Noninvasive methods to assess pulse wave velocity: Comparison with the invasive gold standard and relationship with organ damage

Journal of Hypertension

Volumn 33, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 1023-1025

  Weber, Thomas ^a,b   Wassertheurer, Siegfried ^c   Hametner, Bernhard ^c   Parragh, Stephanie ^c   Eber, Bernd ^a  

^a Klinikum Wels Grieskirchen GmbH   (Austria)

^b PARACELSUS MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

^c AIT AUSTRIAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

Author keywords

Aging; Aortic pulse wave velocity; Arterial stiffness; Carotid femoral pulse wave velocity; Single waveform estimated pulse wave velocity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY HEIGHT; BODY MASS; CALIPER; CAROTID ARTERY; CAROTID FEMORAL PULSE WAVE VELOCITY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY ATHEROSCLEROSIS; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIASTOLIC DYSFUNCTION; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; GOLD STANDARD; GROUPS BY AGE; HEART ATRIUM ENLARGEMENT; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; KIDNEY INJURY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSE WAVE; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; TONOMETRY; WAVEFORM; AGING; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; AORTA; BLOOD; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; DIASTOLE; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; MANOMETRY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PULSATILE FLOW; RENAL INSUFFICIENCY; SYSTOLE; VERY ELDERLY;

BRAIN NATRIURETIC PEPTIDE; PEPTIDE FRAGMENT; PRO-BRAIN NATRIURETIC PEPTIDE (1-76);

