Intelligent detection of cracks in metallic surfaces using a waveguide sensor loaded with metamaterial elements

Sensors (Switzerland)

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 11402-11416

  Ali, Abdulbaset ^a   Hu, Bing ^b   Ramahi, Omar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^b BEIJING INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Artificial intelligence; Crack detection; Metamaterial; Split ring resonators; Waveguide sensors

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DATA HANDLING; EQUIPMENT; EQUIPMENT TESTING; METALLIC COMPOUNDS; METAMATERIALS; MICROWAVE SENSORS; SURFACE MEASUREMENT; WAVEGUIDES;

CRACK CLASSIFICATION; HIGH-RESOLUTION SCREENS; HUMAN OBSERVATIONS; INTELLIGENT DETECTION; METALLIC SURFACE; POST PROCESSING; SPLIT RING RESONATOR; WAVEGUIDE SENSORS;

CRACK DETECTION;

EID: 84929378539     PISSN: 14248220     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/s150511402     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Zoughi, R.; Kharkovsky, S. Microwave and Millimeter Wave Sensors for Crack Detection. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 2008, 31, 695–713.
2. Zhang, H.; Gao, B.; Tian, G.Y.; Woo, W.L.; Bai, L. Metal defects sizing and detection under thick coating using microwave. NDT&E Int. 2013, 60, 52–61.
3. McClanahan, A.; Kharkovsky, S.; Maxon, A.R.; Zoughi, R.; Palmer, D.D. Depth evaluation of shallow surface cracks in metals using rectangular waveguides at millimeter-wave frequencies. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2010, 59, 1693–1704.
4. Boybay, M.S.; Ramahi, O.M. Waveguide Probes Using Single Negative Media. IEEE Microw. Wire. Compon. Lett. 2009, 19, 641–643.
5. Huang, M.; Yang, J. Microwave Sensor Using Metamaterials. Available online: http://cdn.intechweb.org/pdfs/14154.pdf (accessed on 15 May 2015).
6. Hu, B.; Ren, Z.; Boybay, M.; Ramahi, O. Waveguide Probe Loaded With Split-Ring Resonators for Crack Detection in Metallic Surfaces. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech. 2014, 62, 871–878.
7. Worden, K.; Manson, G. The application of machine learning to structural health monitoring. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2007, 365, 515–537.
8. Byrne, D.; O’Halloran, M.; Glavin, M.; Jones, E. Breast cancer detection based on differential ultrawideband microwave radar. Prog. Electromagn. Res. M 2011, 20, 231–242.
9. Byrne, D.; O’Halloran, M.; Jones, E.; Glavin, M. Support vector machine-based ultrawideband breast cancer detection system. J. Electromagn. Waves Appl. 2011, 25, 1807–1816.
10. AlShehri, S.A.; Khatun, S. UWB Imaging for Breastr Cancer Detection Using Neural Network. Prog. Electromagn. Res. C 2009, 7, 79–93.
11. Hasan, A.; Peterson, A.F. Measurement of complex permittivity using artificial neural networks. IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. 2011, 53, 200–203.
12. Duda, R.O.; Hart, P.E.; Stork, D.G. Pattern Classification; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1999.
13. Zoughi, R.; Kharkovsky, S. Microwave and millimetre wave sensors for crack detection. Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct. 2008, 31, 695–713.
14. Zhao, W.; Bhushan, A.; Santamaria, A.D.; Simon, M.G.; Davis, C.E. Machine learning: A crucial tool for sensor design. Algorithms 2008, 1, 130–152.
15. Dreiseitl, S.; Ohno-Machado, L. Logistic regression and artificial neural network classification models: A methodology review. J. Biomed. Inform. 2002, 35, 352–359.
16. Sargent, D.J. Comparison of artificial neural networks with other statistical approaches. Cancer 2001, 91, 1636–1642.
17. Bulu, I.; Caglayan, H.; Aydin, K.; Ozbay, E. Compact size highly directive antennas based on the SRR metamaterial medium. New J. Phys. 2005, 7, doi:10.1088/1367-2630/7/1/223.
18. Engheta, N.; Nelatury, S.R.; Hoorfar, A. The role of geometry of inclusions in forming metamaterials with negative permittivity and permeability. In Proceedings of the 2002 URSI General Assembly, Maastricht, The Netherlands, 17–27 August 2002.
19. Inamdar, K.; Kosta, Y.; Patnaik, S. Study of a new metamaterial particle of ‘AV’shape. In Proceedings of the 2014 2nd International Conference on Emerging Technology Trends in Electronics, Communication and Networking (ET2ECN), Surat, India, 26–27 December 2014; pp. 1–4.
20. Mutlu, M.; Akosman, A.E.; Serebryannikov, A.E.; Ozbay, E. Asymmetric chiral metamaterial circular polarizer based on four U-shaped split ring resonators. Opt. Lett. 2011, 36, 1653–1655.
21. Delac, K.; Grgic, M.; Grgic, S. A Comparative Study of PCA, ICA, and LDA. Available online: http://www.vcl.fer.hr/papers_pdf/A%20Comparative%20Study%20of%20PCA,%20ICA%20and%20LDA.pdf (accessed on 15 May 2015).
22. Tibaduiza Burgos, D.A.; Mujica Delgado, L.E.; Anaya, M.; Rodellar Benedé, J.; Güemes Gordo, A. Principal Component Analysis vs. Independent Component Analysis for Damage Detection. Available online: http://www.ndt.net/article/ewshm2012/papers/fr1d4.pdf (accessed on 15 May 2015).
23. Guyon, I. A scaling law for the validation-set training-set size ratio. AT&T Bell Lab. 1997, doi:10.1.1.33.1337.
24. Özkan, C.; Erbek, F.S. The comparison of activation functions for multispectral Landsat TM image classification. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 2003, 69, 1225–1234.
25. Yuan, J.; Yu, S. Privacy Preserving Back-Propagation Neural Network Learning Made Practical with Cloud Computing. IEEE Trans. Parallel Distrib. Syst. 2014, 25, 212–221.
26. Taormina, R.; Chau, K.W.; Sethi, R. Artificial neural network simulation of hourly groundwater levels in a coastal aquifer system of the Venice lagoon. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2012, 25, 1670–1676.
27. Chau, K. Application of a PSO-based neural network in analysis of outcomes of construction claims. Autom. Constr. 2007, 16, 642–646.
28. Zhang, J.R.; Zhang, J.; Lok, T.M.; Lyu, M.R. A hybrid particle swarm optimization-back-propagation algorithm for feedforward neural network training. Appl. Math. Comput. 2007, 185, 1026–1037.
29. Bishop, C.M.; Jordan, M.; Kleinberg, J.; Scholkopf, B. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2006; Volume 1.
30. Chang, C.C.; Lin, C.J. LIBSVM: A Library for Support Vector Machines. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 2011, 2, doi:10.1145/1961189.1961199.
31. Rennie, J.D.M.; Shih, L.; Teevan, J.; Karger, D.R. Tackling the Poor Assumptions of Naive Bayes Text Classifiers. In Proceedings of the Twentieth International Conference on Machine Learning, Washington, DC, USA, 21–24 August 2003; pp. 616–623.
32. Wang, S.; Manning, C.D. Baselines and bigrams: Simple, good sentiment and topic classification. In Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Jeju, Korea, 8–14 July 2012; Short Papers-Volume 2, pp. 90–94.