Spatially explicit fate modelling of nanomaterials in natural waters

Water Research

Volumn 80, Issue , 2015, Pages 200-208

  Quik, Joris T K ^a,b   de Klein, Jeroen J M ^a   Koelmans, Albert A ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Fate models; Hydrology; Nanomaterials; Nanoparticles; Rivers; Water quality models

Indexed keywords

AGGLOMERATION; CATCHMENTS; NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS; PARTICLE SIZE; PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SIZE DISTRIBUTION; WATER QUALITY;

ENGINEERED NANOPARTICLES; EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT; FATE MODEL; NATURAL WATERS; PROCESS DESCRIPTIONS; SITE-SPECIFIC; SIZE CLASS; SPATIAL HETEROGENEITY; SPATIALLY EXPLICIT; WATER QUALITY MODELLING;

NANOPARTICLES;

NANOPARTICLE; WATER; CERIC OXIDE; CERIUM; FRESH WATER; METAL NANOPARTICLE; SILVER;

ENVIRONMENTAL FATE; HETEROGENEITY; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; NANOTECHNOLOGY; PARTICLE SIZE; RISK ASSESSMENT; RIVER WATER; SIZE DISTRIBUTION; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; WATER QUALITY;

ARTICLE; CATCHMENT; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; HYDROLOGY; PARTICLE RESUSPENSION; PARTICLE SIZE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEDIMENT; SEDIMENTATION; SIMULATION; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; WATER AND WATER RELATED PHENOMENA; WATER CONTAMINATION; WATER FLOW; WATER QUALITY; WATER RETENTION; ALGORITHM; CHEMISTRY; HYDRODYNAMICS; RIVER; THEORETICAL MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; CERIUM; FRESH WATER; GEOLOGIC SEDIMENTS; HYDRODYNAMICS; METAL NANOPARTICLES; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PARTICLE SIZE; RIVERS; SILVER;

