Improving fMRI reliability in presurgical mapping for brain tumours

Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry

Volumn 87, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 267-274

  Stevens, M Tynan R ^a,b   Clarke, David B ^c   Stroink, Gerhard ^a   Beyea, Steven D ^a,b   D'Arcy, Ryan C N ^d  

^a DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b IWK HEALTH CENTRE   (Canada)

^c QUEEN ELIZABETH II HEALTH SCIENCES CENTRE   (Canada)

^d SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; BRAIN DEPTH STIMULATION; BRAIN MAPPING; BRAIN TUMOR; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; FINGER TAPING; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; LEFT HANDEDNESS; MALE; NEURONAVIGATION; OBJECT NAMING; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RIGHT HANDEDNESS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; SENTENCE READING; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN NEOPLASMS; CASE CONTROL STUDY; ELECTROSTIMULATION; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; BRAIN MAPPING; BRAIN NEOPLASMS; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CEREBRAL CORTEX; DATA ACCURACY; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ROC CURVE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84929589803     PISSN: 00223050     EISSN: 1468330X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2015-310307     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Pillai JJ. The evolution of clinical functional imaging during the past 2 decades and its current impact on neurosurgical planning. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:219-25.
2. Giussani C, Roux F-E, Ojemann J, et al. Is preoperative functional magnetic resonance imaging reliable for language areas mapping in brain tumor surgery? Review of language functional magnetic resonance imaging and direct cortical stimulation correlation studies. Neurosurgery 2010;66:113-20.
3. Tharin S, Golby A. Functional brain mapping and its applications to neurosurgery. Neurosurgery 2007;60:185-202.
4. Stippich C, Blatow M, Krakow K. Presurgical functional MRI in patients with brain tumors. In: Stippich C. ed. Clinical functional MRI: presurgical functional neuroimaging. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer-Verlag, 2007:88-126.
5. Jack CR Jr, Thompson RM, et al. Sensory motor cortex: correlation of presurgical mapping with functional MR imaging and invasive cortical mapping. Radiology 1994;190:85-92.
6. FitzGerald DB, Cosgrove GR, Ronner S, et al. Location of language in the cortex: a comparison between functional MR imaging and electrocortical stimulation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:1529-39.
7. Yetkin FZ, McAuliffe TL, Cox R, et al. Test-retest precision of functional MR in sensory and motor task activation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1996;17:95-8.
8. Kho KH, Rutten G-JM, Leijten FS, et al. Working memory deficits after resection of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex predicted by functional magnetic resonance imaging and electrocortical stimulation mapping: case report. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2007;106:501-5.
9. Pouratian N, Bookheimer SY, Rex DE, et al. Utility of preoperative functional magnetic resonance imaging for identifying language cortices in patients with vascular malformations. J Neurosurg 2002;97:21-32.
10. Roux F-E, Boulanouar K, Lotterie J-A, et al. Language functional magnetic resonance imaging in preoperative assessment of language areas: correlation with direct cortical stimulation. Neurosurgery 2003;52:1335-47.
11. Rutten GJM, Ramsey NF, Van Rijen PC, et al. Development of a functional magnetic resonance imaging protocol for intraoperative localization of critical temporoparietal language areas. Ann Neurol 2002;51:350-60.
12. Bennett CM, Miller MB. How reliable are the results from functional magnetic resonance imaging? Ann NY Acad Sci 2010;1191:133-55.
13. Raemaekers M, Vink M, Zandbelt B, et al. Test-retest reliability of fMRI activation during prosaccades and antisaccades. Neuroimage 2007;36:532-42.
