Building a framework for a dual task taxonomy

BioMed Research International

Volumn 2015, Issue , 2015, Pages

  McIsaac, Tara L ^a   Lamberg, Eric M ^b   Muratori, Lisa M ^b  

^a A T STILL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b STONY BROOK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DUAL TASK TAXONOMY; DUAL-TASK PERFORMANCE (TEST); HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LOCOMOTION; MOTOR CONTROL; TAXONOMY; ATTENTION; CLASSIFICATION; COGNITION; LEARNING; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

ATTENTION; CLASSIFICATION; COGNITION; HUMANS; LEARNING; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

EID: 84929347002     PISSN: 23146133     EISSN: 23146141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1155/2015/591475     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. M. Schenkman, J. E. Deutsch, and K. M. Gill-Body, "An integrated framework for decision making in neurologic physical therapist practice," Physical Therapy, vol. 86, no. 12, pp. 1681-1702, 2006.
2. A. M. Gentile, "Skill acquisition: action, movement and neuromotor processes," inMovement Science: Foundations for Physical Therapy in Rehabilitation, J. Carr and R. Shepherd, Eds., pp. 111-187, Aspen, Frederick, Md, USA, 2000.
3. B. S. Bloom, Taxonomy of Educational Objectives Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain, Longman, NewYork, NY,USA, 2nd edition, 1984.
4. A. B. Markman and C. M. Brendl, "Constraining theories of embodied cognition," Psychological Science, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 6-10, 2005.
5. M. Wilson, "Six views of embodied cognition," Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 625-636, 2002.
6. P. Plummer, G. Eskes, S. Wallace et al., "Cognitive-motor interference during functional mobility after stroke: state of the science and implications for future research," Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 94, no. 12, pp. 2565-2574, 2013.
7. H. Chawla, S. Walia, M. Behari, and M. M. Noohu, "Effect of type of secondary task on cued gait on people with idiopathic Parkinson's disease," Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 18-23, 2014.
8. R. Galletly and S. G. Brauer, "Does the type of concurrent task affect preferred and cued gait in people with Parkinson's disease?" Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 175-180, 2005.
9. C. D. Wickens, "Multiple resources and performance prediction," Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 159-177, 2002.
10. S. O'Shea, M. E. Morris, and R. Iansek, "Dual task interference during gait in people with Parkinson disease: effects of motor versus cognitive secondary tasks," Physical Therapy, vol. 82, no. 9, pp. 888-897, 2002.
11. R. Marois and J. Ivanoff, "Capacity limits of information processing in the brain," Trends in Cognitive Sciences, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 296-305, 2005.
12. A. Shumway-Cook andM.Woollacott,Motor Control: Translating Research into Clinical Practice, Wolters Kluwer Health/LippincottWilliams &Wilkins, Philadelphia, Pa, USA, 4th edition, 2012.
13. J. M. Honce, "Gray matter pathology in MS: neuroimaging and clinical correlations,"Multiple Sclererosis International, vol. 2013, Article ID 627870, 16 pages, 2013.
14. B. Dubois and B. Pillon, "Cognitive deficits in Parkinson's disease," Journal of Neurology, vol. 244, no. 1, pp. 2-8, 1996.
15. D. A. Norman and D. G. Bobrow, "On data-limited and resource-limited processes," Cognitive Psychology, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 44-64, 1975.
16. K.-C. Siu and M. H. Woollacott, "Attentional demands of postural control: the ability to selectively allocate informationprocessing resources," Gait and Posture, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 121-126, 2007.
17. J. A. Shaw, J. L. Huffman, J. S. Frank, M. S. Jog, and A. L. Adkin, "The effects of skill focused instructions on walking performance depend on movement constraints in Parkinson's disease," Gait and Posture, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 119-123, 2011.
18. R. Cools, R. A. Barker, B. J. Sahakian, and T. W. Robbins, "Mechanisms of cognitive set flexibility in Parkinson's disease," Brain, vol. 124, no. 12, pp. 2503-2512, 2001.
19. O.Huxhold, S.-C. Li, F. Schmiedek, andU. Lindenberger, "Dualtasking postural control: aging and the effects of cognitive demand in conjunction with focus of attention," Brain Research Bulletin, vol. 69, no. 3, pp. 294-305, 2006.
