"Bottom-up management approach to coastal marine protected areas in Portugal"

Ocean and Coastal Management

Volumn 118, Issue , 2015, Pages 275-281

  Ferreira, Ana ^a,c   Seixas, Sónia ^b,c   Marques, João Carlos ^c  

^a Cascais Ambiente Environment Municipal Company of Cascais   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSIDADE ABERTA   (Portugal)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Bottom up approach; Coastal zone management; Marine protected areas; Portugal

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; FISHERIES; REGIONAL PLANNING;

BOTTOM UP APPROACH; COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT; EVALUATION METHODOLOGIES; MARINE PROTECTED AREA; PORTUGAL; PUBLIC PARTICIPATION; PUBLIC PARTICIPATION PROCESS; USER MANAGEMENT;

SURVEYS;

BOTTOM-UP APPROACH; CENSUS; CLASSIFICATION; COASTAL PROTECTION; COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT; COMPLIANCE; FISHING COMMUNITY; INFORMATION; MARINE ENVIRONMENT; METHODOLOGY;

CASCAIS; LISBOA [PORTUGAL]; PORTUGAL;

EID: 84929180057     PISSN: 09645691     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.05.008     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bennett N.J., Dearden P. Why local people do not support conservation: community perceptions of marine protected area livelihood impacts, governance and management in Thailand. Mar. Policy 2014, 44:107-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2013.08.017.
2. Bennett N.J., Dearden P. From measuring outcomes to providing inputs: governance, management, and local development for more effective marine protected areas. Mar. Policy 2014, 50:96-110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2014.05.005.
3. Beaumont J. Community participation in the establishment and management of marine protected areas: a review of selected international experience. S. Afr. J. Mar. Sci. 1997, 18:333-340. http://dx.doi.org/10.2989/025776197784161009.
4. Castilla J.C. Roles of experimental marine ecology in coastal management and conservation. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2000, 250:3-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0981(00)00177-5.
5. Carter D.W. Protected areas in marine resource management: another look at the economics and research issues. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2000, 46:439-456. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0964-5691(03)00017-6.
6. Cohen P.J., Evans L.S., Mills M. Social networks supporting governance of coastalecosystems in Solomon Islands. Conserv. Lett. 2012, 5:376-386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00255.x.
7. Cox M., Arnold G., Villamayor T.S. A review of design principles for community-based natural resources management. Ecol. Soc. 2010, 15(38). http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art38/.
8. Crowe T.P., Thompson R.C., Bray S., Hawkins S.J. Impacts of anthropogenic stress on rocky intertidal communities. J. Aquat. Ecosyst. Stress Recovery 2000, 7:273-297. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1009911928100.
9. Ferreira A., Faria S., Rijo A., Albuquerque C. Estudos base para a criação de uma Reserva Natural Local da Zona de Interesse Biofísico das Avencas 2012, 111. Agência Cascais Atlântico.
10. Fritz J.S. Towards a new form of governance in science-policy relations in the European maritime policy. Mar. Policy 2010, 34:1-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2009.04.001.
11. Gaymer C.F., Stadel A.V., Ban N.C., Cárcamo P.F., Ierna J., Lieberknecht L.M. Merging top-down and bottom-up approaches in marine protected áreas planning: experiences from around the globe. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 2014, 24(2):128-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2508.
12. Garces L.R., Pido M.D., Tupper M.H., Silvestre G.T. Evaluating the management effectiveness of three marine protected areas in the Calamianes Islands, Palawan Province, Philippines: process, selected results and their implications for planning and management. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2013, 81:49-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.07.014.
13. Garcia A., Smith J.R. Factors influencing human visitation of southern California rocky intertidal ecosystems. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2013, 73:44-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2012.12.006.