14. McGonigle DJ. Test-retest reliability in fMRI: or how I learned to stop worrying and love the variability. NeuroImage 2012;62:1116-20.
15. Beisteiner R, Lanzenberger R, Novak K, et al. Improvement of presurgical patient evaluation by generation of functional magnetic resonance risk maps. Neurosci Lett 2000;290:13-16.
16. Gonzalez-Ortiz S, Oleaga L, Pujol T, et al. Simple fMRI postprocessing suffices for normal clinical practice. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:1188-93.
17. Strother SC, Anderson J, Hansen LK, et al. The quantitative evaluation of functional neuroimaging experiments: the NPAIRS data analysis framework. NeuroImage 2002;15:747-71.
18. La Conte S, Anderson J, Muley S, et al. The evaluation of preprocessing choices in single-subject BOLD fMRI using NPAIRS performance metrics. NeuroImage 2003;18:10-27.
19. Zhang J, Anderson JR, Liang L, et al. Evaluation and optimization of fMRI single-subject processing pipelines with NPAIRS and second-level CVA. Magn Reson Imaging 2009;27:264-78.
20. Genovese CR, Noll DC, Eddy WF. Estimating test-retest reliability in functional MR imaging I: statistical methodology. Magn Reson Med 1997;38:497-507.
21. Liou M, Su H-R, Lee J-D, et al. A method for generating reproducible evidence in fMRI studies. NeuroImage 2006;29:383-95.
22. Stevens MTR, D'Arcy RC, Stroink G, et al. Thresholds in fMRI studies: reliable for single subjects? J Neurosci Methods 2013;219:312-23.
23. Bosnell R, Wegner C, Kincses ZT, et al. Reproducibility of fMRI in the clinical setting: implications for trial designs. Neuroimage 2008;42:603-10.
24. Blautzik J, Keeser D, Berman A, et al. Long-term test-retest reliability of resting-state networks in healthy elderly subjects and patients with amnesticild cognitive impairment. J Alzheimers Dis 2013;34:741-54.
25. Logan BR, Rowe DB. An evaluation of thresholding techniques in fMRI analysis. NeuroImage 2004;22:95-108.
26. Voyvodic JT, Petrella JR, Friedman AH. fMRI activation mapping as a percentage of local excitation: consistent presurgical motor maps without threshold adjustment. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009;29:751-9.
27. Gorgolewski KJ, Storkey AJ, Bastin ME, et al. Adaptive thresholding for reliable topological inference in single subject fMRI analysis. Front Hum Neurosci 2012;6:245.
28. Cox RW. AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput Biomed Res 1996;29:162-73.
29. Stevens MTR, D'Arcy RCN, Beyea SD, et al. Retrospective registration for improved localization of cortical stimulation on MR images. ISMRM, 2013.
30. Besl PJ, McKay ND. A method for registration of 3-D shapes. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 1992;14:239-56.
31. Manoach DS, Halpern EF, Kramer TS, et al. Test-retest reliability of a functional MRI working memory paradigm in normal and schizophrenic subjects. Am J Psych 2001;158:955-8.
32. Maïza O, Mazoyer B, Hervé P-Y, et al. Reproducibility of fMRI activations during a story listening task in patients with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2011;128:98-101.
33. Kimberley TJ, Khandekar G, Borich M. fMRI reliability in subjects with stroke. Exp Brain Res 2008;186:183-90.
34. Eaton KP, Szaflarski JP, Altaye M, et al. Reliability of fMRI for studies of language in post-stroke aphasia subjects. Neuroimage 2008;41:311-22.
35. Churchill NW, Oder A, Abdi H, et al. Optimizing preprocessing and analysis pipelines for single-subject fMRI. I. Standard temporal motion and physiological noise correction methods. Hum Brain Mapp 2012;33:609-27.
36. Spena G, Nava A, Cassini F, et al. Preoperative and intraoperative brain mapping for the resection of eloquent-area tumors. A prospective analysis of methodology, correlation, and usefulness based on clinical outcomes. Acta Neurochirurgica 2010;152:1835-46.
37. Bizzi A, Blasi V, Falini A, et al. Presurgical functional MR imaging of language andotor functions: validation with intraoperative electrocorticalapping 1. Radiology 2008;248:579-89.