How policies affect the use of plant genetic resources: The experience of the CGIAR

Resources

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 231-269

  Noriega, Isabel López ^a   Halewood, Michael ^a   Galluzzi, Gea ^a   Vernooy, Ronnie ^a   Bertacchini, Enrico ^b   Gauchan, Devendra ^c   Welch, Eric ^d  

^a BIOVERSITY INTERNATIONAL   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

^c NEPAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH COUNCIL   (Nepal)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Access and benefit sharing; Intellectual property rights; Partnerships; Plant genetic resources; Policies; Technology development and dissemination

Indexed keywords

EID: 84929336439     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20799276     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/resources2030231     Document Type: Article

References (138)

1. Pinstrup-Anderson, P., Watson, D.D., II. Food Policy for Developing Countries: The Role of Government in Global, National and Local Food Systems; Cornell University Press: Ithaca, NY, USA, 2011.
2. Vernooy, R., Song, Y. New approaches to supporting the agricultural biodiversity important for sustainable rural livelihoods. Int. J. Agric. Sustain. 2004, 2, 55-66.
3. Bioversity International, the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), the International Potato Center (CIP), the International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), the International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), the International Institute for Tropical Agriculture (IITA) and the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI).
4. Data Base of the System-Wide Information Network for Genetic Resources (SINGER). Available online: http://www.singer.cgiar.org/ (accessed on 1 March 2012).
5. The legend classifies countries based on the number of samples sent to these countries from the CGIAR gene banks.
6. Halewood, M., Sood, R., Sackville Hamilton, R., Amri, A., van den Houwe, I., Roux, N., Dumet, D., Hanson, J., Upadhyaya, H.D., Jorge, M.A., et al. Changing Rates of Acquisition of Plant Genetic Resources by International Genebanks: Setting the Scene to Monitor an Impact of the International Treaty. In Plant Genetic Resources as a Global Commons: Challenges in International Law and Governance; Halewood, M., Lopez-Noriega, I., Louafi, S., Eds., Earthscan: London, UK, 2013.
7. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Report of the Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture: Thirteenth Regular Session; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2011.
8. Developed countries include countries in transition.
9. Widrlechner, M., Burke, L. Analysis of germplasm distribution patterns for collections held at the North Central Regional Plant Introduction Station, Ames, Iowa, USA. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2003, 50, 329-337.
10. El Bouhssini, M., Street, K., Amri, A., Mackay, M., Ogbonnaya, F.C., Omran, A., Abdalla, O., Baum, M., Dabbous, A., Rihawi, F. Sources of resistance in bread wheat to Russian wheat aphid (Diuraphis noxia) in Syria identified using the Focused Identification of Germplasm Strategy (FIGS). Plant Breed. 2011, 130, 96-97.
11. System-Wide Genetic Resource Programme of the CGIAR (SGRP). Booklet of CGIAR Centre Policy Instruments, Guidelines and Statements on Genetic Resources, Biotechnology and Intellectual Property Rights; SGRP: Rome, Italy, 2010.
12. Of the original 12 centres, the Centre for International Forestry Research did not sign the revised agreement.
13. Standard Material Transfer Agreement; Adopted at the First Session of the Governing Body of the Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, Madrid, Spain, 12-16 June 2006. Available online: ftp://ftp.fao.org/ag/agp/planttreaty/agreements/smta/SMTAe.pdf (accessed on 8 August 2013).
14. Byerlee, D., Dubin, H.J. Crop improvement in the CGIAR as a global success story of open access and international collaboration. Int. J. Commons 2009, 4, 452-480.
15. Byerlee, D., Dubin, H.J. Crop improvement in the CGIAR as a global success story of open access and international collaboration. Int. J. Commons 2009, 4, 452-480.
16. Evenson, R.E., Gollin, D. Crop Variety Improvement and Its Effect on Productivity: The Impact of International Agricultural Research; Centre for Agricultural Bioscience International (CABI): Oxon, UK, 2003.
17. CGIAR. Genetic Improvement. Available online: http://impact.cgiar.org/genetic-improvement (accessed on 1 August 2013).