14. o 402 2004, Economics and Environment Network. Australian National University. http://hdl.handle.net/10440/1209.
15. Gelcich S., Edwards-Jones G., Kaiser M.J. Importance of attitudinal differences among Artisanal fishers toward co-management and conservation of marine resources. Conserv. Biol. 2005, 19:865-875. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00534x.
16. Gelcich S., Godoy N., Prado L., Castilla J.C. Add-on conservation benefits of marine territorial user rights fishery policies in Central Chile. Ecol. Appl. 2008, 18(1):273-281. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/06-1896.1.
17. Kelleher G., Kenchington R.A. Guidelines for Establishing Marine Protected Areas 1992, 86. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.
18. Likert R. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Arch. Psychol. 1932, 140:5-55.
19. Martins G.M., Jenkins S.R., Hawkins S.J., Neto A.I., Medeiros A.R., Thompson R.C. Illegal harvesting affects the success of fishing closure areas. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U. K. 2011, 41:929-937. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0025315410001189.
20. Phillips A. Turning ideas on their head: the new paradigm for protected areas. George Wright Forum 2003, 20(2):1-25. http://www.uvm.edu/%7Esnrsprng/vermont.pdf.
21. Qiu W., Wang B., Jones P.J.S., Axmacher J.C. Challenges in developing China's marine protected area system. Mar. Policy 2009, 33:599-605. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2008.12.005.
22. Reis J., Stojanovic T., Smith H. Relevance of systems approaches for implementing Integrated Coastal Zone Management principles in Europe. Mar. Policy 2014, 43:3-12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2013.03.013.
23. Ribeiro M. Gestão e Ordenamento de Praias - Capacidade de Carga e Certificação para a Sustentabilidade (ISO 14001). Disertação de Mestrado em Engenharia do Ambiente, perfil de Gestão e Sistemas Ambientais 2011, 164. Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia da Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa.
24. Sanchirico J.N., Cochran K.A., Emerson P.M. Marine Protected Areas: Economic and Social Implications 2002, Resources for the Future, Discussion Paper. 02-26.
25. Sayce K., Shuman C., Connor D., Reisewitz A., Pope E., Miller-Henson M., Poncelet E., Monié D., Owens B. Beyond traditional stakeholder engagement: public participation roles in California's statewide marine protected area planning process. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2013, 74:57-66.
26. Schiel D.R., Taylor D.I. Effects of trampling on a rocky intertidal assemblage in southern New Zealand. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 1999, 235:213-235.
27. Shipman B., Stojanovic T. Facts, fictions and failures of integrated coastal zone management in Europe. Coast. Manag. 2007, 35:375-398. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08920750601169659.
28. Thompson R.C., Crowe T.P., Hawkins S.J. Rocky intertidal communities: past environmental changes, present status and predictions for the next 25 years. Environ. Conserv. 2002, 29(2):168-191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0376892902000115.
29. Toonen R.J., Wilhelm T.A., Maxwell S.M., Wagner D., Bowen B.W., Sheppard C.R.C., Taei S.M., Teroroko T., Moffitt R., Gaymer C.F., Morgan L., Lewis N., Sheppard A.S., et al. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2013, 77:7-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2013.10.039.
30. Wilhelm T.A., Sheppard C.R.C., Sheppard A.L.S., Gaymer C.F., Parks J., Wagner D., Lewis N. Large marine protected areas - advantages and challenges of going big. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 2014, 4(2):25-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2499.
31. INE, 2011-Instituto Nacional de Estatistica/Statistics National Institute (. Last accessed in 30-1-2015). http://www.ine.pt/xportal/xmain?xpid=INE&xpgid=ine_main.
32. CMC, 2012 - Câmara Municipal de Cascais/Cascais City Council (http://www.cm-cascais.pt/. Last accessed in 30-1-2015).
33. POOC Plano de Ordenamento da Orla Costeira "Cidadela - São Julião da Barra"/Coastal Zone Management Plan "Cidadela - São Julião da Barra 1998, (last accessed in 30.01.15.). http://www.apambiente.pt/index.php?ref=x130.