More challenges for machine-learning protein interactions

Bioinformatics

Volumn 31, Issue 10, 2015, Pages 1521-1525

  Hamp, Tobias ^a   Rost, Burkhard ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BIOLOGY; HUMAN; METABOLISM; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN ANALYSIS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; HUMANS; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING; PROTEINS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, PROTEIN;

EID: 84929617836     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu857     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Dessimoz C., et al. (2012). Toward community standards in the quest for orthologs. Bioinformatics, 28, 900-904
2. Guo Y., et al. (2008). Using support vector machine combined with auto covariance to predict protein-protein interactions from protein sequences. Nucleic Acids Res., 36, 3025-3030
3. Hall M., et al. (2009). The WEKA data mining software: an update. SIGKDD Explor. Newsl. 11, 10-18
4. Kohavi R. (1995). A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. In: IJCAI'95 Proceedings. Morgan Kaufmann., Montreal, Canada, pp. 1137-1143
5. Martin S., et al. (2005). Predicting protein-protein interactions using signature products. Bioinformatics, 21, 218-226
6. Mika S. and Rost B. (2003). UniqueProt: creating representative protein sequence sets. Nucleic Acids Res., 31, 3789-3791
7. Mika S. and Rost B. (2006). Protein-protein interactions more conserved within species than across species. PLoS Comput. Biol., 2, e79
8. Park Y. and Marcotte E.M. (2012). Flaws in evaluation schemes for pair-input computational predictions. Nat. Methods, 9, 1134-1136
9. Pitre S., et al. (2008). Global investigation of protein-protein interactions in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae using re-occurring short polypeptide sequences. Nucleic Acids Res., 36, 4286-4294
10. Rajagopala S.V., et al. (2014). The binary protein-protein interaction landscape of Escherichia coli. Nat. Biotechnol., 32, 285-290
11. Rost B. (1999). Twilight zone of protein sequence alignments. Protein Eng., 12, 85-94
12. Rost B. (2002). Enzyme function less conserved than anticipated. J. Mol. Biol., 318, 595-608
13. Rost B. and Sander C. (1993). Prediction of protein secondary structure at better than 70% accuracy. J Mol. Biol., 232, 584-599
14. Salwinski L., et al. (2004). The database of interacting proteins: 2004 update. Nucleic Acids Res., 32, D449-D451
15. Sambourg L. and Thierry-Mieg N. (2010). New insights into protein-protein interaction data lead to increased estimates of the S. cerevisiae interactome size. BMC Bioinformatics, 11, 605
16. Sander C. and Schneider R. (1991). Database of homology-derived structures and the structural meaning of sequence alignment. Proteins, 9, 56-68
17. Schaefer M.H., et al. (2012). HIPPIE: Integrating protein interaction networks with experiment based quality scores. PLoS One, 7, e31826
18. Stumpf M.P., et al. (2008). Estimating the size of the human interactome. PNAS, 105, 6959-6964
19. Venkatesan K., et al. (2009). An empirical framework for binary interactome mapping. Nat Methods, 6, 83-90