Towards a 'new form of governance' in science-policy relations in the European Maritime Policy

Marine Policy

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 1-6

  Fritz, Jan Stefan ^a  

^a German Marine Research Consortium   (Belgium)

Author keywords

European Maritime Policy; Governance; Scientific advice

Indexed keywords

EUROPEAN UNION; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; IMPLEMENTATION PROCESS; MARINE POLICY; POLICY MAKING;

EID: 70349493007     PISSN: 0308597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2009.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Fritz J.S. Looking for an analogy: internationalism and the sciences. In: Schmidt B.C., and Long D. (Eds). Imperialism and internationalism in the study of international relations (2006), SUNY Press, New York 141-158
2. European Commission. An Integrated Maritime Policy for the European Union, 2007. p. 575.
3. European Commission. Commission staff working document accompanying the integrated Maritime Policy for the European Union, 1278; 2007. p. 4.
4. European Commission. A European strategy for marine and maritime research, 534, 2008. p. 11-2.
5. See European Commission. Official Journal C288 project SST 2008 6.6. of 30 November 2007; Official Journal C226 project ENV.2009.2.2.1.3. of 3 September 2008.
6. A prominent collection of studies which generally assume this approach can be found. In: Ruggie JG, Haas EB, editors. International responses to technology: concepts and trends (Special issue). International Organisation, 1975.
7. See, for example, Maasen S, Weingart P, editors. Democratization mocratization of expertise? Exploring novel forms of scientific advice in political decision-making. Berlin: Springer Science & Business; 2005.
8. In: Hackett E.J., Amsterdamska O., Lynch M., and Wajcman J. (Eds). The handbook of science and technology studies. 3rd ed (2007), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
9. Jasanoff S. Is science socially constructed-and can it still inform public policy?. Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (1996) 263
10. Jasanoff S. Designs on nature: science and democracy in Europe and the United States (2005), Princeton University Press, Princeton p. 273.
11. European Commission. White Paper on Governance, no. 428; 2001. p. 8.
12. European Commission. White Paper on Governance, no. 428; 2001. p. 33.
13. See, for example, the six meanings identified in Rhodes RAW. The new governance: governing without government. Political Studies 1996; 44(4): 652-67.
14. European Commission. Communication on the collection and use of expertise by the commission: principles and guidelines, no. 713; 2002. p. 2.
15. See, for example, House of Commons Science and Technology Committee. Scientific advice, risk and evidence based policy making. London: House of Commons; 8 November 2006; Fritz JS. The second report on international scientific advisory processes on the environment and sustainable development. UNEP/DEWA Technical Report 01-1, Geneva: December 2000.
16. Fritz JS. What advice to policy from the social sciences, 4; IHDP Update 2001. p. 12-3.
17. European Commission. Science and Society Action Plan, 2002. p. 25.
18. European Commission. Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously. Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance, 2007. p. 41-85.
19. US National Research Council. Analysis of global change assessments: lessons learned (2007), National Academies Press, Washington, DC p. 22-3