Flaws in evaluation schemes for pair-input computational predictions

Nature Methods

Volumn 9, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 1134-1136

  Park, Yungki ^a   Marcotte, Edward M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RNA;

ANALYTIC METHOD; CHEMOMETRICS; COMPUTATIONAL PREDICTION; DRUG PROTEIN BINDING; LETTER; PAIR INPUT METHOD; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN RNA BINDING; PROTEOCHEMOMETRICS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; EVALUATION STUDIES AS TOPIC; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPPING;

EID: 84870805181     PISSN: 15487091     EISSN: 15487105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.2259     Document Type: Letter

References (11)

1. Shen, J. et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 4337-4341 (2007).
2. Wikberg, J.E. & Mutulis, F. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 7, 307-323 (2008).
3. Yabuuchi, H. et al. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7, 472 (2011).
4. Bellucci, M., Agostini, F., Masin, M. & Tartaglia, G.G. Nat. Methods 8, 444-445 (2011).
5. Gottlieb, A., Stein, G.Y., Ruppin, E. & Sharan, R. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7, 496 (2011).
6. Vert, J.-P. & Yamanishi, Y. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems vol. 17 (eds. Saul, L., Weiss. Y. & Bottou, L.) 1433-1440 (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, 2005).
7. Flicek, P. et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, D800-D806 (2011).
8. Schaefer, M.H. et al. PLoS ONE 7, e31826 (2012).
9. Tropsha, A. & Golbraikh, A. Curr. Pharm. Des. 13, 3494-3504 (2007).
10. Olah, M., Bologa, C. & Oprea, T.I. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 18, 437-449 (2004).
11. Ford, T., Chu, K.-K. & Mertz, J. Phase-gradient microscopy in thick tissue with oblique backillumination. Nat. Methods 9, 1195-1197 (2012).