18. Byerlee, D., Traxler, G. National and international wheat improvement research in the post-green revolution period: Evolution and impact. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 1995, 77, 268-278.
19. Johnson, N., Pachico, D., Voysest, O. The distribution of benefits from public international germplasm banks: The case of beans in Latin America. Agric. Econ. 2003, 29, 277-286.
20. Bellon, M.R., Adato, M., Becerril, J., Mindek, D. The Impact of Improved Maize Germplasm on Poverty Alleviation: The Case of Tuxpeño-Derived Material in Mexico; International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI): Washingotn, DC, USA, 2003.
21. Mazid, A., Amegbeto, K.N., Keser, M., Morgounov, A. Adoption and Impacts of Improved Winter and Spring Wheat Varieties in Turkey; International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA): Aleppo, Syria, 2009.
22. Beyene, H., Verkuijl, H., Mwangi, W. Farmers' Seed Sources and Management of Bread Wheat in Wolmera Woreda; International Center for Maize and Wheat Improvement (CIMMYT): Mexico D.F., Mexico, 1998.
23. Manyong, V.M., Kling, J.G., Makinde, K.O., Ajala, S.O., Menkir, A. Impact of IITA-Improved Germplasm on Maize Production in West and Central Africa; International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (IITA): Ibadan, Nigeria, 2000.
24. Alumira, J., Rusike, J. The green revolution in Zimbabwe. J. Agric. Dev. Econ. 2005, 2, 50-66.
25. Janaiah, A., Hossain, M., Tsuka, K. Productivity mpact of the modern varieties of rice in India. Develop. Econ. 2006, 44, 190-207.
26. Ransom, J. Adoption of improved maize varieties in the hills of Nepal. Agric. Econ. 2003, 29, 299-305.
27. Pandey, S., Gauchan, D., Malabayabas, M., Bool-Emerick, M., Hardy, B. Patterns of Adoption of Improved Rice Varieties and Farm-Level Impacts in Stress-Prone Rainfed Areas in South Asia; International Rice Research Institute (IRRI): Los Banos, Philippines, 2012.
28. Data exclude exchanges among CGIAR breeding programs.
29. International Wheat Improvement Network Web Page. Available online: http://apps.cimmyt.org/english/wps/obtain_seed/iwin/index.htm (accessed on 1 August 2013).
30. Reynolds, M.P., Borlaug, N.E. Impacts of breeding on international collaborative wheat improvement. J. Agric. Sci. 2006, 144, 3-17.
31. Wortmann, C.S., Lunze, L., Ochwoh, V.A., Lynch, J. Bean improvement for low fertility soils in Africa. Afr. Crop Sci. J. 1986, 4, 469-476.
32. Ashby, J.A. The Impact of Participatory Plant Breeding. In Plant Breeding and Farmer Participation; Ceccarelli, S., Guimaraes, E.P., Weltzien, E., Eds., FAO: Rome, Italy, 2009; pp. 649-671.
33. Biermayr-Jenzano, P., Garcia, C.X., Manners, G. Final Report of the PRGA Program (1997-2011); Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT): Cali, Colombia, 2011.
34. Ceccarelli, S., Grando, S. Decentralized-participatory plant breeding: An example of demand driven research. Euphytica 2007, 155, 349-360.
35. International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas. Annual Report; ICARDA: Aleppo, Syria, 2010. Available online: https://apps.icarda.org/wsInternet/wsInternet.asmx/ DownloadFileToLocal?filePath=Annual_report/ICARDA_2010.pdf&fileName=ICARDA_2010.pdf (accessed on 1 August 2013).
36. Al-Yassin, A. Jordan: In Search of New Benefit-Sharing Practices Through Participatory Plant Breeding. In The Custodians of Biodiversity: Sharing Access to and Benefits of Genetic Resources; Ruiz, M., Vernooy, R., Eds., Earthscan: Abingdon, UK; International Development Research Centre of Canada (IDRC): Ottawa, Canada, 2012; pp. 67-78.
37. Danial, D., Parlevliet, J., Almekinders, C., Thiele, G. Farmers' participation and breeding for durable disease resistance in the Andean region. Euphytica 2006, 153, 385-396.
