthcare trials Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2 2007 MR000012
25. R.M. Hoffman, S.R. Steel, E.F. Yee A system-based intervention to improve colorectal cancer screening uptake Am J Manag Care 17 1 2011 49 55
26. D.J. del Junco, S.W. Vernon, S.P. Coan Promoting regular mammography screening, I A systematic assessment of validity in a randomized trial J Natl Cancer Inst 100 5 2008 333 346 (Pubitemid 351480528)
27. R.E. Glasgow, L.M. Klesges, D.A. Dzewaltowski, P.A. Estabrooks, T.M. Vogt Evaluating the impact of health promotion programs: using the RE-AIM framework to form summary measures for decision making involving complex issues Health Educ Res 21 5 2006 688 694 (Pubitemid 44453592)
28. R.E. Glasgow, L.A. Strycker, D. Kurz Recruitment for an internet-based diabetes self-management program: scientific and ethical implications Ann Behav Med 40 1 2010 40 48
29. R. Kessler, R.E. Glasgow A proposal to speed translation of healthcare research into practice: dramatic change is needed Am J Prev Med 40 6 2011 637 644
30. R.E. Glasgow, C.C. Nelson, L.A. Strycker, D.K. King Using RE-AIM metrics to evaluate diabetes self-management support interventions Am J Prev Med 30 1 2006 67 73 (Pubitemid 43083547)
31. National Cancer Institute RE-AIM: proposal for impact calculators Implementation science: integrating science, practice and policy 2011 cancercontrol.cancer.gov/IS/reaim/calculations.html
32. L.E. Lamerato, P.M. Marcus, G. Jacobsen, C.C. Johnson Recruitment in the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial: the first phase of recruitment at Henry Ford Health System Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17 4 2008 827 833 (Pubitemid 351536412)