Detecting treatment-covariate interactions using permutation methods

Statistics in Medicine

Volumn 34, Issue 12, 2015, Pages 2035-2047

  Wang, Rui ^a,b   Schoenfeld, David A ^b,c   Hoeppner, Bettina ^c   Evins, A Eden ^c  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^c MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

Interactions; Multiple covariates; Permutation methods; Subgroup analysis; Variable selection

Indexed keywords

FLUOXETINE; ANTIDEPRESSANT AGENT;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; COGNITIVE THERAPY; DATA MINING; DEPRESSION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MATHEMATICAL PARAMETERS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NULL HYPOTHESIS; PERMUTATION METHOD; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SIMULATION; STANDARD LIKELIHOOD RATIO TEST; STATISTICAL PARAMETERS; TREATMENT COVARIATE INTERACTION; TREATMENT INDICATION; VALIDATION STUDY; ADOLESCENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEPRESSIVE DISORDER, MAJOR; EPIDEMIOLOGY; METHODOLOGY; MULTIMODALITY CANCER THERAPY; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; PROCEDURES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL BIAS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

ADOLESCENT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANTIDEPRESSIVE AGENTS, SECOND-GENERATION; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CLINICAL DECISION-MAKING; COGNITIVE THERAPY; COMBINED MODALITY THERAPY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONFOUNDING FACTORS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DEPRESSIVE DISORDER, MAJOR; FLUOXETINE; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; PRECISION MEDICINE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RESEARCH DESIGN; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84929286591     PISSN: 02776715     EISSN: 10970258     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sim.6457     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Patel KM, Hoel DG. A nonparametric test for interaction in factorial experiments. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1973; 68:615-620.
2. Halperin M, Ware JH, Byar DP, Mantel N, Brown CC, Koziol J, Gail M, Sylvan GB. Testing for interaction in an I × J × K contingency table. Biometrika 1977; 64:271-275.
3. Byar DP, Green S. The choice of treatment for cancer patients based on covariate information: application to prostate cancer. Bulletin du Cancer 1980; 67:477-490.
4. Peto R. Statistical aspects of cancer trials. In Treatment of Cancer. Chapman and Hall: London, 1982; 867-871.
5. Shuster J, van Eys J. Interaction between prognostic factors and treatment. Controlled Clinical Trials 1983; 4:209-214.
6. Byar DP. Assessing apparent treatment-covariate interactions in randomized clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine 1985; 4:255-263.
7. Schemper M. Non-parametric analysis of treatment-covariate interaction in the presence of censoring. Statistics in Medicine 1988; 7:1257-1266.
8. Sleeper LA, Harrington DP. Regression splines in the Cox model with application to covariate effects in liver disease. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1990; 85:941-949.
9. Royston P, Sauerbrei W. A new approach to modelling interactions between treatment and continuous covariates in clinical trials by using fractional polynomials. Statistics in Medicine 2004; 23:2509-2525.
10. Song S, Pepe MS. Evaluating markers for selecting a patient's treatment. Biometrics 2004; 60:874-883.
11. Bonetti M, Gelber RD. A graphical method to assess treatment-covariate interactions using the Cox model on subsets of the data. Statistics in Medicine 2000; 19:2595-2609.
12. Bonetti M, Gelber RD. Patterns of treatment effects in subsets of patients in clinical trials. Biostatistics 2004; 5(3):465-481.
13. Rothwell PM, Mehta Z, Howard SC, Gutnikov SA, Warlow CP. From subgroups to individuals: general principles and the example of carotid endarterectomy. Lancet 2005; 365:256-265.
14. Wang R, Lagakos SW, Ware H, Hunter DJ, Drazen JM. Statistics in medicine U reporting of subgroup analyses in clinical trials. New England Journal of Medicine 2007; 357:2189-194.
15. Kent DM, Hayward RA. Limitations of applying summary results of clinical trials to individual patients - the need for risk stratification. JAMA 2007; 298:1209-1212.
16. Cai T, Tian L, Wong PH, Wei LJ. Analysis of randomized comparative clinical trial data for personalized treatment selections. Biostatistics 2011; 12(2):270-282.
17. Zhao L, Tian L, Cai T, Claggett B, Wei LJ. Effectively selecting a target population for a future comparative study. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2013; 108:502:527-539.
18. Ruberg SJ, Chen L, Wang Y. The mean does not mean as much anymore: finding sub-groups for tailored therapeutics. Clinical Trials 2010; 7:574-583.
19. Foster JC, Taylor JMG, Ruberg SJ. Subgroup identification from randomized clinical trial data. Statistics in Medicine 2011; 30(24):2867-2880.
20. Anderson MJ, Robinson J. Permutation tests for linear models. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics 2001; 43:75-88.
21. Pesarin F, Salmaso L. The permutation testing approach: a review. Statistica 2010; 70(4):481-509.
22. Lee OE, Braun TM. Permutation tests for random effects in linear mixed models. Biometrics 2012; 68:486-493.
23. Anderson MJ. Permutation tests for univariate and multivariate analysis of variance and regression. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2001; 58:626-639.
24. Bůžková P, Lumley T, Rice K. Permutation and parametric bootstrap tests for gene-gene and gene-environment interactions. Annals of Human Genetics 2011; 75(1):36-45.
25. Basso D, Pesarin F, Salmaso L, Solari A. Permutation Tests for Stochastic Ordering and ANOVA: Theory and Applications in R. Springer: New York, 2009.
26. Wang R, Lagakos SW. Inference following variable selection using restricted permutation methods. Canadian Journal of Statistics 2009; 37(4):625-644.
27. March J, Silva S, Petrychi S, Curry J, Wells K, Fairbank J, Burns B, Domino M, McNulty S, Vitiello B, Severe J, Treatment for Adolescents With Depression Study (TADS) Team . Fluoxetine, cognitive-behavioral therapy, and their combination for adolescents with depression: treatment for adolescents with depression study (TADS) randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2004; 292(7):807-820.
28. Braun TM, Feng Z. Optimal permutation tests for the analysis of group randomized trials. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2001; 96:456:1424-1432.
29. Weinberg JM, Lagakos SW. Asymptotic behavior of linear permutation tests under general alternatives, with application to test selection and study design. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2000; 95:450:596-607.
30. Tibshirani R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the Lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B 1996; 58:267-288.
31. Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R. Regularization paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. Journal of Statistical Software 2010; 33(1):1-22.
32. Hurvich CM, Tsai C. The impact of model selection on inference in linear regression. The American Statistician 1990; 44:214-217.