38. Gibson, R.W., Mpembe, I., Mwanga, R.O.M. Benefits of participatory plant breeding (PPB) as exemplified by the first-ever officially released PPB-bred sweet potato cultivar. J. Agric. Sci. 2011, 149, 625-632.
39. Paris, T., Singh, A., Cueno, A., Singh, V.N. Assessing the impact of participatory research in rice breeding on women farmer: A case study of in eastern Uttarpradesh, India. Exp. Agric. 2008, 44, 97-112.
40. Paris, T., Manzanilla, D., Tatlonghari, G., Labios, R., Cuneo, A., Villanueva, D. Guide to Participatory Varietal Selection for Submergence-Tolerant Rice; International Rice Research Institute (IRRI): Manila, Philippines, 2011.
41. IRRI Web Page. The CURE Approach. Available online: http://www.irri.org/index.php? option=com_k2&view=item&id=10361&Itemid=100575&lang=en (accessed on 26 May 2013).
42. Ntare, B.R. Revitalization of groundnut production in West and Central Africa: Partnership between ICRISAT, the CFC, FAO, NARS and CIRAD. Int. Arachis Newsl. 2003, 23, 12-16.
43. Ntare, B.R., Ndjeunga, J., Waliyar, F., Kodio, O., Echekwu, C.A., Kapran, I., Bissal, H.Y., Sako, K., Diallo, A.T., Da Sylva, A., et al. Farmer Participatory Evaluation and Dissemination of Improved Groundnut Varieties in West Africa; International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics: Andra Pradesh, India, 2008.
44. Louwaars, N., Tripp, R., Eaton, D., Henson-Apollonio, V., Hu, R., Mendoza, M., Muhhuku, F., Pal, S., Wekundah, J. Impacts of Strengthened Intellectual Property Rights Regimes on the Plant Breeding Industry in Developing Countries: A Synthesis of Five Case Studies; Wageningen UR: Wageningen, The Netherlands, 2005.
45. Ramaswami, B. Understanding the Seed Industry: Contemporary Trends and Analytical Issues; Indian Statistical Institute: New Delhi, India, 2002.
46. Mula, R.P., Rai, K.N., Kulkarni, V.N., Singh, A.K. Public-private partnership and impact of ICRISAT's pearl millet hybrid parents research. J. SAT Agric. Res. 2007, 5, 1-5.
47. Biggs, S. A multiple source of innovation model of agricultural research and technology promotion. World Dev. 1990, 18, 1481-1499.
48. Rogers, E.M. Diffusion of Innovations, 5th ed., Free Press: New York, NY, USA, 2003.
49. Leeuwis, C. Communication for Rural Innovation: Rethinking Agricultural Extension; Wiley-Blackwell: Oxford, UK, 2004.
50. Snapp, S., Kanyama-Phiri, G., Kamanga, B., Gilberts, R., Wellard, K. Farmer and researcher partnerships in Malawi: Developing soil fertility technologies for the near-term and far-term. Exp. Agric. 2002, 38, 411-431.
51. Sechrest, L., Stewart, M., Stickle, T. Factors Affecting the Adoption and Impact of CGIAR Innovations: A Synthesis of Findings; A report to the Impact Assessment and Evaluation Group (IAEG); Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR): Washington, DC, USA, 1998.
52. Tripp, R. The Impacts of Food Legume Research in the CGIAR: A Scoping Study; Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR): Washington, DC, USA, 2011.
53. Gollin, D., Morris, M.L., Byerlee, D. Technology adoption in intensive post-Green Revolution systems. Agric. Econ. 2005, 87, 1310-1316.
54. Smale, M., Phiri, A., Chikafa, G.A., Heisey, P.W., Mahatta, F. Institutional Change and Discontinuities in Farmers' Use of Hybrid Maize Seed and Fertilizer in Malawi: Findings from the 1996-1997 CIMMYT/MoLD Survey; International Center for Maize and Wheat Improvement (CIMMYT): Mexico D.F., Mexico, 1996.
55. Doss, C.R. Analyzing technology adoption using microstudies: Limitations, challenges, and opportunities for improvement. Agric. Econ. 2006, 34, 207-219.
