Two methods for engaging with the community in setting priorities for child health research: Who engages?

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 5, 2015, Pages

  Rikkers, Wavne ^a   De Haan, Katrina Boterhoven ^a   Lawrence, David ^a   McKenzie, Anne ^b   Hancock, Kirsten ^a   Haines, Hayley ^b   Christensen, Daniel ^a   Zubrick, Stephen R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CHILD HEALTH; COMMUNITY ASSESSMENT; COMMUNITY LIVING; COMMUNITY PROGRAM; CONVERSATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; SOCIAL PARTICIPATION; TELEPHONE INTERVIEW; ADOLESCENT; COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION; MIDDLE AGED; QUESTIONNAIRE; VERY ELDERLY; WESTERN AUSTRALIA; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CHILD HEALTH; COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION; COMMUNITY-BASED PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; WESTERN AUSTRALIA; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84929193090     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125969     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Australian Research Council. Annual Report 2011-2012. Canberra: Australian Research Council; 2012.
2. Hood N, Brewer T, Jackson R, Wewers M. Survey of Community Engagement in NIH-Funded Research. Clinical and Translational Science. 2010; 3:19-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2010.00179.x PMID: 20443949
3. National Health and Medical Research Council. NHMRC Annual Report 2011-12. Canberra: National Health and Medical Research Council; 2012.
4. Abelson J, Forest P-G, Eyles J, Smith P, Martin E, Gauvin F-P. Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation processes. Social Science & Medicine. 2003; 57:239-251.
5. Zubrick S, Taylor C, Lawrence D, Mitrou F, Christensen D, Dalby R. The development of human capability across the lifecourse: Perspectives from childhood. Australasian Epidemiologist. 2009; 16:6-10.
6. Elliott J, Heesterbeek S, Lukensmeyer C, Slocum N. Participatory methods toolkit. A practitioner's manual. New Edition. King Baudouin Foundation and the Flemish Institute for Science and Technology Assessment; 2006. Available: http://www.kbs-frb.be/uploadedFiles/KBS-FRB/Files/EN/PUB-1540- Participatoty-toolkit-New-edition.pdf
7. Boote J, Wong R, Booth A. 'Talking the talk or walking the walk?' A bibliometric review of the literature on public involvement in health research published between 1995 and 2009. Health Expectations. 2015 Feb; 18(1):44-57. doi: 10.1111/hex.12007 PMID: 23033933
8. Beresford P. User involvement, research and health inequalities: developing new directions. Health and Social Care in the Community 2007; 15:306-312. PMID: 17578391
9. Australian Research Council. Annual Report 2011-2012. Canberra: Australian Research Council, 2012.
10. National Health and Medical Research Council. NHMRC Annual Report 2011-12. Canberra: National Health and Medical Research Council, 2012.
11. Auditor General Victoria " Consumer Participation in the Health System". Melbourne: Victorian Government Printer. 2012. Available: http://www.audit.vic.gov.au/publications/20121010-Consumer-Health/20121010-Consumer-Health.pdf
12. Boote J, Telford R, Cooper C. Consumer involvement in health research: a review and research agenda. Health Policy. 2002; 61:213-236. PMID: 12088893
13. National Health and Medical Research Council and Consumers' Health Forum of Australia. Statement on consumer and community participation in health and medical research. Canberra: National Health and Medical Research Council; 2002. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-11-26 PMID: 23898969
14. National Health and Medical Research Council and Consumers' Health Forum of Australia. Summary statement on consumer and community participation in health and medical research. Canberra: National Health and Medical Research Council; 2002.
15. National Health and Medical Research Council and Consumers' Health Forum of Australia. A model framework for consumer and community participation in health and medical research. Canberra: National Health and Medical Research Council; 2005. PMID: 17592651
16. National Health and Medical Research Council and Consumers' Health Forum of Australia. Resource pack for consumer and community participation in health and medical research. Canberra: National Health and Medical Research Council; 2005.
17. Ward P, Thompson J, Barber R, Armitage C, Boote J, Cooper C, et al. Critical perspectives on 'consumer involvement' in health research. Journal of Sociology. 2009; 46:63-82.