20. V. E. Kelly, A. A. Janke, and A. Shumway-Cook, "Effects of instructed focus and task difficulty on concurrent walking and cognitive task performance in healthy young adults," Experimental Brain Research, vol. 207, no. 1-2, pp. 65-73, 2010.
21. J. M. Srygley, A. Mirelman, T. Herman, N. Giladi, and J. M. Hausdorff, "When does walking alter thinking? Age and task associated findings," Brain Research, vol. 1253, pp. 92-99, 2009.
22. A. M. Gentile, "A working model of skill acquisition with application to teaching," Quest, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 3-23, 1972.
23. K. M. Newell, "Motor skill acquisition," Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 213-237, 1991.
24. A. M. Gordon, H. Forssberg, R. S. Johansson, A. C. Eliasson, and G. Westling, "Development of human precision grip. III. Integration of visual size cues during the programming of isometric forces," Experimental Brain Research, vol. 90, no. 2, pp. 399-403, 1992.
25. Y. Lajoie, N. Teasdale, C. Bard, and M. Fleury, "Attentional demands for static and dynamic equilibrium," Experimental Brain Research, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 139-144, 1993.
26. A. E. Patla, "Howis human gait controlled by vision?" Ecological Psychology, vol. 10, no. 3-4, pp. 287-302, 1998.
27. N. Bernstein, The Coordination and Regulation of Movements, Pergamon Press, Oxford, UK, 1967.
28. M. P. Boisgontier, I. A. M. Beets, J. Duysens, A. Nieuwboer, R. T. Krampe, and S. P. Swinnen, "Age-related differences in attentional cost associated with postural dual tasks: increased recruitment of generic cognitive resources in older adults," Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, vol. 37, no. 8, pp. 1824-1837, 2013.
29. P. Gysin, T. R. Kaminski, C. J. Hass, C. E. Grobet, and A. M. Gordon, "Effects of gait variations on grip force coordination during object transport," Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 100, no. 5, pp. 2477-2485, 2008.
30. S. Glasauer, A. Stein, A. L. Günther, V. L. Flanagin, K. Jahn, and T. Brandt, "The effect of dual tasks in locomotor path integration," Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1164, pp. 201-205, 2009.
31. L. L. Saling and J. G. Phillips, "Automatic behaviour: Efficient not mindless," Brain Research Bulletin, vol. 73, no. 1-3, pp. 1-20, 2007.
32. E. M. Lamberg and L. M.Muratori, "Cell phones change theway we walk," Gait & Posture, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 688-690, 2012.
33. P. M. Fitts, "The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement," Journal of Experimental Psychology, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 381-391, 1954.
34. S. T. Klapp, "Motor response programming during simple choice reaction time: the role of practice," Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 1015-1027, 1995.
35. R. A. Schmidt, H. Zelaznik, B. Hawkins, J. S. Frank, and J. T. Quinn, "Motor-output variability: a theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts," Psychological Review, vol. 86, no. 5, pp. 415-451, 1979.
36. J. J. G. van Merriënboer, L. Kester, and F. Paas, "Teaching complex rather than simple tasks: balancing intrinsic and germane load to enhance transfer of learning," Applied Cognitive Psychology, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 343-352, 2006.
37. G. Wulf and C. H. Shea, "Principles derived from the study of simple skills do not generalize to complex skill learning," Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 185-211, 2002.
38. J. R. Berard, J. Fung, and A. Lamontagne, "Evidence for the use of rotational optic flow cues for locomotor steering in healthy older adults," Journal of Neurophysiology, vol. 106, no. 3, pp. 1089-1096, 2011.
39. R.Vitório, E. Lirani-Silva,F.A.Barbieri, V. Raile, F. Stella, andL. T. B. Gobbi, "Influence of visual feedback sampling on obstacle crossing behavior in people with Parkinson's disease," Gait and Posture, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 330-334, 2013.
40. M.A.Guadagnoli and T. D. Lee, "Challenge point: a framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning," Journal of Motor Behavior, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 212-224, 2004.
41. G. Yogev-Seligmann, J. M. Hausdorff, and N. Giladi, "Do we always prioritize balance when walking? Towards an integrated model of task prioritization," Movement Disorders, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 765-770, 2012.
42. C. Habeck, H. J. Hilton, E. Zarahn, J. Flynn, J. Moeller, and Y. Stern, "Relation of cognitive reserve and task performance to expression of regional covariance networks in an event-related fMRI study of nonverbal memory," NeuroImage, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1723-1733, 2003.