56. Chilver, A. The Influence of Institutional Context on the Diffusion of Innovations: Some Lesson from Tru Potato Seed (TPS) in Indonesia. In Into Action Research: Partnership in Asian Rootcrop Research and Development, User's Perspective with Agricultural Research and Development; UPWARD: Los Banos, Philippines, 1996; pp. 227-239.
57. A Strategy and Results Framework for the CGIAR; CGIAR: Washington, DC, USA, 2011.
58. Bantilan, M.C.S., Deb, U.K., Gowda, C.L.L., Reddy, B.V.S., Obilana, A.B., Evenson, R.E. Sorghum Genetic Enhancement: Research Process, Dissemination and Impacts; International Crop Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT): Hyderabad, India, 2004.
59. Deshmukh, S.N., Satpute, G.N., Dabre, W.M., Deshmukh, R.G. PDKV method of own seed production of groundnut. Int. Arachis Newsl. 2001, 21, 23-24.
60. Andrade Piedra, J.L., Hidalgo, O.A., Manrique, K., Velasco, C., Devaux, A. Diagnostic of Seed Potato Systems in Bolivia, Ecuador and Peru Focusing on Native Varieties. In Tropical Roots and Tubers in a Changing Climate: A Critical Opportunity for the World; International Potato Center (CIP), International Society for Tuber and Root Crops (ISTRC), Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina (UNALM): Lima, Peru, 2009.
61. Aw-Hassan, A., Mazid, A., Salahieh, H. The role of informal farmer-to-farmer seed distribution in diffusion of new barley varieties in Syria. Exp. Agric. 2008, 44, 413-431.
62. MasAgro Home Page. Available online: http://masagro.mx/index.php/es/ (accessed on 26 May 2013).
63. Secretaría de Agricultura, Ganadería, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación de México (SAGARPA) y Centro Internacional para la Mejora del Maíz y el Trigo (CIMMYT). MasAgro. Program Activities Report 2011-2012; CIMMYT: Mexico D.F., Mexico, 2012. Available online: http://masagro.mx/index.php/en/2012-06-21-17-47-58/documentos/doc_download/15-masagroinforme-de-actividades-2011-2012#infacte2012 (accessed on 1 August 2013).
64. IRRI Web Page. STRASA: Stress-Tolerant Rice for Africa and South Asia (Phase 2). Available online: http://irri.org/index.php?option=com_k2&view=itemlist&task=category&id=184&Itemid=100030 (accessed on 26 May 2013).
65. Patiño, B.O., Best, R. Strategic alliances of cassava farmers with private and public sectors: A new approach for development of the cassava crop in Latin America. JIRCAS Int. Symp. Ser. 2002, 11, 62-68.
66. Fondo Latinoamericano para Arroz de Riego (FLAR) Home Page. Available online: http://www.flar.org/ (accessed on 26 May 2013).
67. Rubyogo, J.C., Sperling, L., Muthoni, R., Buruchara, R. Bean seed delivery for small farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa: The power of partnerships. Soc. Nat. Resour. 2010, 23, 285-302.
68. Rubyogo, J.C., Sperling, L., Nasirumbi, L., Kasambala, S. Developing Seed Systems with and for the Marginalized: Case of Common Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in East, Central and Southern Africa. In Proceedings of Farmer First Revisited Conference, Sussex, UK, 12-14 December 2007; Institute of Development Studies (IDS): Sussex, UK, 2007.
69. CGIAR Science Council. CGIAR Center Collaboration: Report of a Survey; CGIAR: Rome, Italy, 2006.
70. Reddy, K.G., Rao, P.P., Reddy, B.V.S. Enhancing technology generation and transfer through coalition approach: A case of sorghum poultry coalition, Andhra Pradesh, India. Int. J. Technol. Manag. Sustain. Dev. 2006, 5, 147-157.
71. Spielman, D.J., Hartwich, F., von Grebmer, K. Sharing Science, Building Bridges, and Enhancing Impact; International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI): Washington, DC, USA, 2007.
