Quantification of muscle-derived signal interference during monopolar needle electromyography of a peripheral nerve interface in the rat hind limb

2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC 2014

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 4382-4385

  Woo, Shoshana L ^a   Urbanchek, Melanie G ^a   Leach, Michelle K ^a   Moon, Jana D ^a   Cederna, Paul ^a   Langhals, Nicholas B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTION POTENTIAL; ANIMAL; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; ELECTROSTIMULATION; FISCHER 344 RAT; HINDLIMB; MALE; PERIPHERAL NERVE; PHYSIOLOGY; RAT; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SKELETAL MUSCLE;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ANIMALS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTROMYOGRAPHY; HINDLIMB; MALE; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; PERIPHERAL NERVES; PHYSIOLOGY; RATS; RATS, INBRED F344; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SIGNAL-TO-NOISE RATIO;

EID: 84929494220     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2014.6944595     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (14)

1. J. V. Larson, T. A. Kung, P. S. Cederna, E. D. Sears, M. G. Urbanchek, and N. B. Langhals, "Clinical factors associated with replantation after traumatic major upper extremity amputation," Plast Reconstr Surg, Vol. 132, no. 4, pp. 911-9, Oct, 2013.
2. T. A. Kuiken, G. Li, B. A. Lock, and et al. "TArgeted muscle reinnervation for real-time myoelectric control of multifunction artificial arms," JAMA, Vol. 301, no. 6, pp. 619-628, 2009.
3. P. G. Patil, and D. A. Turner, "The development of brain-machine interface neuroprosthetic devices," Neurotherapeutics, Vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 137-46, Jan, 2008.
4. S. Micera, J. Carpaneto, and S. Raspopovic, "Control of hand prostheses using peripheral information," IEEE Rev Biomed Eng, Vol. 3, pp. 48-68, 2010.
5. X. Navarro, T. B. Krueger, N. Lago, S. Micera, T. Stieglitz, and P. Dario, "A critical review of interfaces with the peripheral nervous system for the control of neuroprostheses and hybrid bionic systems," J Peripher Nerv Syst, Vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 229-58, Sep, 2005.
6. M. G. Urbanchek, B. Wei, Z. Baghmanli, K. Sugg, and P. S. Cederna, "Long-Term Stability of Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interfaces (RPNI)," Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Vol. 128, no. 4S, pp. 88-89, 2011.
7. T. A. Kung, N. B. Langhals, D. C. Martin, P. J. Johnson, P. S. Cederna, and M. G. Urbanchek, "Regenerative peripheral nerve interface viability and signal transduction with an implanted electrode," Plast Reconstr Surg, Vol. 133, no. 6, pp. 1380-94, Jun, 2014.
8. Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. National Institutes of Health publication no. 85-23. 1985.
9. J. V. Larson, S. A. Goretski, J. W. Cockrum, M. G. Urbanchek, P. S. Cederna, and N. B. Langhals, "Electrode characterization for use in a Regenerative Peripheral Nerve Interface." pp. 629-632.
10. E. Stalberg, "Macro electromyography, an update," Muscle Nerve, Vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 292-302, Aug, 2011.
11. R. L. Joynt, "The selection of electromyographic needle electrodes," Arch Phys Med Rehabil, Vol. 75, no. 3, pp. 251-8, Mar, 1994.
12. R. L. Joynt, "The concentric versus the monopolar needle electrode. The case for monopolar needles," Muscle Nerve, Vol. 21, no. 12, pp. 1804-6; discussion 1809, Dec, 1998.
13. P. A. Grandjean, and J. T. Mortimer, "Recruitment properties of monopolar and bipolar epimysial electrodes," Ann Biomed Eng, Vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 53-66, 1986.
14. H. Plenk, Jr. "The role of materials biocompatibility for functional electrical stimulation applications," Artif Organs, Vol. 35, no. 3, pp. 237-41, Mar, 2011.