EID: 84929616973     PISSN: 00431354     EISSN: 18792448     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.05.025     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Aalderink R.H., Zoeteman A., Jovin R. Effect of input uncertainties upon scenario predictions for the river Vecht. Water Sci. Technol. 1996, 33:107-118.
2. Arvidsson R., Molander S., Sandén B.A., Hassellov M. Challenges in exposure modeling of nanoparticles in aquatic environments. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 2011, 17(1):245-262.
3. Atteia O. Evolution of size distributions of natural particles during aggregation: modelling versus field results. Colloid Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 1998, 139(2):171-188. 10.1016/S0927-7757(98)00279-9.
4. Barton L.E., Therezien M., Auffan M., Bottero J.-Y., Wiesner M.R. Theory and methodology for determining nanoparticle affinity for heteroaggregation in environmental matrices using batch measurements. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2014, 31(7):421-427. 10.1089/ees.2013.0472.
5. Blaser S.A., Scheringer M., MacLeod M., Hungerbühler K. Estimation of cumulative aquatic exposure and risk due to silver: contribution of nano-functionalized plastics and textiles. Sci. Total Environ. 2008, 390(2-3):396-409. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.10.010.
6. Blom G., Aalderink R.H. Calibration of three resuspension/sedimentation models. Water Sci. Technol. 1998, 37(3):41-49.
7. Boxall A., Chaudhry Q., Sinclair C., Jones A., Aitken R., Jefferson B., Watts C. Current and Future Predicted Environmental Exposure to Engineered Nanoparticles 2007, Central Science Laboratory, York, UK.
8. Boyd C.E. Bottom Soils, Sediment, and Pond Aquaculture 1995, Chapman & Hall, New York.
9. Brouwer L. Obtaining a Clear View: Sediment dynamics of river de Dommel and the Possible Consequences of Suspended Solids on the Underwater Light Climate 2012, Wageningen University, Wageningen.
10. Clemmens A., Holly F.J., Schuurmans W. Description and evaluation of program: duflow. J.Irrig. Drain. Eng. 1993, 119:724-734. Special Issue: Canal System Hydraulic Modeling.
11. Dale A.L., Lowry G.V., Casman E. Much ado about α: reframing the debate over appropriate fate descriptors in nanoparticle environmental risk modeling. Environ. Sci. Nano 2014, 10.1039/c4en00170b.
12. Farley K.J., Morel F.M.M. Role of coagulation in the kinetics of sedimentation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1986, 20(2):187-195. 10.1021/es00144a014.
13. Filella M. Environmental Colloids and Particles: Behaviour, Separation, and Characterisation 2007, Wiley. K.J. Wilkinson, J.R. Lead (Eds.).
14. Friedlander S.K. Smoke, Dust, and Haze: Fundamentals of Aerosol Behavior 2000, Oxford University Press, New York.
15. Gottschalk F., Scholz R.W., Nowack B. Probabilistic material flow modeling for assessing the environmental exposure to compounds: methodology and an application to engineered nano-TiO2 particles. Environ. Model. Softw. 2010, 25(3):320-332. 10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.08.011.
16. 2, ZnO, Ag, CNT, Fullerenes) for different regions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43(24):9216-9222. 10.1021/es9015553.
17. Gottschalk F., Sun T., Nowack B. Environmental concentrations of engineered nanomaterials: review of modeling and analytical studies. Environ. Pollut. 2013, 181(0):287-300. 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.06.003.
18. Kapustka L., Chan-Remillard S., Goudey S. Nanomaterials: Risks and Benefits 2009, 149-159. Springer Netherlands. I. Linkov, J. Steevens (Eds.).
19. Keller A., McFerran S., Lazareva A., Suh S. Global life cycle releases of engineered nanomaterials. J.Nanoparticle Res. 2013, 15(6):1-17. 10.1007/s11051-013-1692-4.
20. Keller A.A., Wang H., Zhou D., Lenihan H.S., Cherr G., Cardinale B.J., Miller R., Ji Z. Stability and aggregation of metal oxide nanoparticles in natural aqueous matrices. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44(6):1962-1967. 10.1021/es902987d.
21. Kent R.D., Vikesland P.J. Controlled evaluation of silver nanoparticle dissolution using atomic force microscopy. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46(13):6977-6984. 10.1021/es203475a.
22. Kettler K., Veltman K., van de Meent D., van Wezel A., Hendriks A.J. Cellular uptake of nanoparticles as determined by particle properties, experimental conditions, and cell type. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2014, 33(3):481-492. 10.1002/etc.2470.
23. Koelmans A.A., Diepens N.J., Velzeboer I., Besseling E., Quik J.T., van de Meent D. Guidance for the prognostic risk assessment of nanomaterials in aquatic ecosystems. Sci. Total Environ. 2015, (in press). 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.02.032.
24. Koelmans A.A., Nowack B., Wiesner M.R. Comparison of manufactured and black carbon nanoparticle concentrations in aquatic sediments. Environ. Pollut. 2009, 157(4):1110-1116.