72. Gowda, C.L.L., Reddy, B.V.S. Collaboration with the seed industry in Asia. Asian Seed Plant. Mater. 2004, 11, 38.
73. The CGIAR at 31; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2004.
74. Ayele, S., Chataway, J., Wield, D. Partnerships in African crop biotech. Nat. Biotechnol. 2006, 24, 619-621.
75. Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, Annex 1C of the Marrakech Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization, 15 April 1994, 33 ILM 15. Available online: http://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/trips_e/t_agm0_e.htm (accessed on 1 August 2013).
76. Lopez-Noriega, I., Wambugu, P., Mejías, A. Assessment of Progress to Make the Multilateral System Functional: Incentives and Challenges at the Country Level. In Crop Genetic Resources as a Global Commons: Challenges in International Law and Governance; Halewood, M., Lopez-Noriega, I., Louafi, S., Eds., Routledge: London, UK, 2013.
77. Chiarolla, C., Jungcurt, S. Outstanding Issues on Access and Benefit Sharing under the Multilateral System of the International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture; Bern Declaration: Zurich, Switzerland Development Fund: Oslo, Norway, 2011.
78. Vernooy, R., Ruiz, M. Conclusions: Race to the Bottom versus Slow Walk to the Top. In The Custodians of Biodiversity: Sharing Access to and Benefits of Genetic Resources; Ruiz, M., Vernooy, R., Eds., Earthscan: London, UK; International Development Research Center of Canada (IDRC): Ottawa, Canada, 2012; pp. 163-180.
79. International Network for Genetic Evaluation of Rice (INGER) Home Page. Available online: http://seeds.irri.org/inger/ (accessed on 26 March 2013).
80. Khoury, C., Laliberté, B., Guarino, L. Trends in ex situ conservation of plant genetic resources: A review of global crop and regional conservation strategies. Genet. Resour. Crop Evol. 2010, 57, 625-639.
81. The Second Report on the State of the World's Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2010.
82. Generation Challenge Programme Home Page. Available online: http://www.generationcp.org/ (accessed on 26 May 2013).
83. Aoki, K. Malthus, mendel and monsanto: Intellectual property and the law and politics of global food supply: An introduction. J. Environ. Law Litig. 2004, 19, 397-426.
84. Lamola, L.M. Plant Intellectual Property, the Seed Industry and Technology Transfer; Agricultural Law Centre, Drake University Law School: Des Moines, IA, USA, 1992.
85. Maskus, K.E., Reichman, J.H. The globalization of private knowledge and the privatization of global public goods. J. Int. Econ. Law 2004, 7, 279-320.
86. Mooney, P.R. Seeds of the Earth: A Private or Public Resource? Food First Books: Oakland, CA, USA, 1979.
87. Primo Braga, C.A. The economics of intellectual property rights and the GATT: A view from the South. Vanderbilt J. Trans. Law 1989, 22, 243-257.
88. Koo, B., Nottenburg, C., Pardey, P.G. Plants and intellectual property: An international appraisal. Science 2004, 306, 1295-1297.
89. Lopez-Noriega, I. Defensive Protection of Farmers' Varieties. In Farmers' Varieties and Farmers' Rights: Addressing Challenges in Taxonomy and Law; Halewood, M., Ed., Earthscan: London, UK, in press.
90. An Act to Amend the Patent and Trademark Laws. Public Law 96-517, 12 Decemember 1980; 96th Congress; 94 STAT. 3015.
91. Kryder, D., Kowalski, S., Krattiger, A. The Intellectual and Technical Property Components of Pro-Vitamin A Rice (GoldenRice): A Preliminary Freedom to Operate Review; International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA): Ithaca, NY, USA, 2000.
92. RAFI. Golden Rice and Trojan Trade Reps: A Case Study in the Public Sector's Mismanagement of Intellectual Property; RAFI Communique Issue #66; RAFI International Office: Winnipeg, Canada, 2000.
93. Neil. New legal decision against Enola bean. CIAT News, 22 July 2009. Available online: http://www.ciatnews.cgiar.org/2009/07/22/new-legal-decision-against-enola-bean/ (accessed on 1 August 2013).