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AGING; AORTA; BODY HEIGHT; CARDIAC CATHETERIZATION; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES; CAROTID ARTERIES; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; DIASTOLE; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; HUMANS; MALE; MANOMETRY; MIDDLE AGED; NATRIURETIC PEPTIDE, BRAIN; PEPTIDE FRAGMENTS; PULSATILE FLOW; PULSE WAVE ANALYSIS; RENAL INSUFFICIENCY; SYSTOLE; VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 84929245476     PISSN: 02636352     EISSN: 14735598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000000518     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Laurent S, Cockcroft J, Van Bortel L, Boutouyrie P, Giannattasio C, Hayoz D, et al. Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications. Eur Heart J 2006; 27:2588-2605.
2. Vlachopoulos C, Aznaouridis K, Stefanadis C. Prediction of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality with arterial stiffness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010; 55:1318-1327.
3. Ben-Shlomo Y, Boustred SM, May C, Anderson M, Benjamin SG, Boutouyrie EJ, et al. Aortic pulse wave velocity improves cardiovascular event prediction: an individual participant meta-analysis of prospective observational data from 17,635 subjects. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 63:636-646.
4. Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K, Redon J, Zanchetti A, Bohm M, et al. 2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). J Hypertens 2013; 31:1281-1357.
5. Mitchell GF, Parise H, Benjamin EJ, Larson MG, Keyes MJ, Vita JA, et al. Changes in arterial stiffness and wave reflection with advancing age in healthy men and women: the Framingham Heart Study. Hypertension 2004; 43:1239-1245.
6. Pannier B, Guerin AP, Marchais SJ, Safar ME, London GM. Stiffness of capacitive and conduit arteries: prognostic significance for end-stage renal disease patients. Hypertension 2005; 45:592-596.
7. Sugawara J, Hayashi K, Yokoi T, Tanaka H. Age-associated elongation of the ascending aorta in adults. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2008; 1:739-748.
8. McDonald DA. Regional pulse-wave velocity in the arterial tree. J Appl Physiol 1968; 24:73-78.
9. Weber T, Ammer M, Rammer M, Adji A, O'Rourke MF, Wassertheurer S, et al. Noninvasive determination of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity depends critically on assessment of travel distance: a comparison with invasive measurement. J Hypertens 2009; 27:1624-1630.
10. Huybrechts SA, Devos DG, Vermeersch SJ, Mahieu D, Achten E, de Backer TL, et al. Carotid to femoral pulse wave velocity: a comparison of real travelled aortic path lengths determined by MRI and superficial measurements. J Hypertens 2011; 29:1577-1582.
11. Nemeth ZK, Studinger P, Kiss I, Othmane Tel H, Nemcsik J, Fekete BC, et al. The method of distance measurement and torso length influences the relationship of pulse wave velocity to cardiovascular mortality. Am J Hypertens 2011; 24:155-161.
12. Girerd N, Legedz L, Paget V, Rabilloud M, Milon H, Bricca G, et al. Outcome associations of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity vary with different measurement methods. Am J Hypertens 2012; 25:1264-1270.
13. Van Bortel LM, Laurent S, Boutouyrie P, Chowienczyk P, Cruickshank JK, De Backer T, et al. Expert consensus document on the measurement of aortic stiffness in daily practice using carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity. J Hypertens 2012; 30:445-448.
14. Hametner B, Wassertheurer S, Kropf J, Mayer C, Eber B, Weber T. Oscillometric estimation of aortic pulse wave velocity: comparison with intra-aortic catheter measurements. Blood Press Monit 2013; 18:173-176.
15. Weber T, Maas R, Auer J, Lamm G, Lassnig E, Rammer M, et al. Arterial wave reflections and determinants of endothelial function a hypothesis based on peripheral mode of action. Am J Hypertens 2007; 20:256-262.
16. Hametner B, Wassertheurer S, Kropf J, Mayer C, Holzinger A, Eber B, et al. Wave reflection quantification based on pressure waveforms alone: methods, comparison, and clinical covariates. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2013; 109:250-259.
17. Westerhof BE, van den Wijngaard JP, Murgo JP, Westerhof N. Location of a reflection site is elusive: consequences for the calculation of aortic pulse wave velocity. Hypertension 2008; 52:478-483.
18. Omboni S, Riva I, Giglio A, Caldara G, Groppelli A, Parati G. Validation of the Omron M5-I, R5-I and HEM-907 automated blood pressure monitors in elderly individuals according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension. Blood Press Monit 2007; 12:233-242.
19. Lang RM, Bierig M, Devereux RB, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Pellikka PA, et al. Recommendations for chamber quantification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, developed in conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2005; 18:1440-1463.
20. Wilkinson IBM, Schillaci CM, Boutouyrie G, Segers P, Donald P, Chowienczyk PJ. ARTERY Society guidelines for validation of noninvasive haemodynamic measurement devices: part 1, arterial pulse wave velocity. Artery Res 2010; 4:34-40.
21. Choi CU, Park EB, Suh SY, Kim JW, Kim EJ, Rha SW, et al. Impact of aortic stiffness on cardiovascular disease in patients with chest pain: assessment with direct intra-arterial measurement. Am J Hypertens 2007; 20:1163-1169.
22. Park SM, Seo HS, Lim HE, Shin SH, Park CG, Oh DJ, et al. Assessment of arterial stiffness index as a clinical parameter for atherosclerotic coronary artery disease. Circulation J 2005; 69:1218-1222.
23. McEniery CM, Yasmin. Maki-Petaja KM, McDonnell BJ, Munnery M, Hickson SS, et al. The impact of cardiovascular risk factors on aortic stiffness and wave reflections depends on age: the Anglo-Cardiff Collaborative Trial (ACCT III). Hypertension 2010; 56:591-597.
24. Rogers WJ, Hu YL, Coast D, Vido DA, Kramer CM, Pyeritz RE, et al. Age-associated changes in regional aortic pulse wave velocity. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 38:1123-1129.
25. Hickson SS, Butlin M, Graves M, Taviani V, Avolio AP, McEniery CM, et al. The relationship of age with regional aortic stiffness and diameter. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2010; 3:1247-1255.
26. Avolio AP, Deng FQ, Li WQ, Luo YF, Huang ZD, Xing LF, et al. Effects of aging on arterial distensibility in populations with high and low prevalence of hypertension: comparison between urban and rural communities in China. Circulation 1985; 71:202-210.
27. Dotter CT, Roberts DJ, Steinberg I. Aortic length: angiocardiographic measurements. Circulation 1950; 2:915-920.
28. Redheuil A, Yu WC, Mousseaux E, Harouni AA, Kachenoura N, Wu CO, et al. Age-related changes in aortic arch geometry: relationship with proximal aortic function and left ventricular mass and remodeling. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011; 58:1262-1270.
29. Levi-Marpillat N, Desamericq G, Akakpo S, Affes-Ayadi H, Tropeano AI, Millasseau S, et al. Crucial importance of using a sliding calliper to measure distance for carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity assessment. J Hypertens 2013; 31:940-945.
30. Canepa M, Alghatrif M, Pestelli G, Kankaria R, Makrogiannis S, Strait JB, et al. Impact of central obesity on the estimation of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity. Am J Hypertens 2014; 27:1209-1217.
31. Bossuyt J, Van De Velde S, Azermai M, Vermeersch SJ, De Backer TL, Devos DG, et al. Noninvasive assessment of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity: the influence of body side and body contours. J Hypertens 2013; 31:946-951.
32. Paini A, Boutouyrie P, Calvet D, Tropeano AI, Laloux B, Laurent S. Carotid and aortic stiffness: determinants of discrepancies. Hypertension 2006; 47:371-376.
33. Baumann M, Wassertheurer S, Suttmann Y, Burkhardt K, Heemann U. Aortic pulse wave velocity predicts mortality in chronic kidney disease stages 2-4. J Hypertens 2014; 32:899-903.
34. Laurent S, Mousseaux E, Boutouyrie P. Arterial stiffness as an imaging biomarker: are all pathways equal? Hypertension 2013; 62:10-12.