18. Sapienza J, Corbie-Smith G, Keim S, Fleischman A. Community Engagement in Epidemiological Research. Ambulatory Pediatrics. 2007; 7:247-252. PMID: 17512886
19. Saunders C, Girgis A. Enriching health research through consumer involvement-learning through atypical exemplars. Health Promotion Journal of Australia. 2011; 22:196-202. PMID: 22497063
20. Saunders C, Girgis A. Status, challenges and facilitators of consumer involvement in Australian health and medical research. Health Res Policy and Syst. 2010; 8:34.
21. Secko D, Preto N, Niemeyer S, Burgess M. Informed consent in biobank research: A deliberative approach to the debate. Social Science & Medicine. 2009; 68:781-789.
22. Burgess M, O'Doherty K, Secko D. Biobanking in British Columbia: discussions of the future of personalized medicine through deliberative public engagement. Personalized Medicine. 2008; 5(3):285-296.
23. O'Doherty K, Hawkins A, Burgess M. Involving citizens in the ethics of biobank research: Informing institutional policy through structured public deliberation. Social Science & Medicine. 2012; 75:1604-1611.
24. De Vries R, Stanczyk A, Wall I, Uhlmann R, Damschroder L, Kim S. Assessing the quality of democratic deliberation: A case study of public deliberation on the ethics of surrogate consent for research. Social Science & Medicine June. 2010; 70(12):1896-1903.
25. Mitton C, Smith N, Peacock S, Evoy B, Abelson J. Public participation in health care priority setting: a scoping review. Health Policy. 2009; 91:219-228. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2009.01.005 PMID: 19261347
26. Telethon Kids Institute: Consumer and Community Participation Policy 2005. Available: http://www.telethonkids.org.au/media/288007/consumer-community-participation-policy-tichr.pdf. Accessed July 2014.
27. McKenzie A, Hanley B. Consumer and community participation in health and medical research. A practical guide for health and medical research organisations. Perth: The University of Western Australia and Telethon Institute for Child Health Research; 2007. Available: http://www.involvingpeopleinresearch.org
28. McKenzie A. Consumer and community participation in health research. Health Voices: Journal of the Consumers Health Forum of Australia; June 2011.
29. Consumer and Community Advisory Council, Telethon Institute for Child Health Research. Available: http://www.childhealthresearch.org.au/community-engagement/consumer-and-community-advisorycouncil. aspx. Accessed July 2014.
30. Abelson J, Blacksher E, Li K, Boesvel S, Goold S. Public deliberation in health policy and bioethics: mapping an emerging, interdisciplinary field. Journal of Public Deliberation. 2013; 9:5.
31. Abelson J, Warren M, Forest P-G. The future of public deliberation on health issues. Hastings Center Report. 2012; 42:27-29. doi: 10.1002/hast.73 PMID: 22976410
32. Brown J. The world café: shaping our futures through conversations that matter. San Francisco: Berrett- Koehler; 2005.
33. Jones H, McKenzie A, Miers S, Russell E, Watkins R, Payne J, et al. Involving consumers and the community in the development of a diagnostic instrument for fetal alcohol spectrum disorders in Australia. Health Research Policy and Systems. 2013; 11:26. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-11-26 PMID: 23898969
34. Kempf A, Remington P. New Challenges for Telephone Survey Research in the Twenty-First Century. Annual Review of Public Health. 2007; 28:113-26. PMID: 17094769
35. Australian Bureau of Statistics: Community Preparedness for Emergencies, Western Australia, Oct 2011, cat.no.4818.5. Canberra: ABS; 2012.
36. Australian Communications and Media Authority. Australians cut the cord. 2013. Available: http://www.acma.gov.au/theACMA/engage-blogs/Research-snapshots/Mobile-only-Australians-top-over-3-million Article. Accessed October 2014.
37. Hancock K, Shepherd C, Lawrence D, Zubrick S. Student attendance and educational outcomes: every day counts. Report for the Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations. Perth: Telethon Institute for Child Health Research; 2013. Available: http://telethonkids.org.au/media/472779/final-report-2013.pdf
38. Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority. NAPLAN online. Available: http://www.nap.edu.au/naplan/naplan.html. Accessed December 2013.
