Creditability analysis of sensor data in the Cyber-Physical Systems based on the relationship diagram model

Dianzi Yu Xinxi Xuebao/Journal of Electronics and Information Technology

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 679-685

  Tang, Wei ^a   Jing, Bo ^a   Huang, Yi Feng ^a  

^a AIR FORCE ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Creditability analysis; Cyber Physical System (CPS); Relationship diagram; Sensor data

Indexed keywords

CYBER PHYSICAL SYSTEM;

ANALYSIS FRAMEWORKS; CREDITABILITY ANALYSIS; CYBER-PHYSICAL SYSTEMS (CPS); REASONING ALGORITHMS; REASONING METHODS; RELATIONSHIP DIAGRAM; SENSOR DATA; SPACE AND TIME;

EMBEDDED SYSTEMS;

EID: 84929259094     PISSN: 10095896     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.11999/JEIT140437     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Barsocchi P, Chessa S, Martinovic I, et al. A cyber-physical approach to secret key generation in smart environments[J]. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, 2013, 4(1): 1-16.
2. Lukasiewycz M, Steinhorst S, Sagstetter F, et al. Cyberphysical systems design for electric vehicles[C]. Proceedings of the 2012 15th Euromicro Conference on Digital System Design, Izmir, Turkey, 2012: 477-484.
3. Shah A H and Syed M A. False alarm detection in cyberphysical systems for healthcare application[C]. Proceedings of the 2013 AASRI Conference on Parallel and Distributed Computing System, Bucharest, Romania, 2013: 54-61.
4. Adam H, Aditya A, Siddharth S, et al. Cyber-physical security testbeds: architecture, application, and evaluation for smart grid[J]. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 2013, 4(2): 847-855.
5. Volkan C and Lance M. Acoustic sensor network design for position estimation[J]. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks, 2009, 5(3): 21-27.
6. Zhenkai Z, Emeka E, and Xenofon K. A co-simulation framework for design of time-triggered automotive cyber physical systems[J]. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 2014, 43(4): 16-33.
7. Mackowski A W and Williamson C H K. Developing a cyber-physical fluid dynamics facility for fluid-structure interaction studies[J]. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2011, 27(5): 748-757.
8. Zhao Jun-hua, Wen Fu-shuan, Xu Yu-sheng, et al. Cyber physical power systems: architecture, implementationtechniques and challenges[J]. Automation of Electric Power Systems, 2010, 34(16): 1-7.
9. Wu F J, Kao Y F, and Tseng Y C. From wireless sensor networks towards cyber physical systems[J]. Pervasive and Mobile Computing, 2011, 7(4): 397-413.
10. Szewczyk R, Polastre J, Mainwaring A, et al. Lessons from a Sensor Network Expedition[M]. Wireless Sensor Networks, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2004: 307-322.
11. Tolle G, Polastre J, Szewczyk R, et al. A macroscope in the redwoods[C]. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, San Diego, USA, 2005: 51-63.
12. Gupta H, Zhou Z, Das S R, et al. Connected sensor cover: self-organization of sensor networks for efficient query execution[J]. IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking, 2006, 14(1): 55-67.
13. Xiao X Y, Peng W C, Hung C C, et al. Using sensor ranks for in-network detection of faulty readings in wireless sensor networks[C]. Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Workshop on Data Engineering for Wireless and Mobile Access. Beijing, China, 2007: 1-8.
14. Tang L A, Yu X, Kim S, et al. Trustworthiness analysis of sensor data in cyber-physical systems[J]. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 2013, 79(3): 383-401.
15. Isler V, Kannan S, and Daniilidis K. Sampling based sensornetwork deployment[C]. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Sendai, Japan, 2004: 1780-1785.
16. Baumgartner K, Ferrari S, and Wettergren T A. Robust deployment of dynamic sensor networks for cooperative track detection[J]. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2009, 9(9): 1029-1048.