94. In their reports to the Governing Body of the Treaty covering the period 2007-2009 inclusive, only one centre, Bioversity, reported adding any additional terms and conditions to the SMTA when transferring PGRFA under Development (and that was to pass on conditions that had been imposed by the depositor of those materials to the international Musa collection). Numerous interviewees confirmed that since that time, some centres have developed terms and conditions which the routinely add to the SMTA when distributing PGRFA under Development.
95. Experience of the International Agricultural Research Centres of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research with the Implementation of the Agreements with the Governing Body, with Particular Reference to the Use of the Standard Material; System-wide Genetic Resources Programme (SGRP): Rome, Italy, 2011.
96. Guide for the CGIAR Centres' Use of the Standard Material Transfer Agreement; System-Wide Genetic Resources Programme (SGRP): Rome, Italy, 2010. Available online: http://www.bioversityinternational.org/fileadmin/bioversityDocs/Policy_module/eng.policy_module/ Reference:Material/Guide_SMTA.pdf (accessed on 1 August 2013).
97. CGIAR Web Page. CGIAR Principles on the Management of Intellectual Assets. Available online: http://consortium.cgiar.org/principles-on-management-of-intellectual-assets-approved/ (accessed on 26 May 2013).
98. Experience of the Centres of the Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR) with the Implementation of the Agreements with the Governing Body, with Particular Reference to the Standard Material Transfer Agreement; System-wide Genetic Resources Programme (SGRP): Rome, Italy, 2007.
99. International Treaty on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Report of the Third Meeting of the Ad Hoc Advisory Technical Committee of the Standard Material Transfer Agreement and the Multilateral System; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2012.
100. International Seed Federation. Position Paper on Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture; adopted in Christchurch, New Zealand, in 2007. Available online: http://www.worldseed.org/cms/medias/file/PositionPapers/OnSustainableAgriculture/PGRFA_20 070523_(En).pdf (accessed on 1 August 2013).
101. CGIAR ADE-PSC. Report of the workshop on Public Private Partnerships and Associated Needs for Product Stewardship and Liability; CGIAR: Washington, DC, USA, 2009.
102. Grain. Africa's seed laws: Red carpet for the corporations. Seedling 2005, July, 28-35.
103. Jarvis, D.I., Hodgkin, T. The maintenance of crop genetic diversity on farm: Supporting the convention on biological diversity's programme of work on agricultural biodiversity. Biodiversity 2008, 9, 23-28.
104. Bocci, R., Chable, V. Peasant seeds in Europe: Stakes and prospects. J. Agric. Environ. Int. Dev. 2009, 103, 81-93.
105. Ruiz, M., Vernooy, R. The Custodians of Biodiversity; Earthscan: London, UK; IDRC: Ottawa, Canada, 2012.
106. Moseley, W.G., Carney, J., Becker, L. Neoliberal policy, rural livelihoods and urban food security in West Africa: A comparative study of Gambia, Cote d'Ivoire and Mali. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2010, 107, 5774-5779.
107. Pascual, U., Perrings, C. Developing incentives and economic mechanisms for in situ conservation in agricultural landscapes. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2007, 121, 256-268.
108. Tripp, R. New Seed and Old Laws; Overseas Development Institute: London, UK, 1997.
109. Lipper, L., Anderson, C.L., Dalton, T.J., Keleman, A. Conclusions and Policy Implications. In Seed Trade in Rural Markets: Implications for Crop Diversity and Agricultural Development; Lipper, L., Anderson, C.L., Dalton, T.J., Eds., Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO): Rome, Italy; Earthscan: London, UK, 2010; pp. 209-222.
110. Leskien, D., Flitner, M. Intellectual Property Rights and Plant Genetic Resources: Options for a Sui Generis System; International Plant Genetic Resources Institute (IPGRI): Rome, Italy, 1997.
111. Louwaars, N. Seed Policy, Legislation and Law: Widening a Narrow Focus; Food Products Press and Haworth Press: Binghamtom, NY, USA, 2002.
