All right, SQUIRE?

Evidence-Based Dentistry

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 57-58

  Richards, Derek ^a  

^a Centre for Evidence based Dentistry   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PUBLISHING; STANDARD;

EDITORIAL POLICIES; EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC;

EID: 67649744042     PISSN: 14620049     EISSN: 14765446     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ebd.6400657     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Cook DJ, Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH. Critical appraisal of therapeutic interventions in the intensive care unit: human monoclonal antibody treatment in sepsis. Journal club of the Hamilton Regional Critical Care Group. J Intensive Care Med 1992; 7: 275-282.
2. Dawes M, Summerskill W, Glasziou P, et al. Sicily statement on evidence-based practice. BMC Med Educ 2005; 5: 1.
3. Richards D. The EQUATOR network and website. Evid Based Dent 2007; 8: 117.
4. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet 2001; 357: 1191-1194.
5. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Br Med J 2003; 326: 41-44.
6. Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, et al. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med 2007; 4: e297.
7. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of reporting of metaanalyses. Lancet 1999; 354: 1896-1900.
8. PLoS Medicine Editors. Many reviews are systematic but some are more transparent and completely reported than others. PLoS Med 2007; 4: e147.
9. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, et al. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) group. J Am Med Assoc 2000; 283: 2008-2012.
10. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 2007; 19: 349-357.
11. Davidoff F, Batalden P, Stevens D, Ogrinc G, Mooney SE. Publication guidelines for quality improvement studies in health care: evolution of the SQUIRE project. Br Med J2009; 338: 402-404.
12. Davidoff F, Batalden P. Toward stronger evidence on quality improvement. Draft publication guidelines: the beginning of a consensus project. Qual Saf Health Care 2005; 14: 319-325.
13. Plint AC, Moher D, Morrison A, et al. Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review. Med J Aust 2006; 185: 263-267.