Cognitive inflexibility in gamblers is primarily present in reward-related decision making

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Volumn 8, Issue AUG, 2014, Pages

  Boog, Michiel ^a,b   Höppener, Paul ^a,c   v d Wetering, Ben J M ^a   Goudriaan, Anna E ^c,d   Boog, Matthijs C ^e   Franken, Ingmar H A ^b  

^a Bouman Geestelijke Gezondheidszorg   (Netherlands)

^b ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c Reinier van Arkel Groep ^*  (Netherlands)

^d UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^e ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cognitive inflexibility; Gambling disorder; Reversal learning; Reward based; WCST

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITION; COGNITIVE INFLEXIBILITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORPUS STRIATUM; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MENTAL PERFORMANCE; ORBITAL CORTEX; PATHOLOGICAL GAMBLING; PERSEVERATION; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; PROBABILISTIC REVERSAL LEARNING TASK; REWARD; SCORING SYSTEM; SEX DIFFERENCE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VENTROLATERAL PREFRONTAL CORTEX; WISCONSIN CARD SORTING TEST;

EID: 84929504867     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16625161     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00569     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Anholt, G. E., van Oppen, P., Emmelkamp, P. M. G., Cath, D. C., Smit, J. H., van Dyck, R., et al. (2009). Measuring obsessive-compulsive symptoms: Padua Inventory-Revised vs. Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale. J. Anxiety Disord. 23, 830-835. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.04.004
2. APA. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders: DSM-5, 5th Edn. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.
3. Bechara, A., and Damasio, H. (2002). Decision-making and addiction (part I): impaired activation of somatic states in substance dependent individuals when pondering decisions with negative future consequences. Neuropsychologia 40, 1675-1689. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00015-5
4. Blaszczynski, A. (1999). Pathological gambling and obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders. Psychol. Rep. 84, 107-113. doi:10.2466/pr0.1999.84.1.107
5. Boog, M., Goudriaan, A. E., van de Wetering, B. J. M., Deuss, H., and Franken, I. H. A. (2013). The concepts of rash impulsiveness and reward sensitivity in substance use disorders. Eur. Addict. Res. 19, 261-268. doi:10.1159/000346178
6. Brand, M., Kalbe, E., Labudda, K., Fujiwara, E., Kessler, J., and Markowitsch, H. J. (2005). Decision-making impairments in patients with pathological gambling. Psychiatry Res. 133, 91-99. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2004.10.003
7. Cavedini, P., Riboldi, G., Keller, R., D'Annucci, A., and Bellodi, L. (2002). Frontal lobe dysfunction in pathological gambling patients. Biol. Psychiatry 51, 334-341. doi:10.1016/S0006-3223(01)01227-6
8. Clark, L., Cools, R., and Robbins, T. W. (2004). The neuropsychology of ventral prefrontal cortex: decision-making and reversal learning. Brain Cogn. 55, 41-53. doi:10.1016/S0278-2626(03)00284-7
9. De Beurs, E., and Zitman, F. G. (2005). De brief symptom inventory (BSI): de betrouwbaarheid en validiteit van een handzaam alternatief voor de SCL-90. Maandbl. Geestelijke Volksgezond. 61, 120-141.
10. de Ruiter, M. B., Veltman, D. J., Goudriaan, A. E., Oosterlaan, J., Sjoerds, Z., and van den Brink, W. (2008). Response perseveration and ventral prefrontal sensitivity to reward and punishment in male problem gamblers and smokers. Neuropsychopharmacology 34, 1027-1038. doi:10.1038/npp.2008.175
11. Derogatis, L. R., and Melisaratos, N. (1983). The brief symptom inventory: an introductory report. Psychol. Med. 13, 595-605. doi:10.1017/S0033291700048017
12. Derogatis, L. R., Rickels, K., and Rock, A. F. (1976). The SCL-90 and the MMPI: a step in the validation of a new self-report scale. Br. J. Psychiatry 128, 280-289. doi:10.1192/bjp.128.3.280
13. Franken, I. H. A., van Strien, J. W., Nijs, I., and Muris, P. (2008). Impulsivity is associated with behavioral decision-making deficits. Psychiatry Res. 158, 155-163. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2007.06.002
14. Goldstein, R. Z., Volkow, N. D., Wang, G. J., Fowler, J. S., and Rajaram, S. (2001). Addiction changes orbitofrontal gyrus function: involvement in response inhibition. Neuroreport 12, 2595-2599. doi:10.1097/00001756-200108080-00060
15. Goudriaan, A. E. (2013). Gambling and problem gambling in the Netherlands. Addiction 109, 1066-1071. doi:10.1111/add.12213
16. Goudriaan, A. E., Oosterlaan, J., De Beurs, E., and Van Den Brink, W. (2006). Neurocognitive functions in pathological gambling: a comparison with alcohol dependence, Tourette syndrome and normal controls. Addiction 101, 534-547. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01380.x
17. Goudriaan, A. E., Oosterlaan, J., De Beurs, E., and Van den Brink, W. (2008). The role of self-reported impulsivity and reward sensitivity versus neurocognitive measures of disinhibition and decision-making in the prediction and relapse in pathological gamblers. Psychol. Med. 38, 41-50. doi:10.1017/S0033291707000694
18. Heaton, R. K. (1981). A Manual for the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Sources.
19. Klanker, M., Feenstra, M., and Denys, D. (2013). Dopaminergic control of cognitive flexibility in humans and animals. Front. Neurosci. 7:201. doi:10.3389/fnins.2013.00201
20. Lesieur, H. R., and Blumen, S. B. (1987). The South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS): a new instrument for the identification of pathological gamblers. Am. J. Psychiatry 144, 1184-1188.
21. Monchi, O., Petride, M., Petre, V., Worsley, K., and Dagher, A. (2001). Wisconsin card sorting revisited: distinct neural circuits participating in different stages of the task identified by event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging. J. Neurosci. 21, 7733-7741.
22. Odlaug, B. L., Chamberlain, S. R., Kim, S. W., Schreiber, L. R. N., and Grant, J. E. (2011). A neurocognitive comparison of cognitive flexibility and response inhibition in gamblers with varying degrees of clinical severity. Psychol. Med. 41, 2111-2119. doi:10.1017/S0033291711000316
23. Regard, M., Knoch, D., Gütling, E., and Landis, T. (2003). Brain damage and addictive behavior: a neuropsychological and electroencephalogram investigation with pathologic gamblers. Cogn. Behav. Neurol. 16, 47-53. doi:10.1097/00146965-200303000-00006
24. Rugle, L., and Melamed, L. (1993). Neuropsychological assessment of attention problems in pathological gamblers. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 181, 107-112. doi:10.1097/00005053-199302000-00006
25. Sanavio, E. (1988). Obsessions and compulsions: the Padua inventory. Behav. Res. Ther. 26, 169-177. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(88)90116-7
26. Stinchfield, R. (2002). Reliability, validity, and classification accuracy of the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS). Addict. Behav. 27, 1-19. doi:10.1016/S0306-4603(00)00158-1
27. van Oppen, P. (1992). Obsessions and compulsions: dimensional structure, reliability, convergent and divergent validity of the Padua inventory. Behav. Res. Ther. 30, 631-637. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(92)90008-5
28. Van Oppen, P., Hoekstra, R. J., and Emmelkamp, P. M. G. (1995). The structure of obsessive-compulsive symptoms. Behav. Res. Ther. 33, 15-23. doi:10.1016/0005-7967(94)E0010-G