25. Koelmans A.A., Van der Heijde A., Knijff L., Aalderink R.H. Modelling feedbacks between eutrophication and organic contaminant fate & effects in aquatic ecosystems. A review. Water Res. 2001, 35:3517-3536.
26. Langeveld J., Nopens I., Schilperoort R., Benedetti L., de Klein J.J.M., Amerlinck Y., Weijers S. On data requirements for calibration of integrated models for urban water systems. Water Sci. Technol. 2013, 68(3):728-736.
27. Liu H.H., Cohen Y. Multimedia environmental distribution of engineered nanomaterials. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48(6):3281-3292. 10.1021/es405132z.
28. Lyklema J. Fundamentals of Interface and Colloid Science. Particulate Colloids 2005, vol. IV. Elsevier Academic Press, Amsterdam. J. Lyklema (Ed.).
29. Mackay C.E., Johns M., Salatas J.H., Bessinger B., Perri M. Stochastic probability modeling to predict the environmental stability of nanoparticles in aqueous suspension. Integr. Environ. Assess. Manag. 2006, 2(3):293-298. 10.1002/ieam.5630020309.
30. Meesters J.A.J., Koelmans A.A., Quik J.T.K., Hendriks A.J., van de Meent D. Multimedia modeling of engineered nanoparticles with SimpleBox4nano: model definition and evaluation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48(10):5726-5736. 10.1021/es500548h.
31. Mueller N.C., Nowack B. Exposure modeling of engineered nanoparticles in the environment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42(12):4447-4453. 10.1021/es7029637.
32. O'Melia C.R. Particle-particle interactions in aquatic systems. Colloid Surf. 1989, 39(1):255-271. 10.1016/0166-6622(89)80191-X.
33. Peijnenburg W.J.G.M., Baalousha M., Chen J., Chaudry Q., Kammer F.V.D., Kuhlbusch T.A.J., Lead J., Nickel C., Quik J.T.K., Renker M., Wang Z., Koelmans A.A. Areview of the properties and processes determining the fate of engineered nanomaterials in the aquatic environment. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, (in press). 10.1080/10643389.2015.1010430.
34. Petosa A.R., Jaisi D.P., Quevedo I.R., Elimelech M., Tufenkji N. Aggregation and deposition of engineered nanomaterials in aquatic environments: role of physicochemical interactions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44(17):6532-6549. 10.1021/es100598h.
35. 2 nanoparticles in the Rhine River. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 46(12):6705-6713. 10.1021/es204530n.
36. Praetorius A., Tufenkji N., Goss K.-U., Scheringer M., von der Kammer F., Elimelech M. The road to nowhere: equilibrium partition coefficients for nanoparticles. Environ. Sci. Nano 2014, 1(4):317. 10.1039/c4en00043a.
37. Quik J.T.K., Stuart M.C., Wouterse M., Peijnenburg W., Hendriks A.J., van de Meent D. Natural colloids are the dominant factor in the sedimentation of nanoparticles. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2012, 31(5):1019-1022. 10.1002/etc.1783.
38. Quik J.T.K., Van De Meent D., Koelmans A.A. Simplifying modeling of nanoparticle aggregation-sedimentation behavior in environmental systems: a theoretical analysis. Water Res. 2014, 62C:193-201. 10.1016/j.watres.2014.05.048.
39. Quik J.T.K., Velzeboer I., Wouterse M., Koelmans A.A., Meent D.v.d Heteroaggregation and sedimentation rates for nanomaterials in natural waters. Water Res. 2014, 48:169-179. 10.1016/j.watres.2013.09.036.
40. Quik J.T.K., Vonk J.A., Hansen S.F., Baun A., Van De Meent D. How to assess exposure of aquatic organisms to manufactured nanoparticles?. Environ. Int. 2011, 37:1068-1077. 10.1016/j.envint.2011.01.015.
41. R Core Team R: a Language and Environment for Statistical Computing 2014, (Vienna, Austria). http://www.R-project.org/.
42. Shoults-Wilson W.A., Reinsch B.C., Tsyusko O.V., Bertsch P.M., Lowry G.V., Unrine J.M. Role of particle size and soil type in toxicity of silver nanoparticles to earthworms. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 2011, 75(2):365-377. 10.2136/sssaj2010.0127nps.
43. Sterling M.C., Bonner J.S., Ernest A.N., Page C.A., Autenrieth R.L. Application of fractal flocculation and vertical transport model to aquatic sol-sediment systems. Water Res. 2005, 39(9):1818-1830. 10.1016/j.watres.2005.02.007.
44. Therezien M., Thill A., Wiesner M.R. Importance of heterogeneous aggregation for NP fate in natural and engineered systems. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 485-486(0):309-318. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.03.020.
45. 2 nanoparticles in aquatic ecotoxicity tests. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43(12):4537-4546. 10.1021/es9002444.
46. Velzeboer I., Quik J.T.K., Meent D.v.d., Koelmans A.A. Rapid settling of nanomaterials due to heteroaggregation with suspended sediment. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2014, 10.1002/etc.2611.
47. Waterboard De Dommel Routine Measurements Water Quality 2000-2010 2012, http://www.dommel.nl.