FMRI activation mapping as a percentage of local excitation: Consistent presurgical motor maps without threshold adjustment

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 751-759

  Voyvodic, James T ^a,b   Petrella, Jeffrey R ^b   Friedman, Allan H ^b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Fmri; Motor cortex; Presurgical mapping; Reproducibility

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BRAIN MAPPING; BRAIN REGION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; EXCITATION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; MALE; NEUROIMAGING; OXYGEN BLOOD LEVEL; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSORIMOTOR CORTEX; TASK PERFORMANCE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALGORITHMS; BRAIN DISEASES; BRAIN MAPPING; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR CORTEX; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX;

EID: 65249138211     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.21716     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Huettel SA, Song AW, McCarthy GM. Functional magnetic resonance imaging. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer; 2004:245-250.
2. Voyvodic JT. Activation mapping as percentage of local excitation (AMPLE): fMRI stability within scans, between scans, and across field strengths. Magn Res Imaging 2006;24:1249-1261.
3. Malonek D, Grinvald A. Interactions between electrical activity and cortical microcirculation revealed by imaging spectroscopy: implications for functional brain mapping. Science 1997;272:551-554.
4. Jack CR Jr, Thompson RM, Butts RK, et al. Sensory motor cortex: correlation of presurgical mapping with functional MR imaging and invasive cortical mapping. Radiology 1994;190:85-92.
5. Puce A, Constable RT, Luby ML, et al. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of sensory and motor cortex: comparison with elec- trophysiological localization. J Neurosurg 1995;83:262-270.
6. Cuenod CA, Bookheimer SY, Hertz-Pannier L, Zeffiro TA, Theodore WH, Le Bihan, D. Functional MRI during word generation, using conventional equipment: a potential tool for language localization in the clinical environment. Neurology 1995;45:1821-1827.
7. Pujol J, Conesa G, Deus J, et al. Presurgical identification of primary sensorimotor cortex by functional magnetic resonance imaging." J Neurosurg 1996;84:7-13.
8. Binder JR, Frost JA, Hammeke TA, Cox RW, Rao SM, Prieto T, Human brain language areas identified by functional magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci 1997;17:353-362.
9. FitzGerald DB, Cosgrove GR, Ronner S, et al. Location of language in the cortex: a comparison between functional MR imaging and electrocortical stimulation. Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:1529-1539.
10. Modayur B, Prothero J, Ojemann G, Maravilla K, Brinkley J. Visualization-based mapping of language function in the brain. Neuroimage 1997;6:245-258.
11. Schlosser MJ, McCarthy G, Fulbright RK, Gore JC, Awad IA. Cerebral vascular malformations adjacent to sensorimotor and visual cortex: functional magnetic resonance imaging studies before and after therapeutic intervention. Stroke 1997;28:1130-1137.
12. Rutten GJ, van Rijen PC, van Veelen CW, Ramsey NF. Language area localization with three-dimensional functional magnetic resonance imaging matches intrasulcal electrostimulation in Broca's area. Ann Neurol 1999;46:405-408.
13. Schlosser MJ, Luby M, Spencer DD, Awad IA, McCarthy G. Comparative localization of auditory comprehension by using functional magnetic resonance imaging and cortical stimulation. J Neurosurg 1999;91:626-635.
14. Beisteiner R, Lanzenberger R, Novak K, et al. Improvement of pre- surgical patient evaluation by generation of functional magnetic resonance risk maps. Neurosci Lett 2006;290:13-16.
15. Hirsch J, Ruge MI, Kim KH, et al. An integrated functional magnetic resonance imaging procedure for preoperative mapping of cortical areas associated with tactile, motor, language, and visual functions. Neurosurgery 2000;47:711-722.
16. Bartsch AJ, Homola G, Biller A, Solymosi L, Bendszus M. Diagnostic functional MRI: illustrated clinical applications and decision- making. J Magn Res Imaging 2006;23:921-932.
17. Bizzi A, Blasi V, Falini A, et al. Presurgical functional MR imaging oi language and motor functions: validation with intraoperative elec- trocortical mapping. Radiology 2008;248:579-589.
18. McGonigle DJ, Howseman AM, Athwal BS, Friston KJ, Frakowiak RSJ, Holes AP. Variability in fMRI: an examination of intersession differences. Neuroimage 2000;11:708-734.
19. Liu JZ, Zhang L, Brown RW, Yue GH. Reproducibility of fMRI at 1.5T in a strictly controlled motor task. Magn Reson Med 2004;52: 751-760.
20. van Gelderen P, Wu CWH, de Zwart JA, Cohen L, Hallett M, Duyn JH. Resolution and reproducibility of BOLD and perfusion functional MRI at 3.0 Tesla. Magn Reson Med 2005;54:569-576.
21. Vincent DJ, Bloomer CJ, Hinson VK, Bergmann KJ. The range of motor activation in the normal human cortex using bold fMRI. Brain Topogr 2006;18:273-280.
22. Friedman L, Glover G, Krenz D, Magnotta V. Reducing inter-scanner variability of activation in a multicenter fMRI study: role of smoothness equalization. Neuroimage 2006;32:1656-1668.
23. Costafreda SG, Brammer MJ, Vencio RZN, et al. Multisite fMRI reproducibility of a motor task using identical MR systems. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;26:1122-1126.
24. Voyvodic JT. Real-time fMRI paradigm control, physiology, and behavior combined with near real-time statistical analysis. Neuroimage 1999;10:91-106.
25. Arthurs OJ, Boniface SJ. What aspect of the fMRI BOLD signal best reflects the underlying electrophysiology in human somatosensory cortex? Clin Neurophys 2003;114:1203-1209.