39. Australian Bureau of Statistics: Australian Demographic Statistics, Jun 2013, cat.no. 3101.0. Canberra: ABS; 2013.
40. Thompson J, Barber J, Ward P, Boote J, Cooper C, Armitage C, et al. Health researchers' attitudes towards public involvement in health research. Health Expectations. 2009; 12:209-220. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2009.00532.x PMID: 19392833
41. Volunteering Australia: 2011 National Survey of Volunteering Issues Report, 2012. Available: http://www.volunteeringaustralia.org/wpcontent/files-mf/1377045635VANSVI2011.pdf
42. Australian Bureau of Statistics: General Social Survey: Summary Results, Australia, 2010, cat.no. 4159.0. Canberra: ABS; 2011.
43. Link M, Lai J. Cell-phone-only household and problems of differential nonresponse using an address-based sampling design. Public Opinion Quarterly. 2011; 75:613-635.
44. Blumberg S, Luke J. Re-evaluating the need for concern regarding noncoverage bias in landline surveys. American Journal of Public Health. 2009; 99.10.
45. Bosnjak M, Batinic B. Understanding the willingness to participate in online surveys - The case of email questionnaires. Online social sciences. 2002; 81:92.
46. DuBois J, Bailey-Burch B, Bustillos D, Campbell J, Cottler L, Fisher C, et al. Ethical issues in mental health. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2011; 24: 208-214. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e3283459422 PMID: 21460643
47. Goold S, Neblo M, Kim S, DeVries R, Rowe G, Muhlberger P. What is good quality public deliberation?Hastings Center Report. 2012; 42:24-26. doi: 10.1002/hast.72 PMID: 22976409
48. Beresford P. Developing the theoretical basis for service user/survivor-led research and equal involvement in research. Epidemiologia e Psichiatria Sociale. 2005; 14:4-8. PMID: 15792288
49. Abelson J, Eyles, McLeod C, Collins P, McMullan C, Forest P-G. Does deliberation make a difference?Results from a citizens panel study of health goals priority setting. Health Policy. 2003; 66:95-106. PMID: 14499168
50. Leung M, Yen I, MinklerM. Community-based participatory research: a promising approach for increasing epidemiology's relevance in the 21st century. International journal of epidemiology. 2004; 33:499-506. PMID: 15155709
51. Banfield M, Griffiths K, Christensen H, Barney L. SCOPE for Research: mental health consumers' priorities for research compared with recent research in Australia. Australia and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry; Early Online.2007;1-8.
52. O 'Donnell M, Entwistle V. Consumer involvement in decisions about what health-related research is funded. Health Policy. 2004; 70:281-290. PMID: 15488995
53. The James Lind Alliance. Available: http://www.lindalliance.org/. Accessed October 2014.
54. Blacksher E, Diebel A, Forest P-G, Goold S, Abelson J. What is public deliberation? Hastings Center Report. 2012; 42:14-17. doi: 10.1002/hast.83 PMID: 23138366
55. Taras H, Kalichman M, Schulteis G, Dumbauld J, Bell Y, Seligman F, et al. Soliciting views of various communities on health research: a prelude to engagement in specific research projects. Health Expectations. 2014. doi: 10.1111/hex.12249
56. Bryman A. Social Research Methods. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012.
57. Johri M, Damschroder L, Zikmund-Fisher B, Kim S, Ubel P. Can a moral reasoning exercise improve response quality to surveys of healthcare priorities? Journal of Medical Ethics. 2009; 35:57-64. doi: 10. 1136/jme.2008.024810 PMID: 19103946
58. INVOLVE: Promoting public involvement in NHS, public health and social care research. Available: http://www.invo.org.uk/resource-centre/putting-it-into-practice-database/. Accessed December 2013.
59. People in Research. Available: http://www.peopleinresearch.org/. Accessed December 2013.
60. Cancer Australia. National Framework for Consumer Involvement in Cancer Control. Canberra: Australian Government; 2011. Available: http://canceraustralia.gov.au/publications-resources/cancer-australia- publications/national-framework-consumer-involvement-cancer Accessed December 2013.