112. Kastler, G. Europe's seed laws: Locking out farmers. Seedling 2005, July, 10-16.
113. Manzanilla, D.O., Paris, T.R., Vergara, G.V., Ismail, A.M., Pandey, S., Labios, R.V., Tatlonghari, G.T., Acda, R.D., Chi, T.T.N., Duoangsila, K., et al. Submergence risks and farmers' preferences: Implications for breeding Sub1 rice in Southeast Asia. Agric. Syst. 2011, 104, 335-347.
114. FAO Seed and Plant Genetic Resource Service. Quality Declared Seed System; FAO Plant Production and Production Paper 117; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO): Rome, Italy, 1993.
115. FAO Seed and Plant Genetic Resource Service. Quality Declared Seed System; FAO Plant Production and Protection Paper 185; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO): Rome, Italy, 2006.
116. David, S. Farmer seed enterprises: A sustainable approach to seed delivery? Agric. Human Values 2004, 21, 387-397.
117. David, S., Kasozi, S., Wortmann, C. An Investigation of Alternative Bean Seed Marketing Channels in Uganda. Africa; Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT): Kampala, Uganda, 1997.
118. David, S., Sperling, L. Improving technology delivery mechanisms: Lessons from bean seed systems research in Eastern and Central Africa. Agric. Human Values 1999, 16, 381-388.
119. Sperling, L., McGuire, S. Understanding and strengthening informal seed markets. Exp. Agric. 2010, 46, 119-136.
120. Setimela, P., Monyo, E., Bänziger, M. Successful Community-Based Seed Production Strategies; CIMMYT: Mexico D.F., Mexico, 2004.
121. Louwaars, N., Le Coent, P., Osborn, T. Seed Systems and Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture: CGRFA Thematic Background Study; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2010.
122. Ellis, F. Agricultural Policies in Developing Countries; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1992.
123. World Development Report: Agriculture for Development; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2008.
124. Lin, J.Y. Hybrid Rice Innovation in China: A Study of Market-Demand Induced Technological Innovation in A Centrally-Planned Economy. Los Angeles; University of California Los Angeles (UCLA): Los Angeles, CA, USA, 1990.
125. Singh, R.P., Morris, M.L. Adoption, Management and Impact of Hybrid Maize Seed in India; CIMMYT: Mexico D.F., Mexico, 1997.
126. Byerlee, D., Eicher, C.K. Africa's Emerging Maize Revolution; Lynne Rienner Publishers: Boulder, CO, USA, 1997.
127. Tripp, R., Rohrbach, D. Policies for African seed enterprise development. Food Policy 2001, 26, 147-161.
128. Barg, S. Subsidies and Environment: Exploring the Linkages; Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD): Paris, France, 1996.
129. Di Falco, S., Perrings, C. Crop biodiversity, risk management and the implications of agricultural assistance. Ecol. Econ. 2005, 55, 459-466.
130. Thrupp, L.A. Linking agricultural biodiversity and food security: The valuable role of agrobiodiversity for sustainable agriculture. Int. Aff. 2000, 76, 283-297.
131. Cororaton, C.B., Corong, E.L. Philippine Agricultural and Food Policies. Implications for Poverty and Income Distribution; International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI): Washingotn, DC, USA, 2009.
132. David, C. Philippine Hybrid Rice Program: A Case for Redesign and Scaling Down; Philippine Institute of Development Studies: Makati City, Philippines, 2007.
133. Bellon, M.R., Hellin, J. Planting hybrids, keeping landraces: Agricultural modernization and tradition among small-scale maize farmers in Chiapas, Mexico. World Dev. 2010, 39, 1434-1443.
134. Kaur, R., Sharma, M. Agricultural subsidies in India. Boon or curse. IOSR J. Humanit. Soc. Sci. 2012, 2, 40-46.
135. Sharma, V.P. Food Subsidy in India: Trends, Causes and Policy Reform Options; Indian Institute of Management: Ahmedabad, India, 2012.
136. Nature Editorial. How to feed a hungry world. Nature 2010, 466, 531-532.
137. Yadav, S.S., Redden, R., Hatfield, J.L., Lotze-Campen, H., Hall, A. Crop Adaptation to Climate Change John Wiley and Sons: Oxford, UK, 2011.
138. The Second Global Plan of Action for Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture; FAO: Rome, Italy, 2011.