Putting the "E" in SES: Unpacking the ecology in the ostrom socialecological system framework

Ecology and Society

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Vogt, Jessica M ^a,b   Epstein, Graham B ^a   Mincey, Sarah K ^a   Fischer, Burnell C ^a   McCord, Paul ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b FURMAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Ecological theory; Forest ecology; Interdisciplinary science; Linked human natural systems; Social ecological system framework

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGICAL THEORY; FOREST ECOSYSTEM; INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH; NATURE-SOCIETY RELATIONS; THEORETICAL STUDY;

EID: 84929379970     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17083087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5751/ES-07239-200155     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Abrams, M. D. 2003. Where have all the white oak gone? BioScience 53(10):927-939. http://dx.doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568 (2003)053[0927:WHATWO]2.0.CO;2.
2. Arnold, G., J. Bauer, B. Fischer, F. Fleischman, M. Midgley, S. K. Mincey, M. Paulson Priebe, K. Souza, C. Tucker, and S. Villamayor Tomas. 2008. An initial visit to the Yellowwood Lake Watershed forest. International Forestry Resources and Institutions Research Program working paper W07I-24. International Forestry Resources and Institutions Research Program, Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA.
3. Benedick, R. E. 1998. Ozone diplomacy: new directions in safeguarding the planet. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
4. Brothers, T. S., and A. Spingarn. 1992. Forest fragmentation and alien plant invasion of central Indiana old-growth forests. Conservation Biology 6(1):91-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.610091.x
5. Chhatre, A., and A. Agrawal. 2008. Forest commons and local enforcement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105(36):13286-13291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0803399105.
6. Chhatre, A., and A. Agrawal. 2009. Trade-offs and synergies between carbon storage and livelihood benefits from forest commons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106(42):17667-17670. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0905308106.
7. Coleman, E. A. 2009. Institutional factors affecting biophysical outcomes in forest management. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 28(1):122-146. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pam.20405.
8. Cox, M. 2011. Advancing the diagnostic analysis of environmental problems. International Journal of the Commons 5 (2):346-363.
9. Epstein, G., J. M. Vogt, S. K. Mincey, M. Cox, and B.C. Fischer. 2013. Missing ecology: integrating ecological perspectives with the social-ecological system framework. International Journal of the Commons 7(2):432-453.
10. Gatebe, C. K., P. D. Tyson, H. Annegarn, S. Piketh, and G. Helas. 1999. A seasonal air transport climatology for Kenya. Journal of Geophysical Research 104:14237-14244. http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/1998JD200103.
11. Genkai-Kato, M., and S. R. Carpenter. 2005. Eutrophication due to phosphorus recycling in relation to lake morphometry, temperature, and macrophytes. Ecology 86(1):210-219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/03-0545.
12. Gibson, C., J. T. Williams, and E. Ostrom. 2005. Local enforcement and better forests. World Development 33(2):273-284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.07.013.
13. Gowdy, J., and L. Krall. 2013. The ultrasocial origin of the Anthropocene. Ecological Economics 95:137-147. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.08.006.
14. Harper, K. A., S. E. MacDonald, P. J. Burton, J. Chen, K. D. Brosofske, S. C. Saunders, E. S. Euskirchen, D. Roberts, M. S. Jaiteh, and P.-A. Esseen. 2005. Edge influence on forest structure and composition in fragmented landscapes. Conservation Biology 19(3):768-782. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00045.x
15. Holling, C. S. 2000. Theories for sustainable futures. Conservation Ecology 4(2): 7. [online] URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol4/iss2/art7/
16. Homoya, M. A., D. B. Abrell, J. R. Aldrich, and T. W. Post. 1985. The natural regions of Indiana. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Science 94:245-84.
17. Husch, B., T. W. Beers, and J. A. Kershaw. 2003. Forest mensuration. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, New Jersey, USA.
18. Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Division of Forestry (IDNR). 2008. Indiana state forests environmental assessment, 2008-2027: increased emphasis on management and sustainability of oak-hickory communities on the Indiana state forest system. IDNR, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
19. Janssen, M. A. 2010. Introducing ecological dynamics into common-pool resource experiments. Ecology and Society 15(2): 7. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss2/art7/
20. MacArthur, R. H., and E. O. Wilson. 1967. The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
21. McGinnis, M. D., and E. Ostrom. 2014. Social-ecological system framework: initial changes and continuing challenges. Ecology and Society, 19(2): 30. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-06387-190230.
22. Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the commons. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807763.
23. Ostrom, E. 2005. Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
24. Ostrom, E. 2007a. A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104(39):15181-15187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0702288104.
25. Ostrom, E. 2007b. Sustainable social-ecological systems: an impossibility? Presented at the 2007.
26. Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, “Science and Technology for Sustainable Well-Being,” 15-19. February, 2007, San Francisco, California. [online] URL: http://ssrn.com/ abstract=997834.
27. Ostrom, E. 2009. A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science 325:419-422. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133.
28. Ostrom, E., and M. Cox. 2010. Moving beyond panaceas: a multitiered diagnostic approach for social-ecological systems. Environmental Conservation 37(4):451-463. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0376892910000834.
29. Ostrom, V. 2008. The intellectual crisis in American public administration. Third edition. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, USA.
30. Pagdee, A., Y. Kin, and P. J. Daugherty. 2006. What makes community forest management successful: a meta-study from community forests throughout the world. Society & Natural Resources 19(1):33-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941920500323260.
31. Parson, E. A. 2003. Protecting the ozone layer: science and strategy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0195155491.001.0001.
32. Persha, L., A. Agrawal, and A. Chhatre. 2011. Social and ecological synergy: local rulemaking, forest livelihoods and biodiversity conservation. Science 331:1606-1608. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1199343.
33. Pierce, A. R., G. Parker, and K. Rabenold. 2006. Forest succession in an oak-hickory dominated stand during a 40-year period at the Ross Biological Reserve, Indiana. Natural Areas Journal 26:351-359. http://dx.doi.org/10.3375/0885-8608(2006)26[351:FSIAOD] 2.0.CO;2.
34. Poteete, A. R., M. A. Janssen, and E. Ostrom. 2010. Working together. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9781400835157.
35. Redman, C. L., J. M. Morgan, and L. H. Kuby. 2004. Integrating social science into the long-term ecological research (LTER) network: social dimensions of ecological change and ecological dimensions of social change. Ecosystems 7(2):161-171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10021-003-0215-z
36. Schlager, E. 2007. A comparison of frameworks, theories, and models of policy processes. Pages 293-319 in P. A. Sabatier, editor. Theories of the policy process. Second edition. Westview, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
37. Steffen, W., J. Grinevald, P. Crutzen, and J. McNeill. 2011. The Anthropocene: conceptual and historical perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society A: Physical, Mathematical and Engineering Sciences 369(1938):842-867. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0327.
38. Yellowwood Lake Watershed Planning Group (YLWPG). 2006. The Yellowwood Lake Watershed Management Plan: protecting, enhancing, and conserving Yellowwood Lake and its watershed. Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Division of Forestry, Yellowwood State Forest, Nashville, Indiana, USA. [online] URL: http://www.in.gov/idem/nps/files/wmp_yellowwoodlake_4-46.pdf