43. J. J. G. van Merriënboer and J. Sweller, "Cognitive load theory and complex learning: recent developments and future directions," Educational Psychology Review, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 147-177, 2005.
44. F. Paas,A. Renkl, and J. Sweller, "Cognitive load theory: instructional implications of the interaction between information structures and cognitive architecture," Instructional Science, vol. 32, no. 1-2, pp. 1-8, 2004.
45. J. Sweller, P. Ayres, and S. Kalyuga, "Emerging themes in cognitive load theory: the transient information and the collective working memory effects," in Cognitive Load Theory, vol. 1 of Explorations in the Learning Sciences, Instructional Systems and Performance Technologies, pp. 219-233, Springer, NewYork, NY, USA, 2011.
46. L. A. Brown, N. C. McKenzie, and J. B. Doan, "Age-dependent differences in the attentional demands of obstacle negotiation," The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, vol. 60, no. 7, pp. 924-927, 2005.
47. C.D.Hall, K. V. Echt, S. L.Wolf, andW. A. Rogers, "Cognitive andmotor mechanisms underlying older adults' ability to divide attention while walking," Physical Therapy, vol. 91, no. 7, pp. 1039-1050, 2011.
48. P. Plummer-D'Amato, B. Brancato, M. Dantowitz, S. Birken, C. Bonke, and E. Furey, "Effects of gait and cognitive task difficulty on cognitive-motor interference in aging," Journal of Aging Research, vol. 2012, Article ID 583894, 8 pages, 2012.
49. N.Theill, M. Martin, V. Schumacher, S. A. Bridenbaugh, and R. W. Kressig, "Simultaneously measuring gait and cognitive performance in cognitively healthy and cognitively impaired older adults: the Basel motor-cognition dual-task paradigm," Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, vol. 59, no. 6, pp. 1012-1018, 2011.
50. O. Bock, "Dual-task costs while walking increase in old age for some, but not for other tasks: an experimental study of healthy young and elderly persons," Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, vol. 5, article 27, 2008.
51. C. Dromey and A. Benson, "Effects of concurrent motor, linguistic, or cognitive tasks on speech motor performance," Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 1234-1246, 2003.
52. S. Kemper, R. E. Herman, and C. H. T. Lian, "The costs of doing two things at once for young and older adults: talking while walking, finger tapping, and ignoring speech or noise," Psychology and Aging, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 181-192, 2003.
53. U. Laessoe, H. C. Hoeck, O. Simonsen, and M. Voigt, "Residual attentional capacity amongst young and elderly during dual and triple task walking,"HumanMovement Science, vol. 27,no. 3, pp. 496-512, 2008.
54. L. Rochester, V. Hetherington, D. Jones et al., "Attending to the task: interference effects of functional tasks on walking in Parkinson's disease and the roles of cognition, depression, fatigue, and balance," Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 85, no. 10, pp. 1578-1585, 2004.
55. T. Asai, S. Misu, T. Doi, M. Yamada, and H. Ando, "Effects of dual-tasking on control of trunk movement during gait: respective effect ofmanual-and cognitive-task," Gait&Posture, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 54-59, 2014.
56. M. Plotnik, Y. Dagan, T. Gurevich, N. Giladi, and J. M. Hausdorff, "Effects of cognitive function on gait and dual tasking abilities in patients with Parkinson's disease suffering from motor response fluctuations," Experimental Brain Research, vol. 208, no. 2, pp. 169-179, 2011.
57. J.-P. Azulay, S.Mesure, and O. Blin, "Influence of visual cues on gait in Parkinson's disease: contribution to attention or sensory dependence?" Journal of the Neurological Sciences, vol. 248, no. 1-2, pp. 192-195, 2006.
58. T. Cluff, T. Gharib, and R. Balasubramaniam, "Attentional influences on the performance of secondary physical tasks during posture control," Experimental Brain Research, vol. 203, no. 4, pp. 647-658, 2010.
59. P. Herath, T. Klingberg, J. Young, K. Amunts, and P. Roland, "Neural correlates of dual task interference can be dissociated from those of divided attention: an fMRI study," Cerebral Cortex, vol. 11, no. 9, pp. 796-805, 2001.
60. G. D. Logan, "Cumulative progress in formal theories of attention," Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 55, pp. 207-234, 2004.
61. H. Pashler, J. C. Johnston, and E. Ruthruff, "Attention and performance," Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 52, no. 1, pp. 629-651, 2001.